Seattle v Washington... In game

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:24 pm

First game of the weekend is just about to get underway...

The team that wins the run game wins...

that said, I'm taking Seattle and it won't be close.

m2

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:40 pm

Fuck on the fumble, but the offense looked pretty sharp, otherwise.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:42 pm

And that's why Alexander doesn't have a huge contract yet. He better come up big in the playoffs this year.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:47 pm

I wouldn't call his second fumble of the season a lot.

BBMarley · Post by **BBMarley** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:52 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:I wouldn't call his second fumble of the season a lot.

Not the fumble per se- but his performace in the postseason as a whole. In the past- he has sucked major monkey cack in postseason

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:05 pm

Oh shit.......

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:08 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:I wouldn't call his second fumble of the season a lot.

No, but when he does it on his 1st carry without even being touched and causes his team to lose a scoring opportunity, it's called choking in the big game.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:21 pm

Blessing in disguise for Seattle. Now, they can put their best running back in and give him some carries, without the whiniest bitch in the league whining about his stats.

See how Holmgren plays it -- does he give up on the run, or stay true to the philosophy he claims to espouse -- as a GM, he traded up in the draft just to get Morris. He's always cliamed that a team must have two premiere running backs on the roster to win the championship. Let's see how much faith he has in the guy he placed a small bet-of-the-farm on (who incedentally is sporting a pretty gaudy YPC average on his careeer -- better than Alexander's, as a matter of fact).

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:46 pm

Morris isn't what i'd call explosive, but he's getting the job done.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:53 pm

I'm obviously quite biased, but I've maintained since day 1(4 years ago) that Maurice is a better RB than Alexander(although Alexander had his shit together this season, without question). If Morris would have had 370 carries behind that excellent line, he would have won the MVP as well.

Just because Holgren can't play the guy without Panties-In-A-Bunch-Alexander having a meltdown, doesn't mean dude isn't an excellent player.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:57 pm

Dinsdale wrote: Just because Holgren can't play the guy without Panties-In-A-Bunch-Alexander having a meltdown, doesn't mean dude isn't an excellent player.

what, do you just make this shit up as you go Dins.......

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:01 pm

so far, the O is just horrid. i mean, horrid. who the hell is calling these plays??

the D- minus the big pass and the td drive- has been good.

if the O decides not to show up, this one will be over soon. the good news is that the skins D is capable of stepping it up a notch.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:04 pm

Huh?

No, I don't need to make anything up -- Alexander's accomplishments as a whiney bitch are pretty well documented.

Or, have we forgotten "I WAS STABBED IN THE BACK" so soon? That was one in a very, very long line of bitchass moments for that bitch.

And well, Maurice did kind of (help) lead my real team to the best season in their century-long history.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:06 pm

Regardless what side of the fence anyone was on in this one (sup GO), I don't recall anyone here predicting an offensive track meet, nor do I remember anyone saying the Over was a stone cold lock.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:06 pm

Well... Seattle mistakes have keep Washington in this one.

I'm looking for Seattle to pull away in the second half, and this one won't be close.

Thanks for coming... Washington

Looks like another trip to the Super Bowl for the "NFC West" after next week.

m2

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:08 pm

okay, I've made note of the fact that you think Alexander is a bitch and that Morris is Jim Brown reincarnate......

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:09 pm

m2 wrote: Looks like another trip to the Super Bowl for the "NFC West" after next week.

Although I agree that the party is about to come to a quick end for the Skins, Seattle isn't getting out of next weekend alive.

And I am Ninersfan -- the Chickens will always be in the AFC West to me, regardless how many times the Niners play them a year (although the realignment allows me to go see my Niners once a year without too much hassle...didn't make it this year due to illness, though).

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:09 pm

m2 wrote:Well... Seattle mistakes have keep Washington in this one.

I'm looking for Seattle to pull away in the second half, and this one won't be close.

Thanks for coming... Washington

Looks like another trip to the Super Bowl for the "NFC West" after next week.

m2

riiiight.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:10 pm

Felix wrote:okay, I've made note of the fact that you think Alexander is a bitch and that Morris is Jim Brown reincarnate......

I was thinking a combination of Jim Brown, Tony Dorsett, and...well, I guess I shouldn't bring up the name Riggins right now.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:12 pm

Felix wrote:you think Alexander is a bitch

And anymore, it's no longer what I think -- it's pretty well documented. His bitchitude is about as open to debate as that of Terrell Owens.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:14 pm

Dins,

The "NFC West" will rub off on the Seahawks, and they'll lose that stench they had from the "AFC West".

I don't see Carolina or Chi-town taking a game in the Northwest from them.

m2

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:26 pm

poptart wrote:I would have to give a LOT of thought to whether or not the skins are capable of scoring enough to actually WIN this game.

werd

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:26 pm

I'd like to take this opportunity to congratulate Maurice Morris, who has now accomplished more in the postseason as a Seahawk than Shaun Alexander has in his entire career.

Quack Quack.

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:28 pm

alexander out of the game, and the D looks like swiss cheese. call me surprised.

of course, the O can make a play whenever they feel like it.....

Red · Post by **Red** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:33 pm

G.O. wrote:so far, the O is just horrid. i mean, horrid. who the hell is calling these plays??

the D- minus the big pass and the td drive- has been good.

if the O decides not to show up, this one will be over soon. the good news is that the skins D is capable of stepping it up a notch.

WTF do want?!?!?

You've already got almost double the passing yardage you had last week.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:44 pm

m2 wrote: The "NFC West" will rub off on the Seahawks, and they'll lose that stench they had from the "AFC West".

What a tool.

The only reason the Hags are even in the SB hunt with homefield thru-out is because they play in absolutely the most pathetic division in the NFL. It's pretty easy to pad your record when you have 6 gimme' games a year.

If the Hags make the Superbowl, they'll get fucking rolled by whichever AFC team makes it thru that gauntlet.

The Superbowl will be anti-climactic, to say the least.

Funkywhiteboy · Post by **Funkywhiteboy** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:54 pm

'Skins didn't get points off of turnovers like they did last week.
Game over.
Washington will be a combined 0-5 this year against AFC West teams. :P

M2 · Post by M2 » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:57 pm

Funkywhiteboy wrote:'Skins didn't get points off of turnovers like they did last week.
Game over.
Washington will be a combined 0-5 this year against AFC West teams. :P

That's nice... but the Seahawks are in the "NFC West".

m2

Funkywhiteboy · Post by **Funkywhiteboy** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:59 pm

m2 wrote:
Funkywhiteboy wrote:'Skins didn't get points off of turnovers like they did last week.
Game over.
Washington will be a combined 0-5 this year against AFC West teams. :P
That's nice... but the Seahawks are in the "NFC West".

^^
Didn't get the joke.
I was including the Seachickens, as an "erstwhile member". :wink:

Red · Post by **Red** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:00 am

m2 wrote:That's nice... but the Seahawks are in the "NFC West".

m2

And they had better be thankful for that.

They sucked so hard for so many years they got booted out of the AFC West.... and almost immediately pwned the NFC West.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:36 am

Bwhahahahahahahahaha

How's that taste???

m2

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:37 am

Spread covered.

:bigmassivehugeshocker:

I'm going with NE +3.5 in the next one-btw.

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:38 am

m2 wrote:Bwhahahahahahahahaha

How's that taste???

m2

m2-

first, you didnt say dick this whole week that thread was open, so you cant say shit now.

second, 52-17.

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:40 am

Sounds like we have a poor loser...

the truth

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:41 am

How did it feel to lose to a "weak-scheduled" team, Deadskin Fan?

Now the C-list celebrity stalking midget can go back to his pathetic life cruising dive bars on the east coast.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:43 am

G.O. wrote:you didnt say dick this whole week that thread was open

I did :winkywinky:

I think there's some evidence of that somewhere :doublewinkywinky:

And Seattle's linebackers played better than the Skins linebackers.

And the weather was tougher on Washington's passing game than it was on Seattle's.

And Tatupu had a better weekend than Merriman.

And Seattle's defense did just about the same thing to the Skins' offense as Tampa's.

:SHOCKER:

Who woulda thunk it?

What a great working model of the adage "a cornerback is a reciever with bad hands." If the Hen DBs had hung on to any of those gifts Huskell threw them, that would have gotten pretty ugly on the scoreboard.

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:43 am

m2 wrote:Sounds like we have a poor loser...

the truth

i'm sorry- where were you all week?

btw- it was till 52-17.

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:46 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:How did it feel to lose to a "weak-scheduled" team, Deadskin Fan?

Now the C-list celebrity stalking midget can go back to his pathetic life cruising dive bars on the east coast.

wow. what great big balls you have.

missed you as well this week. where were you when this viewtopic.php?t=13002&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 was posted?

M2 · Post by M2 » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:47 am

G.O. wrote:
m2 wrote:Sounds like we have a poor loser...

the truth
i'm sorry- where were you all week?

btw- it was till 52-17.

I read the thread... and made my call at the start of the game.

the truth

G.O. · Post by **G.O.** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:47 am

Dinsdale wrote:
G.O. wrote:you didnt say dick this whole week that thread was open
I did :winkywinky:

I think there's some evidence of that somewhere :doublewinkywinky:

And Seattle's linebackers played better than the Skins linebackers.

And the weather was tougher on Washington's passing game than it was on Seattle's.

And Tatupu had a better weekend than Merriman.

And Seattle's defense did just about the same thing to the Skins' offense as Tampa's.

:SHOCKER:

Who woulda thunk it?

What a great working model of the adage "a cornerback is a reciever with bad hands." If the Hen DBs had hung on to any of those gifts Huskell threw them, that would have gotten pretty ugly on the scoreboard.

props to you for being correct about some things. but bringing up merriman was in poor taste. you know why.