Donkeys @ Pats this Sunday night

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:18 pm

Felix wrote:
Felix wrote: well, with you spotting me 25 points, I definitely think a sig bet is in order........

BSmack wrote:

aight....give me the 6.5 points/sig bet week.......

I'm already in for the Steelers/Bengals game. Besides, I could give a rats ass who wins this game. I'm just sure that the Boncos won't.

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:29 pm

Neely8 wrote:
Th wrote:
godzilla2002 wrote:That said; count me in! Loser carries sig for 2 weeks…eh?

Deal.

Ill get in on this sig bet too. Two weeks it is......

Already got one going with Th, hit Red up

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:09 pm

godzilla2002 wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
Th wrote:
Deal.

Ill get in on this sig bet too. Two weeks it is......
Already got one going with Th, hit Red up

Well TH and I would be in on this together. As I am sure you and Red would be too. If Pats win then you wear the sig that TH and I decide. If Dungver wins then we wear the sig that you and red decide on. Where are all the other Donk faithful on this?

Red · Post by **Red** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:08 am

Neely8 wrote:
godzilla2002 wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
Ill get in on this sig bet too. Two weeks it is......
Already got one going with Th, hit Red up
Well TH and I would be in on this together. As I am sure you and Red would be too. If Pats win then you wear the sig that TH and I decide. If Dungver wins then we wear the sig that you and red decide on. Where are all the other Donk faithful on this?

What the fuck is this "couples sig bet" you ladies are advocating? We're not sharing a sig and we're not spooning after the game, either. Kneely, if you want a bet with me, fine. One week or two - it's up to you but I ain't sharing.

orcinus · Post by **orcinus** » Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:32 am

Selfish bastard.

Th · Post by Th » Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:57 am

Red wrote:
Neely8 wrote:
godzilla2002 wrote: Already got one going with Th, hit Red up
Well TH and I would be in on this together. As I am sure you and Red would be too. If Pats win then you wear the sig that TH and I decide. If Dungver wins then we wear the sig that you and red decide on. Where are all the other Donk faithful on this?
I have no illusion that Denver can win.

FTFY

Red · Post by **Red** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:26 pm

Huh? Show me where I backed out of a bet.

I'm not down with a couples' bet. I'm happy that you and Kneely have found happiness, but that's just not how I roll.

He wants a bet with me, he's got it. If not, it's on him, not me.

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:43 pm

I agree with Red, I wouldn’t want to pass PM’s back and forth to come up with a sig.

Oh yeah, the score will be…
NE - 20
DEN - 13
It’s been a while since I didn’t think the Broncos had at least a decent chance to win.

fenway · Post by **fenway** » Sun Sep 24, 2006 3:21 pm

31-17, Home team.

Th · Post by Th » Sun Sep 24, 2006 11:51 pm

Red wrote:Huh? Show me where I backed out of a bet.

I'm not down with a couples' bet. I'm happy that you and Kneely have found happiness, but that's just not how I roll.

He wants a bet with me, he's got it. If not, it's on him, not me.

Like I said . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Red · Post by **Red** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:54 am

Th wrote:
Red wrote:Huh? Show me where I backed out of a bet.

I'm not down with a couples' bet. I'm happy that you and Kneely have found happiness, but that's just not how I roll.

He wants a bet with me, he's got it. If not, it's on him, not me.

Like I said . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Bitch, please.

Remember this?

Red wrote:
Th wrote:
Th wrote:
Ahem . . . . . . . . . no Donkey backers want in on this action?

I didn't think so.
Relax, some of us work for a living.

I'll take your bet.

Then you backed out of a sig bet with me by taking someone else's.

You can fuck off. If Kneely took the bet - and somehow I imagine he's rethinking that right now - as I've said time and again, he and I are on.

Th · Post by Th » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:57 am

I never backed out cunt boy, I STARTED this thing - Neely followed. You dont want the original bet? Your a cunt. We sorted that out already tho.

Red · Post by **Red** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:10 am

Th wrote:I never backed out cunt boy, I STARTED this thing - Neely followed. You dont want the original bet? Your a cunt. We sorted that out already tho.

My what?

Sorry Shirley, much like the Patirot's record against the Broncos, your chance to make a bet with me has dribbled down your leg.

...it is obvious that the running game is in order so far AND the D is playing well too. The Donks have yet to impress this season and Plummer looks like he may continue to struggle this year in the Denver limelight...

Epcot call, BTW.

Red · Post by **Red** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:40 am

I think a call to the National Guard is in order.

Whoever wants a sig, check in.

Th · Post by Th » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:44 am

Red wrote:I think a call to the National Guard is in order.

Whoever wants a sig, check in.

I don't owe you 1, remember?

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:56 am

Felix wrote:as much as I hate to say it, I just can't see the Broncos pulling this off based on their y-t-d play....

week 3 pickem/confidence games

Felix wrote: Denver

I learned that lesson a long time ago.......

never bet against Denver.......

the pats have a long ways to go......they'd better break loose with some of that salary cap money to bring in abig time wide receiver.....

or it's going to be a hellaciously long season......

Red · Post by **Red** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:58 am

Th wrote:
Red wrote:I think a call to the National Guard is in order.

Whoever wants a sig, check in.

I don't owe you 1, remember?

Never said you did, Shirley. I think you bet godzilla, but you might want to read the thread to make sure.

d-townmike · Post by **d-townmike** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:20 am

I guess 'bode me for being the only one to actually give the Broncos a winning score. Granted I had a gut feeling they wouldn't win tonight's game, but one side of me had this hunch they would somehow pull it off.

It wasn't as much of a defensive game as I expected, especially from the Pats, but as usual, the Broncos D showed up and got the job done!

Nice way to go into the bye week!

Carry on with figuring out who gets to wear what sig for the next two weeks.

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:29 am

I don't care. I owe the refs a sig somehow. My dead mother committed pass interference tonight apparently. Do all the refs live in Boulder or something?

Brady sucked. Pats d sucked when it really mattered. I am cocked.

Lay it on me whoever.....

d-townmike · Post by **d-townmike** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:46 am

Neely8 wrote:I don't care. I owe the refs a sig somehow. My dead mother committed pass interference tonight apparently. Do all the refs live in Boulder or something?

Brady sucked. Pats d sucked when it really mattered. I am cocked.

Lay it on me whoever.....

If the refs lived in Boulder, they'd be throwing flags for ripping up the grass and not giving the environmental impact of spikes on grass any thought whatsoever.

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:51 am

d-townmike wrote:
Neely8 wrote:I don't care. I owe the refs a sig somehow. My dead mother committed pass interference tonight apparently. Do all the refs live in Boulder or something?

Brady sucked. Pats d sucked when it really mattered. I am cocked.

Lay it on me whoever.....
If the refs lived in Boulder, they'd be throwing flags for ripping up the grass and not giving the environmental impact of spikes on grass any thought whatsoever.

I am hammered and alll I can say is huh?

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:33 pm

Neely8 wrote:Do all the refs live in Boulder or something?

At least they threw a couple flags on the Broncos. Last week they became the first team in NFL HISTORY to play an overtime game and not be penalized even once. :roll:

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 1:50 pm

Neely8 wrote:I don't care. I owe the refs a sig somehow. My dead mother committed pass interference tonight apparently. Do all the refs live in Boulder or something?

Brady sucked. Pats d sucked when it really mattered. I am cocked.

Lay it on me whoever.....

Except for your “I owe the refs a sig somehow” comment, Props for manning-up and coming in to get a sig.

Here it is…

After watching my Patriots get their ass handed to them at home by the Broncos, I realize my team sucks and it’s all down hill from here.

Th wrote:I didn't think so.

Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:15 pm

Red wrote:Relax, some of us work for a living. I'll take your bet.

Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:07 pm

godzilla2002 wrote:count me in! Loser carries sig for 2 weeks

Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:45 pm

It only seems right that Red gets to tag Th with the sig

Th · Post by Th » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:02 pm

Red wrote:
Th wrote:
Red wrote:I think a call to the National Guard is in order.

Whoever wants a sig, check in.

I don't owe you 1, remember?

Never said you did, Shirley. I think you bet godzilla, but you might want to read the thread to make sure.

Incorrect 'zilla.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:41 pm

Neely8 wrote:I am cocked.
Lay it on me whoever.....

You bostonians type like you talk?

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:29 pm

godzilla2002 wrote:
Neely8 wrote:I don't care. I owe the refs a sig somehow. My dead mother committed pass interference tonight apparently. Do all the refs live in Boulder or something?

Brady sucked. Pats d sucked when it really mattered. I am cocked.

Lay it on me whoever.....
Except for your “I owe the refs a sig somehow” comment, Props for manning-up and coming in to get a sig.

Here it is…

After watching my Patriots get their ass handed to them at home by the Broncos, I realize my team sucks and it’s all down hill from here.

Th wrote:I didn't think so.
Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:15 pm
Red wrote:Relax, some of us work for a living. I'll take your bet.
Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:07 pm
godzilla2002 wrote:count me in! Loser carries sig for 2 weeks
Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:45 pm

It only seems right that Red gets to tag Th with the sig

It's all good. I think I exaggerated the refs part a little. Just saw yellow hankies all night but couldn't tell if they were legit or not. I was seeing double by then.

Props to the Donks. Played much better then I thought they would.

No love for the Pats right now. Piss poor performance at home against the team that knocked them out of the playoffs last year. Unbelieveable really. I expect more from these guys.....

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:47 pm

mvscal wrote:
Neely8 wrote: Unbelieveable really. I expect more from these guys.....
Struggles on the O line will do that to a team. You have what, two rookies on that line plus Light is banged up?

Only one rookie on the line that I know of. That is Callahan at RT. Mankins is in his second year but he is really good. Did not hear anything about Light being hurt......

The Pats will be ok I think.

Th · Post by Th » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:55 pm

Neely8 wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Neely8 wrote: Unbelieveable really. I expect more from these guys.....
Struggles on the O line will do that to a team. You have what, two rookies on that line plus Light is banged up?

Only one rookie on the line that I know of. That is Callahan at RT. Mankins is in his second year but he is really good. Did not hear anything about Light being hurt......

The Pats will be ok I think.

I think the Pats are mailing it in since the D. Branch thing went south. The offense especially, they don't look like they are playing for Belichick right now at all.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:57 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:I hate the Donkeys.

Good.

You're gonna hate them even more every week.

velocet · Post by **velocet** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:19 pm

Gotta man up and give the Donks props after calling it so wrong.

Result notwithstanding, it was a great game in that the fukkin' players left it ALL on the field, and then some.

velocet

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:26 pm

velocet wrote: the fukkin' players left it ALL on the field, and then some.

yes we did, and your guys get to clean it up.......

sincerely

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:27 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:

Having said that, I'll feel better about them after the Chiefs take them to the woodshed on Thanksgiving.

Unfortunately, you'll start hating on the Chefs Thanksgiving night.

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:41 pm

If Huard is your QB on thanksgiving, then you'll be 7-1 Paul. Denver is starting to pick up some steam and once Plummer and Javon Walker get on the same page, this team is going to be tough to beat.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:46 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: Wrong AGAIN, Coods....I'll be at the game, and the CHIEFS are 7-0 against the Mules when I'm there.

8-0 happens on Thanksgiving.

Maybe you should tell the Chefs management and see if they'll give you free tickets.

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:57 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
DallasFanatic wrote:If Huard is your QB on thanksgiving, then you'll be 7-1 Paul. Denver is starting to pick up some steam and once Plummer and Javon Walker get on the same page, this team is going to be tough to beat.
Party pooper. LMAO

Just pissed about not getting any Cowboy football this weekend. Thought I'd share my misery with you

Red · Post by **Red** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:12 am

Th wrote:
Red wrote:
Th wrote:
I don't owe you 1, remember?

Never said you did, Shirley. I think you bet godzilla, but you might want to read the thread to make sure.

Incorrect 'zilla.

Reading comprehension just isn't your strong suit, is it?

'Zilla took care of business just fine so all's well.