Adam Carolla tells Ann Coulter to get lost

[BSmack]

I had no idea he was still working. Funny shit.

http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Adam-C ... 7-6-06.mp3

[LTS TRN 2]

Just hanging up on the bitch doesn't really get the job done---that is, exposing her as a totally phony hack who dresses like a prostitute.

Corolla is a second-rate hack himself. Oh well

[MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan]

I really don't have anything against him. He's a pretty funny guy. As good a replacement for the KOAM as you'll find. When Howard retires, I might even listen to him. Hopefully he'll be on Sirius by then too.

[Cicero]

Carolla stopped being funny 10 years ago.

[Bizzarofelice]

HOLY KWK RESET!
How the hell did you remember that?

[indyfrisco]

Still a big Carolla fan here. He always has great comebacks.

I liked when he hung up and said, "Well I don't have time for bitches."

Good stuff.

[Dog]

Adam Corolla rocks. I still think he's funny, and that was the best interview with Ann Coulter I've ever heard.

But, I'd still wrap her legs around my neck and grudgefuck her in the poop schute.

[indyfrisco]

But, I'd still wrap her legs around my neck and grudgefuck her in the poop schute.

Either you have a very long dick or you can suck your own dick or both. Either way, I'm sure ILII would love to see ^^^THAT^^^.

[BSmack]

Carolla stopped being funny 10 years ago.

EXACTLY, and I'm VERRAH sure that Ann Coulter give a shit what some douschebag that used to hand out sex advise on motherfucking MTV says about her.

Like you wouldn't have taken that gig on MTV?

[indyfrisco]

Carolla stopped being funny 10 years ago.

EXACTLY, and I'm VERRAH sure that Ann Coulter give a shit what some douschebag that used to hand out sex advise on motherfucking MTV says about her.

Like you wouldn't have taken that gig on MTV?

Of course not. Selling insurance to family is a much better gig.

[BSmack]

I never said I wouldn't take that gig on MTV- all I said was that Ann Coulter probably gives a crap LESS about what Adam Carollo thinks about her, that's all.

So dude had a job that you would have take (in a second mind you) and you use said job as the basis for negating Adam Carolla has to say about Ann Coulter?

I guess that means that she wouldn't waste the time to shit on one of your takes.

[Headhunter]

We couldn't get Michelle Troll to post here, let alone Anne Coulter.

Really doesn't reflect on them as people, or said takes of posters here.

[BSmack]

I never said I wouldn't take that gig on MTV- all I said was that Ann Coulter probably gives a crap LESS about what Adam Carollo thinks about her, that's all.

So dude had a job that you would have take (in a second mind you) and you use said job as the basis for negating Adam Carolla has to say about Ann Coulter?

I guess that means that she wouldn't waste the time to shit on one of your takes.

Or YOUR takes....or anybody elses here.

Just because your self of steam is slipping doesn't mean the rest of us share your issues. Coulter is no more qualified to speak than anybody in this forum. She's done absolutely NOTHING save pose for some book covers. Christ, it's not like she actualy WROTE her books.

[PSUFAN]

We couldn't get Michelle Troll to post here,

Why bother? We have a resident roided-up scarecrow-lookin' bitch that AP drools over in RJ.

[BSmack]

Christ, it's not like she actualy WROTE her books.

Her books aren't ghostwritten. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about and neither do you.

I never said she PAID the people who wrote her material.

[Dog]

Her books aren't ghostwritten. I don't know what the fuck you're talking about and neither do you.

Yeah, it's really tough work re-typing what other people have written.

[BSmack]

Yeah, I'm sure it's even tougher than just making shit up.

From the Daily Kos of all places:

Ann Coulter plagiarism charges overblown
by kos
Fri Jul 07, 2006 at 08:29:00 AM PDT
TPM Muckracker has an itemized list of Ann Coulter's supposed plagiarism, and sorry to say, there's not much there.

Coulter is a lot of things, but it doesn't look like plagiarism is one of them.

Poor little guys left with nothing but your dicks in your hand once again.

You forgot to ctrl-cuda this from the same article.

What these examples show is that Coulter is a lazy writer who rips off other people's research, but stealing someone else's arguments isn't "plagiarism". It's just being a lazy, unimaginative writer.

[Goober McTuber]

What these examples show is that Coulter is a lazy writer who rips off other people's research, but stealing someone else's arguments isn't "plagiarism". It's just being a lazy, unimaginative writer.

Typical attorney.

[Dog]

So you like to pick and choose which articles you believe. Its easy to just to copy and paste them in here. Let's look at some actual passages:

Example 1: "As New Hampshire attorney general in 1977, Souter opposed the repeal of an 1848 state law that made abortion a crime even though Roe v. Wade had made it irrelevant, predicting that if the law were repealed, New Hampshire 'would become the abortion mill of the United States.'"

Alleged Source: "In 1977, Souter as state attorney general spoke out against a proposed repeal of an 1848 state law that made abortion a crime -- even though the measure had been largely invalidated by the Supreme Court in Roe. vs. Wade… 'Quite apart from the fact that I don't think unlimited abortions ought to be allowed . . . I presume we would become the abortion mill of the United States[.]'" ("Liberals Leery as New Clues Surface on Souters Views," Los Angeles Times, Sept. 9, 1990)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 2: "He filed a brief arguing that the state should not have to pay for poor women to have abortions — or, as the brief called it, "the killing of unborn children" and the "destruction of fetuses." At this point the only people more opposed to abortion than Souter were still in vitro."

Alleged Source: "The year before, Souter had filed a legal brief arguing that the state should not have to pay for abortions for poor women. Abortion was referred to as "the killing of unborn children" and the "destruction of fetuses."" An assistant attorney general has said that he, not Souter, wrote the brief. (Ibid)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 3: "Also as state attorney general, Souter defended the governor's practice of lowering the flag to half-staff on Good Friday, arguing that "lowering of the flag to commemorate the death of Christ no more establishes a religious position on the part of the state or promotes a religion than the lowering of the flag for the death of Hubert Humphrey promotes the cause of the Democratic Party in New Hampshire."

Alleged Source: "In 1978, Gov. Meldrim Thomson exhorted state employees to 'reverently observe Good Friday' and ordered flags flown at half staff to 'memorialize the death of Christ on the Cross.' A federal judge struck down the order as a violation of the First Amendment's ban on an 'establishment of religion.' Souter appealed, arguing that Jesus Christ is a 'historical' figure. 'The lowering of the flag to commemorate the death of Christ no more establishes a religious position on the part of the state or promotes a religion than the lowering of the flag for the death of Humbert Humphrey promotes the cause of the Democratic Party in New Hampshire,' Souter wrote." (Ibid)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 4: "Souter vowed in a newspaper interview to 'do everything we can to uphold the law' allowing public school children to recite the Lord's Prayer every day."

Alleged Source: "In 1975, the New Hampshire Legislature gave elementary schools the authority to recite 'the traditional Lord's Prayer' each day, despite earlier Supreme Court decisions barring such activity. In a newspaper interview, Souter promised to 'do everything we can to uphold the law,' but a federal judge struck it down as 'patently and obviously unconstitutional.'" (Ibid)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 5: "As a justice on the New Hampshire Supreme Court, Souter dismissively referred to abortion as something 'necessarily permitted under Roe v. Wade' — not exactly the 'fundamental right' he seems to think it is now."

Alleged Source: "In 1986, the New Hampshire Supreme Court upheld a woman's right to sue her doctor because he did not test for potential birth defects and advise her of the option of abortion. In a concurring statement, Souter referred to abortion not as a fundamental right, but as being "necessarily permitted under Roe vs. Wade[.]" (Ibid)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 6: "In a private speech — not a brief on behalf of a client — Souter attacked affirmative action, calling it 'affirmative discrimination.'"

Alleged Source: "In a May, 1976, speech reported in a newspaper account, Souter said he opposed affirmative action, calling it 'affirmative discrimination.'" (Ibid)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 7: Souter openly proclaimed his support for the 'original intent' in interpreting the Constitution.

Alleged Source: "Souter has declared himself a believer in the strict 'original intent' view of interpreting the Constitution." (Ibid)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

"Thou Shalt Not Commit Religion," June 29, 2005

Example 1: "A photo of a woman breastfeeding an infant, titled 'Jesus Sucks.' — NEA-funded performance"

Alleged Source: "One photo showed a woman breastfeeding an infant; it was titled Jesus Sucks.'" ("Heritage Backgrounder No. 803: The National Endowment for the Arts: Misusing Taxpayers' Money," Jan. 18, 1991. The Heritage Foundation (not available online))
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 2: "A photo of a newborn infant with its mouth open titled to suggest the infant was available for oral sex. — NEA-funded performance"

Alleged Source: "The title of a photo of a newborn infant with its mouth open suggested the infant was available for oral sex." (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 3: "'F—- a Fetus' poster showing an unborn baby with the caption: 'For all you folks who consider a fetus more valuable than a woman, have a fetus cook for you, have a fetus affair, go to a fetus' house to ease your sexual frustration.' — NEA-funded performance"

Alleged Source: "Sister Serpents Fuck a Fetus poster depicting an unborn baby with the heading 'For all you folks who consider a fetus more valuable than a woman, have a fetus cook for you, have a fetus affair, go to a fetus' house to ease your sexual frustration[.]'" (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 4: "Performance of giant bloody tampons, satanic bunnies, three-foot feces and vibrators. — NEA-funded performance"

Alleged Source: "Props such as giant bloody tampons, satanic bunnies, three-foot turds, and dildos." (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 5: "A novel depicting the sexual molestation of a group of 10 children in a pedophile's garage, including acts of bestiality, with the children commenting on how much they enjoyed the pedophilia. — NEA-funded publisher"

Alleged Source: "Experimental novel titled Saturday Night at San Marcos relates the sexual molestation of a group of 10 children in a pedophile's garage, including acts of bestiality. The children relate how much they enjoyed the pedophile's sex games." (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 6: "Christ submerged in a jar of urine. — NEA-funded exhibit"

Alleged Source: "'Piss Christ' featured Christ on a cross in a vat of the artist's own urine." (“How the NEA Pollutes American Culture,” The Boston Globe, Jan. 24, 1995)
(Identified by Raw Story & The Rude Pundit)

Example 7: "A female performer inserting a speculum into her vagina and inviting audience members on stage to view her cervix with a flashlight. — NEA-funded performance"

Alleged Source: "Sprinkle masturbates with sex toys and, inserting a speculum into her vagina, invites audience members on stage to view her cervix with a flashlight." ("Heritage Backgrounder No. 803: The National Endowment for the Arts: Misusing Taxpayers' Money," Jan. 18, 1991. The Heritage Foundation, December, 1993 (not available online))
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 8: "A performance of large, sexually explicit props covered with Bibles performing a wide variety of sex acts and concluding with a mass Bible-burning. — NEA-funded performance (canceled by the venue in response to citizen protests)"

Alleged Source: "Create large sexually explicit props covered with a generous layer of requisitioned Bibles. After employing these props in a wide variety of unholy rituals, SRL machines will burn them to ashes." (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 9: "A show titled "DEGENERATE WITH A CAPITAL D" featuring a display of the remains of the artist's own aborted baby. — NEA-funded exhibit"

Alleged Source: "Put on a show called Degenerate with a Capital D, which included Alchemy Cabinet by Shawn Eichman, featuring the remains of the artist's own aborted baby." (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 10: "A play titled 'Sincerity Forever,' depicting Christ using obscenities and endorsing any and all types of sexual activities as consistent with Biblical teaching. — NEA-funded exhibit"

Alleged Source: "'Christ' uses vulgar obscenities and condones any and all types of sexual activities as being consistent with Christ's Biblical teaching." (Ibid.)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

BOOKS

Godless

Example 1, Page 5: “The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct.”

Alleged Source: “The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $ 227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.” (“People and events that made Maine's century,” Portland Press-Herald, Dec. 12, 1999 (Not available online))
(Identified by Rude Pundit, John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 2, Page 37: “...the judge called it "inconceivable" that Tiffany's injuries were caused by wrestling moves. After the trial, Tate's new lawyers admitted that the "wrestling defense" was "bogus."”

Alleged Source: “...the presiding Judge said that it was “inconceivable” that Tiffany Eunick’s injuries were caused by Lionel Tate mimicking wrestling moves. Indeed, since the trial ended, Lionel Tate’s new lawyers have filed court papers in which they admit that the “wrestling defense” was, in their words, “bogus.”” (“Retraction to WWE And the Public," Parents Television Council, July 11, 2002)
(Identified by Rude Pundit)

Example 3, Page 95: “As the president of the Mississippi Baptist Convention, Pickering presided over a meeting where the convention adopted a resolution calling for legislation to outlaw abortion.”

Alleged Source: "As the president of the Mississippi Baptist Convention, Judge Pickering presided over a 1984 meeting where the convention adopted a resolution calling for legislation to outlaw abortion." ("About Planned Parenthood," Planned Parenthood Federation of America pamphlet, 2004 (Not available online))
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

Example 4, Page 209: “It’s also possible that galactic ruler Xenu brought billions of people to Earth 75 million years ago, piled them around volcanoes, and blew them up with hydrogen bombs, sending their souls flying every which way until they landed on the bodies of living humans, where they still invisibly reside today – as Scientology’s L. Ron Hubbard claimed.”

Alleged Source: “Yes, according to Scientology doctrine, a galactic ruler named Xenu brought billions of people to Earth 75 million years ago, stacked them around volcanoes and blew them up with hydrogen bombs. Their souls then clustered together and stuck to the bodies of the living.” ("Pity This Blushing Bride-To-Be,” San Francisco Chronicle, July 3, 2005)
(Identified by John Barrie/New York Post)

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

Example 1, Page 219: "At least four Democratic fund-raising officials have revealed that former DNC Finance Chairman Marvin Rosen explicitly advocated selling access to the president . . ."

Alleged Source: "Four Democratic fundraisers have stated that former DNC Finance Chairman Marvin Rosen explicitly advocated selling access to the President. . ." ("A Case for Impeachment," David Chapman, Human Events)
(Identified by David Chapman/Boston Globe)


Example 2, Page [TK]: "A DNC fundraiser told Nynex Corporation executives that they would receive invitations to White House coffees if they joined the DNC's 'Managing Trustees' program and agreed to donate $100,000 . . ."

Alleged Source: "A DNC fundraiser told Nynex executives they would receive invitations to White House 'coffees' if they joined the DNC's 'Managing Trustees' program and agreed to donate $100,000 . . ." (Ibid.)
(Identified by David Chapman/Boston Globe) [link]

You once again prove to me that you are incapable of intelligent argument and rely simply on insults. Kudos to you.

I may have a dick in my hand, but at least I also have a brain in my head.

[Dog]

WTF??? Some of which were word for word identical.

Definition of plagiarize from the Websters in my office:

to steal and pass off (the idieas or words of another) as one's own.

This is text book plagiarism!

[Dog]

You quite clearly haven't a fucking clue of what you are talking about.
It is abundantly clear that you have never worked with source materials or a set of facts in your life.

Your personal animosity for the author has caused you and other pathetic morons such as yourself to make this desperate reach which does nothing but prove her point that not only are you people shockingly stupid you're also blatant liars.

Yep, there you go again. Refraining from intellectual argument for the sake of insulting others. Hmmm, gives you much credibility with your posts.

Should I just drop to my knees and salute the all wonderful mvscal, who can't answer a single post without a "you're so fucking stupid" and "fuck you"

Ann Coulter didn't give any credit to anybody when she wrote those passages, thus following the exact definition of plagiarism.

BTW, as a CPA, I deal with source documentation on a daily basis, thank you very much.

Now I can already predict a lame ass response from you :

"You're a stupid liar" Way to go Danica!

[Raydah James]

RACK Mvscal

[BSmack]

Refraining from intellectual argument for the sake of insulting others.

You have nothing on which to base an argument intellectual or otherwise.

You mean other than stating his case and citing his sources?

[Dog]

You mean other than stating his case and citing his sources?

I guess that's just not good enough for some people.

[Dog]

If you wish to continue to make a fool out of youself, I will be happy to continue shitting upon you.

Oh, that's what you've been doing? Seems to me that you've just been trying to get that dead gerbil out of your ass. Personally, I'd leave him there, cause he happens to give you a brain cell.

But, let me get this straight. If I write a book, and completely copy a passage from another book VER BATUM, and I don't give the original author any credit, then according to you, I did not plagiarize!?!

Damn, I wish I could have lived in your world when I was writing all those papers in college. Life would have been much easier.

[Dog]

With responses like yours, mvscal, I find it amazing that you are not the board bitch 'round here. I've read better posts from Jeff in San Diego and M2

[BSmack]

You seem to believe that "stating your case" and "citing your sources" is all it takes. "Done deal". After all, the seriousness of the allegations is what matters not the factual basis of those allegations.

No, what matters are the reams of evidence spewing forth detailing her pitiful attempts at "scholarship". As Dog said (see, a cite), lifting passages nearly word for word and not citing the source is the freaking DEFINITION of plagiarism

[Dog]

Get back to me when any of those circumstances apply in this case.

Rather, why don't you take the time to explain to us why any of those circumstances don't apply in this case?

Or maybe you get off just disagreeing with everybody, cause its easier than formulating an argument.

[Dog]

I've never said her books aren't sourced. They do have sources and footnotes (although investigations have proven those inaccurate too). The cases at point though, were not sourced.

My definition of plagiarism came directly from Websters Nonth New Collegiate Dictionary. I don't know where you pulled your's from.

My advice: Give it up. Your bias is obvious, your ignorance is stunning, and your arrogance is laughable.

[Dog]

Even by your definition, she's a plagiarizer.

Although the definition of plagiarism includes both words or ideas. Its an either/or, not both. Dumbfuck.

[BSmack]

To present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source is the "freaking DEFINITION of plagiarism". A restatement of a limited set of facts is not plagiarism by any definition.

You two dimwits also claim that her works are not footnoted or sourced which of course is a blatant lie of shocking idiocy even by your pathetically moronic standards.

Her own publisher admits that the passages in question were not footnoted.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/More_ ... _0710.html

But hey, feel free to continue kicking your own ass some more.

[Cuda]

b-monica saying anybody is kicking his own ass is just too funny for words, btw

[BSmack]

b-monica saying anybody is kicking his own ass is just too funny for words, btw

As funny as you having a job?

[Dog]

From Websters.com




3 entries found for plagiarize.
pla·gia·rize ( P ) Pronunciation Key (plj-rz)
v. pla·gia·rized, pla·gia·riz·ing, pla·gia·riz·es
v. tr.
To use and pass off (the ideas or writings of another) as one's own.
To appropriate for use as one's own passages or ideas from (another).

v. intr.
To put forth as original to oneself the ideas or words of another




And the link to boot.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarize

[Bizzarofelice]

You quite clearly haven't a fucking clue of what you are talking about.
It is abundantly clear that you have never worked with source materials or a set of facts in your life.

So the passages rehashed word for word are source materials?

Clearly, your image is blurred vision due to skeletal lust.

[Cuda]

b-monica saying anybody is kicking his own ass is just too funny for words, btw

As funny as you having a job?

way funnier than that

[Bizzarofelice]

"similar language"

By that you mean "the exact same words; nouns, pronouns, verbs and everything else".

Look at the examples, tard.

Blinded by a-cup lust, mvscal.

[Bizzarofelice]

Mvscal couldn't finish high school. Poor dumb bastard.

Mvscal couldn't finish high school. Poor dumb bastard

Facts done the exact same way. Your boy-curves goddess fucked up.

[Dog]

Well, you convinced me.




Convinced that you are on crack. Convinced that you when you read things you don't believe, your brain in unable to comprehend them. Convinced that your best arguments in support of anything consists of calling people child molestors or simply suggesting they masturbate.

Well, NEWS FLASH: Yes, I masturbate. But I digress.

Regardless of the literary quality of the NUMEROUS passages that she copied, the bitch plagiarized. Only providing sources for some of her material doesn't change things.

[Cuda]

Your boy-curves goddess fucked up.

obviously, you've never fucked her, have you?

stick to being a music snob, you know nothing about sex