mvscal wrote:
Offensive scoring:
Passing yards:
1 pt. per 50 yards passing, 3 point bonuses at 300, 350, 400 & 500. -2 pts per int, 2pts per passing 2 pt conversion
________________________________________________
Rushing yards (we just tweaked scoring a bit this year):
1 pt per 20 yards (was 25), 3 point bonus at 100, 125, 150, 200
Running backs score .5 pt per reception, 2pts for 2pt conversion
___________________________________________________
Receiving yards:
1pt per 25 yards, 3 point bonus at 100, 150, 200, 250
1pt per reception, 2 pts per receiving 2pt conversion
__________________________________________________
Roster:
1 QB
1 RB
2 WR/TE
1 D/ST
1 Kicker
2 Wild Card positions (must be RB or WR/TE)
In Yardage leagues, the easiest way to determine if a scoring system makes any sense is to look at generaly accepted average of a good game and compare the points - tweaking is usually done from there.
You didn't say what TD are worth - In most leagues it's 6 pts. rush or receive and 4 pts for passing
In your scoring system - based on yardage:
QB - 300 yds passing = 9 pts.
RB - 100 yds. rushing = 8 pts.
WR - 100 yds. receiving = 7 pts.
The basis on yardage shows WR at slight disadvantage so let's look at what happens when we add in 6 Receptions (about the average to get 100 yds.) to the yardage listed above
QB - 9 pts. (No change)
RB - 11 pts.
WR - 13 pts.
Since there's no bonus for big plays - a WR is 18% more valuable than a RB and 44% more valuable than a QB.
You don't show any penalty points for fumbles, yet Qb's get docked 2 pts per INT.
That's a pretty skewed scoring system and explains a lot about your choice of Holt.
The smart player would have drafted 2 WR in the first rounds and waited for a QB till the late rounds