Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 3:47 pm

Two of my favorite trends are up against it this week:
Always pick against Monday night home winner as road favorite following week.
Always pick the opposite of a line that moves 2+ points from its opening. Steelers opened at -6 and now it's down to 3.5. What to do?
Stay away...

Skins crush the hapless Eagles even with TO playing. Eagles too banged up on D and the guys filling in just plain suck. McNabb will be carted out on a stretcher sometime in the 1st Q and they won't be able to run OR pass. Lay the 3.

Skins by at least 20.

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:09 pm

Texans-Jags under 36.5

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:20 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:Two of my favorite trends are up against it this week:
Always pick against Monday night home winner as road favorite following week.
Always pick the opposite of a line that moves 2+ points from its opening. Steelers opened at -6 and now it's down to 3.5. What to do?

Take the under.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:26 pm

BSmack wrote:My Lock involves the Steelers game. Go figure!!

~giggle~

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:31 pm

No you idiot. The lock of the week is Seattle over Arizona. Spread? Who the fuck cares? Kurt Warner is about to have the fork reinserted.

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:33 pm

NYG-SF o42

hell, the giants may make it over 42 by themselves.

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:37 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:My Lock involves the Steelers game. Go figure!!

~giggle~

Beat me to the punch.

RACK

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:47 pm

Raydah James wrote:
Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:My Lock involves the Steelers game. Go figure!!

~giggle~

Beat me to the punch.

RACK

Yea, shocking that a fan of a team would know more about the team than those who don't follow said team. Who woudla thunk it? Rack you guys for pointing that out.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:52 pm

BSmack wrote:No you idiot. The lock of the week is Seattle over Arizona. Spread? Who the fuck cares? Kurt Warner is about to have the fork reinserted.

Seattle doesn't travel well... having dropped six of eight road games prior to a 37-31 win at St. Louis in Week 5. The Seahawks have also lost three of their last four in Arizona and an amazing six straight when coming off a bye.

Good luck.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:02 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:No you idiot. The lock of the week is Seattle over Arizona. Spread? Who the fuck cares? Kurt Warner is about to have the fork reinserted.
Seattle doesn't travel well... having dropped six of eight road games prior to a 37-31 win at St. Louis in Week 5. The Seahawks have also lost three of their last four in Arizona and an amazing six straight when coming off a bye.

Amazing, not a single football take. Just a bunch of stats.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:13 pm

BSmack wrote:Amazing, not a single football take. Just a bunch of stats.

Much like you with nubile boys, Seattle has a long history of sucking cock... on the road, that is.

They LOSE most road games.... nevermind not covering a 4 pt spread. It may hit 90 degrees come Sunday. They'll wilt like your cock would in front of a naked Pam Anderson, kiddiefucker.

Holmgren obviously doesn't know prepare his team after a bye week, either... same shit happened in GB.

I don't care about the match-ups. Shit just seems to happen on the road... and betting road favorites is just plain stupid. Football enough for ya?

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:17 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:So when are you going to enlighten us with your betting website addy?

A buddy of mine owns beverlyhillsbookie.com

Why don't you ask the misses if she'll allow you to go 50 times on the Chefs this week? Shouldn't you be waxing your wife's back or some shit right about now? Bitch.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:12 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:Seattle has a long history of sucking cock... on the road, that is.

The Cards suck no matter where they play.

They LOSE most road games.... nevermind not covering a 4 pt spread. It may hit 90 degrees come Sunday.

The Cards lose most games period.

Holmgren obviously doesn't know prepare his team after a bye week, either... same shit happened in GB.

And that turns Denny Green into Vince Fucking Lombardi?

I don't care about the match-ups. Shit just seems to happen on the road... and betting road favorites is just plain stupid. Football enough for ya?

So if they were a 4 point dog you would hit it?

That is why I laugh at gamblers.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:30 pm

BSmack wrote:So if they were a 4 point dog you would hit it?

Much like you with a 4 year old boy... yes, I would hit it.

Listen douchebag... do you even know what's being discussed here? It's what team you think will definitely cover the line this week.

Betting road favorites is just plain stupid... this is why every serious gambler in here is laughing at you.

Though I'm not touching the game, I''m willing to make a Sig Bet with you on Arizona +4.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:50 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:Betting road favorites is just plain stupid... this is why every serious gambler in here is laughing at you.

Every serious gambler in here is too busy crying about their depleted bank account.

If you want to talk football, go right ahead. I'll be waiting.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:48 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:If you want to talk football, go right ahead. I'll be waiting.
Then what are you doing in a handicapping thread? Are you lost, confused or simply stupid?

No, I just felt like kicking some problem gamblers around. They're funny people. I like to laugh at them.

rozy · Post by **rozy** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:49 am

Locks?

Last line I heard on the Houston, Jags game was Houston +13. Nice farm bet but I'm a homer on that one.

Lock?

Patriots

Why? Trends. Peyton has never beaten them. And won't this time either. This is as deep as Tennesse vs. Spurrier. Pure PWNAGE!!

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:09 am

BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:If you want to talk football, go right ahead. I'll be waiting.
Then what are you doing in a handicapping thread? Are you lost, confused or simply stupid?
No, I just felt like kicking some problem gamblers around. They're funny people. I like to laugh at them.

Yea it sucks being a gambler.

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:19 am

I love the ignorant outsider that was never able to make money laying down some bets. Or is just so ignorant they never laid one down and then tries to talk shit on us.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:24 am

Dumbass wrote:I love the ignorant outsider that was never able to make money laying down some bets. Or is just so ignorant they never laid one down and then tries to talk shit on us.

The retarded Cryin Ryan "winner" who replies to his own posts always gets me laughing.

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:29 pm

after last weeks shameful, embarrassing, pathetic, horrendous, (insert synonym for 'pathetic' here) performance, its hard to say any win for them is a lock.

plus, they have struggled vs the iggles for years.

the good news is that the skins may finally have shaken the 'dysfunctional' moniker and passed it right over to the eagles. we are witnessing an implosion of epic proportions in philly.

now if the skins can only do their part and help them implode with a nice pummeling.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 2:17 am

BSmack wrote:The Cards lose most games period.

That's a rack....

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 5:38 pm

rozy wrote:Lock?

Patriots

Why? Trends. Peyton has never beaten them. And won't this time either. This is as deep as Tennesse vs. Spurrier. Pure PWNAGE!!

Yep. Plus, every time the Patriots have been 'dogs this year they have either covered or won outright. With the Colts being 3.5 favorites (at least it was 5 days ago), this seems like a no-brainer.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 6:05 pm

Bears over Saints.

Falcons over Dolphins.

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sun Nov 06, 2005 11:10 pm

stuckinia wrote:NYG-SF o42

hell, the giants may make it over 42 by themselves.

You rock! Keep up the good work slim.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 1:30 pm

RadioFan wrote:Yep. Plus, every time the Patriots have been 'dogs this year they have either covered or won outright.

Reeeallllly?

Sin,

Denver (-3) 28 NE 20 10/16/05

Oh yeah... RACK those of us who barely covered and were shitting their pants right up until the bitter end.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 2:22 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:Oh yeah... RACK those of us who barely covered and were shitting their pants right up until the bitter end.

You're one of Shrubber's Trolls?

How did that Seahawks-Cards game work out?

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:16 pm

BSmack wrote:How did that Seahawks-Cards game work out.

Just fine:

Snooze Baton wrote:Though I'm not touching the game.

I won a bundle of cash yesterday, you?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:24 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:How did that Seahawks-Cards game work out.
Just fine:

Snooze Baton wrote:Though I'm not touching the game.
I won a bundle of cash yesterday, you?

I prefer paying my bills to problem gambling.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:50 pm

BSmack wrote:I prefer paying my bills to problem gambling.

Excellent... leave the gambling to people who have a track record of winning and aren't a recovering Gambler's Anonymous patient who lost his house/car/life and has been reduced to spewing Steeler's gibberish 24x7...

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:27 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:
BSmack wrote:I prefer paying my bills to problem gambling.
Excellent... leave the gambling to people who have a track record of winning and aren't a recovering Gambler's Anonymous patient who lost his house/car/life and has been reduced to spewing Steeler's gibberish 24x7...

Wassup bitch? I see comming correct isn't one of your stong points. You see, I made two calls in this thread. You may have noticed that they both hit. Then again, the addictive personality is usualy the last one to know he has a problem.

Snooze Baton · Post by **Snooze Baton** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:43 pm

BSmack wrote: You see, I made two calls in this thread.

You're good at cunting up wagering threads. That's all I see. You're a talker. I'm a doer. I'm actually out there winning and shit.

Addictive personality? Nigga please. You're the broke bitch living paycheck to paycheck who's actually lost his rent to Moose and Rocko before.

First rule of gambling, never risk what you can't afford to lose. That's why you don't bet anymore, huh? What a tool.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:58 pm

Snooze Baton wrote:First rule of gambling, never risk what you can't afford to lose. That's why you don't bet anymore, huh? What a tool.

Still not comming correct? How shocking.

:bode:

T1B

Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.

Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.

Re: Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.

Re: Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.

Re: Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.

Re: Two worlds colliding... and... your LOCK OF THE WEEK.