Should Judges... always be lawyers???
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Should Judges... always be lawyers???
This maybe the problem... with our "perfect" system.
the truth
the truth
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:44 pm
- Location: Riverside, CA
- Mike the Lab Rat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 1948
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:17 pm
- Location: western NY
Concur. Having sat through court proceeding run by a local yokel non-lawyer, I'd have to say that an individual well-versed in legal precedents, admissability of evidence, etc. is preferable. The whole "I don't know a lick about law but got elected as the smartest chimp in the clan" is utter bullshit.Rack Fu wrote:That just might be the dumbest question that I have ever seen. Props on being number one at something.Should Judges... always be lawyers???
What next?
Should writers... always know how to read???
Should swimmers... always know how to swim???
You are an epic moron.
THE BIBLE - Because all the works of all the science cannot equal the wisdom of cattle-sacrificing primitives who thought every animal species in the world lived within walking distance of Noah's house.
- TenTallBen
- No title requested
- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Zydeco Country
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
One of the biggest problems with the legal system in New York is that town and village justices are not required to be lawyers, and as a point of fact, in rural areas town and village justices who are lawyers are the exception rather than the rule.Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Concur. Having sat through court proceeding run by a local yokel non-lawyer, I'd have to say that an individual well-versed in legal precedents, admissability of evidence, etc. is preferable. The whole "I don't know a lick about law but got elected as the smartest chimp in the clan" is utter bullshit.Rack Fu wrote:That just might be the dumbest question that I have ever seen. Props on being number one at something.Should Judges... always be lawyers???
What next?
Should writers... always know how to read???
Should swimmers... always know how to swim???
You are an epic moron.
I'm considering running for town justice in the town where I live next year, to remedy that in part.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
In New York, town and village justices have jurisdiction over misdemeanors, violations (relatively minor offenses that are not considered crimes or traffic infractions) and traffic infractions allegedly occurring in their municipality. They have limited jurisdiction over felonies, said jurisdiction being limited to conducting a preliminary hearing to determine whether there is probable cause to hold the defendant for the action of a grand jury, and also to set bail on the defendant. They also have civil jurisdiction over cases where at least one of the parties is a resident of the municipality and the amount in controversy is not more than $3,000, as well as all landlord-tenant matters arising in their jurisdiction.Mace wrote:The same is true in Iowa for many of the smaller rural counties. We call them Magistrates and they only hear simple misdemeanor and traffic cases.Terry in Crapchester wrote:One of the biggest problems with the legal system in New York is that town and village justices are not required to be lawyers, and as a point of fact, in rural areas town and village justices who are lawyers are the exception rather than the rule.Mike the Lab Rat wrote: Concur. Having sat through court proceeding run by a local yokel non-lawyer, I'd have to say that an individual well-versed in legal precedents, admissability of evidence, etc. is preferable. The whole "I don't know a lick about law but got elected as the smartest chimp in the clan" is utter bullshit.
I'm considering running for town justice in the town where I live next year, to remedy that in part.
City courts have the same jurisdiction, except that the upper limit on civil jurisdiction for city court is $15,000 in controversy, and also, in cities with a population of more than 200,000, traffic infractions are not heard in city court but are referred to an administrative adjudication bureau. City court judges must be attorneys, however.
Unfortunately, it's not that way here. You have to be elected to a town or village justice position.Any attorney in the county who applies for the appointment is given preference over a lay person also applying for the job.
Mace
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.