USC cheerleader

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:51 pm

Did she have money on the game or did she really just want to fuck VY?

BTW, Sooner's are farking the hell out of this.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 7:55 pm

hooo boy.

~cowbells ringing~

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:03 pm

I really love how her two girlfriends are looking all bewildered--#16 is really tall.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:13 pm

#16 is tall? How about the giant with the pom-poms!

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:18 pm

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:22 pm

That was quick^^^^

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:26 pm

They were on an ND board.

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:29 pm

Deuce Bigalow, Male Gigelow wrote:That's one big bitch!

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jan 13, 2006 8:51 pm

Killian wrote:

What, no pic of the Twin Towers going down and her cheering?

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:03 pm

Killian wrote:Did she have money on the game or did she really just want to fuck VY?

BTW, Sooner's are farking the hell out of this.

Blonde and Usc. What did you expect?

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:08 pm

You know, the more I look at it, the more I think the original is a wytch.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:16 pm

Killian wrote:You know, the more I look at it, the more I think the original is a wytch.

How do you come to that conclusion? I see those two blondes on the left looking at her direction and thinking, what the hell is she cheering about?

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:18 pm

At least she can use her sweater as a reference if she forgets how to spell "U$C."

m2

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:19 pm

Look at their legs. Something seems a bit off about the legs. Also, look at her shoes. You can see hers, but you can't see the rest of them. And how often are the cheerleaders directly behind the endzone? Typically they are on the sideline/corner of the endzone.

Even if the group is behind the endzone, I think the pic of her may be wytched.

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:27 pm

Killian wrote:Look at their legs. Something seems a bit off about the legs. Also, look at her shoes. You can see hers, but you can't see the rest of them.

ummmmm...

She's jumping.

m2

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:44 pm

Killian,

For what it is worth, that is exactly where they were standing the whole game. The USC band was to our left was we look at the picture and to the cheerleaders right. They were right behind the goal post and never moved the whole game.

Roofer · Post by **Roofer** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:05 pm

She was cheering because she knew that USC's best defense was their offense, and they were gettin the ball back with 19 ticks on the clock. I was pullin for Texas to score quickly as well!!

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:12 pm

Killian wrote:Look at their legs. Something seems a bit off about the legs. Also, look at her shoes. You can see hers, but you can't see the rest of them. And how often are the cheerleaders directly behind the endzone? Typically they are on the sideline/corner of the endzone.

Even if the group is behind the endzone, I think the pic of her may be wytched.

Looks like the real deal to me Killian.
The shadows from top / left match on all the cheerleaders.
The focus (or lack of) match throught-out.

I think it's just a case of an out of focus blonde co-ed. Not unusual.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:17 pm

m2 wrote:
Killian wrote:Look at their legs. Something seems a bit off about the legs. Also, look at her shoes. You can see hers, but you can't see the rest of them.

ummmmm...

She's jumping.

m2

Sorry Kill but m2 gets a RACK for that. She's a big girl...looks about 5-10 or 5-11 if the other ladies are average height. She's got legs for days but she's got a '50s hairstyle though.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sat Jan 14, 2006 9:26 pm

Maybe she thought that USC stopped them...?

the_ouskull

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:45 am

I think they are just on a slant, a slight slant from right to left. And just like #16, she might be jumping or starting her jump.

It's not that hard to believe some ditz cheerleader jumped/cheered at the wrong moment, is it?

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:26 am

Maybe Lendale had given her crabs. :twisted:

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:16 pm

I thought it was a wytch because she is just so damn huge. I know at IU, they require cheerleaders to be 100 lbs or less. That's why my cousin didn't make the team there. She was like 110 so she ended up cheering at Purdue. I know not all schools have that requirement, but this SC cheerleader is farkin huge. Just doesn't make sense...

Nolesy · Post by **Nolesy** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:37 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Just so I am sure I understand. She could'nt cut mustard at IU so she transfered to Purdue so she could be a cheerleader?
One might infer that their is some sort of yell leader gene runing amuck in the frisco gene pool. :wink:

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:56 pm

^^^^^^^^^^

Naw, the only talent you have to have to be a yell leader at ATM is...well...nothing. It just takes being in the corps, wearing white coveralls on game days, denim coveralls other days, and the enough coordination to move your hands together.

His cousin on the other hand must have had some talent. Purdue requires their cheerleaders to tumble, toss, etc. ;)

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:03 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:I thought it was a wytch because she is just so damn huge. I know at IU, they require cheerleaders to be 100 lbs or less. That's why my cousin didn't make the team there. She was like 110 so she ended up cheering at Purdue. I know not all schools have that requirement, but this SC cheerleader is farkin huge. Just doesn't make sense...

The only way a weight limit that stringent makes sense is where you have a co-ed cheerleading team and the men have to lift the women. I could be wrong about this, but I think the USC Song Girls are a bit different in that regard, and there are no male cheerleaders at USC. Under those circumstances, I can't see such a stringent weight limit.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:51 pm

Well, it is actually my cousin-in-law. It's my wife's cousin. She knew when she graduated high school she wouldn't be able to cheer for IU so she never went there. She went to Purdue instead.

And yes, the weight limit at IU is that stringent.

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:22 pm

at IU the cheerleaders spend half the game with a male cheerleaders hand up their butt, Song girls dont do any acrobatics.

They have been saying it was a Wytch on other boards, if she was jumping her skirt would be moving and her hair as well as that the shadows on her leg are on the other side of the shadows on the other song girls legs. I havent been able to stomach any replays to see if that was her real reaction or not.

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:41 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:And yes, the weight limit at IU is that stringent.

Not disputing you, Indy, just pointing out that a weight limit that low doesn't really make any sense unless there are guys on the cheerleading squad and they're doing a lot of lifts.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:19 pm

Sorry Terry, but I don't know the ins and outs of cheerleading. Only what I've been told from my cuz. I've gone to a lot of IU football games, and I don't really pay attention to the cheerleaders, but I don't ever recall seeing any dudes there.

In any case, I don't see this USC cheerleader being tossed up in the air much unless they have a catapult and net.

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:48 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:Sorry Terry, but I don't know the ins and outs of cheerleading.

Neither do I, except for what I've absorbed through osmosis by seeing my stepdaughter cheerlead for most of the past decade or so.

Only what I've been told from my cuz. I've gone to a lot of IU football games, and I don't really pay attention to the cheerleaders, but I don't ever recall seeing any dudes there.

I honestly don't know whether IU's cheerleading squad is co-ed or not. I know ND's is, and in fact, a guy in my dorm was on the cheerleading team (I think I posted my "Think of Laura" story, but it might have been on the main board). Without knowing for sure, I would venture a guess that the majority of cheerleading squads at 1-A schools are co-ed, but obviously, some are not.

In any case, I don't see this USC cheerleader being tossed up in the air much unless they have a catapult and net.

I remember when the Song Girls came to ND, most of the male students (myself included) were swooning over them. I'm pretty sure that they come sans dudes.

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Jan 16, 2006 8:53 pm

Shoalzie wrote:
m2 wrote:
Killian wrote:Look at their legs. Something seems a bit off about the legs. Also, look at her shoes. You can see hers, but you can't see the rest of them.

ummmmm...

She's jumping.

m2

Sorry Kill but m2 gets a RACK for that. She's a big girl...looks about 5-10 or 5-11 if the other ladies are average height. She's got legs for days but she's got a '50s hairstyle though.

Shoalzie, It's another illusion.

She looks a lot taller than the other girls, because she's jumping and she has her arms straight up in the air... giving her the illusion of being much taller than the girls that are standing.

At most... she's a couple of inches taller than the other girls.

m2

Nolesy · Post by **Nolesy** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:40 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:Well, it is actually my cousin-in-law. It's my wife's cousin. She knew when she graduated high school she wouldn't be able to cheer for IU so she never went there. She went to Purdue instead.

And yes, the weight limit at IU is that stringent.

Thanks for clearing that up. Now we don't have to be so concerned about lil frisco. :P

Does any one else see this thread going the way of the quinn sisters?

GrizBearStare · Post by **GrizBearStare** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:12 pm

The Snopes expanation is too kind to the cheerleader. I hope they understand that they don't improve their chances of nailing her just because they are polite on the 'net.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:47 am

Regardless, dumb or not...USC females are always winners with me.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Jan 17, 2006 8:33 am

A few more good ones...

My favorites...

The Picasso

The Last Supper :twisted:

m2

See You Next Wednesday · Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:05 pm

This is obviously not the VY TD run to win the game. It looks like a close play at the goal line, I can't remember one of those though. But look at the Texas players, claiming TD and looking over at the Line Judge to see if he agrees.

She thinks, I guess, that SC stopped them. I dunno, did they? I can't remember.

Sky · Post by **Sky** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:40 pm

Yeah really, which play was this? I don't recall a short run (less than 10-15 yds) where the linemen would have been that close? Anyone?

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 6:59 pm

I think it was the 2-point conversion after VY scored the winning TD.

She was probably still cheering from the play before. :D

SoCalTrjn · Post by **SoCalTrjn** » Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:41 am

Its an obvious FARK, the shadows on her body and legs are on her left side, the shadows on the other song girls are on their right side

T1B

USC cheerleader

USC cheerleader

Re: USC cheerleader