incrementally
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
Your proposition requires the earth to be in motion, rotating on an axis and also revolving around the sun.
And your proposition also requires water to be clinging to the outside of this flying, spinning ball.
A child knows this will not happen.
lol
Until proven otherwise, the earth is as we all experience -- stationary.
This is what is rational to assume.
The sun, moon, and stars (lights) are in motion above us.
If you want to post your proof that the earth is moving, take a shot at that.
Otherwise I continue to chuckle at your assumptions and arrogance.
And your proposition also requires water to be clinging to the outside of this flying, spinning ball.
A child knows this will not happen.
lol
Until proven otherwise, the earth is as we all experience -- stationary.
This is what is rational to assume.
The sun, moon, and stars (lights) are in motion above us.
If you want to post your proof that the earth is moving, take a shot at that.
Otherwise I continue to chuckle at your assumptions and arrogance.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
So post something we can all try that shows the flat stationary erff and the eclipse that happened last night.
Your problem is you can’t. So instead you attack gravity.
Go ahead show us your model.
Your problem is you can’t. So instead you attack gravity.
Go ahead show us your model.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
I have never claimed a model, because -----> I do not know.
What I have are assumptions.
I don't claim it is a fact that the earth is flat, but I consider it to be a rightful assumption.
The globe is obviously VERY ridiculous, and I honestly laff at those who continue to pimp it.
Why do you do this?
NASA's cartoons are about all you've got.
I would like to know what is happening with a lunar eclipse, but I have not found an answer yet that satisfies me.
Btw, YouTube has been actively censoring/deleting/manipulating flat earth content now for a few years.
And it has escalated.
On "flat earth" videos, YouTube posts the following message directly under the video...
Flat Earth
Wikipedia
The flat Earth model is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of Earth's shape as a plane or disk.
LOL
Number 1, they are full of shit.
Number 2, why do they post such a thing on flat earth video content, and why do they so actively censor flat earth videos?
What's the big deal?
What I have are assumptions.
I don't claim it is a fact that the earth is flat, but I consider it to be a rightful assumption.
The globe is obviously VERY ridiculous, and I honestly laff at those who continue to pimp it.
Why do you do this?
NASA's cartoons are about all you've got.
I would like to know what is happening with a lunar eclipse, but I have not found an answer yet that satisfies me.
Btw, YouTube has been actively censoring/deleting/manipulating flat earth content now for a few years.
And it has escalated.
On "flat earth" videos, YouTube posts the following message directly under the video...
Flat Earth
Wikipedia
The flat Earth model is an archaic and scientifically disproven conception of Earth's shape as a plane or disk.
LOL
Number 1, they are full of shit.
Number 2, why do they post such a thing on flat earth video content, and why do they so actively censor flat earth videos?
What's the big deal?
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
Like I said, you got nothing.
Meanwhile the globe model explains 95% of things and yet you toss it out without question because something doesn’t fit in your mind.
Meanwhile you believe in the Bible which requires far more FAITH as very little can be proven.
Why are you inconsistent? I use a bit of faith in both God and globe earth. You on the other hand claim belief in something that can’t be proven and discard faith when 95% can be proven.
Meanwhile the globe model explains 95% of things and yet you toss it out without question because something doesn’t fit in your mind.
Meanwhile you believe in the Bible which requires far more FAITH as very little can be proven.
Why are you inconsistent? I use a bit of faith in both God and globe earth. You on the other hand claim belief in something that can’t be proven and discard faith when 95% can be proven.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
Yes, I am happy to place faith in my God, not in silly nonsense that proven human shysters try to pass off on me.
This is a good one to show the absurdities NASA sells the sheeple...
Dude, you claim to be all about reckless spending, yet we fund NASA to the tune of over 50 million dollars a day.
And we've been being RIPPED by them like this for decades.
And you say nothing about them, but instead are happy to let them prop up this zany globe fantasy that you, for some weird reason, choose to cling tightly to.
Ponderous.
It is fine.
All will be revealed.
The firmament will be broken, the stars will fall to earth, and the Lord God will be seen by all.
And He won't be coming to make fliends at this point.
The Day of the Lord!
The ultimate, "Wait until your Father gets home" moment.
EPCOT!
Isaiah 34:4
All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree.
Revelation 6:12-17
Then I looked when the Lamb opened the sixth seal, and a huge earthquake took place; the sun became as black as sackcloth made of hair, and the full moon became blood red;
and the stars in the sky fell to the earth like a fig tree dropping its unripe figs when shaken by a fierce wind.
The sky was split apart like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved from its place.
Then the kings of the earth, the very important people, the generals, the rich, the powerful, and everyone, slave and free, hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They said to the mountains and to the rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of the one who is seated on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb,
because the great day of their wrath has come, and who is able to withstand it?”
You can run, but make no mistake, you cannot hide.
This is a good one to show the absurdities NASA sells the sheeple...
Dude, you claim to be all about reckless spending, yet we fund NASA to the tune of over 50 million dollars a day.
And we've been being RIPPED by them like this for decades.
And you say nothing about them, but instead are happy to let them prop up this zany globe fantasy that you, for some weird reason, choose to cling tightly to.
Ponderous.
It is fine.
All will be revealed.
The firmament will be broken, the stars will fall to earth, and the Lord God will be seen by all.
And He won't be coming to make fliends at this point.
The Day of the Lord!
The ultimate, "Wait until your Father gets home" moment.
EPCOT!
Isaiah 34:4
All the host of heaven shall rot away, and the skies roll up like a scroll. All their host shall fall, as leaves fall from the vine, like leaves falling from the fig tree.
Revelation 6:12-17
Then I looked when the Lamb opened the sixth seal, and a huge earthquake took place; the sun became as black as sackcloth made of hair, and the full moon became blood red;
and the stars in the sky fell to the earth like a fig tree dropping its unripe figs when shaken by a fierce wind.
The sky was split apart like a scroll being rolled up, and every mountain and island was moved from its place.
Then the kings of the earth, the very important people, the generals, the rich, the powerful, and everyone, slave and free, hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains. They said to the mountains and to the rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of the one who is seated on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb,
because the great day of their wrath has come, and who is able to withstand it?”
You can run, but make no mistake, you cannot hide.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
Why do you lie?
I have said every government line item needs a 25% spending cut tonight. I never said exempt NASA.
And I employ faith in both instances. You on the other hand only employ faith in limited situations. That makes you a hypocrite.
Still waiting on your model we can all experiment with in our own homes.
I have said every government line item needs a 25% spending cut tonight. I never said exempt NASA.
And I employ faith in both instances. You on the other hand only employ faith in limited situations. That makes you a hypocrite.
Still waiting on your model we can all experiment with in our own homes.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
Okay.Lefty wrote:I have said every government line item needs a 25% spending cut tonight. I never said exempt NASA.
Thank you for correcting me on that.
But...
Only a 25% cut for NASA?
They need to be eliminated, with many folks put up on trial.
My model?
They guy whose model (globe) would NEVER work demands that I present my model.
lol
Neither of us have the correct model right now.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: incrementally
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 1:46 am Only a 25% cut for NASA?
They need to be eliminated, with many folks put up on trial.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
My model completely and totally explained the recent eclipse.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 1:46 am They guy whose model (globe) would NEVER work demands that I present my model.
You can’t produce anything that even explains 10% of happenings.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
Do you really think this landed on the moon?SM wrote:
This is NASA's picture of -----> Pluto.
They laff at you.
They mock you with the "space" bullshit they present to you...
Why do the sizes of continents change drastically in different years?
And on and on and on...
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
Lefty wrote:My model completely and totally explained the recent eclipse.
Yeah, if you get past the lunacy of water clinging to the outside of a flying, spinning ball you might really have something!
The detachment from reality is truly staggering.
And men like this pilot the planes you sit in, folks.
:)
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
I understand gravity. Something that completely baffles you.
But go ahead and show us a model that explains even 50% of the eclipse with your dinner plate beliefs.
But go ahead and show us a model that explains even 50% of the eclipse with your dinner plate beliefs.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
Gravity is one of your gods.Left Seater wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 3:45 amI understand gravity. Something that completely baffles you.
But go ahead and show us a model that explains even 50% of the eclipse with your dinner plate beliefs.
It in no way explains how the waters of the earth stay pinned to a flying, spinning ball.
It is ridiculous.
For me, explaining the eclipse is not necessary.
I would like to, sure, but not having a comfortable explanation does not deter me in the least.
It just has not yet been revealed.
1. For the bulk of human history, people have had the understanding that the earth is flat and stationary. And WAY prior to the heliocentric model being widely accepted, those holding to the flat earth view were accurately forecasting when the eclipses would occur. They had various explanations for them, but I am not personally satisfied by those explanations.
2. The globe zealots have their theory for the lunar eclipse. That is fine. Just know that there is a LONG list of scientific theories that have been superseded. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersede ... in_science
You "know" things until -----> you DON'T "know" things.
3. Also, not having a working map for a flat earth does not mean flat earth is necessarily wrong. There are certainly VERY compelling reasons for assuming the earth is flat and stationary. You don't toss that aside just because you don't have a comfortable explanation for the lunar eclipse. Well, the zealots do, but yeah...
There is a major agenda there.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: incrementally
So you're all in with Aristotle? Lucretius says hi... :wink:Softball Bat wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 12:28 am Your proposition requires the earth to be in motion, rotating on an axis and also revolving around the sun.
And your proposition also requires water to be clinging to the outside of this flying, spinning ball.
A child knows this will not happen.
lol
Until proven otherwise, the earth is as we all experience -- stationary.
This is what is rational to assume.
The sun, moon, and stars (lights) are in motion above us.
If you want to post your proof that the earth is moving, take a shot at that.
Otherwise I continue to chuckle at your assumptions and arrogance.
But make no mistake, I was wrong, you've got game. And I'm with ya, sure as the moon being artificial and all driven narratives of human history and existence being outrageously false on so many fronts.
As for your own fakery--preaching Jesus to K-pop--it's irrelevant. Hang in, this could get good quick..
Before God was, I am
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: incrementally
Just because they contract out the launches doesn't mean its being done "outside of government" now.Papa Willie wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 4:29 am He's right. The space flights are being done outside of the government now. NASA really doesn't do shit. Their day is over. Oh - they try to cry about global warming now, but that's a fucking joke. Hell - NOAA is funded to do that.
NASA is now Captain Dunsel.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: incrementally
Oh, yes. Of course, the RWNJ belief that NASA is worthless because it contracts out the launches for human spaceflight. Might want to run that past all the moderate GOPers who would disagree with you on that.
NASA budget is $23 billion. Drop in the fucking bucket.
NASA budget is $23 billion. Drop in the fucking bucket.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
And there is the problem with both parties. Liberals generally don’t care at all. Most conservatives give it lip service, but they want to restrict spending cuts only to some areas. Government is wasteful. Period. Full stop.
This is why we need an immediate 25% spending cut on each and every line item, tonight.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Bill in Houston
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:29 am
Re: incrementally
So your policy preference is to trigger a full on recession?
Gotcha.
Gotcha.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
Oh because runaway inflation is so much better?
Nice policy position.
Nice policy position.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Bill in Houston
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:29 am
Re: incrementally
I was afraid this would happen.
Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?
Most Rice grads can do much better than that.
Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?
Most Rice grads can do much better than that.
Re: incrementally
Left Seater, like many on this board, lives in a binary world.
Re: incrementally
Not this one. He actually knows better but his greed and hate have so consumed his life he will do anything too grow his money pile.Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm I was afraid this would happen.
Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?
Most Rice grads can do much better than that.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
Most functioning adults saw this inflation coming from miles away. Props to you I guess for seeing the obvious.
Of course those aren’t the only options. But one is the option your leadership has taken. There are all kinds in between. But we need a major spending cuts tonight. And if you don’t think there is 25% waste in federal government spending then you are even dumber that we thought, which is damn near impossible.Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?
Last edited by Left Seater on Fri May 20, 2022 11:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: incrementally
I resemble that remark.Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:38 pmMost functioning adults say this inflation coming from mikes away. Props to you I guess for seeing the obvious.
:brad:
- Bill in Houston
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:29 am
Re: incrementally
So now you pine for those grand ol’days of Herbert Hoover. You truly are a regressive being.Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:38 pmMost functioning adults saw this inflation coming from miles away. Props to you I guess for seeing the obvious.
Of course those aren’t the only options. But one is the option your leadership has taken. There are all kinds in between. But we need a major spending cuts tonight. And if you don’t think there is 25% waste in federal government spending then you are even dumber that we thought, which is damn near impossible.Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 9:54 pm Those are the only two options? Go with your dimwit 25% across the board cuts, or runaway inflation?
Are we to really blame you though? The village idiot will be laughed at for sure, but no thinking person could take your ideas seriously. You suggest deflationary policy to erode decades of wealth? And that helps who exactly?
But… but… erm… government bad. Yeah.
How about any of those other options you claim to identify? Nothing worthwhile there? You’ve done your analysis and 25% instantaneous federal spending cuts are the best way to go?
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13456
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: incrementally
We can negotiate down to 20% or so. But we spend far too much and this needs to stop.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: incrementally
Big fatliar. Everything is just one big fox talking point with you. Thinking is hard when you’re dumb.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
See my post to begin this thread.
In an effort to make their commitment [to the LGBTQ+ community] more visible, the Rays this year
decided to follow the lead of the Giants and add rainbow-colored logos to their Pride Night uniforms,
to the "TB" on their caps and a sunburst on their right jersey sleeves.
https://www.tampabay.com/sports/rays/20 ... q-support/
Now faggotry has to be celebrated by dolling ballplayers up in fag logos.
#incrementally
In an effort to make their commitment [to the LGBTQ+ community] more visible, the Rays this year
decided to follow the lead of the Giants and add rainbow-colored logos to their Pride Night uniforms,
to the "TB" on their caps and a sunburst on their right jersey sleeves.
https://www.tampabay.com/sports/rays/20 ... q-support/
Now faggotry has to be celebrated by dolling ballplayers up in fag logos.
#incrementally
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
As far as I know, fags have always been free to go to ballgames.MS wrote:Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: incrementally
Clearly you don't know much...Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 11:14 pmAs far as I know, fags have always been free to go to ballgames.MS wrote:Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
1. The fact that the gheys were at the ballgame VALIDATES my take, Diego.
2. I was not there to witness the *kiss*. All we have is what was written in the news. I don't know what kind of a *kiss* took place, and I do not know what other things the lesbians did. I do not know all the circumstances surrounding the episode.
3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.
4. I went to a Brooklyn Nets game 6 or 7 years ago and it was -----> brain damage. It was 60% basketball and 40% carnival. Not IN. Every stop of play there were projectiles flying around, lights flashing everywhere, "clowns" spazzing around everywhere, and dipshit Smackie Chan wannabes blaring their idiotic voices throughout the arena. People seemingly have no capacity for sitting in solitude for 7 seconds. There evidently must be a constant influx of lowest-common-denominator "entertainment," or else they are -----> very sad.
What a shit show.
2. I was not there to witness the *kiss*. All we have is what was written in the news. I don't know what kind of a *kiss* took place, and I do not know what other things the lesbians did. I do not know all the circumstances surrounding the episode.
3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.
4. I went to a Brooklyn Nets game 6 or 7 years ago and it was -----> brain damage. It was 60% basketball and 40% carnival. Not IN. Every stop of play there were projectiles flying around, lights flashing everywhere, "clowns" spazzing around everywhere, and dipshit Smackie Chan wannabes blaring their idiotic voices throughout the arena. People seemingly have no capacity for sitting in solitude for 7 seconds. There evidently must be a constant influx of lowest-common-denominator "entertainment," or else they are -----> very sad.
What a shit show.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
I was hoping at least one person would catch that balst!
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: incrementally
Go ahead & tell us how two lesbians or two gays would be identified at the turnstiles from two straight people from the same gender....Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am 1. The fact that the gheys were at the ballgame VALIDATES my take, Diego.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Re: incrementally
I was taking about you you intolerant fuck.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 11:14 pmAs far as I know, fags have always been free to go to ballgames.MS wrote:Yes including people is a horrible thing to do.
Re: incrementally
Only small children, stupid people and assholes use the slippery slope fallacy un-ironically.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am
3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.
What a shit show.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: incrementally
How Softball Batshit Crazy wants the stands to look like...Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 4:13 pmOnly small children, stupid people and assholes use the slippery slope fallacy un-ironically.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 9:51 am
3. Btw, the "kiss cam" bullshit should get lost. More commentary on that should be added here in this Incrementally thread. The ball game is a not a night club. At the rate we're going we'll have couples humping on the 3rd base line in about 20 years.
What a shit show.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10916
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: incrementally
In our modern era, all people (unless they are a visible threat of some kind) have been free to enter a ballgame.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jun 07, 2022 4:08 pmGo ahead & tell us how two lesbians or two gays would be identified at the turnstiles from two straight people from the same gender....
Identifying their sexuality is a total non-issue.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is