Schedule next year

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:00 pm

This just in...
UM's 12th game is a season opener (9/02) at home versus Vanderbilt.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:02 pm

Good for them. I heard rumors of adding Maine and that would be horrible.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:04 pm

I heard it was going to be Army. I know Bobby Ross has them on the rise, but Vandy is a better choice.

PS. Glad the qb is gone :) .

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:12 pm

ND added Army, so that's likely why they couldn't be added to UofM schedule.

Yes, fuck you all. ND is playing all 3 next season. I'm already gearing up for a long offseason of "Where's the Coast Guard and Merchant Marines?"

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:14 pm

No fair if you unveil the blasts first!

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:16 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:Provided we find a better QB and have better offensive play calling:

9/2 - vs. McNeese St - W
9/9 - vs. Florida International - W
9/16 - @ UCF - W
9/23 - @ Kansas - L
10/21 - @ North Carolina - W

Dates to be determined
@ WVU - L
@ Louisville - L
@ Cincinnati - W
vs. Pitt - W
vs. Syracuse - W
vs. UConn - W
vs. Rutgers - W

You think you will beat UConn and Rutgers but not Kansas next year? WTF man?

BlindRef · Post by **BlindRef** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:18 pm

WolverineSteve wrote:This just in...
UM's 12th game is a season opener (9/02) at home versus Vanderbilt.

Where did you hear that?

The website has Ball State as the 9/2 game.

The date they need to fill is 11/4

Or am I just confused.

EDIT: NEVERMIND I FOUND IT AT THE WOLVERINE.COM

cool, that's not a bad choice at all.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:20 pm

Michigan State 2006:

VS Idaho W
VS Eastern Michigan W
@ Pittsburgh W
VS Notre Dame L

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:27 pm

Vito how can you give a team who is only going to return 2 starters on defense more credit than Oklahoma, who has most of its top 5 in the nation defense returning, in a game without superman?

Just curious. Maybe it is a bit homerish but this defys logic to me.

* Ignore the multitude of screw ups today. I am *gasp* actualy at the office today and my keyboard has been treated like a cheap whore.

Terry in Crapchester · Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:29 pm

Killian wrote:ND added Army, so that's likely why they couldn't be added to UofM schedule.

Yes, fuck you all. ND is playing all 3 next season. I'm already gearing up for a long offseason of "Where's the Coast Guard and Merchant Marines?"

In fairness, ND last played Army in '98, and Air Force in '02, so it's been awhile for those two.

And being a member of the only class in ND history to witness four straight losses to Air Force, I never consider that game a gimme, anyway.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 7:22 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Killian wrote:ND added Army, so that's likely why they couldn't be added to UofM schedule.

Yes, fuck you all. ND is playing all 3 next season. I'm already gearing up for a long offseason of "Where's the Coast Guard and Merchant Marines?"
In fairness, ND last played Army in '98, and Air Force in '02, so it's been awhile for those two.

And being a member of the only class in ND history to witness four straight losses to Air Force, I never consider that game a gimme, anyway.

I like it that Notre Dame is the only school who still consitantly plays the service academies. Gives them some much needed national exposure and Notre Dame is one school who people can't complain about going out of there way to get an easy schedule. There really aren't many easy schedules in South Bend and never by design.

RACK the Spud Sucking Catholics. :D

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:08 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:Provided we find a better QB and have better offensive play calling:

9/2 - vs. McNeese St - W
9/9 - vs. Florida International - W
9/16 - @ UCF - W
9/23 - @ Kansas - L
10/21 - @ North Carolina - W

Dates to be determined
@ WVU - L
@ Louisville - L
@ Cincinnati - W
vs. Pitt - W
vs. Syracuse - W
vs. UConn - W
vs. Rutgers - W
You think you will beat UConn and Rutgers but not Kansas next year? WTF man?

UConn and Rutgers are home games, so that is why I give us the nod. Kansas has a good D and I have no idea what our offense is going to be like 4 weeks into the season. The first 3 teams we should beat just running basic plays.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:35 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:...Kansas was a good D ...

FTFY.

It's gone, Charles Gordon declared for the NFL draft. The LB corp was senior heavy. Their D is pretty much in complete rebuild mode.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 8:42 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:...Kansas was a good D ...
FTFY.

It's gone, Charles Gordon declared for the NFL draft. The LB corp was senior heavy. Their D is pretty much in complete rebuild mode.

That's good for us then. Just hope we find a QB in the spring. Our D should be pretty good next season. We only have to fill a couple of spots on DL and potentially a LB spot if Nicholas declares for the draft, which doens't look likely.

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:59 pm

KU also lost Senior Charlton Keith from the DL, who was double-teamed a majority of the time. I did not see much of USF last year and do not know what they are returning.

Kansas

9/2 or 9/9 - I believe these dates are still open. I'm sure Lew Perkins can find a jellyfish or two. W
9/16 @ Toledo. A homer W, since Toledo is breaking in a new QB. They always seem to win 8-9 games a year, tho.
9/23 vs. South Florida. Probably a L
9/30 @ Nebraska. At least they don't lose 73-10 in Lincoln like they used to. L
10/7 vs. Texas A&M. I really have no idea. Let's say W.
10/14 vs. Oklahoma State. W
10/21 @ Baylor. W
10/28 vs. Colorado. Not sure who the Buffs are returning, but they definitely have KU's number ('sup used to be Nebraska?). L
11/4 @ Iowa State. L
11/11 @ Missouri. Mangino pwns Pinkel. W
11/18 Sat vs. Kansas State. W

7-4/8-4 at best, but i'm sure i gave them a W for a game they'll drop. Hello Tangerine Bowl!

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:39 pm

Degenerate wrote:I did not see much of USF last year and do not know what they are returning.

Since it looks like Nicholas is not going to declare for the NFL draft, we will be bringing back a very good D. We lose a couple of starters off of the DL, but we have depth in that area. Our LB's are the strong point of the D and the secondary is good.

Offense is a whole different story. We lose 3 OL and Andre Hall. While we do have depth at OL, filling Hall's shoes will be tough. Ponton looked good in the times he played and Plancher was getting rave rviews from the coaching staff. We're also in the running for some quality RB's for the upcoming recruting class. The biggest question mark again will be who be playing QB. If Julmiste starts the season (which I don't expect), then we are in trouble. We need to go with either Hill or Grothe and live with the mistakes they will make as a first year QB.

I still think we'll have a tough time playing Kansas.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:53 am

Sat, Sep 02 MONTANA STATE BOULDER TBA - Win

Sat, Sep 09 Colorado State at Denver (INVESCO Field) TBA - Win

Sat, Sep 16 ARIZONA STATE BOULDER TBA - Toss-up

Sat, Sep 23 Georgia at Athens, Ga. TBA - Loss

Sat, Sep 30 *Missouri at Columbia, Mo. TBA - Win

HOMECOMING GAME
Sat, Oct 07 *BAYLOR BOULDER TBA - Win

FAMILY WEEKEND
Sat, Oct 14 *TEXAS TECH BOULDER TBA - Toss-up

Sat, Oct 21 *Oklahoma at Norman, Okla. TBA - Loss

Sat, Oct 28 *Kansas at Lawrence, Kan. TBA - Win

Sat, Nov 04 *KANSAS STATE BOULDER TBA - Win

Sat, Nov 11 *IOWA STATE BOULDER TBA - Win

Fri, Nov 24 *Nebraska at Lincoln, Neb. 1:30 p.m - Toss-up

Somewhere between 7-5 and 10-2 in Hawkins' first season. Depends who's under center. If Bernard Jackson gets the job, I think 10-2 is feasible. But I'd be happy with 8-4, a win over Nebraska, another North title, and a bowl win to finish 9-5.

The ASU game certainly got more interesting after the Hawkins hire...

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:43 am

SunCoastSooner wrote:Vito how can you give a team who is only going to return 2 starters on defense more credit than Oklahoma, who has most of its top 5 in the nation defense returning, in a game without superman?

Just curious. Maybe it is a bit homerish but this defys logic to me.

* Ignore the multitude of screw ups today. I am *gasp* actualy at the office today and my keyboard has been treated like a cheap whore.

1. tOsu is the 2nd game of the year
2 tOsu's offense is light years better than the Oklahoma offense
3. Tressel always fields a great defense
4. The OU offensive line sucked last year and return no body for next year, I conclude they will suck worse next year.
5. Texas/OU is a rivalry game where anything can happen
6. Texas is returning a hell of a lot of Talent and experience, the only real problem is that none of the experience is at QB. But by the 5th game of the year a lot of their issues should start to be resolved. I'm scared to see what happens in week 2.

Is that enough for you.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:14 pm

Vito Corleone wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:Vito how can you give a team who is only going to return 2 starters on defense more credit than Oklahoma, who has most of its top 5 in the nation defense returning, in a game without superman?

Just curious. Maybe it is a bit homerish but this defys logic to me.

* Ignore the multitude of screw ups today. I am *gasp* actualy at the office today and my keyboard has been treated like a cheap whore.
1. tOsu is the 2nd game of the year

mmmmkay

2 tOsu's offense is light years better than the Oklahoma offense

Then tell me why did Oklahoma average more total yards a game than Ohio State did over the last half of the season if they are "light years" in front of us?

3. Tressel always fields a great defense

And Oklahoma doesn't? We haven't been outside the top 20 in total defense since Stoops came in. We haven't been outside the top 10 in rushing defense since before Stoops came to Norman.

4. The OU offensive line sucked last year and return no body for next year, I conclude they will suck worse next year.

I conclude you are an idiot if that is your reasoning because Texass is losing a lot on their OLine as well and we have just as talented prospects coming up and and coming in from JUCO as Texass has.

5. Texas/OU is a rivalry game where anything can happen

That is an even more valid reason to think that OU has a better shot than Ohio State, especially when taking into consideration the recent history of the series.

6. Texas is returning a hell of a lot of Talent and experience, the only real problem is that none of the experience is at QB. But by the 5th game of the year a lot of their issues should start to be resolved. I'm scared to see what happens in week 2.

The Oline is going to return 2 kids and if you think that texass is that much more talented than OU position to position your smoking crack.

Is that enough for you.

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:30 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
2 tOsu's offense is light years better than the Oklahoma offense
Then tell me why did Oklahoma average more total yards a game than Ohio State did over the last half of the season if they are "light years" in front of us?

Where did you find stats to support this? The only reason I ask is OSU's offense was like 65th through the first half of the season and then caught on fire to finish 32nd.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 3:09 pm

Sky wrote:
SunCoastSooner wrote:
2 tOsu's offense is light years better than the Oklahoma offense
Then tell me why did Oklahoma average more total yards a game than Ohio State did over the last half of the season if they are "light years" in front of us?
Where did you find stats to support this? The only reason I ask is OSU's offense was like 65th through the first half of the season and then caught on fire to finish 32nd.

Straight from the Ohio State and Oklahoma Athletic sites. Oklahoma's caught fire as well at the end of the season. I didn't bag on the tOSU offense in the least, it is very impressive. The difference in total yards was negligible but OU had a very slight lead over the last 6 games of each of our seasons. That is far and away from light years ahead of us.

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:17 pm

Roger that.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:50 pm

Before I post this, let me first say that in no way do I agree w/ this schedule. I think it is weak and I dont know if we scheduled those 3 cream puffs b/c other schools backed out, but we are gonna pay for it in '07. Our schedule is a mutha fucka. We play UF, Va Tech, Bama and Miami. Wish the AD would have evened the next 2 years out a little better.

Thus, we go undefeated in '06 but get left out b/c of our SOS.

HOME
Florida W
Wake Forest W
Clemson W
Virginia W
Boston College W
Troy - September 9 W
Rice - September 23 W
Western Michigan - November 11 W

AWAY
Miami - Sept 4 W
NC State W
Maryland W
Duke W

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:56 pm

8 home games?

And people criticize the way ND schedules?

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:07 pm

Cicero wrote:Before I post this, let me first say that in no way do I agree w/ this schedule. I think it is weak and I dont know if we scheduled those 3 cream puffs b/c other schools backed out, but we are gonna pay for it in '07. Our schedule is a mutha fucka. We play UF, Va Tech, Bama and Miami. Wish the AD would have evened the next 2 years out a little better.

Thus, we go undefeated in '06 but get left out b/c of our SOS.

HOME
Florida W
Wake Forest W
Clemson W
Virginia W
Boston College W
Troy - September 9 W
Rice - September 23 W
Western Michigan - November 11 W

AWAY
Miami - Sept 4 W
NC State W
Maryland W
Duke W

I think it more likely you pay for it in 2010 personally. ;) :D

Nolesy · Post by **Nolesy** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 9:25 pm

Cicero wrote:Before I post this, let me first say that in no way do I agree w/ this schedule. I think it is weak and I dont know if we scheduled those 3 cream puffs b/c other schools backed out, but we are gonna pay for it in '07. Our schedule is a mutha fucka. We play UF, Va Tech, Bama and Miami. Wish the AD would have evened the next 2 years out a little better.

Thus, we go undefeated in '06 but get left out b/c of our SOS.

HOME
Florida W
Wake Forest W
Clemson W
Virginia W
Boston College W
Troy - September 9 W
Rice - September 23 W
Western Michigan - November 11 W

AWAY
Miami - Sept 4 W
NC State W
Maryland W
Duke W

8 home games. Those season tickets prices are going to give me a nose bleed.

I did'nt know we slipped Rice in ther. Lefty, I'll have the guest house ready.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 2:39 am

SunCoastSooner wrote:

1. tOsu is the 2nd game of the year
mmmmkay
2 tOsu's offense is light years better than the Oklahoma offense
Then tell me why did Oklahoma average more total yards a game than Ohio State did over the last half of the season if they are "light years" in front of us?

3. Tressel always fields a great defense
And Oklahoma doesn't? We haven't been outside the top 20 in total defense since Stoops came in. We haven't been outside the top 10 in rushing defense since before Stoops came to Norman.

4. The OU offensive line sucked last year and return no body for next year, I conclude they will suck worse next year.
I conclude you are an idiot if that is your reasoning because Texass is losing a lot on their OLine as well and we have just as talented prospects coming up and and coming in from JUCO as Texass has.

5. Texas/OU is a rivalry game where anything can happen
That is an even more valid reason to think that OU has a better shot than Ohio State, especially when taking into consideration the recent history of the series.

6. Texas is returning a hell of a lot of Talent and experience, the only real problem is that none of the experience is at QB. But by the 5th game of the year a lot of their issues should start to be resolved. I'm scared to see what happens in week 2.
The Oline is going to return 2 kids and if you think that texass is that much more talented than OU position to position your smoking crack.

Is that enough for you.

OK lets look at what OU and tOSU have coming back.

OU has a medicore QB, tOSU has a stud QB
OU has the best RB in the nation, tOSU has a great runningback coming back.
OU has some good receivers, tOSU has Ted Ginn Jr, enough said.

OU is returning 2 starters from an Oline that sucked badly. tOSU loses one guy off a pretty salty group.

Defense
OU Dline sucked last year and lost 3 seniors including DD (that is unless he can punch another friend and squeeze another year out of the NCAA) you do bring Byrd back so at best your line will be about the same. tOSU loses 3 on the dline but returns Patterson, there will be a dropoff.

OU had a pretty good linebacking corp but loses Ingram, I expect your linebackers to be pretty salty next year. tOSU loses 3 starters but they played 5 backers pretty regularly there will be a major drop off but they will still be good.

OU secondary sucked, there is no way around it, they were so toasted you could butter them up and serve em for breakfast. I think they will be better next year only cause they can't get much worse. tOSU they had a good secondary but only bring back one guy, I have no idea what to expect.

What it comes down to for me is that Texas is catching tOSU when we will be starting a freshmen QB for only the 2nd game of his career. I will feel a little better about our chances against tOSU if Blalock decides to come back, (According to reports he is leaning towards coming back), If Blalock does come back our Oline won't miss a beat. The Texas defense will be better next year than they were this year when you just consider the talent level, but will need to replace lots of leadership. I can see the Texas defense shutting down the OU offense much easier than seeing them shutting down the tOSU offense.

If I were a betting man my money would be on tOSU to win it all next year.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:11 pm

Believe the Heupel wrote:Er OU's DLine sucked last year?

Team Rushing Defense
1. Ohio State 73.4 ypg
4. Oklahoma 90.6 ypg

Team Sacks

4. Oklahoma 45
5. Ohio State 44

Tackles for Loss

9. Oklahoma 86
31. Ohio State 74

It's okay BtH the more Vito posts the less I believe he has ever watched a football game that doesn't involve texass. Vito should stick to texass smack and that's about it because it is painfully obvious he doesn't have clue one about college football.

That mediocre football player at QB wasn't held under 200 passing yards but twice in the last nine games as a freshman with no Oline.

Ted Ginn is definatly the best receiver between the two and Malcom Kelley (OU) is pretty much a lock as the second best. Our receiving cortps are pretty damn comparable next year especially since we have everything returning other than two seniors who saw the field slightly more than I did.

BtH alread dispelled your load of shit about th Dline.

OU's secondary was a bunch of freshman and sophmore they won't ever improve I suppose?

.

Nolesy · Post by **Nolesy** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:57 pm

Cicero wrote:Before I post this, let me first say that in no way do I agree w/ this schedule. I think it is weak and I dont know if we scheduled those 3 cream puffs b/c other schools backed out, but we are gonna pay for it in '07. Our schedule is a mutha fucka. We play UF, Va Tech, Bama and Miami. Wish the AD would have evened the next 2 years out a little better.

Thus, we go undefeated in '06 but get left out b/c of our SOS.

HOME
Florida W
Wake Forest W
Clemson W
Virginia W
Boston College W
Troy - September 9 W
Rice - September 23 W
Western Michigan - November 11 W

AWAY
Miami - Sept 4 W
NC State W
Maryland W
Duke W

Crown, Does'nt FSU travel to Wake this year as this year Wake was in Tally?

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:38 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote:Er OU's DLine sucked last year?

Team Rushing Defense
1. Ohio State 73.4 ypg
4. Oklahoma 90.6 ypg

Team Sacks

4. Oklahoma 45
5. Ohio State 44

Tackles for Loss

9. Oklahoma 86
31. Ohio State 74
It's okay BtH the more Vito posts the less I believe he has ever watched a football game that doesn't involve texass. Vito should stick to texass smack and that's about it because it is painfully obvious he doesn't have clue one about college football.

That mediocre football player at QB wasn't held under 200 passing yards but twice in the last nine games as a freshman with no Oline.

Ted Ginn is definatly the best receiver between the two and Malcom Kelley (OU) is pretty much a lock as the second best. Our receiving cortps are pretty damn comparable next year especially since we have everything returning other than two seniors who saw the field slightly more than I did.

BtH alread dispelled your load of shit about th Dline.

OU's secondary was a bunch of freshman and sophmore they won't ever improve I suppose? .

I never said the OU defense sucked, they were pretty salty. I never meant to imply that the dline didn't have talent, but if I remember correctly injuries tore the dline up this year. So maybe I should have said the dline sucked because of injuries. I don't think your defense will suck next year. Now I do think your secondary sucked and I think it has sucked ever since baby stoops left for Arizona. Deal with it. Will they be better, like I said, they have no where to go but up.

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:42 pm

Just to add a little tOSU perspective...

Offense should be loaded. As long as the playcalling is agressive, we should put massive numbers on the board next season. To correct Vito, we lose 2 guys on the O-line, Rob Sims and Nick Mangold. Those will be tough shoes to fill (both played as freshman in the '02 NC game), but we have plenty of guys with experience. With Troy Smith, Tony Pittman, Chris Wells, and Maurice Wells in the backfield and Ted Ginn, Anthony Gonzalez, and Roy Hall on the outside, this should be Tressel's most talented team, offensively, thus far.

Of course, the downside is that we only return 2 starters on defense, and they are both lineman (Quinn Pitcock & David Patterson). The linebacker position, surprisingly enough, is not the biggest concern area. It will be nothing close to what it was this year, but it will not be a weak unit (guys with experience like Mike D'Andrea, Marcus Freeman, John Kerr, James Laurinaitis, & Chad Hoobler should fill in nicely). The main concern area is the secondary, where we just lost S Nate Salley and CB Tyler Everett to graduation, and CB Ashton Youboty and S Donte Whitner to the NFL. Lots of young talent to fill in there, but not a lot of guys with game experience.

There are some folks worried in Columbus, but like Vito said, Tressel always seems to have a solid defense. And coordinator Jim Heacock is one of the best nobody's heard much about. One thing that springs to mind-- as fucking stellar as OSU's D was this past season, we were 104th in turnover margin in '05. Aside from the Texas game, in which we gave Vince Young his toughest game IMO, we did not capitalize on many opportunities in that department. I expect that to change considerably next year.

I tend to agree with Soonerfan, in that Oklahoma has just as good a shot to knock off Texas as we do. I would say due to our youth in the secondary vs. UT's receivers, the game being in Austin and the game falling on the 2nd week of the CFB calendar, it will be extremely tough to pull it out. But anyways, carry on fellas.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:22 am

Nolesy wrote:
Cicero wrote:Before I post this, let me first say that in no way do I agree w/ this schedule. I think it is weak and I dont know if we scheduled those 3 cream puffs b/c other schools backed out, but we are gonna pay for it in '07. Our schedule is a mutha fucka. We play UF, Va Tech, Bama and Miami. Wish the AD would have evened the next 2 years out a little better.

Thus, we go undefeated in '06 but get left out b/c of our SOS.

HOME
Florida W
Wake Forest W
Clemson W
Virginia W
Boston College W
Troy - September 9 W
Rice - September 23 W
Western Michigan - November 11 W

AWAY
Miami - Sept 4 W
NC State W
Maryland W
Duke W

Crown, Does'nt FSU travel to Wake this year as this year Wake was in Tally?

I took it right from seminoles.com. Not Crown BTW.