Oh good...Shrek is back
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Oh good...Shrek is back
So glad he put on his best duds for the occasion
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/m ... b-n1688175
What an utter disgrace.
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/m ... b-n1688175
What an utter disgrace.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
What are you obsessing… I mean melting…. I mean spamming… I mean babbling on about now?
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Lol, check out this douchebag's resume
Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trump, and the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama, and The Scandalous Presidency of Barack Obama.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
When you said douchebag’s resume, I thought you meant Sven.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
He does indeed look like a fucking slob. Do you dispute that? He's not popping out to Home Depot for a couple of new bolts for his neck.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
At least he’s not wearing a dress and stiletto heels.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Great - thanks for that image.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Someone ought to take a gander at Shrek's resume.
Or better yet, compare some of the most elegant oratory written by our forefathers to a phrase you all know Shrek is most familiar with:
"Uh, you want lids on those?"
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
At issue is Cave Man's complete lack of competence...this is a U.S. senator?
Before God was, I am
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Agriculture is not even close to being Pennsylvania's largest industry.
Pennsylvania agriculture did manage to produce the world's largest potato, though, and promptly sent it to represent them in the United States Senate, so they've got that going for them.
Pennsylvania agriculture did manage to produce the world's largest potato, though, and promptly sent it to represent them in the United States Senate, so they've got that going for them.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
You've been melting hard over Fetterman the last couple of days. Makes me savor even more how D voters kicked your quack TV doctor square in the nuts and how they're going to do it again to all the other GQP tards over killing women via dangerous pregnancies. 2024 is gonna be a bloodbath.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Melting? Ah...no. Just making simple observations such as the fact that Fetturdman is a stupid, brain damaged slob. That he is stupid, brain damaged and a slob is not even an opinion. It's all out there on video.
Do you disagree with that?
Do you disagree with that?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
They're melting hard on Fetterman not only because of his political views but also because it draws attention away from the batshit crazy congressman who they had previsious censured & removed committee assignments from but have now put in a influential committee:
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Doc Oz was not directly supportive of Orange Man, though receiving his support had to be accepted. The elective process in Pennsyvania is a classic case of the DNC herding the black voters like sheep. And Cave Man is a simply astonishing example of lock-step obeisance to the Woke narrative and agenda. And even if he had basic mental function, his politics are his real disease.
Before God was, I am
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Considering you have never been right once, ever….
- Bill in Houston
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2020 12:29 am
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
John Fetterman has only been back one day and crushed Kevin McCarthy‘s hopes and dreams.
He destroyed McCarthy’s plans:
“Cut SNAP for families and kids while pushing tax cuts for billionaires? Not on my watch.”
Fetterman is currently chairing a subcommittee hearing and he just made it clear McCarthy’s plans will not pass in the senate.
McCarthy’s plan to cut SNAP is just like his future as Speaker of the House.
It’s dead on arrival.
He destroyed McCarthy’s plans:
“Cut SNAP for families and kids while pushing tax cuts for billionaires? Not on my watch.”
Fetterman is currently chairing a subcommittee hearing and he just made it clear McCarthy’s plans will not pass in the senate.
McCarthy’s plan to cut SNAP is just like his future as Speaker of the House.
It’s dead on arrival.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Uh, SNAP isn't all that it's cracked up to be.
https://fee.org/articles/snap-the-uncom ... gLogvD_BwE
Try again...
https://fee.org/articles/snap-the-uncom ... gLogvD_BwE
Try again...
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
So you are against feeding hungry people in the riches country ever. You are human (or possibly AI) garbage.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
They don't need to limit the amount. They need to limit what products it can buy. Basic dry and canned goods only. Beans, rice, cooking oil, powdered milk, canned vegetables and fruits etc.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:20 pm No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
So you care more about some mismanagement than about feeding people. You literally could have said anything and you picked, “but waste”, great job.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:20 pm No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.
Shut up, Randy!
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
I'd rather have Other People's Money going to benefit poor and working Americans than lining the wallets of crony capitalist POS GOPers.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:11 pm As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Totally agree - no more junk foodmvscal wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:36 pmThey don't need to limit the amount. They need to limit what products it can buy. Basic dry and canned goods only. Beans, rice, cooking oil, powdered milk, canned vegetables and fruits etc.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 4:20 pm No I'm not against feeding the hungry you pile of shit. I'm against government mismanagement.
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
How about crony capitalist POS Leftists? You care about them making billions, fuckstick?Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 8:40 pmI'd rather have Other People's Money going to benefit poor and working Americans than lining the wallets of crony capitalist POS GOPers.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:11 pm As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.
Start with Blackrock, JPMorgan Chase, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and let me know how far down the list you get before you find a Republican.
Hmm.. sure seems like an awful lot of people at the top of our evil capitalist system are devout Left Wingers. Why is that, do you think?
Shut up, Randy!
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
I absolutely do just that. I volunteer at food banks all the time.Jsc810 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 6:24 pmThat's 100% bullshit, and even what the article describes as fraud is not considered fraud by the USDA Food and Nutrition Service.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 3:18 pm Uh, SNAP isn't all that it's cracked up to be.
https://fee.org/articles/snap-the-uncom ... gLogvD_BwE
Try again...
Go to your local food bank and volunteer one Saturday morning. Don't just write a check (although that is good to do), actually go there and look in the eyes of those receiving food assistance. You'll get a much better appreciation of the issue that way as compared to reading hack articles.
Has nothing to do with terrible gubmint oversight.
God you liberal squishes with your feelings.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Yeah what about something else besides the topic!?!Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 9:11 pmHow about crony capitalist POS Leftists? You care about them making billions, fuckstick?Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 8:40 pmI'd rather have Other People's Money going to benefit poor and working Americans than lining the wallets of crony capitalist POS GOPers.Donnie Baker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 7:11 pm As long as the government is spending more of Other People's Money the Democrats in the room are happy.
Start with Blackrock, JPMorgan Chase, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and let me know how far down the list you get before you find a Republican.
Hmm.. sure seems like an awful lot of people at the top of our evil capitalist system are devout Left Wingers. Why is that, do you think?
- Donnie Baker's Ghost
- I swear to god . . .
- Posts: 1091
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
I think SNAP is a worthy program, but it needs a reset to its stated purpose. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance. Key words being "supplemental" and "nutrition." By limiting it to basic, staple dry goods, canned goods and herbs and spices, you don't need to cut the benefit and it will stretch further for the individuals using it. Luxury items and junk food should not be part of the discussion. Buy those on your own dime. Including those items just inflates the cost of the program, encourages lazy, ignorant habits and does not provide nutrition.Jsc810 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 20, 2023 6:29 pmWhile I'm generally against restricting the food that may be purchased with SNAP, if you don't limit the amount, well that would be a potential compromise.
And I'm assuming that you are not meaning literally no limits, but rather substantially increasing the amount of benefits while restricting the types of eligible food.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Why not fresh produce, meat, poultry and fish?
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Which part of 'supplemental' eludes your comprehension?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
Every study ever conducted says that last sentence is wrong. Which makes the rest of the post your typical pedokkkal BS.
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
I know what “supplemental” means. How does it exclude all of those items? Seems like a matter of semantics. You yourself described the canned and dried shelf-stable goods as basic staples. That would make fresh produce and proteins supplemental.
Which part of “staples” eludes your comprehension?
You might want to try and be consistent.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Oh good...Shrek is back
C'mon, you've been posting here long enough to know mvscunt believes the poor don't deserve such nutritional staples such as meat, poultry or fish. If they want those luxuries, god damn it, they should get an education or some fucking skills.Mikey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 21, 2023 3:55 am I know what “supplemental” means. How does it exclude all of those items? Seems like a matter of semantics. You yourself described the canned and dried shelf-stable goods as basic staples. That would make fresh produce and proteins supplemental.
Which part of “staples” eludes your comprehension?
You might want to try and be consistent.