Appears Feinstein vill vote no to confirm Roberts because Roberts didn't talk enough of being a man, father, and husband...
I thought Bush nominated Roberts for Chief Justice of the United States...
What a bunch of idiots. This is truly a humiliating display for the Democrats.
More Democrat nonsense re: John Roberts
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
I'm not complaining about how they are voting. It's just amazing that a nominee that they felt was a terrible threat to civil rights for minorities and women and privacy is all of sudden qualified despite not having assuaged their fear during the hearings or not qualified because he didn't speak to the Committee as a man, a husband, and a father.Mikey wrote:Leahy sucks for voting for Roberts.
Feinstein sucks for voting against him.
At least you're consistent.
You suck just for sucking.
Bwaahahahahaaaa!!! You people are pathetic. You're giving Americans a good laugh this week.
-
See You Next Wednesday
- De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:34 pm
"you people"?
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)