But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Biden's attorneys made the discovery & self-reported the found documents whereas the documents found at Mar-a-Lardo were requested many times by the National Archives but those requests were ignored.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:25 pm https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/09/politics ... index.html
And this came from CNN no less.
So yeah, those are exactly the same...
Biden left the Naval Observatory in 2017. He went to the WH in 2021. Care to share with everyone why the National Archives while under control of the Dump administration, never did anything about those missing documents?
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Keep making excuses.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:45 pmBiden's attorneys made the discovery & self-reported the found documents whereas the documents found at Mar-a-Lardo were requested many times by the National Archives but those requests were ignored.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:25 pm https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/09/politics ... index.html
And this came from CNN no less.
So yeah, those are exactly the same...
Biden left the Naval Observatory in 2017. He went to the WH in 2021. Care to share with everyone why the National Archives while under control of the Dump administration, never did anything about those missing documents?
I'm sure there is more to this, but your fascist, lamestream media will not pursue.
Just like the Hunter laptop deal was a nothingburger, right?
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Gets explained how their argument is shit. Brushes it off and then blames “the media”, like their side is incapable of covering facts.
Oh wait, never mind.
Oh wait, never mind.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Answer the question, numbnuts.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 3:02 pmKeep making excuses.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:45 pmBiden's attorneys made the discovery & self-reported the found documents whereas the documents found at Mar-a-Lardo were requested many times by the National Archives but those requests were ignored.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:25 pm https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/09/politics ... index.html
And this came from CNN no less.
So yeah, those are exactly the same...
Biden left the Naval Observatory in 2017. He went to the WH in 2021. Care to share with everyone why the National Archives while under control of the Dump administration, never did anything about those missing documents?
I'm sure there is more to this, but your fascist, lamestream media will not pursue.
Just like the Hunter laptop deal was a nothingburger, right?
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Thanks for that Captain Obvious. Do you have an actual take?
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Don’t forget that Trump committed no crimes. He declassified all those documents in his mind after he left office. On the other hand, Biden did not.
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Shut up, Randy!
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Apples are the same as oranges.
Sin,
Donnie the Nazi traitor.
Sin,
Donnie the Nazi traitor.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
The point Sven is making is that they shouldn't have gone missing in the first place, for Trump or for Biden. Unless it's been normal the whole time.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:45 pmBiden's attorneys made the discovery & self-reported the found documents whereas the documents found at Mar-a-Lardo were requested many times by the National Archives but those requests were ignored.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:25 pm https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/09/politics ... index.html
And this came from CNN no less.
So yeah, those are exactly the same...
Biden left the Naval Observatory in 2017. He went to the WH in 2021. Care to share with everyone why the National Archives while under control of the Dump administration, never did anything about those missing documents?
Biden 'self reported' through attorneys only a couple month's ago. Why would he have to self-report something which we're being told they're not supposed to do? Why was it done in the first place? I mean yeah, ask why Trump didn't do anything to Biden.... but also ask why Biden did it in the first place?
To go back to Trump not doing anything, is to unironically support the message of the Clay Travis tweet Donnie Baker has posted. Sarcasm or not, should this be SOP from now on?
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Impeachment doesn't mean anything anymore. It's just partisan theatrics. Biden isn't even in control of the presidency. What's the point of a show trial run by those who are actively undermining this country for the benefit of someone else?JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:39 pmArticles of impeachment are imminent for nazi Alzheimer's Joe.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Left wing, right wing, doesn't make a difference. They all play for the same team: AIPAC. That is the blackpill. Do you play for them?
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
I’m sure they are. You idiots wanted to impeach the guy who changed Mr. Potato head.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 6:39 pmArticles of impeachment are imminent for nazi Alzheimer's Joe.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Not really. They both took. The declassify qualifier is capricious reasoning. This is a case where everyone should be bound by the same rule, as a reminder about one's role, and that role being bigger than the person who occupies it.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 8:03 pm
There's a HUGE difference between a vice president having these documents, and a president having them.
ONLY a president can declassify. A vice president cannot even order chinese food for christ's sakes.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Trump was prez and had the authority to do so.Mikey wrote:Don’t forget that Trump committed no crimes. He declassified all those documents in his mind after he left office. On the other hand, Biden did not.
Biden was not.
He does not have the “I was prez and can do whatever the fukk I want” excuse.
Of course this is all bullshit.
Whether Prez or VP, they had the clearance to possess said documents.
No one ever gave a fukk about any former Prez possessing such docs unless there was evidence that they were trying to peddle them.
There is no such evidence with Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
People who are not traitors always cared which is why you can’t fathom someone caring.smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 10:46 pmTrump was prez and had the authority to do so.Mikey wrote:Don’t forget that Trump committed no crimes. He declassified all those documents in his mind after he left office. On the other hand, Biden did not.
Biden was not.
He does not have the “I was prez and can do whatever the fukk I want” excuse.
Of course this is all bullshit.
Whether Prez or VP, they had the clearance to possess said documents.
No one ever gave a fukk about any former Prez possessing such docs unless there was evidence that they were trying to peddle them.
There is no such evidence with Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Again for the mentally handicapped....smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 10:46 pmTrump was prez and had the authority to do so.Mikey wrote:Don’t forget that Trump committed no crimes. He declassified all those documents in his mind after he left office. On the other hand, Biden did not.
The president of the United States CANNOT unilaterally declare a document unclassified w/o following procedure. And Trump never took any action to declassify the documents that he had in his possession at Mar-a-Lardo. And shortly after Trump left office he was stripped of his security clearance by the sitting POTUS. Biden never lost his.
These two situations are completely different from each other.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
In point of fact, Biden's is much, much worse.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 2:39 am These two situations are completely different from each other.
Shut up, Randy!
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Keep dreaming. Biden is actually cooperating with the probe, as opposed to Dump, who was busy giving Fox News excuses as to why he didn't do anything wrong, including declassifying documents with his mind.
Your support for the orange traitor will never not be repulsive.
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Just conclusions. It’s always just conclusions. Never any facts never any analysis.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 3:23 amIn point of fact, Biden's is much, much worse.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 2:39 am These two situations are completely different from each other.
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
What about crime and cops?
Sin,
You know who
Sin,
You know who
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
The severity of a crime is in the eye of the beholder. Crime and cops in the US is more complex than your statement.... otherwise there would be no chink human trafficking rub and tugs operating out in the open.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 7:14 pmThe HUGE DIFFERENCE between the violent crime in democrat run cities from coast to coast, coupled with the tiny fraction of bad officers, is factual data that you deny, deflect and run from.
-
- Mercia Furst
- Posts: 4781
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 9:29 pm1BInnocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 9:09 pmThe severity of a crime is in the eye of the beholder. Crime and cops in the US is more complex than your statement.... otherwise there would be no chink human trafficking rub and tugs operating out in the open.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Wed Jan 11, 2023 7:14 pm
The HUGE DIFFERENCE between the violent crime in democrat run cities from coast to coast, coupled with the tiny fraction of bad officers, is factual data that you deny, deflect and run from.
You might not be understanding my point.
Depends. It sounded like you were arguing a 13/50 position. My position is crime stats begin and end with pursuit.
The main narrative of the left-wing media and left-wing democrat party is that the police are racist criminals themselves.
When Israel is re-enforcing an 'us vs them' military mindset in its training of US police officers, then yes you're going to mold racist criminal cops.
The REALITY is that only a tiny fraction of officers are criminal.
But the overwhelming majority of the coloreds they police are criminal? You want to go there without political euphemisms, or nah?
The other main narrative of the left wing media and left-wing democrat party is that violent crime is way down, when in fact it's at extremely high levels.
Explain. Also, what is the importance of the qualifier 'violent'?
I am stunned that any reasonably intelligent human being actually believes these narratives of the left.
Israel says they aren't human beings, they are cattle.
BUT THEN AGAIN. the nazi socialists understood the massive power that propaganda has on the weak minded sheep who vote for these left-wing politicians.
Boxer was sent to the glue factory. Nazi is a misused epithet. You believe the enemy is left-wing, instead of Saturnalian. Who fed you your views? Who is fattening you up?
What do they gain by misdirecting you towards left and right?
- General Peters
- All-American Kid
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:24 am
- Location: C-Ville
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
And Kierland will vote for Potato Head again because everyone else is so stupid and he's WHOOOOSHHH over everyone's head.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Tue Jan 10, 2023 2:39 pm You're probably wasting your time with the left-wing democrats on here because they are delusional pathological liars who deny and deflect everything and anything that goes against their leftist party.
Alzheimer's Joe was corrupt long before he lost cognition. The corrupt left-wing media has protected him, but now they just might have to turn on him due to the hierarchy of the party wanting him gone.
One side note, after all the remarks about the new speakers troubles getting the votes, it's funny when you realize that Pelosi was elected with the same amount of votes, 214.
But I digress........
The left doesn't want low IQ whore harris either.
So don't be surprised if Hillary shows back up.
Or that POS wife of Barry's.
Won't much matter who's running because as the economy worsens, DeSantis will crush anyone these criminals put forth.
well kiss my ass and call it rosy
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Pro liberty like women not controlling their bodies and gays not being able to marry. Like books being banned and drugs being illegal. You know freedum!!
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Literally Whataboutism on a subject where the only reason it was brought up is because you did Whataboutism.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Classified docs are being to show up in several ice cream parlors in Delaware...
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Turned in without even asking, let alone a warrant? Shocking!!
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
So fukking what?
He removed the documents, which according to your side is a crime. Returning them after committing the crime does not absolve one of the crime.
An actual lawyer should know that.
My guess is that this has been done for two reasons.
1. They need to ditch Joe.
2. In addition to ditching Joe, they will make a big fukking deal about how this is such a serious crime in their never ending attempt to bury the Bad Orange Man.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Just STFU. You have no idea what a crime is. You don’t even know what mens rea or “gross negligence” are.
Your handlers on Tucker Carlson told you to be outraged so you are. What a stupid pawn.
Your handlers on Tucker Carlson told you to be outraged so you are. What a stupid pawn.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
And then there is the fact that a President has the power to declassify whatever he wants. A VP does not.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Oh, and shove your fancy latin words up your ass.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9623
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Only when they follow the proper protocol (per NY Times v. CIA). Trump didn't do that with the documents he took, and thus committed a crime.smackaholic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 3:56 am And then there is the fact that a President has the power to declassify whatever he wants. A VP does not.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10914
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
I'm not saying Bidet's documents is not a story, but I am more interested in why both the U.S. and Canada had airline system "glitches" right around the same time this week.
Oh sure!
What is going on that flights needed to be grounded for a period of time in North America?
Nothing to see here, folks...
#ff
Oh sure!
What is going on that flights needed to be grounded for a period of time in North America?
Nothing to see here, folks...
#ff
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10914
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Point of parliamentary procedure!JP wrote:we need special counsels convened immediately.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
Learning literally hurts you doesn’t it.
Re: But it's OK for Biden to have these docs, right?
But What about Gas Stoves and Mr Potatohead?