0.4%

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: 0.4%

Post by smackaholic »

Asylum cases should be decided at the border, very quickly.

My take on DACA kids is that if they came here before the age of 12, they should be allowed to stay legally, but they should not be eligible for citizenship or voting.

If they want to become citizens, let them return to their native land and apply like everyone else must.

If they came here after 12, send them home.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
The State
Ren Fairy
Posts: 1283
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:45 am

Re: 0.4%

Post by The State »

schmick wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:53 pm 100% of people seeking asylum in this country should agree to be sterilized before their asylum case is even considered

Go fuck yourself.

You don't even live in this country... why the fuck would you care.

You live in Mexico. The California and US border starts at Santa Barbara around Oprah's house near Rincon.
EAP wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:39 am The STATE has all the answers
User avatar
The State
Ren Fairy
Posts: 1283
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:45 am

Re: 0.4%

Post by The State »

smackaholic wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:59 pm
My take on DACA kids is that if they came here before the age of 12, they should be allowed to stay legally, but they should not be eligible for citizenship or voting.

If they want to become citizens, let them return to their native land and apply like everyone else must.

You're a fucking moron.

My take is... FAT FUCKING RETARDS should be deported. Just because.

Whada ya say, skinny ?
EAP wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:39 am The STATE has all the answers
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: 0.4%

Post by smackaholic »

Fuck off, carnie.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
The State
Ren Fairy
Posts: 1283
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:45 am

Re: 0.4%

Post by The State »

smackaholic wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 10:38 pm Fuck off, carnie.

Such a stinging rebuttal.

Get out of my country... you FAT FUCKING RETARD.


If you lose weight you can stay. But you can't vote. We can't trust that you won't get FAT again and we can't take that chance.

Make America Great Again !
EAP wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:39 am The STATE has all the answers
Kierland

Re: 0.4%

Post by Kierland »

schmick wrote: Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:53 pm Thats the percentage of asylum cases in to the United States that are granted to the Remain in Mexico program.
Show your work you paste eating gibbon.
Kierland

Re: 0.4%

Post by Kierland »

And a gibbon actually did, too bad the article didn’t say what you girlfriend said.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31562
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: 0.4%

Post by Mikey »

0.4%

Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.

‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.

Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by EAP »

Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm 0.4%

Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.

‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.

Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm 0.4%

Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.

‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.

Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
Penis is not important.

I agree with Smackaholic.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31562
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: 0.4%

Post by Mikey »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm 0.4%

Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.

‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.

Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by EAP »

Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm 0.4%

Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.

‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.

Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
Who doesn't?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by EAP »

Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:30 pm
Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:43 pm 0.4%

Schmick’s percentile on the intelligence spectrum.

‘Spray’s percentile on the reading comprehension spectrum.

Marty’s percentile on the Funnay spectrum, despite being at 99.6% for level of effort.
0.4% is mikey's penile percentile in relation to the rest of the board's.
I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
That in and of itself, wouldn't necessarily qualify as being the resident board expert on the cack.
You'd have to show some solid substance before you get certified by the board elders as such.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21096
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: 0.4%

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:37 pm I've heard you have lots of experience with penises.
Other peoples' penises
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
Who doesn't?
Women.

Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
Who doesn't?
Women.

Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Women? You mean dykes?

If you suffer from dry orgasm syndrome, it's probably diet related. Quit eating McDonald's every day and flirting with those big butt cashiers, and that should solve your problem.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:52 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
Who doesn't?
Women.

Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Women? You mean dykes?

If you suffer from dry orgasm syndrome, it's probably diet related. Quit eating McDonald's every day and flirting with those big butt cashiers, and that should solve your problem.
Women have no experience with penis (and Lesbians don't want any, which is why they are in growing online conflict with MtF transexuals, but more about that never).

I read a comment that dry orgasms were full body orgasms for men, which wet orgasms are not. That person's description of a dry orgasm sounded similar to a woman's. Maybe the commenter was larping. You are proud of your experience with penis, so I asked you to find out if it's true.

So why is a dry orgasm inferior?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: 0.4%

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:01 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:52 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:24 pm

Women.

Is it true a dry orgasm is better than a rope-y one?
Women? You mean dykes?

If you suffer from dry orgasm syndrome, it's probably diet related. Quit eating McDonald's every day and flirting with those big butt cashiers, and that should solve your problem.
Women have no experience with penis (and Lesbians don't want any, which is why they are in growing online conflict with MtF transexuals, but more about that never).

I read a comment that dry orgasms were full body orgasms for men, which wet orgasms are not. That person's description of a dry orgasm sounded similar to a woman's. Maybe the commenter was larping. You are proud of your experience with penis, so I asked you to find out if it's true.

So why is a dry orgasm inferior?
It's not.

Pleasure without having to clean up.
Unless you like gargling cum and drinking it by the litre.
Post Reply