Usually...

War Stoops · Post by **War Stoops** » Thu May 11, 2006 8:07 pm

...when your name is in a story with the words "passes out" and "Kelly Clarkson" you should be embarassed. This, however, is pretty f-ing cool.

War Stoops · Post by **War Stoops** » Fri May 12, 2006 4:12 am

I stand corrected.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri May 12, 2006 2:44 pm

Rules.

And I'm with BtH on this one.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Fri May 12, 2006 2:50 pm

If she passes for "meaty" then I've fucked some down right fatties.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri May 12, 2006 2:54 pm

WAR girls with meat on their bones...

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Fri May 12, 2006 2:56 pm

For "having meat on her bones," she looks awful titless. ...and to me, at least, a woman without titties is like a day without beer, which is like a day with sunshine, which is like a woman without titties.

the_ouskull

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Fri May 12, 2006 3:20 pm

Titties are a little overrated IMO. Ass and abs is where its at and Kelly fits that description just fine.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri May 12, 2006 3:37 pm

Sissyroo wrote:Titties are a little overrated IMO.

Possible sig material for someone.

What a stupid thing to type.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Fri May 12, 2006 3:52 pm

Yeah, you need a handful but I would rather have a girl w/ bangin ass and stomach w/ a handful of boobies, over a girl that just has huge fun bags. I like the athletic, fit girls and most of the time they dont have tig o bitties.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri May 12, 2006 3:56 pm

Once they become milk factories, doesn't matter.

Sin,
Father of 7 month old