The governor of Michigan spoke treason?

[EAP]

on NBC's fake left wing propaganda show, "meet the press", the governor of Michigan said that it's Un- American to go against a tyrannical Government

And left wing socialist chuck todd, never corrected her treasonous words.

What the fuck is going on here?

The very foundation of liberty, calls for bringing down a government that is tyrannical.

Is this governor part of the new crop of left wing government control socialists?

[Mikey]

Link?

[Mikey]

LOL. Yeah I found it there too. I was waiting to see if he’d post that as his source and argue it’s legitimacy. Wouldn’t be beyond the pale.

[Mikey]

Bump:

Still waiting for Eat a Dick's source for this claim.

[Kierland]

Methinks EAP got catfished a bit:

https://babylonbee.com/news/mi-governor ... unamerican

Calling out your trolls once a quarter doesn't make you any less of a POS.

[EAP]

Methinks EAP got catfished a bit:

https://babylonbee.com/news/mi-governor ... unamerican

What about when Beto O'Rourke said that,
"The people cannot fight a tyrannical government, NOR do they have the right to".
end quote.

Isn't that treasonous?

[Mikey]

Nice backpedal.

This wasn't about Beto, was it?


And BTW, you seriously need to look up the meaning of treason because you apparently have it backwards.

[Screw_Michigan]

How does one "speak treason?"

:?

[EAP]

How does one "speak treason?"

:?

When you are a public servant.
A member of congress the senate, etc....and you violate our liberty and bill of rights, that's treasonous.
Is that pretty clear?

So when Beto O'Rourke says that we the people don't have the right to fight a tyrannical government?
That's not only treasonous, but it's fascist to say that.

And that's why you see left wing nutjobs like Beto O'Rourke attacking our liberty and bill of rights. He's a government control socialist/fascist.
He calls our bill of rights, the bill of wrongs.

[Screw_Michigan]

You might want to brush up on what treason actually entails, you god forsaken halfwit.

[Kierland]

88 really is a POS.

"a day or two"

[Mikey]

You might want to brush up on what treason actually entails, you god forsaken halfwit.

Don't try to talk sense to an idiot troll.
He is, after all, an idiot troll.

[Mikey]

How does one "speak treason?"

:?

When you are a public servant.
A member of congress the senate, etc....and you violate our liberty and bill of rights, that's treasonous.
Is that pretty clear?

So when Beto O'Rourke says that we the people don't have the right to fight a tyrannical government?
That's not only treasonous, but it's fascist to say that.

And that's why you see left wing nutjobs like Beto O'Rourke attacking our liberty and bill of rights. He's a government control socialist/fascist.
He calls our bill of rights, the bill of wrongs.

Dumbass.

A democratically elected government cannot, but definition, be a "tyrannical" government. Even if you don't like it.
Also, by definition, the act of trying to overthrow it would be treasonous.

in 3, 2, 1 ...

But, but, but

Obama
Valerie Jarrett
Clinton
Beto
liberty
socialist
communist
sheep
etc
etc

Go fuck yourself. Troll.

[EAP]

How does one "speak treason?"

:?

When you are a public servant.
A member of congress the senate, etc....and you violate our liberty and bill of rights, that's treasonous.
Is that pretty clear?

So when Beto O'Rourke says that we the people don't have the right to fight a tyrannical government?
That's not only treasonous, but it's fascist to say that.

And that's why you see left wing nutjobs like Beto O'Rourke attacking our liberty and bill of rights. He's a government control socialist/fascist.
He calls our bill of rights, the bill of wrongs.

Dumbass.

A democratically elected government cannot, but definition, be a "tyrannical" government. Even if you don't like it.
Also, by definition, the act of trying to overthrow it would be treasonous.

in 3, 2, 1 ...

But, but, but

Obama
Valerie Jarrett
Clinton
Beto
liberty
socialist
communist
sheep
etc
etc

Go fuck yourself. Troll.

hey DUMBFUCK?
NOT GOVERNMENT.
TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENT.

There's a HUGE difference between the two.

If a tyrannical government started violating our constitutional rights. That's treasonous.

By definition, treason is the act of betraying one's country.

So if a tyrannical government starts violating the constitutional rights of it's own citizens, then by definition, they are betraying their own country.

What don't you understand about this?

[EAP]

How does one "speak treason?"

:?

When you are a public servant.
A member of congress the senate, etc....and you violate our liberty and bill of rights, that's treasonous.
Is that pretty clear?

So when Beto O'Rourke says that we the people don't have the right to fight a tyrannical government?
That's not only treasonous, but it's fascist to say that.

And that's why you see left wing nutjobs like Beto O'Rourke attacking our liberty and bill of rights. He's a government control socialist/fascist.
He calls our bill of rights, the bill of wrongs.

Dumbass.

A democratically elected government cannot, but definition, be a "tyrannical" government. Even if you don't like it.
Also, by definition, the act of trying to overthrow it would be treasonous.

in 3, 2, 1 ...

But, but, but

Obama
Valerie Jarrett
Clinton
Beto
liberty
socialist
communist
sheep
etc
etc

Go fuck yourself. Troll.

hey low IQ weak minded sheep?
YES, a democratically elected government CAN become tyrannical and betray it's own country by violating the constitutional rights of it's citizens.

ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?

Your last post, claiming that a democratically elected government, cannot ever become treasonous, IS the single DUMBEST thing ANYONE has EVER SAID ON THIS BOARD!

It's slowly been progressing in that direction RIGHT before your very eyes, and you're either too stupid or too brainwashed to notice.

The whole point of electing a government democratically, is to ENSURE that they follow our constitutionally protected rights and liberty.
HOWEVER, should they become tyrannical, by violating our liberty and bill of rights, THAT'S betraying one's own country, which by definition, is TREASON!

ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?

[Mikey]

QED

Thank you very much.

[EAP]

QED

Thank you very much.

What the fuck?
What are you elvis now?
Thank you very much?
Sounded good when the king said it.
You? Not so much.

[Kierland]

What does that have to do with the price of apples in Orange County?

[Left Seater]

So in other words yes Schmick.

It would seem though that the supporters of prop 187 could use the judge’s words on finding prop 187 unconstitutional, to also end many of California’s current practices.

California is powerless to enact its own legislative scheme to regulate immigration. It is likewise powerless to enact its own legislative scheme to regulate alien access to public benefits

[Mikey]

To some folks, if you don't like the results of democracy, it's treason.

[Left Seater]

What I don't understand is why citizens put up with their elected officials invalidating their voice on propositions? It generally isn't a good move for elected officials to go against the "will of the people" who voted for a proposition. But, more power to them, if the citizens just let them get away with it.

[Kierland]

Mostly because those propositions are unconstitutional. Like if the will of the people in CA was to own slaves. Granted the cases are not that cut and dry, but valid analogy none the less.

[Left Seater]

Not paying welfare to illegal aliens is unconstitutional?

[Innocent Bystander]

Not paying welfare to illegal aliens is unconstitutional?

This'll rack.

[EAP]

To some folks, if you don't like the results of democracy, it's treason.

AS LONG as those results DO NOT VIOLATE liberty and our bill of rights.

Do you understand that?

[Mikey]

To some folks, if you don't like the results of democracy, it's treason.

AS LONG as those results DO NOT VIOLATE liberty and our bill of rights.

According to whom?

YOU DON'T GET TO MAKE THAT CALL.
We have courts for that.

Do you understand?

If you don't like the system, feel free to leave. You won't be missed.

[EAP]

To some folks, if you don't like the results of democracy, it's treason.

AS LONG as those results DO NOT VIOLATE liberty and our bill of rights.

According to whom?

YOU DON'T GET TO MAKE THAT CALL.
We have courts for that.

Do you understand?

If you don't like the system, feel free to leave. You won't be missed.

Guess what?
There's a huge difference between the 9th circuit "kangaroo" court, and the Supreme Court.

Meaning for years now, the 9th circuit was overturned 87% of the time by the high court.

WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT TELL YOU GENIUS?

It means that LEFT WING JUDGES are a CLEAR THREAT to our liberty and bill of rights.
You follow?

They openly admit it.

Ruth bader Ginsburg openly admitted her disdain for our constitution, some years back.
She said that she'd put several other country's constitutions ahead of ours. Direct quote.
That's treasonous.

I view our founding principles and documents as SACROSANCT!

DO YOU?
If you don't?
YOU have a serious problem.
Not me.

You leave.

Guess what? If the people don't like the 1st, 2nd 3rd, ammendments?
There's a process to make changes.
NOT JUDGES.
They don't get to legislate from the bench. It's not constitutional.

It just so happens that judges like Neal Gorsuch, are texturalists, they respect the actual words and meanings.

Left wing judges bypass the words and their meanings.
They basically bypass the letter of the law, and wind up making NEW LAWS. THAT'S NOT THEIR JOB.
According to the constitution, they are not allowed to legislate from the bench. That's the job of congress.
That's why the left wing 9th circuit has been overturned 87% of the time.
They have been going around the constitution for years, effectively doing the job the congress is charged to do.
Got it now?
If you don't like it? Pack your bags and leave. Go to mexico.
You'll love the lawlessness there.

[Mikey]

Meaning for years now, the 9th circuit was overturned 87% of the time by the high court.

Which means that the system is working...in your favor.

You are monumentally stupid.
The concept of quality over quantity has never more aptly applied.

[EAP]

Meaning for years now, the 9th circuit was overturned 87% of the time by the high court.

Which means that the system is working...in your favor.

You are monumentally stupid.
The concept of quality over quantity has never more aptly applied.

The system is working?
You have a gross misunderstanding about our constitution.

The principles of liberty do not change.

But, what if the 9th circuit stayed far left, and then the Supreme Court was stocked with far left judges?
You would end up with a serious constitutional crisis on your hands. The likes of which have never been seen.

See , you seem to think that the constitutional rights can be overturned by leftist judges who really don't agree with them.
But that's unconstitutional.
Left wing judges don't get to tamper with and change our rights just because they want to.
But, if they get the majority, that's exactly what they will do.

There's a HUGE difference between left wing nutjob judges and center right judges.
The left wing judges have OPENLY EXPRESSED their disdain for our bill of rights.
Do you see the GIANT problem with this?
The constitution is sacrosanct.
If judges dislike it, that's VERY DANGEROUS to our liberty and rights.
The system isn't supposed to fuck with our core principles of liberty.
They can fuck with a lot of things. BUT NOT OUR CORE TRUTHS that we hold self evident.

Are we clear? You disconnected left wing fuck.
The system, as you call it, has a legislative branch for making new laws and changing existing laws. The judicial branch is NOT allowed to change existing law.
Are you clear on that? Their job is set.
The problem with left wing judges is that they've already openly spoken about their disdain for our bill of rights.
They aren't afraid to disrespect our constitutional rights, or violate them in fact.

That's the difference between a cocksucker like Bernie Sanders, and a Donald trump.
Sanders wants to trample all over our liberty and bill of rights.
Trump wants to protect and defend them.
And not just Bernie, but Beto, and Elizabeth Warren, and AOC, and etc....etc.....ALL left wing government control socialists.

I'm not saying this because I'm biased in any way shape or form, mind you.

I'm saying it because I hold the founding principles as sacrosanct.
And, judging by your posts?
You clearly do not.

[Kierland]

That’s a lie. And you are a lying POS.

[Mikey]

.
.
.
.

God I'm smart.

[EAP]

.
.
.
.

God I'm smart.

I knew that you don't hold the founding principles sacrosanct.
And that you have disdain for our founding fathers.

I expected nothing less from a leftist.