Superbowl matchup?

Th · Post by Th » Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:39 am

My vote:

Chicago

vs.

Indy

DISCUSS!

Show Us Your Tits · Post by **Show Us Your Tits** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:30 pm

Denver vs. Dallas

RSoxFan · Post by **RSoxFan** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:32 pm

Indy

vs.

Carolina

frodo_biguns · Post by **frodo_biguns** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 1:39 pm

Th wrote:My vote:

Chicago

vs.

Indy

DISCUSS!

Bears SUCK!

Indy vs. Seahawks

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:15 pm

Right now I'd say Chicago Vs Indy.

Nobody in the NFC is going to beat the Bears in Chicago. Seattle better hope they can hold home field advantage, even then I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears toughness puts them over the top.

frodo_biguns · Post by **frodo_biguns** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:43 pm

Joe in PB wrote:Right now I'd say Chicago Vs Indy.

Nobody in the NFC is going to beat the Bears in Chicago. Seattle better hope they can hold home field advantage, even then I wouldn't be surprised if the Bears toughness puts them over the top.

The Bears SUCK! They should have lost their last two games. If you sore 13 points you will beat them!

Kyle Orton!!!!! Does he look south side or what?

Not too mention , they are homosexuals

Funkywhiteboy · Post by **Funkywhiteboy** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm

frodo_biguns wrote:Kyle Orton!!!!! Does he look south side or what?

Not too mention , they are homosexuals

I want in on that!

Sin,

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:20 pm

Right about now I'd say the logical pick would be the Colts vs Giants.

Back off Seachicken fan, no way Feeley misses those kicks again.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:40 pm

Indy v. Carolina

frodo_biguns · Post by **frodo_biguns** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:20 pm

Cicero wrote:Indy v. Carolina

I'm not sold on the Panthers yet either. The way the NFC is going the Vikings have a chance. They have the second best rated defense in the past four weeks. Things are starting to gel. :D

RSoxFan · Post by **RSoxFan** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:23 pm

frodo_biguns wrote:
Cicero wrote:Indy v. Carolina
I'm not sold on the Panthers yet either. The way the NFC is going the Vikings have a chance. They have the second best rated defense in the past four weeks. Things are starting to gel. :D

I'm not that sold on anybody in the NFC period. There is no clear cut favorite like Indy in the AFC.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 6:54 pm

Funkywhiteboy wrote:
frodo_biguns wrote:Kyle Orton!!!!! Does he look south side or what?

Not too mention , they are homosexuals
I want in on that!

Sin,

BWAH..RAAAAAAAAAACK

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:50 pm

frodo_biguns wrote: The Bears SUCK! They should have lost their last two games. If you sore 13 points you will beat them!

Yea, the only problem is that they only allow an average of 10.9 points a game. Um, hate to be the one to tell you this but that wins championships. With a defense like that all they need to do is not turn it over. A team with that record and that defense FAR from sucks. How should they have lost to Carolina? They allowed 3 points and were ALL OVER them. I saw it and The Panthers did not deserve to win that game at all.

You say that in the same breath you state The Vikings have a chance? Um, which NFC south team did they beat? Oh the one that won't be in the playoffs. They won't avoid all of them, IF they get in. You're dreaming if you think that pile of shit can do anything against the true contenders of the NFC. Things usually start to gel for an average team when they start playing teams that can not defend. The Giants have a fair share of wins but they don't exactly put the clamps on anyone. Every other team that has a defense has had their way with Minnesota and there are 3 teams at the end of December that find ways to shut down offenses. Sorry, but the only North team worthy of going to the playoffs are those Bears that "suck". The Vikings present "success" is merely dictated by the timing of the schedule. You'll wake up soon.

As far as The Panthers go, yea I have my question marks with them myself now and they still have to prove they can take out Vick. What is more concerning however is that they are not going to be able to rely on that piss poor North to bring CHI down and below them so they can only win out and count on Pittsburgh and Atlanta to do that. If they get that even still they will have to sweep Atlanta to get homefield. With a first round bye and homefield Chicago and Seattle can be some real shitty places to play come January.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Fri Dec 02, 2005 7:53 pm

Garcia is gay smack...how fresh. Not like he'll be a Lion next year anyways...have at it.

QB Ratings:
30. Harrington.....66.5
31. Losman.....65.3
32. Orton.....62.3

The Bears have been great in spite of Orton. If you can figure out how to score on them, they can be beat. This looks so much like a few years ago when they got all sorts of breaks and won the division. Calling them frauds is a little harsh but they are certainly a blessed team right now. They beat the Panthers and Buccaneers in back-to-back weeks. The only team I can see beating them is the Seahawks with their offensive attack. I'd hate to say it but the Bears are the second best team in the NFC.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Sat Dec 03, 2005 2:01 am

Colts v Panthers. I'm still not sold on the Seahawks.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Sat Dec 03, 2005 3:15 am

Giants over Bears.

Colts over Broncos.

Giants over Colts.

upstart · Post by **upstart** » Sat Dec 03, 2005 6:12 pm

New England over Cowboys

Red · Post by **Red** » Sat Dec 03, 2005 7:45 pm

frodo_biguns wrote:
Not too mention , they are homosexuals

Don't be alarmed, fraudo. Despite what you may be used too, it's not unusual for a defender too be that close too an opposing player. It's all part of that thing called tackling.

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Sun Dec 04, 2005 9:49 pm

Looks like 10.9 just went a little lower.

THE PANTHERS BEAT THE FALCONS, THE PANTHERS BEAT THE FALCONS!!!

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff · Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:23 pm

The Bears are not even as good as they were in 2001, when they somehow went 13-3 with Dick Jauron as coach and Jim Miller at QB and picked up a playoff first round bye only to get their dicks ripped off and shoved up their assholes by the Eagles.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:10 am

gotta go with mvscal. The proper wording of the question should have been...

"Who will the colts sodomize in the superbowl.

Nasty defense. Check. Solid running game. Check. Peyton Manning, who in addition to being the coolest, collected QB in the league, did a pretty good Dan Marino immitation with that little on the run TD lob.

My hope is Colts/G-men. Imagine Ole Archie sitting around with his buddies talking about what fukking awesome DNA he possesses.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:34 am

Dumbass wrote:
frodo_biguns wrote: The Bears SUCK! They should have lost their last two games. If you sore 13 points you will beat them!
Yea, the only problem is that they only allow an average of 10.9 points a game. Um, hate to be the one to tell you this but that wins championships. With a defense like that all they need to do is not turn it over. A team with that record and that defense FAR from sucks. How should they have lost to Carolina? They allowed 3 points and were ALL OVER them. I saw it and The Panthers did not deserve to win that game at all.

You say that in the same breath you state The Vikings have a chance? Um, which NFC south team did they beat? Oh the one that won't be in the playoffs. They won't avoid all of them, IF they get in. You're dreaming if you think that pile of shit can do anything against the true contenders of the NFC. Things usually start to gel for an average team when they start playing teams that can not defend. The Giants have a fair share of wins but they don't exactly put the clamps on anyone. Every other team that has a defense has had their way with Minnesota and there are 3 teams at the end of December that find ways to shut down offenses. Sorry, but the only North team worthy of going to the playoffs are those Bears that "suck". The Vikings present "success" is merely dictated by the timing of the schedule. You'll wake up soon.

As far as The Panthers go, yea I have my question marks with them myself now and they still have to prove they can take out Vick. What is more concerning however is that they are not going to be able to rely on that piss poor North to bring CHI down and below them so they can only win out and count on Pittsburgh and Atlanta to do that. If they get that even still they will have to sweep Atlanta to get homefield. With a first round bye and homefield Chicago and Seattle can be some real shitty places to play come January.

Uhhhh....the Bucs outplayed them. Simms fumble at the 1 resulted in the difference as well as the mised FG. TB had chi beat. Not sour grapes but the bucs defense was better than the bears that day while completely confusing orton. No way a rook makes it to the super bowl.

Is there a stat nut that can look up rook QBs in the SB or making it to teh SB??????

Thanks.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:56 am

T REX wrote:Not sour grapes but the bucs defense was better than the bears that day while completely confusing orton. No way a rook makes it to the super bowl.

Yup... except Tampa Bay's defense wasn't tough enough when it counted.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:22 am

JHawkBCD wrote:
T REX wrote:Not sour grapes but the bucs defense was better than the bears that day while completely confusing orton. No way a rook makes it to the super bowl.
Yup... except Tampa Bay's defense wasn't tough enough when it counted.

Huh...tard......TB....number TWO defense in the NFL.

KC? That opportunistic 27th rated defense. Yep, another stand out year for the KC swiss.

PS No rookie QB has EVER made it to teh Super Bowl. I looked it up.

Chicago ain't going no where.

chowd103 · Post by **chowd103** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:32 am

Phil Simms wrote:

"To say that I'm disappointed in my boy would be an understatement."

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:59 am

You're next week........

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:24 pm

T REX wrote:
JHawkBCD wrote:
T REX wrote:Not sour grapes but the bucs defense was better than the bears that day while completely confusing orton. No way a rook makes it to the super bowl.
Yup... except Tampa Bay's defense wasn't tough enough when it counted.
Huh...tard......TB....number TWO defense in the NFL.

KC? That opportunistic 27th rated defense. Yep, another stand out year for the KC swiss.

PS No rookie QB has EVER made it to teh Super Bowl. I looked it up.

Chicago ain't going no where.

Once again, you miss the sarcasm... a play off of your own words... and that's what makes you the uber-tard.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:49 pm

mvscal wrote:
chowd103 wrote:

This is just wrong.

I agree.

Shouldn't Simms be on his stomach?

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:58 pm

Dammit Jim, I splurged and got the $1 pepsi drink today. For a fan of a shitty team, you sure are a funny one.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 9:04 pm

You're diabolical, chowd...RACK!

T1B

Superbowl matchup?

Superbowl matchup?

Re: Superbowl matchup?

Re: Superbowl matchup?