KC Scott

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:01 am

I know gamblin' gets you jazzed up.

Here are my best picks for this week.

Oh, ....... and call 1-800-YOU-TOOL and for FREE, I'll give you my BONUS super-duper LOCK OF THE CENTURY pick, which is NOT described below. You have to dial me up for the LOCK OF THE CENTURY pick.

Take.......

Seattle -6.5 over St. Louis
The Rams give up an atrocious 4.7 yds per carry. S. Alexander ALL day long here. 200 yds is realistic for Alexander, as Seattle has the 3rd best rushing attack in the NFL. Rams are 1-3 on the road so far this year. Seattle wins by at least 10, IMO.

Oakland +3 over Denver
Bitter rivals, home team receiving pts...? Looks like a take to me, particularly in light of Denver coming off a bye, which looks disadvantageous (is that a word) to me. Denver has also lost 2 of 3 on the road so far this year.

KC +2.5 over Buffalo
Buffalo is 3-1 at home this year, but those wins have been over softies Miami, Houston, and the Jets.
The Bills biggest threat is McGahee, but KC's run defense has actually been respectable this year for the most part.
KC 'believes' in themself more than Buffalo and I play them receiving 2 1/2 pts here.

Anyone agree or disagree....?

Got some primo picks of your own for this week...?

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:18 am

Good thoughts, pop.

While not strongly, I'll disagree with two of the three.

St. Louis has been a Jeckyl and Hyde team all year, partly due to the stubborn nature of their coach. He's gonzo and, thanks to the bye, the Rams will have all their toys back on offense. Martz and the all-pass, all-the-time spread is gonzo. Jackson will keep the chains moving and the score closer than a TD.

Depending on how flat Denver comes out in the first half, three may not be enough for Oakland. Denver's ball-control offense can and will run it down the 'duh's throats, and the defense will be a considerable upgrade from last week's tilt. For the Raiders to cover and win, they'll need some help from Plummer.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:46 am

poptart wrote:Oh, ....... and call 1-800-YOU-TOOL and for FREE, I'll give you my BONUS super-duper LOCK OF THE CENTURY pick, which is NOT described below. You have to dial me up for the LOCK OF THE CENTURY pick.

That was last week and you missed out, according to the bad gamblers, er, "wagering" radio shows.

Sincerely,

Next week.

These look fairly easy, imo:

ATLANTA -9 1/2 vs. Green Bay

PITTSBURGH -7 1/2 vs. Cleveland

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Thu Nov 10, 2005 5:11 am

I finally made a list........

Wait, I ran you, what are you still doing here?

Dude... your smoking some serious shit to think the Raiders will cover 3 at home vs. the Doinks.

I hate to fucking say it, but the Doinks are the second best team in the league right now.

Stone Cold Lock Denver -3

---------------------

Will KC be on a huge letdown after last week's win and the loss of Priest Holmes?

Probably, but I still like the Chiefs + 2.5 at Buffalo

----------------------

St. Louis always plays the Seahawks tough and with the return of Mark Bulger I like the Rams +7 at Seattle.

-----------------------

In Fantasy Football, Take Toos and the 2.8 pts. over a decimated Drunken Troll squad

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:15 pm

0-1 so far.

I'll win both late games.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 9:38 pm

They had the Chiefs game on in Houston or do you have direct TV?

As for the late games, if the Rams keep running Jackson, they'll cover.

I'd much rather be watching the Mules/Duhs game

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:11 pm

Texans were on here, per norm.

Was able to follow the Chef game a little bit on the internet.

No direct tv for me.

Btw, so much for the Hee-Haws coming out flat.

Well, actually maybe they are just a bit.

Oakland is just FLATTER???

Collins + Turner = mediocrity....at best.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 10:50 pm

KC Scott wrote:They had the Chiefs game on in Houston or do you have direct TV?

As for the late games, if the Rams keep running Jackson, they'll cover.

I'd much rather be watching the Mules/Duhs game

uhh maybe not Scott...the Raiduhs just plain SUCK! Getting their a$$'s handed to them in their own hole errr house again. It's not pretty, it's not pretty at all.

sin,

Boltfan looking for a little help once in awhile.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:01 pm

This game might be the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Norv goes.

Or maybe the ten-ton-truck.

Embarassing 'effort' by the 'duds today.

Don't think Al's got the patience for this shit here.

Let's talk coach and qb.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sun Nov 13, 2005 11:40 pm

At least it would be AFC West vermin I'd be watching, rather than the Lambs.

They are a mess, or maybe Seattle is better than.......

No they are just a mess.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:00 am

Dungver was practically BEGGIN' Oakland to get back in the game, and all the 'duds could do is piss it down their leg.

Amazing futility, really.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 12:13 am

1-2 on my picks this week.

Now you know why I'm not a gamblin' man.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Nov 14, 2005 2:16 am

poptart wrote:1-2 on my picks this week.

Now you know why I'm not a gamblin' man.

Yea, but you should try it more often.

If I wasn't, I'd have absolutely no reason to give a fuck after the Chiefs are eliminated from the playoffs

T1B

KC Scott

KC Scott

Re: KC Scott