A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31555
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Mikey »

User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by smackaholic »

Good to see you embracing the idea of federalism. Not sure all your filthy hippy commie pals are gonna approve though.

Different states should handle this differently. Hell, same for counties.

A rural county in upstate NY needs a different plan of action than Brooklyn.

While you guys are in the federalist spirit, I suggest Gavin should announce plans for Cali single-payer healfcare.

Show us bumpkins to the East how it’s done.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Innocent Bystander »

So Newsome is the predicted Anti-Christ?

What's his background?

Because nation-states are really city-states. Nig.gas, be wary.

Fuck you, China, or thank you China for ripping off the band-aid?
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Innocent Bystander »

smackaholic wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 4:21 pm Good to see you embracing the idea of federalism. Not sure all your filthy hippy commie pals are gonna approve though.

Different states should handle this differently. Hell, same for counties.

A rural county in upstate NY needs a different plan of action than Brooklyn.

While you guys are in the federalist spirit, I suggest Gavin should announce plans for Cali single-payer healfcare.

Show us bumpkins to the East how it’s done.
Good arguments, but still wary of the gerrymandering effect.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31555
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Mikey »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 4:25 pm gerrymandering
Brown retired. Newsome is Governor now.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by smackaholic »

Not sure what gerrymandering has to do with states handling their own affairs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13470
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Left Seater »

CA should secede already.

But the author of this pile of crap is cut from the screwy mold. Claims minority rule by the GOP, a war on Team D ideals, etc.

Just leave already if you don’t like the US. But stop blaming the Feds for this and claiming you would have had a better response. While the pandemic was becoming a thing, you were wrapped up in a bungled Impeachment.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31555
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Mikey »

You're about as reality challenged as your narcissist Orange Dear Leader.

"if you don't like it here then leave." Nice job.
Can you actually refute anything in that article?



Didn't think so.
Now, go watch some re-runs of the daily Trump Show. That should settle you down.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Innocent Bystander »

smackaholic wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:13 pm Not sure what gerrymandering has to do with states handling their own affairs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your point that different counties have different needs within even the same state.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by smackaholic »

Innocent Bystander wrote:
smackaholic wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 7:13 pm Not sure what gerrymandering has to do with states handling their own affairs.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your point that different counties have different needs within even the same state.
Ok. The same question applies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12848
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by mvscal »

Since when is it the responsibility of the Federal government to provide the State of California with medical supplies?

California has all the sovereign authority necessary to raise revenue for the purpose of purchasing medical supplies. I would suggest that California's spending priorities are wildly misguided.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13470
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Left Seater »

Mikey wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 8:26 pm You're about as reality challenged as your narcissist Orange Dear Leader.

"if you don't like it here then leave." Nice job.
Can you actually refute anything in that article?
Sure. Lots of pure shit in that opinion piece:
So far, the Republican Party’s war on democratic values, institutions and laws
First off their aren’t Democratic Party laws. There are US laws and State laws. Second these Democratic values like murdering unborn babies, allowing illegal aliens to vote, sanctuary cities, etc, etc, etc are illegal and wrong in most cases.
The GOP intends to restrict vote-by-mail and other legitimate enfranchisement to suppress turnout amid fear, uncertainty and disease.
Nice projection and quite sad actually. In fact there have been other opinion pieces by Team D members that are discussing what to do when Trump tries to delay elections. So is Trump going to delay elections or is he trying to railroad them thru in their scheduled time?

At some point this civil war by other means, with the goal of enshrining GOP minority rule,
More Team D bullshit talking points. Is this a reference to Trump losing the general election? If so why does Team D hate the Constitution? If it is a reference to something else, then this fiction writer needs to spell it out.

The federal government is no longer a reliable partner in delivering health care, in supporting immigrants, supporting LGBT people, in protecting the environment, so we need to forge our own path,
The Feds shouldn’t be involved in Health Care. Further this clown is talking about illegal immigrants not getting support, because we bend over backwards for legal immigrants. But by the very definition illegal immigrants don’t deserve our support. Protecting the environment? CA is free to enact whatever they feel necessary, the Feds aren’t stopping that.
the Trump administration’s failure to protect against a pandemic.
Meanwhile in the real world Team D fought Trump trying to put in place travel restrictions and went to the racist card for doing it. Meanwhile if Team D thinks they would have done a better job that is a joke. Team D was focused on Impeachment instead of a growing pandemic. But look no further than NY’s response and failures in containing this. Cuomo said his state needed more ventilators from the Feds, but then when called on it he said they weren’t using the ones in storage as those were being saved. WTF?
The GOP war on democracy is inspired by a drive for racial and cultural supremacy that jeopardizes the democratic aspirations and human rights of California’s multiracial citizenry.
What a crock of shit. Team R could just as easily argue that Team D is waging a war on Democracy. What with their drive to overhaul the 2nd. Or allowing illegal immigrants to vote. Or harboring criminals in their sanctuary cities.

What is the difference, conceptually, between a state deploying its power to protect its population’s health and a state using it to protect its population’s democratic rights?
This cuts both ways. Should states take this stand towards attacks on the 2nd? Or to States protecting their borders with other Nations?
With the heirs of the Confederacy now reigning in Washington,
Team D was the heirs of the Confederacy, so did this guy just have a moment of clarity or is he spinning more fiction?

So yeah this piece of fiction is nothing but shit.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Kierland

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Kierland »

mvscal wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 11:15 pm
Since when is it the responsibility of the Federal government to provide the State of California with medical supplies?
It’s not, problem is they take money they say is this kind of event and then piss it away.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13470
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Left Seater »

Thanks for making the smaller Federal Government argument we have been making for years.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Kierland

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Kierland »

schmick wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 11:39 pm The state of California already had the medical supplies.
Governor Schwarzenegger had mobile hospitals, millions of masks and thousands of respirators on hand for just this sort of issue.
Its was governor brown and his lt governor newscum that got rid of all that equipment

https://www.politico.com/states/califor ... lt-1269954

brown and newscum thought it was a better idea to build a monorail and waste 25 billion a year on illegal immigrants
Keep lying about the 25bil a year fucktard.
And we had enough ventilators and apparently enough masks because 20,000 people have it so far. That’s .05 percent of the population.
So all the isolation looks to be paying off.
Kierland

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Kierland »

Left Seater wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2020 12:22 am Thanks for making the smaller Federal Government argument we have been making for years.
Who has brought up Wickard and what a bullshit case it is earlier and more often than I have?

Not only are you fat you are also slow.
Innocent Bystander
Mercia Furst
Posts: 4786
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Innocent Bystander »

schmick wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2020 11:39 pm The state of California already had the medical supplies.
Governor Schwarzenegger had mobile hospitals, millions of masks and thousands of respirators on hand for just this sort of issue.
Its was governor brown and his lt governor newscum that got rid of all that equipment

https://www.politico.com/states/califor ... lt-1269954

brown and newscum thought it was a better idea to build a monorail and waste 25 billion a year on illegal immigrants
How much less would it have cost to maintain it, especially since the Obama administration itself recommended keeping stockpiles.
Kierland

Re: A New and Positive Twist on States' Rights

Post by Kierland »

I told you a bunch of times why that study is shit.
As for Ca and CV19, again .05% of the population infected, enough ventilators and masks.
Post Reply