![Image](https://i.imgur.com/emvG2eU.jpeg)
A brilliant student of history
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: A brilliant student of history
Haha now do it with anything Biden says.
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: A brilliant student of history
I'm waiting for the MSM to do it.
Oh wait.
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
- HighPlainsGrifter
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2023 8:10 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
I found it funny. Not quite as funny as Dems pretending they care about the cognitive ability of a Presidential candidate but still funny.
Re: A brilliant student of history
You didn't catch what Mikey did.
No surprise.
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
Re: A brilliant student of history
#unclebosie
they never found the body because there used to be a lot of cannibals, for real, in that part of New Guinea.
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
Re: A brilliant student of history
#stupidfuckwitbidenI don’t know why we’re surprised by Trump.
How many times does he have to prove we can't be trusted?
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
- HighPlainsGrifter
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2023 8:10 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Kind of like m2 posting in here about how maga & Trump suck while watching his lefties have pro hamas rallies across many college campuses and are busy chanting death to Israel & the US....
Denial exemplified.
Denial exemplified.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
Seer's brain functioning properly is an anomaly.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21095
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: A brilliant student of history
They do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.
Nothing more sucky than that.
Re: A brilliant student of history
That would mean that Biden would have absolute immunity as well. I’m not suggesting anything specific, but there’s all sorts of shit he could pull.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 amThey do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.
Nothing more sucky than that.
Re: A brilliant student of history
Yep, all those Trump voters doing work cheering for hamas....
![Rolling Eyes :meds:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
"You remain the dumbest fuck to ever mash submit on this self-fellating shit bucket."
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
- HighPlainsGrifter
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2023 8:10 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
I know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 amThey do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.
Nothing more sucky than that.
All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.
Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Your viewpoints on Israel and the sub-humans who seek to exterminate them, are exactly the same as mine.
Israel is a very very diverse democracy, surrounded by racist sociopaths.
Yet you continue supporting the current left-wing administration that directly funds Iran, the number one state sponsor of terrorism worldwide.
On day one, this administration reversed every policy from the trump administration. President trump's foreign policy unified the moderates of the region, putting the extremists on serious notice.
If the Nobel Peace organization wasn't "leftist", president trump would've unanimously received the Nobel prize. That's how historically great his "Abraham accords" were.
You're a quagmire, an enigma trapped inside a
"left-wing" house of horrors with no exit in sight.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2022 9:11 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Spot on - well said HPGHighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:17 pmI know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 amThey do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.
Nothing more sucky than that.
All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.
Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Agreed. 100% correct.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:54 pmSpot on - well said HPGHighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:17 pmI know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 12:15 am
They do suck. They have a fucking lawyer arguing to the corrupt Supreme Court that Dump is above the law. Period. Doesn't really bode (no pun intended) well for the future of American democracy if corrupt GQP Supreme Court members vote the president to have absolute immunity to save Dump's ass.
Nothing more sucky than that.
All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.
Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.
A mere senator is excused of having classified documents in five unsecured locations, AND this leftist department of Justice says "nothing to see here" reveals how criminally corrupt today's Democrat party has become.
Comey and Loretta lynch did the same thing with secretary of state Clinton.
The left has weaponized the very government against president trump, just like the soviet socialists and nazi socialists weaponized their governments against their political enemies.
But I digress..............
This November, the American people can "right the ship" and send a clear and powerful message to the DC swamp.
Screw called the Supreme Court corrupt?
The Supreme Court has left-wing justices. They UNANIMOUSLY struck down the left-wing extremist Colorado Supreme Court 9-0.
So that means screw has finally gone screwy.by calling his fellow leftists "corrupt"
On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
Re: A brilliant student of history
... which is WHY we need to nominate 6 more Supreme Court Justices ASAP!JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
Sin,
Emotionally Crippled Lefties
Re: A brilliant student of history
Clarence Thomas was shown to be bought and paid for. Did the chief or any of the other judges do anything but ignore it? Some bullshit generalized press release but no statement of ethics or sanctions.
Corrupt? Fuk what else do you need?
Corrupt? Fuk what else do you need?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
And the left-wing extremist judge presiding over president trump's case is clean in your view?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
The last eight years has shown the weaponization of the very government against president trump, starting with the Obama justice department that literally used unverified BS propaganda to take down the DULY ELECTED president trump. James Comey then set in motion the BS Mueller investigation run by leftist friend of Hillary Clinton Andrew Weissman himself! Spending millions upon millions of the tax payers money on complete and utter BS.
And your only concern is propaganda about Thomas?
- HighPlainsGrifter
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2023 8:10 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Don't forget the KNOWN AND VERIFIED lies to the FISA court during the election.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 9:30 pmThe last eight years has shown the weaponization of the very government against president trump, starting with the Obama justice department that literally used unverified BS propaganda to take down the DULY ELECTED president trump. James Comey then set in motion the BS Mueller investigation run by leftist friend of Hillary Clinton Andrew Weissman himself! Spending millions upon millions of the tax payers money on complete and utter BS.
And your only concern is propaganda about Thomas?
This government is a shit show of Banana Republic proportions and 81 Million voters have their feet up cheering it on. Fuck every last one of those traitors.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
Alito as well.
I love how the conservatards opine that the left has no moral direction yet they themselves have no problem with SCOTUS justices accepting bribes from men who have business before the court.
Hell, even municipal court judges are held to higher standards....
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pmAgreed. 100% correct.Sven Golly wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:54 pmSpot on - well said HPGHighPlainsGrifter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 3:17 pm
I know you struggle with big picture concepts since the bad orange man touched you in your no-no square but please do your best to examine the issue in a broader perspective than Trump=Bad.
All presidents enjoy immunity. You'll notice Bill Clinton hasn't been prosecuted for bombing an aspirin factory in Syria. Barack authorized drone strikes on Americans citizens and got a pass. Baby Bush outright lied, killed millions, and destabilized an entire region while pumping billions into Dick Cheney's companies. Nobody cares. They get away with this stuff while in office because the only provision for prosecuting them is impeachment and removal from office. That's a political process, not a legal one. Why? Because there is no legal process for punishing a President. They are protected.
"Immune," if you will.
Once a president is out of office does that immunity disappear? If Trump has no immunity, then neither does anyone else. You sure that's the direction you want this to go? You want Trump47's justice department to have the authority to investigate and prosecute his predecessors? This isn't a trivial matter. There are broad and significant implications buried under the surface-level rantings of people trying to "get Trump." That's the broader issue the Supreme Court is considering. Not whether Trump could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and get away with it. He could as President, by the way, 100%. But after leaving office could he be prosecuted for killing that person on 5th Avenue? The answer is not simple, which is probably why you're struggling with it.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Quote, "self-reported'l"Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pmWrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pmAgreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
Are you a pathological liar?
He's had classified documents going back over a decade.
Simpletons regurgitate the BS propaganda fed to them daily, which is what you just did.
A senator, a vice president, etc......
Being in possession of classified documents in multiple unsecured locations, including an unlocked garage, should face serious felony charges.
He's been in possession of these documents for a long time, without self reporting anything.
Understand?
- Sudden Sam
- Official T1B Gigolo
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2022 5:38 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Nahhhhh,Diego. The war with China will push all that shit to the side.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
The difference is that:JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:26 amQuote, "self-reported'l"Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pmWrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm
Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
Are you a pathological liar?
He's had classified documents going back over a decade.
Simpletons regurgitate the BS propaganda fed to them daily, which is what you just did.
A senator, a vice president, etc......
Being in possession of classified documents in multiple unsecured locations, including an unlocked garage, should face serious felony charges.
He's been in possession of these documents for a long time, without self reporting anything.
Understand?
1) NARA never contacted Biden regarding the mission documents, and
2) Biden voluntarily gave up all discovered documents.
Get it, nimrod?
I'm sure that you don't.
Try googling mens rea, idiot.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Nice fantasy.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pmWrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pmAgreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.
Furthermore, numerous constitutional scholars have already weighed in on this matter, and they overwhelmingly are in favor of immunity because otherwise, every living president could easily be indicted for their actions while in office.
Specifically Obama's drone strikes which killed Americans.
Clinton, G W Bush. etc........
Are you really that simple minded?
But I digress...........
Your. 'Self-reported" comment revealed how utterly manipulated you are at the hands of left-wing BS propaganda.
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:30 amThe difference is that:JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:26 amQuote, "self-reported'l"Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm
Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
Are you a pathological liar?
He's had classified documents going back over a decade.
Simpletons regurgitate the BS propaganda fed to them daily, which is what you just did.
A senator, a vice president, etc......
Being in possession of classified documents in multiple unsecured locations, including an unlocked garage, should face serious felony charges.
He's been in possession of these documents for a long time, without self reporting anything.
Understand?
1) NARA never contacted Biden regarding the mission documents, and
2) Biden voluntarily gave up all discovered documents.
Get it, nimrod?
I'm sure that you don't.
Try googling mens rea, idiot.
Your reading skills reveal a very low IQ.
They DON'T have to contact a senator or vice president.
The VERY ACT of being in possession of these classified documents for over a decade, storing them in multiple unsecured locations, ARE ALL SERIOUS FELONIES with VERY SERIOUS national security implications.
The ONLY reason he's not facing criminal charges is because Merrick Garland and the DOJ are criminally corrupt, and they themselves should face obstruction charges.
Hopefully, as soon as #45 becomes #47, his attorney general will assign a special counsel and bring these left-wing crazies to justice.
What the hell is wrong with you?
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
In the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:35 amNice fantasy.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pmWrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:14 pm
Agreed. 100% correct.
Every single one of these indictments brought against president trump by these left-wing crazies, are themselves evidence of a "political witch hunt" by definition.
The fact that leftist Merrick Garland allows president trump to be indicted for the same exact things Alzheimer's Joe is excused of, tells you EVERYTHING you need to know and more.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.On the presidential immunity case that's forthcoming, it will be very interesting to see how the left-wing justices vote.
If the Court issues another UNANIMOUS decision, THAT PROVES that the criminally corrupt left-wing democrats have indeed weaponized the government against president trump.
A 9-0 ruling CONFIRMS what we've already known all along.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.
Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Now you're getting real Nit-pickyDiego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 amIn the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:35 amNice fantasy.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:28 pm
Wrong, but we'd expect nothing more from a simpleton.
Biden's attorneys found documents in a storage unit & self-reported. Biden & his attorneys welcomed an FBI investigation to look for more documents which produced some documents found somewhere else in Delaware (possibly Biden's home). The documents had never been requested back by NARA (including while under the Trump administration) and were voluntarily given back.
NARA requested numerous times that Trump return documents that it knew were missing, and Trump refused to comply. The FBI obtained a search warrant & found some of the missing documents. Trump's lawyers signed an agreement with the DOJ that Trump possessed no other documents. Shortly thereafter the FBI returned & found more documents. So no, this is not the same as Biden. Not even close.
Which shows how little you know about the case. If you had been paying attention during arguments yesterday you'd know that neither Jackson, Kagen nor Sotomayor are voting for Trump.
And the GOP will only lose in a bigger landslide if SCOTUS either rules for Trump or delays their decision until after the election. The overturning of Roe has already incensed most women voters & many male voters. Delaying a decision or outright ruling for Trump would infuriate even more voters (including some Republicans). And after Congress turns very blue I would be on the watch for impeachment hearing for Brett Keggernaugh, Amy Coathanger Barrett, Clarence RV Thomas and Thomas Fisherman Alito. Getting the votes in both the House & Senate after all this would not be very difficult.
The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.
Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:04 amNow you're getting real Nit-pickyDiego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 amIn the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:35 am
Nice fantasy.
The presidential immunity already has legal standing, ie.......a case brought against Nixon in 1982.
Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Falsifying business records is....Nit-picky?
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
Here's what you need to know.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:07 amJPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:04 amNow you're getting real Nit-pickyDiego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:59 am
In the decision of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the SCOTUS ruled that a president "is entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."
Now would you like to explain how paying off two pron actresses to remain silent about their adulterous affairs is an official act of a president?![]()
Falsifying business records is....Nit-picky?
First, according to every single person doing business in New York, president trump should NEVER have been charged. It's a political witch hunt that Bragg is conducting here.
Obviously, they got a hostile jury of democrats, HOWEVER, trump's "ace in the hole" are the two lawyers on the jury who are familiar with what Bragg is trying to do.
We saw Fani Willis and her punk boyfriend commit perjury. ALL part of the biggest political witch hunt in our nation's history.
You claim everyone is turning against president trump? You must be watching NPR. 24/7.
Because all the current polling suggests that president trump has increased his support from 2020 across every demographic.
INCLUDING minorities and the suburban areas.
Another perfect storm is coming this November.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: A brilliant student of history
You must not have been paying attention when jury selection was going on. Lots of potential jurors indicated that they didn't like him.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:58 amHere's what you need to know.
First, according to every single person doing business in New York, president trump should NEVER have been charged. It's a political witch hunt that Bragg is conducting here.
Obviously, they got a hostile jury of democrats, HOWEVER, trump's "ace in the hole" are the two lawyers on the jury who are familiar with what Bragg is trying to do.
We saw Fani Willis and her punk boyfriend commit perjury. ALL part of the biggest political witch hunt in our nation's history.
You claim everyone is turning against president trump? You must be watching NPR. 24/7.
Because all the current polling suggests that president trump has increased his support from 2020 across every demographic.
INCLUDING minorities and the suburban areas.
Another perfect storm is coming this November.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
-
- Elwood
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2023 3:12 pm
Re: A brilliant student of history
NYC and DC are 98% left-wing democrats, sheep.Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 2:06 amYou must not have been paying attention when jury selection was going on. Lots of potential jurors indicated that they didn't like him.JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2024 1:58 amHere's what you need to know.
First, according to every single person doing business in New York, president trump should NEVER have been charged. It's a political witch hunt that Bragg is conducting here.
Obviously, they got a hostile jury of democrats, HOWEVER, trump's "ace in the hole" are the two lawyers on the jury who are familiar with what Bragg is trying to do.
We saw Fani Willis and her punk boyfriend commit perjury. ALL part of the biggest political witch hunt in our nation's history.
You claim everyone is turning against president trump? You must be watching NPR. 24/7.
Because all the current polling suggests that president trump has increased his support from 2020 across every demographic.
INCLUDING minorities and the suburban areas.
Another perfect storm is coming this November.
To be fair, the trial should've been moved to either Montana or Utah.