Trump/GOP bullshit

[HighPlainsGrifter]

Quit deflecting about the damn headline.

trump is talking about using our military against American citizens.

That is completely fucked up from anyone, and especially from a POTUS candidate.

He's talking about using the military in response to potentially violent extremists. Like the ones rioting in 2016. Are you really this daft?

[FiatLux]

Quit deflecting about the damn headline.

trump is talking about using our military against American citizens.

That is completely fucked up from anyone, and especially from a POTUS candidate.

He's talking about using the military in response to potentially violent extremists. Like the ones rioting in 2016. Are you really this daft?

But not the ones at the Capitol.


Go fuck yourself Nazi.

[HighPlainsGrifter]

Quit deflecting about the damn headline.

trump is talking about using our military against American citizens.

That is completely fucked up from anyone, and especially from a POTUS candidate.

He's talking about using the military in response to potentially violent extremists. Like the ones rioting in 2016. Are you really this daft?

But not the ones at the Capitol.


Go fuck yourself Nazi.

Trump requested National Guard (you know...military) at the Capitol. Dear Gawd you're a dumb motherfucker.

[FiatLux]

He's talking about using the military in response to potentially violent extremists. Like the ones rioting in 2016. Are you really this daft?

But not the ones at the Capitol.


Go fuck yourself Nazi.

Trump requested National Guard (you know...military) at the Capitol. Dear Gawd you're a dumb motherfucker.

Then where were they?

L. 109-364 enables the President to call up the National Guard of the United States for active federal military service during Congressionally sanctioned national emergency or war. Places the National Guard Bureau directly under the Department of Defense as a joint activity.

Take your time shit for brains.


I'll be waiting.



Psst...

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/1 ... d-00152757

Donald Trump could have cleared up confusion and hastened the arrival of National Guard troops to quell the Capitol riot if he’d called Pentagon leaders on Jan. 6, 2021, according to recent closed-door congressional testimony by two former leaders of the D.C. guard.

[Roux]

trump wanted the National Guard to protect his supporters, not to protect the Capitol from his supporters. Link

The conclusion remains the same: fuck trump.

[HighPlainsGrifter]

You guys can rewrite history and claim Trump woudashouldacoulda done a hundred things. Rhetoricals and theoreticals are not as compelling as actual history. What Trump ACTUALLY DID was ask for NG troops and his request was denied. That's real history. That actually happened. And that's the one thing you refuse to talk about because the orange man is bad and history must be rewritten to prove it. Fuck off.

[FiatLux]

What Trump ACTUALLY DID was ask for NG troops and his request was denied.

I laughed.


Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops on Jan. 6

CLAIM: Former President Donald Trump signed an order to deploy 20,000 National Guard troops before his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but was stopped by the House sergeant at arms, at the behest of Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. While Trump was involved in discussions in the days prior to Jan. 6 about the National Guard response, he issued no such order before or during the rioting. Speaker Pelosi does not control National Guard troops.

Trumpers are the dumbest motherfuckers in the country.

[Sven Golly]

Quit deflecting about the damn headline.

trump is talking about using our military against American citizens.

That is completely fucked up from anyone, and especially from a POTUS candidate.

Are you really this delusional?

And you keep believing the "dictator on day one" and "fine people on both sides" shit, so you'll believe anything.

It must be exhausting for you to be worrying so much about things that didn't or won't happen.

Go back to the fetal position. We'll let you know when it's all over on Nov 6th.

[Mikey]

But January 6 was just a normal day in DC with maybe a few more peaceful visitors than normal. Why would he order a bunch of NG to be deployed?

[Roux]

Literally a fox news video of trump wanting to use the military against U.S. citizens, and trump supporters still don't believe it and continue to support him.

You are in a cult.

[HighPlainsGrifter]

I tried to enter Fort Hood illegally and the US Government LITERALLY USED THE MILITARY against me, a US citizen, and removed me from the area. They even threatened me with further punishment!

[Sven Golly]

Literally a fox news video of trump wanting to use the military against U.S. citizens, and trump supporters still don't believe it and continue to support him.

You are in a cult.

But a good cult, wouldn't you agree?

I also recall one Joe Biden saying he would use the military against US citizens - I think F-15's were the weapons of choice?

[Roux]

But a good cult, wouldn't you agree?

If you consider cancer good, then yes.

[The Seer]

b

Trump conviction could be thrown out by NY Court of Appeals — No one in mainstream media is writing about this hearing.


https://x.com/i/status/1845923593990918254

[HighPlainsGrifter]

Literally a fox news video of trump wanting to use the military against U.S. citizens, and trump supporters still don't believe it and continue to support him.

You are in a cult.

But a good cult, wouldn't you agree?

I also recall one Joe Biden saying he would use the military against US citizens - I think F-15's were the weapons of choice?

Black Jesus literally used Military drone strikes to kill American citizens without trial.

But Trump!

[The Seer]

You think the bankers are up to no good? No band of scoundrels has brought more chaos and grief to the life of this republic than the claque that gathers darkly under the banner of “Lawfare.” Its public face is Lawfaremedia.org, run by Benjamin Wittes, a Brookings senior fellow, but that gang functions only to lend a false-front of decorum to the operations of its Democratic Party activist lawyer-army led by Field Marshal Marc Elias, architect of the ballot fraud that has caused Americans to lose faith in their elections.

Marc Elias was the original expeditor of the RussiaGate hoax in 2016 from his perch at Perkins Coie, then Hillary Clinton’s campaign law firm, which laundered payments to Christopher Steele, front-man for Glenn Simpson’s Fusion GPS political PR shop, which concocted the fraudulent “dossier” and set in motion a train of DC intel blob legal shenanigans aimed at defenestrating Donald Trump from the White House — the Mueller Investigation, impeachment, etc.

While all that was going on through the Trump term, and with the Covid-19 Op providing cover, Mr. Elias engineered the 2020 changes in many states’ election laws and bylaws to permit large-scale mail-in voting, organized ballot-harvesting activities, and introduce the use of drop-boxes for receiving bundled votes. He and his George Soros-financed staff lawyers sued states that attempted to require voter-identification, and provided legal protection for Mark Zuckerberg’s $419-million-dollar assault on election precinct staffing in swing states. When the 2020 election concluded suspiciously, Mr. Elias and his gang joined lawsuits in every case where the balloting was contested and got more than sixty of them dismissed on the basis of “standing,” without the merits of the cases being heard. This is Lawfare.

[Roux]

and got more than sixty of them dismissed on the basis of “standing,” without the merits of the cases being heard.

This simply is not true, even if it was in bold and underlined.

[The Seer]

and got more than sixty of them dismissed on the basis of “standing,” without the merits of the cases being heard.

This simply is not true, even if it was in bold and underlined.

The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to an unprecedented wave of election litigation.

A FRONTLINE analysis of two databases tracking lawsuits found that more than 400 election-related cases have been filed in the U.S. in 2020 by political parties, campaign committees, activists and individual voters. The majority of cases have focused on voting by mail in the midst of COVID-19, voting in person during the pandemic, and the counting of a historic number of mail-in ballots, FRONTLINE found.

The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to an unprecedented wave of election litigation.

A FRONTLINE analysis of two databases tracking lawsuits found that more than 400 election-related cases have been filed in the U.S. in 2020 by political parties, campaign committees, activists and individual voters. The majority of cases have focused on voting by mail in the midst of COVID-19, voting in person during the pandemic, and the counting of a historic number of mail-in ballots, FRONTLINE found.

In general, this year’s lawsuits fall into two broad categories: Liberal groups have sought to loosen voting procedures, and conservatives have tried to tighten them. Cases range from mail-in and curbside voting to lack of safety measures at polling places. Other lawsuits tackle early voting, voter registration, photo ID and witness signature requirements, as well as voting rights for those with a felony conviction.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/arti ... s-history/


Republican plaintiffs filed 76 post-election lawsuits in matters pertaining to the presidential election. In accordance with state laws governing election challenges, the overwhelming majority of these cases were filed in state courts. In the courtroom, these lawsuits yielded no meaningful success for plaintiffs. In the court of public opinion , however, they contributed to an erosion of trust in the democratic process. This article analyzes the evolution of these 76 post-election lawsuits relating to the presidential race and the unique nature of their claims in each of six battleground states. It also examines how judges reckoned with the issues in these lawsuits and what role the U.S. Supreme Court played. The Appendix briefly summarizes 95 post-Election Day lawsuits—82 related to the general election and 13 related to the U.S. Senate runoff election in Georgia.

Of the remaining 66 cases, one of the most common bases on which judges rejected a case was for “lack of standing.” That is, judges found that (i) plaintiffs had not articulated a particularized harm that they uniquely had suffered, (ii) that their injury was not traceable to the named defendant, or (iii) that a favorable decision would not redress the purported injury.

So, Judges decided.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://web.mit.edu/healthyelections/ww ... alysis.pdf

[Diego in Seattle]

He's got you now, Roux. He used a few words that were in....ALL CAPITALS!!!!

[Screw_Michigan]

Grandpa needs to be institutionalized. Even the puppy killer thinks he's off his rocker

1:49:00 is when the good stuff starts

1:59:00 is pretty fucking funny too

https://youtu.be/l3sxCuOExf4?t=6531

[Roux]

Of course some of the suits were dismissed from a lack of standing. But plenty went to the merits, and were found lacking.



American Bar Association: Litigation in the 2020 Election

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election

[Roux]

Trump refusing to go on 60 Minutes

vs

Harris going on Fox to be interviewed




Harris

[Screw_Michigan]

Grandpa needs to be institutionalized. Even the puppy killer thinks he's off his rocker

1:49:00 is when the good stuff starts

1:59:00 is pretty fucking funny too

https://youtu.be/l3sxCuOExf4?t=6531

The Post nailed the incident

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... town-hall/

I want Grandpa to be my president


Sincerely,
Slobbering Sam, 88braincells, et al

[Roux]

His actual teleprompter

[The Seer]

Of course some of the suits were dismissed from a lack of standing. But plenty went to the merits, and were found lacking.



American Bar Association: Litigation in the 2020 Election

Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections

Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 U.S. presidential election

From the CLC: - Frivolous Mass Challenges to Voter Eligibility Damaging to Democracy (2022)

Today: DOJ sues Virginia over removing non-citizens from voter rolls ahead of November election

"With less than 30 days until the election, the Biden-Harris Department of Justice is filing an unprecedented lawsuit against me and the Commonwealth of Virginia, for appropriately enforcing a 2006 law signed by Democrat Tim Kaine that requires Virginia to remove noncitizens from the voter rolls - a process that starts with someone declaring themselves a non-citizen and then registering to vote," Youngkin said in a statement Friday.

They'll summon Lynn Cheney to chime in and say a bipartisan group found this baseless.

[Screw_Michigan]

[Screw_Michigan]

[Roux]

Trump refusing to go on 60 Minutes

vs

Harris going on Fox to be interviewed




Harris

And now trump abruptly cancels another mainstream TV interview.

Won't release medical records. He's acting, well, weird in multiple public situations. Won't do interviews.

Perhaps that is normal when you're the oldest candidate on a presidential ballot in our nation's history. In any event, he's certainly demonstrating that he's not up for the task of serving as POTUS.

[HighPlainsGrifter]

Won't do interviews.

Wow.

Just wow. This shit you'll believe is staggaring.

[Roux]

Did he do 60 Minutes, like every nominee has done for the past 50 years, and I missed it?

Did he actually go on CNBC and that article was wrong?


Surely even you can see that trump is circling in the toilet bowl now. Things are bad for him, and they are getting worse.

[Sudden Sam]

Perhaps that is normal when you're the oldest candidate on a presidential ballot in our nation's history. In any event, he's certainly demonstrating that he's not up for the task of serving as POTUS.

But you said Biden was fine back in June.

[Sven Golly]

Did he do 60 Minutes, like every nominee has done for the past 50 years, and I missed it?

Did he actually go on CNBC and that article was wrong?


Surely even you can see that trump is circling in the toilet bowl now. Things are bad for him, and they are getting worse.

My God you're marinating in your own ignorance.

Harris is desperate so she's throwing Hail Mary's.

If Brett Baier does his job, she'll be more humiliated. If that's even possible at this point.

[FiatLux]

Perhaps that is normal when you're the oldest candidate on a presidential ballot in our nation's history. In any event, he's certainly demonstrating that he's not up for the task of serving as POTUS.

But you said Biden was fine back in June.

You have more important things to worry about.

3:30pm on Saturday.

[HighPlainsGrifter]

Did he do 60 Minutes, like every nominee has done for the past 50 years, and I missed it?

Did he actually go on CNBC and that article was wrong?


Surely even you can see that trump is circling in the toilet bowl now. Things are bad for him, and they are getting worse.

Oh I get it. You decided which interviews a political opponent should and shouldn't do, and then get upset when he doesn't do them. I can also play that game.

Kamala isn't doing interviews because she hasn't sat down with Glenn Beck, Dan Bongino, Tucker Carlson, or Jesse Waters, all of whom have more viewership than CBS and CNBC. Why is she hiding?

[Sudden Sam]

Perhaps that is normal when you're the oldest candidate on a presidential ballot in our nation's history. In any event, he's certainly demonstrating that he's not up for the task of serving as POTUS.

But you said Biden was fine back in June.

You have more important things to worry about.

3:30pm on Saturday.

You’re goddam right!

Fuck this political bullshit.

[FiatLux]

But you said Biden was fine back in June.

You have more important things to worry about.

3:30pm on Saturday.

You’re goddam right!

Fuck this political bullshit.

Yeah, let's go with the funny.

[Roux]

trump says Jan. 6 was a "day of love," glossing over his supporters' assault on officers

Washington — Former President donald trump insisted that the Jan. 6 attack, when his supporters stormed the Capitol and assaulted scores of law enforcement officers, was not a day of violence, but a "day of love" when "nothing" was "done wrong."

Fuck absolutely everything about that lying, disgusting felon.

[Sven Golly]

trump says Jan. 6 was a "day of love," glossing over his supporters' assault on officers

Washington — Former President donald trump insisted that the Jan. 6 attack, when his supporters stormed the Capitol and assaulted scores of law enforcement officers, was not a day of violence, but a "day of love" when "nothing" was "done wrong."

Fuck absolutely everything about that lying, disgusting felon.

Better get used to the "felon".

After Cackle's immolation yesterday evening, it's all over.

[Screw_Michigan]

All this Dump nonsense about the "enemy within." His swiss cheese brain is completely incapable of stringing even two sentences together anymore. This is the only Enemy Within that I care about.

[Roux]

Rack