Put the bottle down, you fukking mic. It's rteally starting to show in this thread.
That last post may technically be true, but what does that have to do with the price of tea in china?
The original premise here, that thomas is an idiot because he said mr war hero doesn't know what he is talking about, is horseshit.
Stevens, an admittedly very smart fellow was real good at cryptography. During the war II this ability was put to use cracking codes. For this, the country owes him a debt of gratitude. But, it does not qualify him as an authority on all things concerning warfare.
88 showed the actual response of thomas and it seems pretty fukkin' nails to me.
Perhaps Bsackless can take the actual writing on this matter and point out where he is an idiot.
Clarence Thomas is an idiot
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
- Some Damn Retard
- Elwood
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 6:31 pm
- Location: You've been punked by a retard.
America will never not be at war.Tom In VA wrote:Both you an mvscal are typically nails in my book as well, but it seems the two of you are having issues with the difference between combat and war.
You might have a war, without combat, but you can't have combat without a war, something like that.
A BILL to Regulate the Hunting and Harvesting of Attorneys PC 370.00:
370.02. Bag Limits per day: yellow-bellied sidewinders 2 two-faced tortfeasors 1
back-stabbing divorce litigators 3 horn-rimmed cut-throats 2 minutiae-advocating vultures 4 honest attorneys protected (endangered species)
370.02. Bag Limits per day: yellow-bellied sidewinders 2 two-faced tortfeasors 1
back-stabbing divorce litigators 3 horn-rimmed cut-throats 2 minutiae-advocating vultures 4 honest attorneys protected (endangered species)
Well because mvscal was equating "WAR" with "combat". The "realities of war" vs. the "realities of combat". Webster's seems fit to attribute different meaning to these words ....smackaholic wrote:Put the bottle down, you fukking mic. It's rteally starting to show in this thread.
That last post may technically be true, but what does that have to do with the price of tea in china?
The third connotation being ....
3 : active fighting in a war : ACTION <casualties suffered in
One can be experienced in aspects of warfare without having experienced combat. There are, War Vets, and Combat Vets. The U.S. Army sees fit to award those soldiers in COMBAT, a badge for being in COMBAT. However, many soldiers participate in the war.
Agreed but it does give him a leg up on Thomas, as he actually did experience warfare. You yourself implicitly make my point by saying "on all things". BTW, what does closing with the enemy, directing fire on them and killing them (combat) have to do with how prisoners are kept off the battlefield ?smackaholic wrote: ..... But, it does not qualify him as an authority on all things concerning warfare.
Right but much of the discussion between MVSCAL and me, took place prior to 88's post.smackaholic wrote:
88 showed the actual response of thomas and it seems pretty fukkin' nails to me.
Perhaps Bsackless can take the actual writing on this matter and point out where he is an idiot.
With all the horseshit around here, you'd think there'd be a pony somewhere.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
mothster wrote:please don't, there are enough yaawhoo's as it is up hereThe Seer wrote:Oh, and P.S.
I am leaving for Santa Barbara in a few minutes for the weekend, so you'll need to find another babysitter.....
Hey! How long has the Californian been closed? Used to go to a kool bar in there back in the day....Also, what ever happened to the blue roofed Miramar resort?????
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs