First chickenshit call of the night.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:41 am

Young was clearly down! Whats the point of replay if you aint gonna use it?

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:42 am

Coaches challenging calls is not far off.

Moby Dick · Post by **Moby Dick** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:44 am

this bowl season is by far the worst officiating i've ever seen.

split the refs...half of say Pac10 half BigXII for the game tonight (or any bowl game for that matter). split conference officiating.

the game moves ENTIRELY too fast for a BCS bowl for a conf. USA team to be officiating it...etc etc.

FLW Buckeye · Post by **FLW Buckeye** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:46 am

Your team has got to play through it. SC is letting it affect them.

BraveFan · Post by **BraveFan** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:46 am

Bad call, but I find it hard to believe Texas wouldn't have scored in the next play or two anyway. They're starting to find their rhythm. USC's O better quit fucking up if they want to stay in this thing.

How big could that missed extra point end up being?

FLW Buckeye · Post by **FLW Buckeye** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:47 am

BraveFan wrote:
How big could that missed extra point end up being?

Ask FSU.

M2 · Post by M2 » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:48 am

MuchoBulls wrote:Coaches challenging calls is not far off.

There's people in the box right now, that get paid to make the right call!!!

No excuse for that missed call whatsoever.

the truth

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:48 am

the call wasn't chickenshit. not challenging it was. nice yob, pete.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:51 am

m2 wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:Coaches challenging calls is not far off.
There's people in the box right now, that get paid to make the right call!!!

No excuse for that missed call whatsoever.

the truth

Absolutely agree 100%. However, since it's been proven more than a few times that these people aren't doing their jobs maybe some tweaking should be looked into. For instance, Michigan shouldn't have had to blow 2 timeouts to get plays reviewed in their bowl game.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:51 am

The Assassin wrote:Young was clearly down! Whats the point of reply if you aint gonna use it?

Unfortunately for you, I will reply.

Texas was carving up USC at the time...if you don't think they'd have scored a TD anyway, and then NOT missed the extra point because they were trying to hurry to avoid a replay...you are a fucking 'tard.

I wished they would have replayed it, then they wouldn't have missed the XP the next time.

Then again, watching USC fan melt down and bitch about that non-call is going to be priceless, so perhaps it's a blessing in disguise.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:54 am

War Wagon wrote:
The Assassin wrote:Young was clearly down! Whats the point of reply if you aint gonna use it?
Unfortunately for you, I will reply.

Texas was carving up USC at the time...if you don't think they'd have scored a TD anyway, and then NOT missed the extra point because they were trying to hurry to avoid a replay...you are a fucking 'tard.

I wished they would have replayed it, then they wouldn't have missed the XP the next time.

Then again, watching USC fan melt down and bitch about that non-call is going to be priceless, so perhaps it's a blessing in disguise.

Not an SC fan, just hate seeing obvious missed calls. You're right BTW: I didn't want to hear your worthless opinion bitch.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:54 am

BraveFan wrote:Bad call, but I find it hard to believe Texas wouldn't have scored in the next play or two anyway.

That's a terrible take. Terrible.
What the impending result of Texas' next several plays would or would not have been has absolutely NO relevance on whether replay should be used.

How that play could not have been reviewed is abhorrent.

And smackaholic... there is no challenging in the college game. Pete could've called a timeout to give the upstairs refs a bit more time to take a look, but that's it. You could argue that he should have called the TO, but that kinda undermines the whole intent of the auto video replay, eh?

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:55 am

if they win by 4 pts. it's a moot point. and they're ahead by 9.....

for now.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:56 am

SC looks done, Texas is just beating them up right now. Leinert looks lost out there.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:57 am

War Wagon wrote:Texas was carving up USC at the time...if you don't think they'd have scored a TD anyway, and then NOT missed the extra point because they were trying to hurry to avoid a replay...you are a fucking 'tard.

Your take sucks even worse.
Damn, now I know why your the Main Street's bitch.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:02 am

The Assassin wrote: Not an SC fan, just hate seeing obvious missed calls.

Then it's about time for you to start crying about the missed INT call, bitch.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:05 am

War Wagon wrote:
The Assassin wrote: Not an SC fan, just hate seeing obvious missed calls.
Then it's about time for you to start crying about the missed INT call, bitch.

It was an INT. Didnt know you needed me to do a play by play for you you 3 toed fag.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:05 am

Ken wrote: Your take sucks even worse.
Damn, now I know why your the Main Street's bitch.

But since you're an obviously sloped forehead of an idiot, your opinion doesn't really count for much, now does it?

mothster · Post by **mothster** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:06 am

well if sc loses van has a way out (allegedly)

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:12 am

War Wagon wrote:
Ken wrote: Your take sucks even worse.
Damn, now I know why your the Main Street's bitch.
But since you're an obviously sloped forehead of an idiot, your opinion doesn't really count for much, now does it?

Puss out w/a 'your opinion doesn't matter' take.
Biggie size my rolleyes, please.

BraveFan · Post by **BraveFan** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:12 am

Ken wrote:
BraveFan wrote:Bad call, but I find it hard to believe Texas wouldn't have scored in the next play or two anyway.
That's a terrible take. Terrible.
What the impending result of Texas' next several plays would or would not have been has absolutely NO relevance on whether replay should be used.

How that play could not have been reviewed is abhorrent.

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEasy there, killer.

I wasn't trying to make an argument about whether the play should have been reviewed. There's no question it should've been.

But as an objective fan, I don't think it had an impact on the end result of the drive. The Texas offense is just flat out better than the USC defense. Just sayin'.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:14 am

mvscal wrote:At least the shit calls are balancing out. That was clearly an interception.

Yep.

Remind me to remind Van of that, just in case the Greatest Team In The History Of The World just happens to have this game "stolen" from them.

mothster · Post by **mothster** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:15 am

usc seems to be a 2nd half team-----is tejas?

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:19 am

Not the first time I've seen an extra point shanked because they were hurrying to avoid a replay. I agree with Wagon that they'd have been better off if it had been replayed. USC wasn't going to stop them that series anyway.

After all the previous problems you'd think they'd have been adamant with the crew about how/when to do replay. What a cluster.

Props to the horn defense on a good first half, THIRTY MORE MINUTES BABY.

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:22 am

Yes they can be. May not matter if the USC players can't keep from getting their bell rung. Not no easy to score shitload of points when your stars get hit a few times. After watching the 1st half it seems White is the best player they got and they seem afraid to use him. I'd take 5 yds a carry over a little shake and bake and piss poor ball handling-showboat- gone-wrong crap. Texas needs to keep hitting hard, quit fumbling and let VY continue the Rose Bowl magic. He must have left a little there last year. He is playing above expectations, thankfully not letting his hurt heisman feelings get in the way.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:35 am

nope, i dont. :)

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:37 am

I'm a bit surprised he didn't call a TO which likely would have gotten him a replay. Maybe he wanted to hold onto it for when he got the ball back.

I agree with campin that White is underused. Texas has an athletic D, you'd be better off taking it to them with the workhorse then changing up with Bush.

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:39 am

All right all right, lets all just settle down.

Each team got a call in it's favor. I think the no-interception had a bigger effect but neither team should complain right now.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:50 am

Bingo about Lendale. Folks forget how many games White was a workhorse in.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:55 am

Last two times Texas had the ball it looked like they were going against a scout team.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:03 am

Danimal wrote:Bingo about Lendale. Folks forget how many games White was a workhorse in.

Nice TD there.

See You Next Wednesday · Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:04 am

Good game.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:06 am

What a pathetic display of defense so far in the second half.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:50 am

The Assassin wrote:SC looks done, Texas is just beating them up right now. Leinert looks lost out there.

and I'm done making predictions.

win or lose USC is showing me and everyone else they are a tough team that doesnt crumble under the pressure.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:00 am

MuchoBulls wrote:Coaches challenging calls is not far off.

It can't be. The Big 10 replay system got the stink blown off of it this year, and what was underneath wasn't pretty.

Teams need to be able to initiate reviews, if it's going to happen at all. We all will probably agree, now, that some form of replay is necessary, because CFB ref competence isn't real high these days (sorry Lefty).

T1B

First chickenshit call of the night.

First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.

Re: First chickenshit call of the night.