Naw, she's just a down to earth conservative who is willing to be unvarnished in her opposition to the "Admiral" Levine's and their perverted agenda. Of course no one would expect "roach" to offer any sort of specific issues, policies or positions that Greene supports that would so move him to such harsh and vivid personal attacks. :doh:
Greene wants lower taxes, secure borders, Fauci in jail, Obama exposed, the Squad deported, violent criminals (joqqers) charged and imprisoned, the CRT agenda opposed and smashed, the Queer legions remanded back to their bath houses, and DeSantis in the White house come 2024.
Ok so only 90% of her platform is stupid nazii stuff.
Lower taxes is good but so have never heard her talk about that. She probably means for billionaires just like Dump did. She’s a bag of shit the loons of Georgia lit on fire and chucked into Congress.
While I don't share her religious beliefs, the idea that she's proposing any sort of theocracy is as absurd as calling everyone a "nazii." It doesn't mean anything if everything is exaggerated into cartoonish nonsense.
I'll tell you what's not an exaggeration--that she would bend you like a pretzel and bounce you like a ball.
LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 10:38 pm
While I don't share her religious beliefs, the idea that she's proposing any sort of theocracy is as absurd as calling everyone a "nazii." It doesn't mean anything if everything is exaggerated into cartoonish nonsense.
I'll tell you what's not an exaggeration--that she would bend you like a pretzel and bounce you like a ball.
Mikey, you dripping sweat mop from a bath house, are you really calling out fake seater for misplacing an apostrophe? C'mon, man. Sure, he meant "dudes' cocks," suggesting plural men. But you're so bored in the day room that you' just can't resist the most meaningless and tedious of nonsense? Really?
Why would I assume that he was talking about more than one man (your preferred ménage combo from what I understand), when my original take referred to only one?
And the main subject was not the tiny dick, but the women who were apparently craving it. Why would you assume I was focused on male genitalia? Your projection is painfully obvious.
Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in "what about…?") denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation. From a logical and argumentative point of view it is considered a variant of the tu-quoque pattern (Latin 'you too', term for a counter-accusation), which is a subtype of the ad-hominem argument.
That's just stating the obvious, Squirmy, but it obviously doesn't apply to the ludicrous subject at hand--which was Mikey looking to steal one of fake seater's cookies in the day room by distracting him with a grammar correction of f-seat's toss off joke which actually attended a real question as far as the conservative congress gals and their desire (or not) to fellate the former president. The "you're another" fallacy was never in the mix, though it certainly applies when someone like Stacy Abrams goes down with the ship insisting on a fraudulent election loss while now demonizing everyone who thinks 2020 was tainted. Yes, "what about you?" certainly applies in such cases because they are not abstract logical problems, but concrete actions by individuals--just like in a criminal trial.