Hey genius?The State wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:37 pmsmackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 7:05 pmTake a look at the map. Imagine a point equidistant from the Oregon line and the Mexican border.
Where is it?
To my admittedly uncalibrated eye, I would say that point is roughly Santa Cruz. Let's say it is a bit south of that, Big Sur, your apparent Mason Dixon line for Cali.
If that is the case, then it would seem to me that a place described by the name Central Coast, would cover territory to the north and south of BS. I will stick with my original statement of SF and SB being pretty good borders.
Someone from Connecticut or Texas has no idea what the regions of California are. Californians in this thread have been telling you what the regions are... but you two are just to stupid to figure it out.
"Northern California braces for fire weather as Southland expects rain — those events are related"
https://www.latimes.com/california/stor ... a-related
The Northern California Megaregion
http://www.bayareaeconomy.org/report/th ... egaregion/
Both of you retards have failed your California Geography course.
Good day.
That last map is just divided into "northern" and "southern" California.
Of course a POS leftist like you would leave out an entire "central" region, in order to make yourself look good.
Once you properly include the "central" region of California,
You lose the debate.
Did you think you'd get away with leaving out the entire "central" region?
You underestimate your fellow posters.