OK DonkFan, it's time again to DO THIS

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:12 am

Felix wrote: You remember that time Wags unleashed that promised ass-kicking on that guy.....

You remember that time Pinks brought anything of more substance to a topic than an insipid :smilie:?

You remember that time Scott goaded you into a foolish bet?

Would you like to play the fool this time as well?

I'm your Huckleberry.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:55 am

Rack Wags's beer-feuled rant.

Felix wrote:You remember that time... Wags unleashed that promised ass-kicking on that guy.....

neither do I

'S'at right?

Selective mem-ry at its best, eh, Pinks?

Since we're trotting down Memory Lane here, Greenie, I'd venture to wager that you pro'lly don't remember your Truman-induced "retirement" from the World...

We do.

Play nice, Pinks, 'fore the Defenders decide to make you look silly....

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:01 am

^^^^^^

OMG..this is mahvalous..come back Jimmah, come back.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:35 am

Truman wrote:Selective mem-ry at its best, eh, Pinks?

Since we're trotting down Memory Lane here, Greenie, I'd venture to wager that you pro'lly don't remember your Truman-induced "retirement" from the World...

I've forgotten a lot of things that have happened on these boards over the years

glad you've taken the time to spread sheet them Tru......nice.....

you really should come around more often....you should have been here when tart ran me......

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:12 am

Felix wrote:I've forgotten many of the things that have occured on these boards over the years, but glad you've taken the time to spread sheet them Tru......nice.....

Mind if I reply, or are you still editing you last response? Try to keep up, Pinks....

Ah. MORE selective memory. What's it gonna take? A Kaley-melt-Idaho-potato-reset-or-seven before you remember your place?

Truman: How about a little fire, Felix? Ahhahaha...

Pinks: Look what you've done!! I'm melting, melting.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:35 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: The Chiefs are 7-0 against the hated Donkey PUKES when KC Paul 3.0 attends the game.

Make it 8-0 by about 6:30CST Sunday night, Donkey BITCHES....I'll be in the Field Box (lower level, about 6 rows UP from the Chiefs' sideline) in Section 119. :twisted:

Well if your fat ass is going to be there...

Tell you what I'm going to do for you, a simple litle wager.

Chiefs win, I don't post in this forum the rest of the regular season.

Broncos win, you don't post in a thread I've posted in previously the same amount of time.

Straight up, no points.

Either all the whinny fucking Diophobes will have you as their hero, or I'll be minus one ankle-biter.

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:50 am

please Pardon the impending Dio v. Paul EXTRAVAGANZA...just for a second.....

thanx!

Truman wrote:
Felix wrote:I've forgotten many of the things that have occured on these boards over the years, but glad you've taken the time to spread sheet them Tru......nice.....
Mind if I reply, or are you still editing you last response? Try to keep up, Pinks....

Ah. MORE selective memory. What's it gonna take? A Kaley-melt-Idaho-potato-reset-or-seven before you remember your place?

Truman: How about a little fire, Felix? Ahhahaha...

Pinks: Look what you've done!! I'm melting, melting.

OUCH!

Greenie....my fellow m0d...your Russet Skin is going to 'crisp' in this Heat.

you better get some SPF I-70 or its really gonna turn out UGLY here for you.

'jus sayin'!
:wink:

i don't want to go to the grocery store in the next couple of weeks...and see your Spud on the Milk Carton!

drummer · Post by **drummer** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:33 am

mvscal wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Raydah James wrote:
IN.

-Dick ForMeal
"ForMeal"? WTF is THAT,
It's the Breakfast of Champions for many overweight west Missouri homosexuals.

Bone Appetit, tubby.

Red · Post by **Red** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 1:46 pm

Tough game to call. Both teams can run the ball and both have had success stopping the run. Denver's Achilles Heel has been third down conversions, but despite that we've done a good job controlling the clock due in large part to a +14 turnover differential.

Week after week we've heard that "This is the week Jake remembers he's Jake..." Keep squawking that and then sit there dumbfounded when he's in the running for league MVP.

Win the turnover battle and win the game...

Denver by a FG.

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:32 pm

Queefs win this in a nail biter that sucks the life out of them. Set them up for a prime let down the following week.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:43 pm

Truman wrote:
Ah. MORE selective memory. What's it gonna take? A Kaley-melt-Idaho-potato-reset-or-seven before you remember your place?

Lay it on me Tru.........

I've got my retirement speech all ready.......

War Wagon wrote: Would you like to play the fool this time as well?

All this coming from somebody that thought posting this insideousness

was a good idea.....

(only because I know how much you hate it wags)

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:26 pm

Red wrote:Denver's Achilles Heel has been third down conversions, but despite that we've done a good job controlling the clock due in large part to a +14 turnover differential.

Week after week we've heard that "This is the week Jake remembers he's Jake..." Keep squawking that and then sit there dumbfounded when he's in the running for league MVP.

Still on meds, eh, Red? Thanks for proving once again that MuleFan truly is dumber than a bag of hammers.

Lemme see if I’ve got this straight: Denver sucks at third down… But the Snake carts home League honors for most valuable play. :roll:

More stellar post-graduate work from the Cuda School of Having It Both Ways (Colorado campus).

Never mind that the Snake isn’t even the best player in the Division (s’up LT). Re-read your own post… At +14, it sounds to me like your D might be a bit more deserving of post-season recognition.

BTW, Sparky, did it occur to you that “Jake isn’t Jake” this season cuz Banana-hand has reined him in? “Take care of the ball, and don’t do anything to get us beat.” Or maybe you’d care to list all those stunning, come-from-behind-late-fourth-quarter victories that the Snake has singe-handedly orchestrated this season.

League MVP… Christ-on-a-freaking-pony. Dumbfounded indeed. :roll:

Red · Post by **Red** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:52 pm

Truman wrote:

Still on meds, eh, Red? Thanks for proving once again that MuleFan truly is dumber than a bag of hammers.

Lemme see if I’ve got this straight: Denver sucks at third down… But the Snake carts home League honors for most valuable play. :roll:

More stellar post-graduate work from the Cuda School of Having It Both Ways (Colorado campus).

Never mind that the Snake isn’t even the best player in the Division (s’up LT). Re-read your own post… At +14, it sounds to me like your D might be a bit more deserving of post-season recognition.

BTW, Sparky, did it occur to you that “Jake isn’t Jake” this season cuz Banana-hand has reined him in? “Take care of the ball, and don’t do anything to get us beat.” Or maybe you’d care to list all those stunning, come-from-behind-late-fourth-quarter victories that the Snake has singe-handedly orchestrated this season.

League MVP… Christ-on-a-freaking-pony. Dumbfounded indeed. :roll:

Let me get this straight... a guy that has a 14:4 TD to INT ratio and has led his team to a 9-2 record, first place in the division (and a two-game lead over the chefs) shouldn't be considered for Most Valuable Player, but Denver's defense should? Or is there some other "post-season recognition" that you were speaking of?

You are right about one thing though. LT is hands-down the best player in the league. Unfortunately for him, MVP candidates usually come from playoff-bound teams.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:14 pm

Truman wrote:Or maybe you’d care to list all those stunning, come-from-behind-late-fourth-quarter victories that the Snake has singe-handedly orchestrated this season.

Hasn't had to.....they've almost always been ahead late in the fourth quarter....

Red wrote: LT is hands-down the best player in the league.

and the MVP IMHO regardless whether the Blots make it to the dance or not........

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:11 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: \Whatever- the Chiefs WILL win the remainder of their home games....

Against the Broncos, the Bolts, and the Bengals.......?

yeah, good luck with that.....

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:23 pm

mvscal wrote:
But hey, if they really do go 4-1 against five playoff contenders in a row then they will certainly have earned their place.

yep......

interestingly enough though is when I asked that very question and turned the Magic 8 ball upside down, the prediction came out as

"Outlook Not Promising"

sorry Paul, but the 8 Ball is never wrong.......

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:37 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
mvscal wrote:the Queefs have an absolutely brutal schedule down the stretch.
Whatever- the Chiefs WILL win the remainder of their home games and win AT LEAST one on the road. It's ALL good.

12/04/05 Denver Broncos ..W
12/11/05 at Dallas Cowboys ..L
12/17/05 at New York Giants ..L
12/24/05 San Diego Chargers ..L
01/01/06 Cincinnati Bengals ..W

FIXED

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 6:56 pm

Felix wrote:interestingly enough though is when I asked that very question and turned the Magic Potato upside down, the prediction came out as

"Outlook Not Promising"

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:22 pm

JHawkBCD wrote:
Felix wrote:interestingly enough though is when I asked that very question and turned the Magic Potato upside down, the prediction came out as

"Outlook Not Promising"

No, it was the Magic 8 Ball

I only break out the Magic Potato during the playoffs....

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:22 pm

“Mules is such idjits…”

Red wrote: Let me get this straight... a guy that has a 14:4 TD to INT ratio and has led his team to a 9-2 record, first place in the division (and a two-game lead over the chefs) shouldn't be considered for Most Valuable Player…?

Correct.

“You win a cookie…”

I’d forgotten how much stock you Losers place in stats.

Through 11 Games:

Carson Palmer: 252 of 361, 2922 yards. 23 TDs, 7 INTs. 107.1 QB rating.
Peyton Manning: 232 of 341, 2770 yards. 22 TDs, 8 INTs. 104.5 QB rating.
Jake Plummer: 193 of 314, 2236 yards. 14 TD, 4 INTs. 92.5 QB rating.

Well, now, gee! Lookee here! Peyton’s and Carson’s teams both have great records and lead their Divisions too!

Oh... And go ahead and consider yourself straightened.

BTW, Red, Steve DeBerg lead his Chiefs to the playoffs back in ’90 sporting a gaudy 23:4 TD to INT ratio. I don’t seem to recall the League crowning him MVP for his effort that year either…

Biggie · Post by **Biggie** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:31 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:UNDEFEATED AT HOME IN DECEMBER SINCE 1996.

How's your January record?

d-townmike · Post by **d-townmike** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:36 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Call it what you want m2scal, but I like to call it being UNDEFEATED AT HOME IN DECEMBER SINCE 1996.

Streaks are meant to be broken right? Chief-fan, this year will be different. Broncos are on fire right now, we've got one of the best D's ever, Plummer has thrown minimal picks all season and of course our runningbacks are lighting it up too.

Broncos do have trouble at Arrowhead, I will admit. I will also admit that the Broncos are just 2-8 in that rathole since Shanahan took over.

But expect this year for the Broncos to absolutely waste them in their own crib.

Broncos 27
Chiefs 10

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 7:44 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: Call it what you want m2scal, but I like to call it being UNDEFEATED AT HOME IN DECEMBER SINCE 1996.

Truman wrote:
I’d forgotten how much stock you Losers place in stats.

something tells me Tru just laid an inadvertent ass-kicking on Paul.....

Red · Post by **Red** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:41 pm

Truman wrote:

This explains much.

When you finish your coloring, show me where I, or anyone else annointed Plummer the MVP. If you need a head start in your research, I can point you to a link in this very site where several non-Bronco fans threw his name out as a likely candidate.

When you're done looking for that, maybe you can explain why you think Denver's defense is more deserving of the MVP award.

Truman wrote:At +14, it sounds to me like your D might be a bit more deserving of post-season recognition.

I won't edit out the relevant part of your post. :wink:

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:29 pm

Stat of the week:

What NFL team currently has the longest streak of games of not allowing an enemy runner to top 100 yds rushing...?

Kansas City, 18 straight games.

I know, I know......Dungver gets it done with running back-by-committee.

The Mules are due for a loss, and KC at home in December looks like a good place for it.

Chefs - 22
Mules - 19

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:42 pm

Broncos website doesn't break it down as to which runner had how many yards, but the Chefs allowed the Broncos to rush for 221 yards when they played earlier this year and that's something less than 18 games ago.

Both teams are due for a loss, but considering the Chefs home record in December and their stat of not allowing 100+ yard games, for however many games it is, the law of averages tends to favor Denver, imo.

And ignorance of the law is no excuse.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:44 pm

Mike Anderson led Denver with 98 yds that day.

:wink:

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:50 pm

Where'd the other 123 yards come from? They haven't activated more than 2 running backs for any game all season

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:53 pm

T. Bell 47
A. Lelie 56

J. Plummer 9
R. Dayne 6
K. Johnson 5

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 12:18 am

Felix wrote:
All this coming from somebody that thought posting this insideousness

was a good idea.....

(only because I know how much you hate it wags)

In-sid-e-ous-ness? Is that even a word? Better check your thesaurus there greenie. Of all words to describe that pic, insideous doesn't quite work.

That sure is one handsome fella' there, but no, wasn't me who posted it. And why should I hate it? Doesn't bother me a bit. Reminds of some good times, good BBQ, and good brew right outside Arrowhead with some good ol' boys. You should be so lucky someday.

Now, since Scott isn't present at this particular time to su...err, elicit a wager, I guess that task is left to me.

$20 sound familiar? And no, you ain't getting no points.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 1:57 am

Well la dee fucking da.

A 4 page Doink a thon and it's only W3dnesday.

I just escaped Colorweedho yesterday.

More Chiefs gear on peaks 8, 9 & 10 in Breck than Doink fans (And the ones that were there wore funny hats)

That Fucking state is so poor they closed I-70 East to keep the well to do Missourians hostage another day.

I digress......

Big surprise (No it wasn't) that many Coloradopes don't really give a fuck about the Doinks. They all seemed far more concerned with smoking dope in the warming huts or trying or bitching about how cold it was on the mountain during the snowstorm (it's a fucking snowstorm for chrissakes)

As for the game:

It's been broken down pretty well. Both teams are running the ball pretty well and defense the run pretty well. So that's a wash.

Fake and trINT can both win a game or blow it, so more laundry there.

That leaves special teams, where, If I'm not mistaken, Dante' Hall seems to be that special sumptin that leaves you dickskinners cryin' every year.

Last year's Pinky augratin (That's German for thanks for the $20, Spud) was a 6 page rant if I remember had sumptin to do with illegal blocks (Lordy, Lord the irony).

But much like the tuck, it fell on deaf ears and Good triumphed.

All you dungver fans suck big fat donkey dicks, at least for this week, as you sit on your orange naugahide couches from Elway's furniture and feed, freezing inside your miserable duplexes in Saudi Aurora watching My Chiefs win 24-21 on your 19" emerson TVs from Wally world.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:28 am

War Wagon wrote:
I feel like if KC can win this one, they just might run the table.

This is exactly what everyone talks about.....run the fucking table?????

Complete and utter homerism to the nth degree. Fuck people, take a deep breath and look at your team. Your secondary is porous at best while giving up 4 yards a carry. Please. You ain't running the table unless its a buffet table.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:39 am

T REX wrote: You ain't running the table unless its a buffet table.

Can too!

Will too!

Run both fucking tables and I'm springing for Paul's. :wink:

chowd103 · Post by **chowd103** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:19 am

poptart wrote:Mike Anderson led Denver with 98 yds that day.

:wink:

Shut up.
He starts every week on my weakass fantasy team.

Sincerely,

3-9

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:35 am

Yeah Scott, you got over on me BIG TIME......

Big ups on that one bud.......

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 2:21 am

Chiefs win by a field goal.

Unless Vermiel decides to go for it,then Chiefs by 7.

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:26 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:Chefs SUCK.

BRONCOS RULE.

FTFY

I liked it better when the AFC West rivalry was Broncos/Raiders; it’s clearly Broncos/Chiefs now, been building up for a while, welcome to fun football Chef Fan, enjoy it now cause something tells me it will be Broncos/Chargers before long.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:57 am

yawn

No surprise that there ain't a mulefan anywhere who can provide even a mildly decent take or rebuttal to obliterate.

The level of sucktitude appears to be inherent....seriously, has anyone ever read a goddman thing from mulefan that didn't make you want to go take an immediate nap?

Must be the air.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:15 am

whitey I can see this thread is boring you....

your participation is no longer required.......

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:04 am

Felix wrote:whitey I can see this thread is boring you....

your participation is no longer required.......

:wink:

greeny

i'm pretty bored as well.

i'm shirking my m0d duties for the evening to catch up on the reindeer Troll escapades.

fvnny Shit....BALEE DAT...erl..de..der..de..dorf!

T1B

OK DonkFan, it's time again to DO THIS

Re: OK DonkFan, it's time again to DO THIS