
Note: fuck you all. King of page 151.

Moderator: Jesus H Christ
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Carson wrote:Uhh, no.
Lawrence O'Donnell?
Really???
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 12:03 am How interesting.
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal trade court on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump from imposing
sweeping tariffs on imports under an emergency-powers law.
The Seer wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 7:49 amSoftball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 12:03 am How interesting.
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal trade court on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump from imposing
sweeping tariffs on imports under an emergency-powers law.
Unless we start seeing democRats paying for their crimes I will concede the swamp is undrainable.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
So, what's your point?The Seer wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 4:22 pm
2017 - Trump's 1st term:
Trump sued nearly three times more than predecessors: report
In his first three months in office, President Trump has been sued in federal court 134 times – nearly three times more than his three most recent predecessors combined, according to a tally of lawsuits by the Boston Globe.
2025 Trump's 2nd term:
220 lawsuits in 100 days: Trump administration faces unprecedented legal blitz
The administration has been sued over nearly every element of Trump's agenda.
Since Donald Trump took office 100 days ago, the president and his administration have faced an average of more than two lawsuits per day, challenging nearly every element of his agenda.
The breakneck pace of the president's policies has been matched in nearly equal force by a flood of litigation -- at least 220 lawsuits in courts across the country -- challenging more than two dozen executive orders, the firing of twenty high-ranking government officials, and dozens of other executive actions.
While the Trump administration has had some victories in the courts, federal judges have blocked key parts of Trump's agenda ranging from parts of his immigration policy and military guidelines to his effort to roll back diversity and equity initiatives.
Just a coincidence that almost all of the "judges" are neo marxist judges from blue districts.
Meanwhile the federal trade deficit for 2024 was ONE TRILLION dollars. So yeah, why do anything to correct that?
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 12:41 pm How about an activist president?
One of the judges was a Dump appointee, and one was a Reagan appointee.
Try a new talking point.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
The Seer wrote:Meanwhile the federal trade deficit for 2024 was ONE TRILLION dollars. So yeah, why do anything to correct that?
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
The Federal Government does not run a trade deficit. The trade deficit and the budget deficit are two completely different things.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Agreed. What are the chances* that ever happens?Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu May 29, 2025 10:19 pm Rather than sharp increases in tariffs, addressing the federal budget would have a greater impact on the trade deficit.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Agree. The country was much better off having a puppet wander around aimlessly and mumbling incoherently while the US got fucked by it's trade partners RATHER than deploy various tactics to end getting screwed. Let's see if he takes his ball and goes home or there is some kind of compromise that evens out the imbalances to some extent...
You’ve not added or proven anything here. The trade deficit is not a function of the federal government. It’s how much we as a country buy from other countries vs how much we sell. The federal government doesn’t “sell” anything except, in the case of your Dear Leader, a whole lot of bullshit.The Seer wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 2:13 am
Trump’s nemesis, the US trade deficit, hit record high in 2024
The U.S. goods trade deficit increased in 2024 to a record $1.2 trillion, putting a target on countries around the world as President Donald Trump considers new tariffs.
The Commerce Department report also showed the United States ran record bilateral trade deficits with Mexico, Vietnam, India, Taiwan, South Korea and the 27-nation European Union.
The EU data included record high trade deficits with two members, Germany and Ireland, that Trump advisers complain benefit unfairly from the EU’s value-added tax system.
The annual report takes on increased significance this year because of Trump’s conviction that the deficit shows the U.S. is being treated unfairly in trade and his eagerness to use tariffs for a variety of purposes, including to try to rebalance trade with other countries.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/0 ... 4-00202569
Oh...and,
Federal refers to a system of government where power is divided between a central authority and individual states or regions. It can also relate specifically to the central government of a federation, such as the United States government.
Maybe "dumbfuck" was projection.
You’ve not added or proven anything here. The trade deficit is not a function of the federal government. It’s how much we as a country buy from other countries vs how much we sell. The federal government doesn’t “sell” anything except, in the case of your Dear Leader, a whole lot of bullshit.Mikey wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 2:29 pm Oh...and,
Federal refers to a system of government where power is divided between a central authority and individual states or regions. It can also relate specifically to the central government of a federation, such as the United States government.
Maybe "dumbfuck" was projection.
Over the years I have put up literally dozens of posts describing my disgust with U.S. economic policy, and specifically, my disgust with the fact that we routinely carry on with massive deficit spending.The Seer wrote:Funny how in Cuckville you don't mind getting fucked for years but if it isn't fixed in a month or two of trying you become hysterical.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
You don't think Trump wouldn't cut spending bigly if he could get it past the swamp? Look at the activist neo marxist judges that thwart every attempt he makes at cost cutting (and everything else that needs fixing). Pols on both sides of aisle getting kickbacks from foreign Govts and billionaires getting products sold there...at the expense of the budget.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 3:12 pm
If Dumpy were serious, we would not see him pursuing this massive deficit spending bill that he is pursuing.
And we would not see him pursuing an utterly chaotic trade war with the world.
If Cheeto were serious, we would see...
1. A spending bill that reflects an earnest intent on getting out of control deficits under control.
And what you think this man is trying to accomplish is not what he is really trying to accomplish.