Is the Pac 10 really this good?

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:45 am

Sure as hell looks like it...

It's gonna be hell... in the toughest conference in college football.

Let the conference games, begin... :twisted:

the truth

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:47 am

yup.

sin,

Oregon State

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:51 am

King Crimson wrote:yup.

sin,

Oregon State

Thanks for bringing up the worst team in the conference...

You should know about the "worst" team in a conference...

the truth

GreginPG · Post by **GreginPG** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:53 am

Yup.

Sincerely,

Stanford (who lost to UC Davis at home 20-17) :roll:

P.S. The Pac 10 is a good conference IMO, but the best in college football? Not so much.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 5:58 am

GreginPG wrote:Yup.

Sincerely,

Stanford (who lost to UC Davis at home 20-17) :roll:

P.S. The Pac 10 is a good conference IMO, but the best in college football? Not so much.

It's a UC school, so you knew "The Tree" was gonna get slapped.

Which conference is better ...?

m2

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:04 am

damn, you are good.

GreginPG · Post by **GreginPG** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:25 am

m2 wrote:
GreginPG wrote:Yup.

Sincerely,

Stanford (who lost to UC Davis at home 20-17) :roll:

P.S. The Pac 10 is a good conference IMO, but the best in college football? Not so much.
It's a UC school, so you knew "The Tree" was gonna get slapped.

Which conference is better ...?

m2

Dude, UC Davis is a NON-DIVISION 1 football team! They play in something called the Great West. The Great West includes powerhouses like Cal Poly, Southern Utah, and a couple of directional Dakota schools.

Are you kidding me?

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 6:37 am

GreginPG wrote:
m2 wrote:
GreginPG wrote:Yup.

Sincerely,

Stanford (who lost to UC Davis at home 20-17) :roll:

P.S. The Pac 10 is a good conference IMO, but the best in college football? Not so much.
It's a UC school, so you knew "The Tree" was gonna get slapped.

Which conference is better ...?

m2
Dude, UC Davis is a NON-DIVISION 1 football team! They play in something called the Great West. The Great West includes powerhouses like Cal Poly, Southern Utah, and a couple of directional Dakota schools.

Are you kidding me?

No.

Davis is a UC school, and you need very good grades to get into the school...

Furd, and uSc are private schools, and demand much less of their student body...

Intelligence... plays a much more demanding roll in winning, when all you have is your brain.

the truth

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:34 am

i'm having leftover indian food for a late night snack.

some saffron rice and nan. a little chana masala too.

buckeye_in_sc · Post by **buckeye_in_sc** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:04 pm

sin Arizona

dude Arizona loses to Purdue, ASU loses to LSU, Oregon barely gets by Fresneck State...

boy you really want this board bitch crown don't you...

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:05 pm

Aside from USC and ASU?

No.

Rich Fader · Post by **Rich Fader** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:29 pm

Relax, guys...m2 just has a chubby because Cal's on top of the conference right now...

...and I emphasize right now...

:twisted:

Rich Fader is the truth

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:54 pm

mtard

cal was pushed around for 2 1/2 quarters, by a depleted Illinois team. Yeah, that is something to brag about. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Is Cal scheduling Taco Tech anytime soon? Taco Tech Ownz Cal

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 3:59 pm

Kal was losing to Illinois yesterday.

Yes. Illinois.

BlindRef · Post by **BlindRef** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:05 pm

m2 wrote:
King Crimson wrote:yup.

sin,

Oregon State

Thanks for bringing up the worst team in the conference...

You should know about the "worst" team in a conference...

the truth

I would say the same about Illinois.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:25 pm

BlindRef wrote:
m2 wrote:
King Crimson wrote:yup.

sin,

Oregon State

Thanks for bringing up the worst team in the conference...

You should know about the "worst" team in a conference...

the truth
I would say the same about Illinois.

Illinois is going to suprise some people, now that they're starting to understand what Zook is trying to get them to do.

The spread offense they run, once again had Cal confused and looking like shit. Once the adjustments were made at halftime(Cal is a second half team), they rolled up around 300 yards rushing, and shut down Illinois to the tune of 28-3.

m2

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:45 pm

m2 wrote:(Cal is a second half team)

I laughed.

[web]http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=242830030[/web]

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 7:37 pm

m2 wrote:It's gonna be hell... in the toughest conference in college football.

I didnt know Cal was in the ACC.

Ps. Cal barely beat Illinois. ILLI-FUCKING-NOIS!

How is that an accomplishment?

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:13 pm

If a Pac-10 wins a game vs. a crappy team then that team is underrated. If they lose to a team that would lose to a high school team like Davis then they're underrated and a very good team. Toolshed....give it a rest. the Crap-10 is a 1 team conference. Are you going to tell us that OU was a great team and the Bruins really played their asses off? Cal is going to get smoked by SC. UCLA is going to get smoked by USC, Oregon is going to get smoked by USC. Face it. The Pac-10 is an average conference at best.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:39 pm

Laxplayer wrote: Face it. The Pac-10 is an average conference at best.

And a better conference would be?_________________

p.s. Your broadcast was done well; especially considering the megawatts....

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:28 pm

I think the one with UC Davis is the best.............It really seems like they're all average.

thanks for the compliment. Will you be there Friday?

Roofer · Post by **Roofer** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 11:55 pm

The top 2 Pac 10 teams are SC and SC's second teamers.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:02 am

Laxplayer wrote:I think the one with UC Davis is the best.............It really seems like they're all average.

thanks for the compliment. Will you be there Friday?

Back up to the mountains to murder trout. Gotta take advantage of the bye week....But if I do go to a game at COC, what do I do, moon the broadcast booth or what??????

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:09 am

m2 wrote:Sure as hell looks like it...

It's gonna be hell... in the toughest conference in college football.

Let the conference games, begin... :twisted:

the truth

You have to be kidding?

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:44 am

Drop em baby....no, come up and say hello. Or I'll give you my cell phone number and we'll hook up. but since you're going to hook some trout then fuhget it. Good fishing.

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:17 am

m2 wrote:
GreginPG wrote:
m2 wrote: It's a UC school, so you knew "The Tree" was gonna get slapped.

Which conference is better ...?

m2
Dude, UC Davis is a NON-DIVISION 1 football team! They play in something called the Great West. The Great West includes powerhouses like Cal Poly, Southern Utah, and a couple of directional Dakota schools.

Are you kidding me?
No.

Davis is a UC school, and you need very good grades to get into the school...

Furd, and uSc are private schools, and demand much less of their student body...

Intelligence... plays a much more demanding roll in winning, when all you have is your brain.

the truth

Cant beleive no one else caught this..... its role, tard, keep blowing smoke about Kals tougher standards

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:27 am

just thought it was ironic that he would run so much smack on USC's academic standards and then not know the difference between roll and role

dontcha think?

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:35 am

usually avoid his ren faire dork drivel

he obviously suffers from Trojan envy

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:51 am

SoCalTrjn wrote:
m2 wrote:
GreginPG wrote: Dude, UC Davis is a NON-DIVISION 1 football team! They play in something called the Great West. The Great West includes powerhouses like Cal Poly, Southern Utah, and a couple of directional Dakota schools.

Are you kidding me?
No.

Davis is a UC school, and you need very good grades to get into the school...

Furd, and uSc are private schools, and demand much less of their student body...

Intelligence... plays a much more demanding roll in winning, when all you have is your brain.

the truth
Cant beleive no one else caught this..... its role, tard, keep blowing smoke about Kals tougher standards

Once again...

:Context: alludes SC fan...

In rhetoric, an allusion is the implicit referencing of a related object or circumstance, which has occurred or existed in an external context. An allusion is understandable only to those with prior knowledge of the reference in question (as the writer assumes the reader has). An "allusion" is not the same as an "illusion".

Believe the Heupel wrote:Spelling and grammar smack on mdropout is about as challenging as inducing Babs to post a picture or nine

Once again...

:context: alludes not only SC fan, but OU fan jumps in the fray..

In context with "football" it's roll, and not "role"....

Have you losers' ever read a headline from a newspaper?

You losers make 14 year old girls on cell phones, look like astronauts.. .

m2

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:04 am

Right now it looks to me like the SEC is the best conference followed by the PAC 10, Big 10, ACC and Big 12 :(

But these things run in cycles, the Big 12 will be back as soon as one of the north schools and blOwU can pick up the pieces.

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:10 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Yeah, actually..no.

You're wrong, tard.

You can be on a roll, but you don't play one. You play a role. Like you playing the role of a medieval windchime artist.

My God you're slow...

m2

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:14 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Yeah, actually..no.

You're wrong, tard.

You can be on a roll, but you don't play one. You play a role. Like you playing the role of a medieval windchime artist.

thats not true you can play with a roll if your drunk enough and her rolls are big enough...just ask skull

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:19 am

Vito Corleone wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote:Yeah, actually..no.

You're wrong, tard.

You can be on a roll, but you don't play one. You play a role. Like you playing the role of a medieval windchime artist.
thats not true you can play with a roll if your drunk enough and her rolls are big enough...just ask skull

Now that's funny...

even if it's not in context...

m2

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:17 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:mmhmm.

Spend some time with a dictionary published post-Chaucer and get back to us.

?????

There's a reason why you're "frozen sooner"...

let the bottle bounce...

m2 is the truth

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:36 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Dictionary. It's a big book with words and their definitions.

Frankly(as a matter of speak, or truth), you're boring me...

m2

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 2:55 pm

Boy - I know Stanford has been bad lately, but they are in for a world of hurt - Walt Hairless style.

Squeaking by Navy, Harris took home a game ball because he was "proud". Now, he loses to UC STINKING DAVIS, a 1-AA team.

I wonder...does a school like Stanford actually check references outside of Bill Walsh's office? They seem to be totally insulated from reality. This will not end well for Stanford.

T1B

Is the Pac 10 really this good?

Is the Pac 10 really this good?

Re: Is the Pac 10 really this good?

Re: Is the Pac 10 really this good?