Now look back at the picture of Gore that I posted.Derron wrote:
Not affecting my vision...at least I know where the fucking magazine is...and what it is ....
Notice the difference?
Christ you're a fucking retard.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Now look back at the picture of Gore that I posted.Derron wrote:
Not affecting my vision...at least I know where the fucking magazine is...and what it is ....
Why do you think I was asking where the bolt was? Christ, the man was in the field, without a magazine in his weapon. He was obviously doing some maintenance on his weapon when the picture was taken. My presumption would be that he removed the magazine and the bolt before doing said maintenance. My picture is proof of the former, nobody will ever know the latter because there isn't a picture that tells the whole story.Turdmaker wrote:Ever shoot a weapon B Wenie?
Ever take a firearms safety course?
The problem for you is that it was NOT patently unsafe. I guess I'll have to point it out for you again.Turdmaker wrote:You blither on an on defending this dipshit's patently unsafe handling of a weapon and I'm the gibbering dumbfuck, internet warrior.
Typical liberal cunt juice spin.Now look back at the picture of Gore that I posted.
Notice the difference?
Christ you're a fucking retard.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Show your son this picture as well.Derron wrote:Note the picture taken on the left....a reasonalbly new M-16. Note the picture with the inventor of the internet...an older M-16 model. You see that ridge on the bottom??? That's the bottom of the fucking clip you cunt face. There are about 50 different clip configurations for the M-16/ AR 15. That is the smaller, vintage clip that is in that weapon. Holds a minimal amount of rounds, but it only takes one to dedome Al there.
The new weapon has a standard military issue 2006 style clip. Apples and oranges....as you like to compare. When is the last time you fired one B Monica ??
I shot one 5 days ago, one that I pulled out of my own fucking gun safe you dick....I will make sure I show your brillant post to my son when he comes home tomorrow from Camp Pendelton, oh did I say that he's an armorer ??...and he will probably want it printed out to show his unit....what a fucking moron Gore and yourself are.
How can you tell that gun is pointed at his head? You wearing 3-D glasses?Turdmaker wrote:Gawddamn you're a fucking idiot. I've hunted my whole life, I've taken gun safety courses, I've taught gun safety courses and in NO, ZERO, NONE circumstances ever call for a barrel of a rifle to be pointed at or around or near anyone's head or any other part of the body--that's all there is to it.
You don't want me to start dropping screen grabs on yo ass.poptart wrote:
Roethlisberger SCORED !!!!
I don't see anybody here doing that. What I object to is you trying to reinvent W in the same light, particularly when he used Daddy's money and connections to secure a spot with a champagne Guard unit, then couldn't even be bothered to show up for that.mvscal wrote:Why are you trying to reinvent this assclown as Audie Murphy?
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Considering you're too stupid to spell Al Gore correctly, I don't think I need to spend any more time on you. The facts remain that you posted a deliberately misleading picture and are now desperately trying to spin your way out of it.mvscal wrote:Obviously algore was too fucking stupid to have absorbed the lesson.
So you too have a way to see this picture in 3-D? Please, share your stash with the rest of the group.mvscal wrote:The muzzle of the weapon is pointed straight at his face and the weapon is off safe. There is nothing misleading about that, you retarded, braindead fuck.BSmack wrote:The facts remain that you posted a deliberately misleading picture
Ah, the appeal to authority. A classic logical fallacy. How classically mvscal that he props himself up as the "authority". Of course that still doesn't explain how a two dimensional image turns into a 3 dimensional one when viewed by mvlsd. Perhaps Albert Hoffman could help?mvscal wrote:You don't need a three dimensional image, dumbshit. Oh yeah, sorry I almost forgot that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
It's set to semi. Now you know. But go ahead and pretend like you know more about it than I do if you want.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Martyred wrote: Hang in there, Whitey. Smart people are on their way with dictionaries.
War Wagon wrote:being as how I've got "stupid" draped all over, I'm not really sure.
Al Gore's fuckup was in allowing jackoffs like mv to define him. It sure as hell wasn't defending his country. You, mv and I know absolutely NOTHING about what was going down when that picture was taken. But for some reason (politics anyone?) people on the right side of the aisle want to use that picture as evidence that a man who volunteered to serve his country in wartime was somehow not a "real" soldier. Which is, as far as I am concerned, absolutely chickenshit. Especially since the picture that mv posted was obviously doctored to make it look worse than it was.Goober McTuber wrote:Brian,
Give it up already. It doesn’t matter if the magazine is out. It doesn’t matter if the muzzle is pointed three inches outside of his left ear. Anyone who knows anything about firearms knows that Al Gore fucked up in that picture. EOS.
Oh I know what the pic was doctored. The stolen election out front should have told you that.poptart wrote:Now that Bri's over-thinking pseudo-intellectual ass of a self has FINALLY conceded that there is NO excuse for having the weapon pointed anywhere close to the direction Algoron had it pointed ...... we're going to be treated to another 4 or 5 pages on why the pic is doctored ... ?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
BSmack wrote:But for some reason (politics anyone?) people on the right side of the aisle want to use that picture as evidence that a man who volunteered to serve his country in wartime was somehow not a "real" soldier.
Since when is it OK to have a gun on safe pointed at you?mvscal wrote:The uncropped photo is actually worse for algore. It shows that the weapon was off safe as well as pointed at his own face.BSmack wrote:Oh I know what the pic was doctored. The stolen election out front should have told you that.poptart wrote:Now that Bri's over-thinking pseudo-intellectual ass of a self has FINALLY conceded that there is NO excuse for having the weapon pointed anywhere close to the direction Algoron had it pointed ...... we're going to be treated to another 4 or 5 pages on why the pic is doctored ... ?
I'm starting to understand how the Rodney King trial must have gone down. Did you live in Simi Valley?Dinsdale wrote:No...I was just using that evidence to support the (CORRECT) statements made by others here that Gore fucked up in that picture.
Ooops.....my bad.poptart wrote:Now that Bri's over-thinking pseudo-intellectual ass of a self has FINALLY conceded that there is NO
excuse for having the weapon pointed anywhere close to the direction Algoron had it pointed ......
BSmack wrote:The facts remain that was not a loaded weapon.
NRAhq.org wrote:1. ALWAYS keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.
This is the primary rule of gun safety. A safe direction means that the gun is pointed so that even if it were to go off it would not cause injury or damage. The key to this rule is to control where the muzzle or front end of the barrel is pointed at all times. Common sense dictates the safest direction, depending on different circumstances.
Agreed. But to those of us who don't have short memories, it would be patently obvious that Gore is not the only Vice-President in need of a firearms safety refresher course.Dinsdale wrote:NRAhq.org wrote:1. ALWAYS keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.
This is the primary rule of gun safety. A safe direction means that the gun is pointed so that even if it were to go off it would not cause injury or damage. The key to this rule is to control where the muzzle or front end of the barrel is pointed at all times. Common sense dictates the safest direction, depending on different circumstances.
Notice that that bit of basic info (and common sense) is numbered...1 ?
Notice that there's no qualifiers to rule #1? It doesn't say anything about "....UNLESS such-and-such?"
Nope...it says "at all times." Not "most of the time." Not "unless the magazine is out." Not "unless you plan on running for public office someday." Not "unless you don't feel like it." Not "unless some retard on a messageboard says it's OK."
"At all times."
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Terry in Crapchester wrote: Gore is not the only Vice-President in need of a firearms safety refresher course.
You're looking at one picture, frozen in time, and presuming that Gore did not check the chamber?Dinsdale wrote:Because IN THAT PICTURE (B's theme through this whole thing), neither I, nor anyone else, can see daylight through the bore.
THAT is the definition of a "loaded weapon." Period. Ask anyone who actually knows what the fuck they're talking about.
Martyred wrote: Hang in there, Whitey. Smart people are on their way with dictionaries.
War Wagon wrote:being as how I've got "stupid" draped all over, I'm not really sure.
BSmack wrote:You're looking at one picture, frozen in time, and presuming that Gore did not check the chamber?
mvscal wrote:You're right.
Please do explain how you know what transpired both before and after that picture was taken. I won't be holding my breath.Dinsdale wrote:If you weren't so busy flailing aimlessly at those "big meanies," you might even realize how ungodly fucking stupid this statement is...but I doubt it.BSmack wrote:You're looking at one picture, frozen in time, and presuming that Gore did not check the chamber?