Tom Delay's mug shot

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:01 pm

Ain't it grand?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:35 pm

mvscal wrote:Why is your copy all sticky?

Only after you got your hands on it.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:38 pm

Nice red x.

MSUFAN · Post by **MSUFAN** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:55 am

He hasn't went in, dude. Nice try, though.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:13 am

MSUFAN wrote:He hasn't went in, dude. Nice try, though.

Go to Smoking Gun and check out the mug shot archives. Or maybe go to Google News. You didn't think he'd be stupid enough to go in all dishevled like Glen Campbell?

MSUFAN · Post by **MSUFAN** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:24 am

BSmack wrote:
MSUFAN wrote:He hasn't went in, dude. Nice try, though.
Go to Smoking Gun and check out the mug shot archives. Or maybe go to Google News. You didn't think he'd be stupid enough to go in all dishevled like Glen Campbell?

You're right. I just saw it on the news. Had'nt had the TV on today.

And you're right again. That "look", is the one of some computerized, meglomaniac mold machine, that's placated on all shifty, underhanded, schrills like him. That "mug" is frozen on his grill for eons to come. It's the mug of a snakeoil salesman. What can I say.

tough love · Post by **tough love** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 11:25 am

Just in time for christmas, P_Uglytell brings you; The Bilingual Tom Delay Action Figure Doll.
Push the button on his lapel, and he lie$ in English, and in Spanish.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:39 pm

Now the idiot has a problem with not only the prosecutor, but the judge as well. It must be a left wing conspiracy!! ;)

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 12:56 pm

Well, the judge did contribute to Democratic candidates. During the Hutchinson case the initial judge recused himself because he had contributed to Hutchinson and other Republicans.

The mere appearance of conflict I recall led Democrats to demand that Kennedy recuse himself regarding the Cheney energy meeting notes. Why should it be any different here, Diego.

As well, the Prosecutor has admitted that he doesn't have the actual evidence that implicates DeLay nor evidence that seven Republicans received corporate dollars...

Yeah, I'd say DeLay should have a problem with this guy who also, while pursuing this case permitted a left-wing activist unprecedented access to film the whole thing.

I wonder why the media has ignored the grand jury shopping that Earle has gone through... :roll:

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:29 pm

Here's a better pic.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 3:48 pm

B is indicative of his party and media...

You people abandon any notion of innocent until proven guilty when it comes to mere indictments of Republicans...but not for child molesters, rapists, murderers, terrorists...

Quite the irony.

Criminalization of politics...thanks, Dems.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 5:38 pm

DrDetroit wrote:You people abandon any notion of innocent until proven guilty when it comes to mere indictments of Republicans...but not for child molesters, rapists, murderers, terrorists...

I see nothing in this thread wherein anybody said he was either innocent or guilty....just a mug shot.

Is it tough wearing that scarlet R and playing the victim all of the time?

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 5:54 pm

Felix wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:You people abandon any notion of innocent until proven guilty when it comes to mere indictments of Republicans...but not for child molesters, rapists, murderers, terrorists...
I see nothing in this thread wherein anybody said he was either innocent or guilty....just a mug shot.

Is it tough wearing that scarlet R and playing the victim all of the time?

shifty, underhanded, schrills like him.

I wouldn't exactly call that an objective take.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 5:56 pm

Felix wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:You people abandon any notion of innocent until proven guilty when it comes to mere indictments of Republicans...but not for child molesters, rapists, murderers, terrorists...
I see nothing in this thread wherein anybody said he was either innocent or guilty....just a mug shot.

Is it tough wearing that scarlet R and playing the victim all of the time?

Yeah, the prison garb that B has him in doesn't at all suggest that B believes he is guilty... :roll:

BTW - reading about Rove, Libby, and Cheney re: Valerie Plame, one certainly does not get the impression that the NYT or WaPo believe they are innocent...

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:29 pm

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:31 pm

titlover wrote:
Felix wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:You people abandon any notion of innocent until proven guilty when it comes to mere indictments of Republicans...but not for child molesters, rapists, murderers, terrorists...
I see nothing in this thread wherein anybody said he was either innocent or guilty....just a mug shot.

Is it tough wearing that scarlet R and playing the victim all of the time?
shifty, underhanded, schrills like him.

I wouldn't exactly call that an objective take.

Why not? It happens to be true.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:51 pm

titlover wrote:
shifty, underhanded, schrills like him.

I wouldn't exactly call that an objective take.

Well, he is shifty and underhanded....just like every other politician.

I don't however view that as a pronunciation of his innocence or guilt, just an observation........

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:54 pm

Felix wrote:
titlover wrote:
shifty, underhanded, schrills like him.

I wouldn't exactly call that an objective take.
Well, he is shifty and underhanded....just like every other politician.

I don't however view that as a pronunciation of his innocence or guilt, just an observation........

oh i think it gives an insight as to BallSmack's opinion of him. no doubt.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:02 pm

titlover wrote: oh i think it gives an insight as to BallSmack's opinion of him. no doubt.

No offense, but you might want to check who actually wrote that phrase before you start crackin on him......

MSUFAN wrote:
....all shifty, underhanded, schrills like him.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:49 am

Felix wrote:
titlover wrote: oh i think it gives an insight as to BallSmack's opinion of him. no doubt.
No offense, but you might want to check who actually wrote that phrase before you start crackin on him......

MSUFAN wrote:
....all shifty, underhanded, schrills like him.

seriously, what's the diff?