GRAMMY'S IN-SHOW THREAD. CALL IT!

RIP scritti.

Moderator: scritti

Post Reply
User avatar
Buried_Nick
You can't spell scUM, without UM
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: ^ Eating her edible britches offen her crack

GRAMMY'S IN-SHOW THREAD. CALL IT!

Post by Buried_Nick »

:mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:
User avatar
Buried_Nick
You can't spell scUM, without UM
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: ^ Eating her edible britches offen her crack

Post by Buried_Nick »

Looking forward to seeing Green Day and U2 rip it up.

& John Mayer to win a couple. He's outstanding.

You?
User avatar
KUTTER
Reads more, posts less
Posts: 474
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Stage left

Post by KUTTER »

Its all about white people tonight. Looks like we won't be getting a whole lot of thanking God first and foremost tonight.
Now pretty please, with sugar on top, clean the fucking car.
mothster
at moderators discretion
Posts: 1880
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:15 pm
Location: 10 minutes south of la conchita

Post by mothster »

not in
mvscals blow monkey spunk
User avatar
scritti
The Internationalist
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: the 412
Contact:

Post by scritti »

who gives a fuck about a grammy? the world is over now because Miss bayou trash Britney won...

expect pestilence soon...
Image
Guess what-I got a FEVAH...and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL
User avatar
Funkywhiteboy
Wiseass
Posts: 1667
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Palmyra, PA

Post by Funkywhiteboy »

scritti wrote:who gives a fuck about a grammy? the world is over now because Miss bayou trash Britney won...

expect pestilence soon...
And locusts! Plagues of locusts! :lol: :twisted:
“If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more
successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh,
excuse me, in the Republican Party.” (NPR Interview Of Howard Dean

<http://www.breitbart.tv/html/153493.html> , 8/15/08)
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Post by Shoalzie »

I love Ray Charles but apparently dying is a huge thing with Grammy voters...it worked for Johnny Cash. :lol:
mothster
at moderators discretion
Posts: 1880
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:15 pm
Location: 10 minutes south of la conchita

Post by mothster »

GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
mvscals blow monkey spunk
User avatar
chargerfan
Elwood
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:11 pm

Post by chargerfan »

mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
User avatar
scritti
The Internationalist
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: the 412
Contact:

Post by scritti »

chargerfan wrote:
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Image
Guess what-I got a FEVAH...and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL
Guest

Post by Guest »

didn't watch the show

i did hear that J-Lo sounded like ASS

is anybody surprised? :lol:
User avatar
Shepard Smith
Fuckin' Noob
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:37 am

Post by Shepard Smith »

Samurai G wrote:i did hear that J-Lo sounded like ASS

is anybody surprised? :lol:
She's got enough of it to go 'round! :wink:
FOX Reports, You Decide!
Guest

Post by Guest »

Shepard Smith wrote:
Samurai G wrote:i did hear that J-Lo sounded like ASS

is anybody surprised? :lol:
She's got enough of it to go 'round! :wink:
true

:lol:

i didn't even realize i typed that
User avatar
chargerfan
Elwood
Posts: 387
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:11 pm

Post by chargerfan »

scritti wrote:
chargerfan wrote:
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Um desperate housewives hands down.
User avatar
Mister Bushice
Drinking all the beer Luther left behind
Posts: 9490
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:39 pm

Post by Mister Bushice »

scritti wrote:
chargerfan wrote:
mothster wrote:GRAMMY RATINGS PLUNGE: VIEWERSHIP DOWN 25% FROM YEAR AGO... MORE... LOWEST IN 8 YEARS... ABC 'DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES' EASILY TOPS MUSIC FEST...
That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Meaningless empty shit com that shows NO T& A just a cock tease with a bunch of heavily painted hags (ever seen hatchers rock-in-socks from 20 years ago? :shock: )

Etheridge at least has real talent.

But I think that the last few years of bling bling bullshit and talentless hacks acting like they actually matter probably has a lot to do with loss of viewership.

What I saw this year on the grammies talent wise was better than recent shows.

Except the has beens tsunami relief crew version of across the universe. Ghastly.
User avatar
scritti
The Internationalist
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 7:26 pm
Location: the 412
Contact:

Post by scritti »

Mister Bushice wrote:
scritti wrote:
chargerfan wrote: That's because alot of people myself included are really turned off by todays so called stars. They do nothing but run around like a bunch of idiots in their ghetto sleds and all their bling or whatever the fuck they're calling it these days and act like they can do whatever they want. Oh you're right about 1 thing if you want to win alot of grammys i guess dying would be a good start to acomplish that goal. He probably would'nt have won jack if he were still alive.
um rack that...and besides,who would you rather watch? a bald melissa etheridge and queen latifah or Eva and Teri from desperate housewives?
Meaningless empty shit com that shows NO T& A just a cock tease with a bunch of heavily painted hags (ever seen hatchers rock-in-socks from 20 years ago? :shock: )

Etheridge at least has real talent.

But I think that the last few years of bling bling bullshit and talentless hacks acting like they actually matter probably has a lot to do with loss of viewership.

What I saw this year on the grammies talent wise was better than recent shows.

Except the has beens tsunami relief crew version of across the universe. Ghastly.
don't get me started on that tsunami charity song...if you need to hear a remake of "Across The Universe",get either the versions done by Rufus Wainwright or Fionna Apple.
Image
Guess what-I got a FEVAH...and the only prescription is MORE COWBELL
Post Reply