Randy Moss
Chris Brown
Indy Def (This really isn't relevent but it is part of the trade)
for
Willie Parker
TJ Houshmandzadeh
Antwaan Randle El
6 pts for a TD,
1 pt for every reception,
1 point for every 10 yards rushing
1 pt for every 10 yards recieving
My team is the bottom 3.
Thanks for any imput
Would you make this FF trade?
D. McNabb
(Phi - QB)
Ro. Smith
(Den - WR)
A. Chatman
(GB - WR)
T. Houshmandzadeh
(Cin - WR)
T. Fisher
(GB - RB)
M. Moore
(Min - RB)
J. Wiggins
(Min - TE)
A. Randle El
(Pit - WR)
W. Parker
(Pit - RB)
J. Jones
(Dal - RB)
M. Brunell
(Was - QB)
M. Anderson
(Den - RB)
D. Jackson
(Sea - WR)
K- N. Kaeding
Detroit-DEF
(Phi - QB)
Ro. Smith
(Den - WR)
A. Chatman
(GB - WR)
T. Houshmandzadeh
(Cin - WR)
T. Fisher
(GB - RB)
M. Moore
(Min - RB)
J. Wiggins
(Min - TE)
A. Randle El
(Pit - WR)
W. Parker
(Pit - RB)
J. Jones
(Dal - RB)
M. Brunell
(Was - QB)
M. Anderson
(Den - RB)
D. Jackson
(Sea - WR)
K- N. Kaeding
Detroit-DEF
Thank's, that is what I thought. In the interest of full disclosure this trade had already been agreed upon, it just needs to go thru the waiver period. I am getting Moss and Brown, and this was proposed to me. The only thing that worries me is Brown and Moss being banged up. But still I have good depth at rb, and like you metioned Parker will not be getting as many carries, never mind goal line carries. Plus I know that Housh is having a really good year, and you could even say Moss is somewhat underachieving , but the potential with Moss is to much for me to pass up. Plus he is better than Housh. I will have no problem replacing Randle El.Cicero wrote:I'd keep Moss and Brown. Moss when healthy is good for 15-18 points and Brown has played well as of late. Willie Parker is gonna get less red zone carries w/ Bettis healthy again and TJ is a #2 receiver.
I think he got a little too excited about Parkers performance this past sunday. Although I would keep him on my team if the trade proposal had not been proposed to me. I look at Parker having a great game against one of the worst rushing defenses, and not really doing much since week 2 before then. His team is 2nd to last place so in my opinion he is deperate.
Last edited by RSoxFan on Tue Oct 25, 2005 8:30 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Would you make this FF trade?
Why? So far this season, they have outscored all of the others on both ends of that trade in most leagues.RSoxFan wrote:Indy Def (This really isn't relevent but it is part of the trade).
- ChargerMike
- 2007/2011 JFFL champ
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:26 pm
- Location: So.Cal.
Re: Would you make this FF trade?
kcdave wrote:Why? So far this season, they have outscored all of the others on both ends of that trade in most leagues.RSoxFan wrote:Indy Def (This really isn't relevent but it is part of the trade).
^^^^^^^^^^^
Exactly..it's extremely revelent, in fact it tips the scales heavily in favor of the trade IMO.....Hey, but what do I know, I'm scrounging the WW and Claims every week.
Re: Would you make this FF trade?
Perhaps using the word irrelevant in describing getting Indy's D was off. However I already have a team D that is near the top in FF team D rankings. Plus the Colts play more teams with good to great offenses in the second half, than they did in the first half. So I don't really expect them to keep this pace up. However I do have some great weeks to use them like week 10 against the Texans at a loud RCA Dome.