Welcome to the Furher Bunker 2005

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:38 pm

Do you think he's having spanking parties with Harriet Miers and Condi Rice as he orders imaginary divisions into battle?

President of the United States is a bitter, frustrated, raving batshit loon

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:41 pm

Since when is a reporters speculation of a President's behavior relevant?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:44 pm

DrDetroit wrote:Since when is a reporters speculation of a President's behavior relevant?

The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is in a better postition to assess the mental state of the President than you.

You may now put your head back in the sand.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:50 pm

The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:52 pm

DrDetroit wrote:The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.

Do you seriously think a major daily newspaper would allow their Washington Bureau Chief to write a piece like that if he DIDN'T have multiple sources?

Your boy is cracking.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:54 pm

BSmack wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.
Do you seriously think a major daily newspaper would allow their Washington Bureau Chief to write a piece like that if he DIDN'T have multiple sources?

Your boy is cracking.

Bwahahahaaaaa...his editors actually care about the alleged sources he has??

I'm sorry, but lets drop the pretense here and just admit that his article simple reflects what he perceives the President's behavior/attitude to be and that he only sought those alleged "sources" that agreed with him...okay?

Come on...there's unanimous agreement that the President is behaving this way?

If you want to see cracking, you need look no further than your party's leadership.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:57 pm

DrDetroit wrote:Come on...there's unanimous agreement that the President is behaving this way?

You failed logic. Didn't you?

Feel free to cite something to rebutt this article. I'm sure Rove ...err Libby... err Delay... err Frist..

Shit, is there a Republican NOT being indicted?

Anyway, I'm sure Free Republic will have your talking points up in an hour.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:00 pm

How exactly do you rebut anonymous sources? of whom you do not know their relationship to the principal, level of interaction, or otherwise?

I failed logic because I choose not to accept the rumor-mongering of anonymous sources telling a one-sided story??

DeLay gets indicted and now the entire Republican Party has been indicted?? Yet, you're going to assert that Bush is cracking?? Bwahahahahahaaa!!!

BTW - your sarcastic appeal to whatever sources I might rely on for information only demonstrates that you, too, don't even buy what this hack is selling.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:02 pm

DrDetroit wrote:I failed logic.

I know.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:04 pm

Who gives a shit?

So he reads the riot act to some staffers that prove to be fuck ups every now & then. So fucking what? It's not like he's shoving cigars up their asses.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:05 pm

JHawkBCD wrote:Who gives a shit?

So he reads the riot act to some staffers that prove to be fuck ups every now & then. So fucking what? It's not like he's shoving cigars up their asses.

No, he leaves that to the MPs.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:07 pm

BSmack wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:The Daily News Washington Bureau Chief is merely closer to the White House than I am. Period. That you rely on this guy as a barmometer of the President's mental state is quite revealing.
Do you seriously think a major daily newspaper would allow their Washington Bureau Chief to write a piece like that if he DIDN'T have multiple sources?

You're right.... News sources never report anything without verifying it!

Sin,

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:08 pm

Will the libs be this bitter when Hillary loses in 2008?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:10 pm

BBMarley wrote:You're right.... News sources never report anything without verifying it!

The difference is Turd Blossom is too busy to plant stories at CBS.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:10 pm

Cicero wrote:Will the libs be this bitter when Hillary loses in 2008?

No, they will support the Democratic nominee. And that won't be Hillary.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:12 pm

mvscal wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:
Cicero wrote:Will the libs be this bitter when Hillary loses in 2008?
Just in case y'all consider me a lib,
You are a lib. So save the bullshit.

Compared to you, Himmler was a liberal.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:31 pm

Libby and Rove have been indicted ?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:37 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:Libby and Rove have been indicted ?

One doesn't need to be indicted to be exposed as scum.

You implying that no proof or evidence, that a trial by jury is not necessary ?

I see. So why do we have laws against slander ?

tough love · Post by **tough love** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:57 pm

"The President is just unhappy in general and casting blame all about," said one Bush insider.

Someone tell daddy's little idiot to check out a mirror.
What's his problem, anyway.
It's not like he was going to run again, or does he not know that.

Anywho, the po$er can take his place in history next to the likes of the other poli_butchers.

Variable · Post by **Variable** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:15 pm

L to R: BSmack, Detroit

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:17 pm

Mike,

You should wytch a Louisville Slugger in the hands of the chick on the left and send it to Dave. He'd love it.

Variable · Post by **Variable** » Mon Oct 24, 2005 6:41 pm

Even better, I asked 3putt to do it for me. :D

Nishlord · Post by **Nishlord** » Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:06 am

Bush usually reserves his celebrated temper for senior aides because he knows they can take it.

What 'celebrated temper' might this be? 'Celebrated inability to stop speaking like a window-licker', more like.

DrDetroit · Post by **DrDetroit** » Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:05 pm

He quietly explained how Rove's arrival had poisoned the judicial climate by putting politics above matters of law and justice—"collateral damage," he called it, from the win-at-all-costs attitude that now prevails in judicial races.

Oh, that's what he calls it...okay.

"We were trying to counter the positives from that ad," a former Rove staffer told me, explaining that some within the See camp initiated a whisper campaign that Kennedy was a pedophile. "

Nice anonymous sourcing... :roll:

"What Rove does," says Joe Perkins, "is try to make something so bad for a family...

Thanks, Joe, for your impression of Rove.

There you go, SS, always a mirror for the other guy's opinion.