Welcome to the New Reich (Spellcheck courtesy of PSU)

The best of the best
Post Reply
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

BSmack wrote:
Van wrote:People have been making that argument since the halcyon rebellion days of the 50's and 60's and no, we're no closer to Hitler's Nazi Germany than we ever were.
We were comming awfuly close in the early 50s. Thanks in great measure to the rebels of the 50s and 60s, we avoided that fate. I wish I could be as certain about our not so distant future.
No, we were never even coming remotely close. Not in the McCarthy 50's, not during the Prohibition, not during the Reagan Era and certainly not now.

This is the sort of Chicken Little extremist "The sky is falling! The sky is falling!" nonsense that fuels the ACLU and the Far Left since dirt was new.

On our worst day we never have been and never will be anything at all like Hitler's Nazi Germany. There is nothing in our national make up, our internal political manueverings and especially our foreign policy that has ever borne any resemblance to Hitler's Nazi Germany.

Nothing. Zilch. Nada. We are diametric opposites.

The United States literally has the ability to do exactly what Hitler endeavored to do, and quite a bit more. We not only don't do it, we've instead set an historical benchmark in our lack of international conquests. We could easily re-draw maps all over the world, and we don't. We could easily annnihilate our enemies, and we don't. We could easily decimate and take over any country on the planet, and we don't.

We have weak neighbors surrounding us and we let them be.

Mexico's oil? Venezuela's?

Iran's? Iraq's?

Saudi's?

All ours for the taking. Not the buying, or the leveraging, or even the gaining of pricing advantages and other favors.

No. The outright taking. What was theirs is now ours, including their land, and the name of their former city is now New Philadelphia.

We don't do it, and there's nothing and nobody that could stop us from doing it if we decided to go Hitler on 'em.

Canada? Mexico? Central America? All ours, within a few mere weeks, if we were only willing to engage in real war rather than the politically precious type we engage in throughout the middle east. There's not a damn thing anybody could do about it if the U.S. decided to annex all of North America...as Hitler attempted to do in Europe.

Kristallnacht? Liebensraum? Blitzkrieg?

There are no equivalents in modern U.S. history. There easily could be, and with a level of bloodless effectiveness (on our side, anyway) that Hitler could've never dreamt of enjoying.

No, instead we attempt to target only specific buildings while attempting to leave all the others alone, and then we allow ourselves to sit there and be pilloried in response to the relatively infintesimal collateral damage that does occasionally occur.

Somehow, I don't think Hitler was nearly so circumspect when he rolled through Warsaw.

Gypsies, Jews....foreigners?

How do you suppose Hitler would've dealt with illegal Mexicans and minorities in general in this country?

For the umpteenth time, the U.S. is easily the most benevolent world dynasty in the history of mankind. No nation in history has ever wielded the level of economic and military dominance at our disposal, much less done so little with it in terms of imperialistic conquest. Similarly, no other dynasty in world history has ever suffered so much internal dissention from its populace, without deciding to simply quash it.

The fucking irony: You monkeys sit here and decry the potential Hitler-esque degree of conduct by the U.S....and you sit here publicly decrying it, on the worldwide internet, where anybody and everybody can read it, including your own government...and you do so rightfully 100% confident in your ability to do so with no fear of reprisals.

But you compare Bush to Hitler.

Fucking people, trying to elevate yourselves, thinking you're so cute. Oh yes, you're so "open minded"; please, bow down and by all means give each other a self satisfied blowjob over this comfortable armchair quarterbacking game of yours. Go ahead and keep taking your mushbrained potshots, completely oblivious to the fact that you're free to do so and, um, exactly why is that, anyway??

It's only the luxury provided by the U.S.'s unprecedented cultural and governmental benevolence that affords you precious cunts the ability to sit back and be this gobsmackingly snide and stupid.

For your sake it's a good thing there is no "Hitler" in George Bush or in any aspect of modern U.S. society because if there were many of you morons would be herded up, lined up against a wall and shot, simply for the benefit of society.

They used to call it "culling the herd", starting with the woefully opinionated and loudmouthed 'tards.
Last edited by Van on Fri Mar 03, 2006 4:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Welcome to the New Reich (Spellcheck courtesy of PSU)

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Van wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:Any moron who in any way equates George Bush with Adolph Hitler has no business taking part in a political discussion...and he sure as hell shouldn't be standing in front of a high school geography class offering up pointed and asinine political editorials to fifteen year olds.
You're welcome.
The teacher compared the political tactics of the two, not the two as whole people. Tell me you know the difference. :meds:
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: Welcome to the New Reich (Spellcheck courtesy of PSU)

Post by Van »

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Van wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:Any moron who in any way equates George Bush with Adolph Hitler has no business taking part in a political discussion...and he sure as hell shouldn't be standing in front of a high school geography class offering up pointed and asinine political editorials to fifteen year olds.
You're welcome.
The teacher compared the political tactics of the two, not the two as whole people. Tell me you know the difference. :meds:
Tell me you can't tell the difference between the political tactics of George Bush and Adolph Hitler and...

...nevermind. If you even attempt to further any such discussion you're beyond hope. You're too anti Bush to even comprehend the obvious difference: You and your continual public diatribes against George Bush would soon see you dead if you lived in Hitler's version of America.

Considering you lived in Yosemite and now Seattle it's simply amazing, your complete inability to see the forest for the trees.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

You monkeys sit here and decry the potential Hitler-esque degree of conduct by the U.S
Nice rant, Van...but get a hold of yourself. Care to point out who's doing that here? About the rant, though...interesting how it veered towards admiring genocide, at the end? So basically, the only one espousing a comparison to Nazism, and ending up admiring its methods, is yours truly.

Once again, did this teacher compare Bush and Hitler from top to bottom? You know he didn't.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

Like those two things aren't one in the same. Show me one lib who has used the term "neocon" in a positive way
Once again, you're an idiot - because you don't seem equipped to really understand what is being said here. Yes, often political labels are insulting...but when I call you an idiot, it has nothing to do with your politics. Instead, it refers to your limited ability to understand what we're discussing. As an idiot, your analysis of politics relies on labels, because you are unable to go any further...and even if you could, you'd likely refuse to do so.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Rich Fader
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1948
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:44 pm
Location: Riverside, CA

Post by Rich Fader »

BING! BING! BING!

RACK Van...and RACK TTB for the :shock: yet strangely :lol: mental image of Franken getting Hannitized.
Jihad is hump of Islam...and Islam wants to hump us very much.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

PSU, nice try at a cheap shot spin but no, I didn't espouse genocide. I said that if there was any truth to the Hitler-Bush comparison people would be getting rounded up and killed, willy nilly, starting with minorities and political dissidents.

See, that's what Hitler did. If George Bush was anything like Hitler...

That teacher didn't compare Hitler and Bush "from top to bottom" but as I clearly demonstrated there is no measure whatsoever by which Bush could be politically compared to Adolph Hitler.

Bush could easily have what Hitler dreamed of having, and he doesn't even bother taking Mexico.

In terms of internal politics Bush has no Kristallnachts or beer garden rallies as his equivalents.

He didn't kill everybody who stood between him and power. He didn't kill his opposition once he arrived at power. He didn't scapegoat an entire race of people and attempt to kill them.

He didn't attempt to rally his people around hate and then set out on world conquest.

There are no valid comparisons. Bush wields the mightiest stick in the history of mankind and he has a world full of perfectly worthwhile enemies and....nothing. He's done absolutely nothing in any vein that's even remotely similar to Hitler's idea of politics.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

PSU, also, Bsmack absolutely tried to draw the comparison. It's right there in his quote...
Bsmack wrote:
Van wrote:
People have been making that argument since the halcyon rebellion days of the 50's and 60's and no, we're no closer to Hitler's Nazi Germany than we ever were.


We were comming awfuly close in the early 50s. Thanks in great measure to the rebels of the 50s and 60s, we avoided that fate. I wish I could be as certain about our not so distant future.


...in no uncertain terms.

In has fantastically paranoid left wing view of the world the U.S. was "comming (sic) awfully close" and he's not even sure about our not so distant future.

I'm guessing that when the wind kicks up a bit in his neighborhood he also immediately battens down the hatches and begins worrying that flying cows will take out his second floor and Helen Hunt will appear in his driveway in a pick up truck and a wet t-shirt, ready to help him go out and track the twister...
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

Please, take the time to read the post.
the only one espousing a comparison to Nazism, and ending up admiring its methods, is yours truly.
I said you espoused a comparison to nazism, and that you admired its methods. That's quite different than saying you "espoused genocide".

And now I see that you've edited out the part of your post that admires genocide...oh well, clearly we both remember it.

Anyway, if you're going to clack out screeds like that and expect them to be read and understood, please show others the decency to read and comprehending their posts as well.

Or ask TTB to bum you a stupid pill...
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

I'm not sure exactly what he's referring to, but if he's talking about 50s America, perhaps we can agree that he's not referring to the Bush administration, can't we?

What's more, perhaps he's referring to the McCarthy hearings, which most Americans now regard as a black eye on that period, and certainly the kind of thing that recalled the evils of the Nazi regime, particularly in the early stages. I'd say that a comparison could easily be made there.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

PSU, I didn't edit out anything so I don't know what you're talking about. The only edit I made was to correct a single typo and that was way higher in the post.

I also expressed no admiration for the methods of Nazism. I merely described them, and I then applied them to prove the absurdity of Diego's point.
Last edited by Van on Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gunslinger
Sir Slappy Tits
Posts: 2830
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:06 pm

Post by Gunslinger »

Spinach Genie wrote: The guy should just count his lucky stars he didn't say the word 'Jesus' out loud. Every ACLU lawyer within 500 miles would have swooped in for the attack.
Yet, he is on administrative leave and will lose his job.

Jesus Christ! Can any of you motherfuckers ever step outside of the box?

I didn't get in this thread, because I didn't give a shit, but come on. What the fuck are you talking about with your babblings that he is getting away with this shit? You have got to be fucking kidding me?
I fucking suck.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

PSUFAN wrote:I'm not sure exactly what he's referring to, but if he's talking about 50s America, perhaps we can agree that he's not referring to the Bush administration, can't we?
A tangent on his part, yes, but it was his way of again going Chicken Little and attempting to compare America to Nazi Germany.

Absurd.
What's more, perhaps he's referring to the McCarthy hearings, which most Americans now regard as a black eye on that period,
Of course he is, and of course it was.
and certainly the kind of thing that recalled the evils of the Nazi regime, particularly in the early stages. I'd say that a comparison could easily be made there.
And there you'd be reaching like crazy. At its worst, the fruition of McCarthyism run amok in America still would never evoke in the minds of any intelligent person images akin to Hitler's Nazi Germany.

The mere fact that there were hearings involved there rather than quiet round ups and executions speaks to this in spades.

It's simply irresponsible as hell to ever make comparisons to Hitler and the Nazis when you're discussing American politics. That's SNL level "thinking" and nothing more.

Anybody who'd attempt to compare George Bush (or America in the 50's) with Adolph Hitler quite obviously has a very twisted agenda and an almost complete lack of command of facts. Such talk and such speakers should be dismissed out of hand as inconsequential fluff.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

attempting to compare America to Nazi Germany.
Stop right there. You've annexed a lot of rhetorical territory. Initially, you were aghast at the Bush/Hitler comparisons...now, you're expanding it to America/Nazi Germany? Pretty sloppy, if you ask me.
The mere fact that there were hearings involved there rather than quiet round ups and executions speaks to this in spades.
The Nazis didn't assume control of the state right after the Beer Putsch, now did they? They had a good 5 years in which they scratched and clawed their way to power, employing character assassinations frequently, without a doubt. When comparing the McCarthy Hearings with the early period of the Nazi Party, one is on solid ground.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
TenTallBen
No title requested
Posts: 1975
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Zydeco Country

Post by TenTallBen »

PSUFAN wrote:
Like those two things aren't one in the same. Show me one lib who has used the term "neocon" in a positive way
Once again, you're an idiot -.
Wow! You're fresh as hell when it comes to name calling. I guess you can't show me what I asked for so I will take that as admission of guilt/stupidity.

My wife is a dem but not as extreme and outgoing as you PissStain. She actually has more of an open mind than you ever will. Keep on sticking to your "guns" and rejoice in the fact that you are so much better than everyone else. Don't look now but dins might want a piece of you....either that or to lick your asshairs.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

PSUFAN wrote:
attempting to compare America to Nazi Germany.
Stop right there. You've annexed a lot of rhetorical territory. Initially, you were aghast at the Bush/Hitler comparisons...now, you're expanding it to America/Nazi Germany? Pretty sloppy, if you ask me.
Fortunately I didn't ask you but yes, "America in the 50's" encompasses "America/Nazi Germany", as does Bsmack's other comment that he still worries about America in the not too distant future.

I didn't bring up those other "America/Nazi Germany" comparisons, Bsmack did. I merely responded to them.
The mere fact that there were hearings involved there rather than quiet round ups and executions speaks to this in spades.
The Nazis didn't assume control of the state right after the Beer Putsch, now did they? They had a good 5 years in which they scratched and clawed their way to power, employing character assassinations frequently, without a doubt. When comparing the McCarthy Hearings with the early period of the Nazi Party, one is on solid ground.
No, one is not. The tactics were entirely different and most definitely so were the goals.
Last edited by Van on Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

My wife is a dem but not as extreme and outgoing as you PissStain.
TTB, who told you I was a democrat? I'm not, BTW.
Don't look now but dins might want a piece of you....either that or to lick your asshairs.
Why are we...ok, you...talking about Dinsdale, all of a sudden? I don't see the connection. Care to enlighten me?
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
TenTallBen
No title requested
Posts: 1975
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Zydeco Country

Post by TenTallBen »

PSUFAN wrote:TTB, who told you I was a democrat? I'm not, BTW.
If it walks like a duck and it talks like a Kennedy then it must be a dumbass.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

TTB, I'll give PSU his due: I've not noticed him to be one who is normally prone to going to the gratuitous name calling card. From my observations at least he seems to try to stay on topic and he seems to try to conduct himself civilly.

Otherwise, I'm like you in that sense. When someone starts resorting to nothing but gratuitous name calling I lose interest in them and the debate.
Last edited by Van on Fri Mar 03, 2006 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

The tactics were entirely different and most definitely so were the goals.
Sorry, but Hitler chasing Jews around and sullying their names looks an awful lot like Joe McCarthy chasing Jews around and sullying their names to me. Yes, the two situations ended differently, but the comparison I'm making doesn't go that far. It doesn't require the consideration of points that you might add to it to be valid. You are free to make your own comparisons, and choose the parameters accordingly, or not.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
velocet
"Q-Town"
Posts: 937
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:14 pm

Post by velocet »

PSU...

When you say: "So basically, the only one espousing a comparison to Nazism, and ending up admiring its methods, is yours truly."

...you do realize the "yours truly" part means you're referring to yourself?


:mrgreen:


BSmack,

Method equals style now? But overall what the hell are we going to argue about? I think his conclusion in the Bush-Hitler comparison is over the top but nothing he should see disciplinary action over. And most importantly, his statement to the effect that all of what he said was said with stimulating thought as the intent sounded genuine to me. It might have served as something of a cover as well, but whatever. You were obviously right in pointing out in an earlier post that he did conduct the class as an open forum. So in sum and substance, no harm no foul.
I hope he doesn't see any further consequences from this situation. If one wanted to issue condemnation upon the loopy dome of a fukked up teacher, I think it should go right to the Florida teacher who recently called a kid in his class a n.i.g.g.e.r and then tried to play it off like he was using the slang salutation "nigga".






velocet
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

PSU, the goals and tactics weren't the least bit similar.

Joe MCarthy never espoused or practiced the condemnation/scapegoating and literal segregation and then branding of an entire religious group that had been living peacefully in the U.S. forever.

He went after political individuals, and he sure as hell didn't go after an entire religious group using an escalating and opportunity driven blanket plan of property seizures, physical brands, terrorism, herding into ghettos, forced starvation and genocide.

There's just no comparison. Mountains vs molehills.
Gunslinger
Sir Slappy Tits
Posts: 2830
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:06 pm

Post by Gunslinger »

It's good that the American Education System ultimately believes that:
Those that don't know history are doomed to repeat it.
I'll be sure to shout that shit as I cum on another Tshirt.

"Hey! Just remember! I didn't give you an egg to scope out, because you dumbfucks don't know history! You would have grown up believing that censorship is the American way and mother fuck that first amendment, cuz you are now in a sock in my laundry basket. BOOYAH! I fucking rule!"
I fucking suck.
User avatar
TenTallBen
No title requested
Posts: 1975
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Zydeco Country

Post by TenTallBen »

Gunslinger wrote:I'll be sure to shout that shit as I cum on another Tshirt.!"
Nobody will be listening.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

TTB, I'll give PSU his due: I've not noticed him to be one who is normally prone to going to the gratuitous name calling card. From my observations at least he seems to try to stay on topic and he seems to try to conduct himself civilly
Hey, I've called TTB an idiot here, because frankly, he's deserved the epithet. I've explained my reasoning for tarring him with it several times. Meanwhile, he himself essentially is holding up the name-calling like a swiss cheese umbrella.

Thanks, velo, I got a little phrase-heavy there.

I'll be sure to shout that shit as I cum on another Tshirt.
There's no call for that type of imagery.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Gunslinger
Sir Slappy Tits
Posts: 2830
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:06 pm

Post by Gunslinger »

Van wrote:PSU, the goals and tactics weren't the least bit similar.

Joe MCarthy never espoused or practiced the condemnation/scapegoating and literal segregation and then branding of an entire religious group that had been living peacefully in the U.S. forever.

He went after political individuals, and he sure as hell didn't go after an entire religious group using an escalating and opportunity driven blanket plan of property seizures, physical brands, terrorism, herding into ghettos, forced starvation and genocide.

There's just no comparison. Mountains vs molehills.
WOW! Was I the only one that linked a current event to everyone of those denials he placed on the Bush administration?

Political individuals: Liberals
Religious Group: Muslims
Property Seizures: emanate domain
Physical brands: imaginary lib vs. conservative argument
Terrorism: attacking Iraq over Saudi Arabia and Iran and N. Korea got nukes
Herding into ghettos: Guantanamo Bay
Forced starvation: Africa
Genocide: Iraqis vs. Saudis

WOW! Pure ignorance.
I fucking suck.
velocet
"Q-Town"
Posts: 937
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:14 pm

Post by velocet »

'Slinger,

You're point is well taken, ignorance of history is a bummer. Even worse is the fact that even should that be overcome in any appreciable degree, there's always the fights over interpretation and presentation of said historical knowledge.

And as Van down by the River graciously emphasized, at least here we're free to go about having those fights. In totalitarian hellholes, there is a choice... the party line or one becomes history.





velocet
Gunslinger
Sir Slappy Tits
Posts: 2830
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:06 pm

Post by Gunslinger »

velocet wrote:'Slinger,

You're point is well taken, ignorance of history is a bummer. Even worse is the fact that even should that be overcome in any appreciable degree, there's always the fights over interpretation and presentation of said historical knowledge.

And as Van down by the River graciously emphasized, at least here we're free to go about having those fights. In totalitarian hellholes, there is a choice... the party line or one becomes history.





velocet
Yeh, but its up to us to criticize it and make it better. This discussion is about freedom of speech and you compliment freedom of speech as being the foundation of our democracy, so you have to hate it also.

This teacher shouldn't be replaced, but maybe warned that not everyone agrees with his takes. At the same time, its up to us to ensure that mvscal and others become comedy and not taken seriously.

There is a common mainstream opinion in this country and it should be protected. It is our duty to defeat those that are lunatics.

This forum created a forum for political banter, when we are men and we discuss politics as men do.

Was he wrong? No, I don't believe so. Is Bush Hitler? No, he isn't. Is his administration showing signs of Nazi ism? Yeh, they are.

We can all discuss that intellectually. Sure.
I fucking suck.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

:meds: :meds: :meds:
Gunslinger wrote:
Van wrote:PSU, the goals and tactics weren't the least bit similar.

Joe MCarthy never espoused or practiced the condemnation/scapegoating and literal segregation and then branding of an entire religious group that had been living peacefully in the U.S. forever.

He went after political individuals, and he sure as hell didn't go after an entire religious group using an escalating and opportunity driven blanket plan of property seizures, physical brands, terrorism, herding into ghettos, forced starvation and genocide.

There's just no comparison. Mountains vs molehills.
WOW! Was I the only one that linked a current event to everyone of those denials he placed on the Bush administration?
Jeez...

Okay...
Political individuals: Liberals
Neither George Bush nor America in general has ever treated any liberal as an "enemy" at all, much less the way Hitler or Nazi Germany treated their political "enemies". In fact, America nearly often as not elects liberals to their highest office.

Nice catch phrases and all, "liberals" and "conservatives", but in the grand scheme of things in American politics they both co-exist with no real problems.

San Francisco has never been branded, seized and then turned into a militarily enforced ghetto.

The lengths you blockheads will go in your hatred of Bush, wow...
Religious Group: Muslims
Care to name any groups of U.S. Muslims that've been herded up and summarily executed?

How about specifying the physical brands they've been given, either on their bodies or their clothing? Are their storefronts branded, and then seized, across the board?

Moreover, the last time I checked U.S. Muslims were still organizing and demonstrating and exercising their rights to free speech, assembly, property, arms, religion and yes, political dissension.

We also haven't gone out and simply slaughtered Muslims around the globe. Don't even begin to equate our war on terrorism with Nazi Germany's genocide against the gypsies and Jews.
Property Seizures: emanate domain
Across the board property seizures, with the only justification given being that the property was Muslim owned?

Nope. Absurd.
Physical brands: imaginary lib vs. conservative argument
Chicken Little, freaking out again. This is getting weaker and weaker.
Terrorism: attacking Iraq over Saudi Arabia and Iran and N. Korea got nukes
Try it again, in English.

Anyway, Saudi Arabia is our strategic ally. They've allowed our troops on their soil.

Oh, also...

They aren't led by a despotic madman who gasses his own people along the way to slaughtering hundreds of thousands, all the while destabilizing the region and loudly and constantly fomenting a climate of anti U.S. terrorism.
Herding into ghettos: Guantanamo Bay
Small potatoes compared to the Warsaw Ghetto. GB's detainees are captured war combatants, not entire city populations made up of innocent working men, women and children.

Keep going though. You're proving my point more and more with each absurd comparison.
Forced starvation: Africa
Yep, the leading nation in the world in terms of food drops, peacekeeping military intervention and overall humanitarian aid is attempting to starve out Africa.

I'm sure the African villagers looking hopefully up at the sky for the next sortee of U.S. cargo planes dropping off payloads of supplies view the U.S. exactly as the inmates at Bergen-Belsen viewed their captors.
Genocide: Iraqis vs. Saudis
Narrowly targeted smart bombs and all out humanitarian aid in Iraq pretty much precludes any notion of Iraqi genocide. If Hitler had the means we do to commit genocide and Iraq were his enemy there wouldn't be anything in Iraq now but a few bratwurst shops and the occasional Volkswagon dealership.
WOW! Pure ignorance.
That's what sucks the most here. Like so many over the top, hate filled left wingers you're not even ignorant. I know you know better than this. You're simply choosing to equate all that we do with the Nazis even when you know full well there are no corollaries there at all.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

Nice catch phrases and all, "liberals" and "conservatives", but in the grand scheme of things in American politics they both co-exist with no real problems.
cool. will you have tea with TornTreeBen sometime please?
emanate domain
heh heh
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Gunslinger
Sir Slappy Tits
Posts: 2830
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:06 pm

Post by Gunslinger »

Van wrote: Anyway, Saudi Arabia is our strategic ally. They've allowed our troops on their soil.
Oh lord I'm going to puke.

I don't understand why you changed your posting stance towards me in this thread, but I believe it is alcohol.

And I'm not going to puke out of outrage, but out of laughing my ass off.

Bin Laden wanted troops out of Saudi Arabia and we have no more troops in Saudi Arabia.

How could you seriously screw that one up more?
I fucking suck.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

Your question, near as I could tell, was, "Why attack Iraq instead of Saudi?"

If the answer to that inane question didn't come to you as easily as your next anti Bush whinge than hey, you're simply beyond my help.

Bare minimum though, I'm giving you credit for knowing that the Saudis are still considered to be a working ally of ours while for quite a long time now Iraq has tended to run right near the front of the line in terms of being a card carrying member of the "Death to America!" brigade...

They haven't quite nudged ahead of Iran in that line but then Iran never attacked Kuwait and Saudi, now did they?

Moreover, what's any of this got to do with your comical comparisons of the U.S. vs Nazi Germany?? Your points were laughable, and they were dispensed with, so....what??
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Post by BSmack »

Van wrote:No, we were never even coming remotely close. Not in the McCarthy 50's, not during the Prohibition, not during the Reagan Era and certainly not now.
I guess your tolerance for repression and mine are not the same. I prefer not to have the 4th Reich breathing down my neck before I start to draw the comparisons. Perhaps you may have read something about liberty and eternal vigilance?

Like it or not, the Nazis (along with Stalin’s apparatchiks) have become the benchmark for repression of liberty. So it is only natural that they will be the ones to whom comparisons are drawn when, in times like our present, our government seeks to expand hegemony abroad and curtail rights at home.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Spinach Genie
Elwood
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Bama
Contact:

Post by Spinach Genie »

BSmack wrote: I guess your tolerance for repression and mine are not the same.
You haven't got the slightest clue what real repression is.

Like it or not, the Nazis (along with Stalin’s apparatchiks) have become the benchmark for repression of liberty. So it is only natural that they will be the ones to whom comparisons are drawn when, in times like our present, our government seeks to expand hegemony abroad and curtail rights at home.
Only for the ignorant.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Post by BSmack »

Spinach Genie wrote:You haven't got the slightest clue what real repression is.
That would be a good thing you jackbooted fucknut.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Spinach Genie
Elwood
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Bama
Contact:

Post by Spinach Genie »

No shit. So why is this thread littered with 7 pages of your bitching about it?
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Post by BSmack »

Spinach Genie wrote:No shit. So why is this thread littered with 7 pages of your bitching about it?
Do I have to explain the concept of eternal vigilance to you as well? Just because I have not experienced "real" repression first hand doesn't mean I can't recognize when it is happening. Just as one does not need your extensive experience with anal sex to know when a dick is in their ass.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Spinach Genie
Elwood
Posts: 417
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:18 am
Location: Bama
Contact:

Post by Spinach Genie »

BSmack wrote:
Spinach Genie wrote:No shit. So why is this thread littered with 7 pages of your bitching about it?
Do I have to explain the concept of eternal vigilance to you as well? Just because I have not experienced "real" repression first hand doesn't mean I can't recognize when it is happening. Just as one does not need your extensive experience with anal sex to know when a dick is in their ass.

I'd try and return that fagsmack volley, but it's fairly apparent that when your head is as far up your ass as yours seems to be, you'd make a pretty poor fag in all but style.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

I find this whole episode to be much ado about nothing.
Agreed. I find it interesting that there seems to be a ready market in Colorado for "exposing" teachers in this way. In a prior age, twats like this would be paddled.

Kids sure are uppity in Colorado.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

The day that my kids come to me with complaints of political bias in the classroom, of any derivation, I'll RACK that teacher for getting their mental gears going. I'll challenge them to make their cases substantial in opposition.
Last edited by PSUFAN on Fri Mar 03, 2006 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Post Reply