Bushice:
That the war in Iraq is NOT protecting us from terrorists hidden here, never will.
No shit, idiot. Again, as I noted yesterday when you first ran this line...this was never the intent of the war in Iraq, fool.
It has been widely reported they are coordinated smaller groups of local men, primarily sunnis who are unhappy with the direction the new government is heading in.
Here you go again trying to tell us that the insurgents are locals. :roll:
How are they supposed to get here? Walk? It's less than 500 miles from Baghdad to Jordan and the two countries share a common border. Anyone from that region could there there in a matter of a few days. Bad argument.
Damn, ignore the obvious point?
Your assertion is that those fighting in Iraq hardly would be coming here. First, you do not know who these insurgents are. You still believe that there are merely locals. Second, knowing that wave after wave of insurgents are coming into Iraq from neighboring countries it's not a stretch to believe that if they are willing to travel to Iraq to fight us that they would also be willing to travel elsewhere to attack the US whether it is to Jordan to attack US naval vessels or elsewhere to attack embassies, etc.
Yes. Bush made that a lower priority a couple of years ago, for some unknown reason.
Not for unknown reason, idiot. You just don't agree with the war in Iraq so you'll attempt to argue that the mission strategy re: bin laden is flawed despite not knowing what it is nor offering some alternative.
We are doing little to nothing to root out terrorists here, we are not capturing the people coordinating attacks elsewhere.
We're not, eh? The FBI, ATF, CIA, DIA, NSA, DoJ, TSA, etc., are all doing nothing, eh? Nothing at all...
And you expect to be taken seriously?
Dumbshit, just because they might not be doing what you believe..err..what Howard Dean or Hillary Clinton..think they ought to be doing doesn't mean that nothing is being done.
Iraq is a quagmire.
Yeah, yah, blah, blah. Afghanistan was also a "quagmire" 30 days into it. Iraq was a "quagmire" according to you idiots literally four days into it. Sorry, but seeing your other arguments, you calling Iraq a "quagmire" means literally nothing.
As soon as we do leave, civil war will break out because that is what happens in a divided society that uses violence as a means to an end.
If you say so...
So don't give me that crap about the IRaq war being a success and try and convinvce me it will accomplish the goal of wiping out terrorism here by fighting over there.
1) I didn't call Iraq a "success." It's a work in progress. However, it's certainly not the "quagmire" that you calling it and it certainly is not a failure.
2) No one ever said that the war in Iraq would root out terrorists already here. However, that we are grinding terrorists down there is certainly a better alternative to doing here in the states, wouldn't you agree?
There will eventually be an incident here somewhere because not enough is being done to prevent it.
You cannot prevent 100% of the attempts, idiot. So, of course, there will be another incident, but not because enough is being done. We are human. Humans are infallible, idiot, we make mistakes.
But your nonsense that nothing is being done stateside is just bogus rubbish that demonstrates that you have no good faith argument and will rely on hyperbole and rhetoric to whine that Bush sucks. At least when I hammer Bush it's reasonable, valid criticism.
