Tell me again how this is a hard cap?

Get the Puck out of here...

Moderator: Shoalzie

Post Reply
fix
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:20 pm

Tell me again how this is a hard cap?

Post by fix »

If it is then Lou Lamoriello's a freaking genius and just enjoys making Betteman look like a fool...
Suffice to say, the natives are restless.

The natives, in this case, are NHL general managers who aren't happy with how New Jersey Devils' GM Lou Lamoriello has apparently extricated himself from a salary cap conundrum that, at one point, looked as though it might cause him to gut his team.

Now, though, with two moves over the last few days, Lamoriello looks as though he has deftly gotten cap relief to the tune of $7.1 million. That isn't to say he isn't going to be tight against the cap when the season opens and that all his problems are behind him, but he should at least be able to sign some of the players – Brian Gionta, Paul Martin and David Hale, for example – that he previously couldn't sign because of financial limitations. And it doesn't look as though the Devils will have to engage in a cap-induced fire sale to come in under the $44 million cap figure.

Did we mention a lot of his brethren aren't happy.

''This opens up a real can of worms for the league,'' said one GM, who requested anonymity. ''This is going to get ugly.''





This GM's unhappiness, or outrage if you will, is focused on what will unfold today when the Devils submit their final 23-man roster with the league. It is fully expected forward Alexander Mogilny will be listed as a Long-Term Injury, which if approved by the league will allow the Devils to spend over the $44 million salary cap by the amount of Mogilny's contract ($3.5 million) for as long as he remains on LTI.

Which, no doubt, will be the entire season.

And sources tell TSN that is precisely what will happen – Mogilny will be designated as an LTI and the league will approve it because he's legitimately injured.

In effect, as long as Mogilny remains on LTI, the Devils' salary cap is $47.5 million, which of course includes Mogilny's $3.5 million.

Many in the NHL community are shocked by the way this is unfolding because it was thought that there was no way for a team to get out from under the financial burden of a multi-year contract to a player who is 35 or over.

The new CBA included a clause that basically said any 35 and over player who signs a multi-year contract will count against the team's salary cap even if he retires or plays in the minors. It is why the Tampa Bay Lightning have to account for retired Dave Andreychuk's salary. Ditto for the New York Islanders with retired goalie cum GM Garth Snow and the Toronto Maple Leafs with the retired Tie Domi.

Why would Mogilny be any different?

That's the question a lot of GMs want answered.

There are a number of issues here.

The first is whether a 35 and over player is eligible for LTI status. The CBA clearly spells out that a 35 and over player has to count against the cap even if he's retired, playing in the minors or on injured reserve, but it doesn't specifically say anything about Long-Term Injury status. Conversely, the CBA clause on Long-Term Injury doesn't say anything about precluding 35 and over players from getting LTI.

It is that interpretation that sources say will get the Devils' their relief on Mogilny.

The other GMs who aren't happy about this turn of events will threaten to do the same with their over 35 players who are no longer useful or contributing to the team.

''You're going to see a lot of teams do this with their older players,'' a GM said. ''Why would you have a player retire when you can get him on LTI and his dollars don't count against the cap?''

Good question, but that goes to the second issue of importance. That is, the legitimacy of the injury.

It's all well and good for an NHL team, like the Devils, to say they have a 35 and over player who should be on LTI, but the league isn't going to take any team's word at face value on that.

That's why Mogilny had to receive an ''independent'' medical examination above and beyond any medical diagnosis from the team physicians. Sources tell TSN that ''independent'' medical assessment showed beyond any doubt that Mogilny, who has a chronic and degenerative hip condition, is physically unfit to play in the NHL.

If other teams want to get LTI status for their 35 and over players, and get an allowable overage on the cap, they will have to submit the player to the ''independent'' medical evaluation. If that player is deemed unfit to play, or legitimately long-term injured, then that team will get the same cap relief the Devils are about to receive.

There are some in the NHL community who, all rules and their interpretation aside, feel as though Lamoriello is getting a favorable ruling because he's one of the most powerful and influential executives in the game. He was front and centre in the CBA negotiations. But the league will argue that any team is entitled to do what Lamoriello has done and that the CBA is being upheld.

Which brings us to Lamoriello's other move that ruffled feathers.

On Sunday, Lamoriello traded veteran defenceman Vladimir Malakhov and a first-round pick to the San Jose Sharks in exchange for forward Igor Korolyuk and defenceman Jim Fahey.

This was an ingenious bit of work. Malakhov is no longer playing – he's unofficially retired, though he hasn't filed any retirement papers -- but because he's an over 35 player on a multi-year contract his $3.6 million salary this season has to count against the cap. So Lamoriello simply traded him to a team, the Sharks, that has plenty of salary cap room and can absorb the cap hit without any problem. Sharks' GM Doug Wilson was rewarded for his largesse with a first-round pick from the Devils. As for the players going to New Jersey, Korolyuk is playing in Russia and has no intention at this point of playing in the NHL and Fahey is low-priced depth defenceman.

A first-round pick is a nice return for Fahey. Very nice.

''It doesn't break any rules,'' a rival GM said of the Devils-Shark transaction, ''but it still has a smell to it. It stinks.''

Nevertheless, this one was a no brainer for the league. Unofficially retired players, like Malakhov, or players playing in Europe, like Korolyuk, have had their rights traded in the past. And it's not for the league to decide whether a first-round pick is too heavy a price to pay for a player of Fahey's stature.

It was clear from the get go what this transaction was all about. Lamoriello was paying a price (a first-round pick), a fairly stiff one, to open up cap room. It's not the first time it's been done with the new CBA and it certainly won't be the last one.

Philosophically, it is not much different than the move the Philadelphia Flyers made in the summer of 2005, when they traded Jeremy Roenick and his $5.5 million worth of cap-applicable salary, and an additional third-round pick, to the Los Angeles Kings in exchange for future considerations. The Flyers were effectively giving Roenick away to make room to sign Peter Forsberg to a free-agent contract. In fact, the Flyers had to do more than give Roenick away, they had to throw in a third-round pick to entice the Kings to take the player and his salary. The only difference is that Roenick actually played for L.A. while Malakhov is not ever going to play for San Jose (although if he showed up on the Sharks' doorstep ready to play, they would have to start paying him).

But in each case, the rules of the CBA were followed to the letter of the law.

Teams may not like it, but they could do the same if they so desire.

What we're seeing here is the natural evolution of the new CBA. There are many nooks and crannies to be explored. Over time, sharp GMs, or desperate ones, are going to find loopholes and areas open to interpretation. It's their job to exploit those to their own advantage.

And that, much to the chagrin of others, is precisely what Lamoriello has done.

There is a temptation to laud Lamoriello for these shrewd cap-world maneuverings, to brand him as the genius GM. But if that were the case, he wouldn't have gotten himself in such deep cap trouble in the first place with players such as Malakhov and Mogilny.

But the bottom line is the bottom line and New Jersey's previously-troubled cap situation is improved. Much improved.

For TSN.ca, I'm Bob McKenzie.
Oh and as a matter of point, a medical review has ruled that Molgilny's chronic hip condition makes him physically unfit to play and that when the Devils file their roster with the league today, they will be allowed to designate Mogilny as a long term Injury.
Hence, his salary won't count against their cap.
JD
Elwood
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by JD »

I fail to see where the big injustice is.

Regardless of whether Mogilny is injured or not, he won't play, and won't count against the cap. Why should the other GM's whine and point the finger, just because they're fucked and Lou found a way out.

And regarding the trade with San Jose, there's nothing stopping any of these other GM's from making similar deals to get out of trouble. It's not like a 1st round pick is a small price to pay!

The cap is working. NJ still has to keep their 23 players under $44M. Malakhov and Mogilny were stupid decisions Lou was able to rectify.

Maybe the other guys should stop crying and find a way out of their own woes.
Still a FlameFan
fix
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:20 pm

Post by fix »

The cap is working. NJ still has to keep their 23 players under $44M. Malakhov and Mogilny were stupid decisions Lou was able to rectify.
So circumventing the cap's okay in your books?

Gotcha...
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Post by Shoalzie »

The Wings have an interesting situation with Fischer and his status. He's still on the roster but on the long-term IR with his heart problem. I don't believe his salary counts towards the payroll since he's on IR. The cap essentially limits the amount of spending you can have on your active 23-man roster. There's the exemption for having playing on IR where that money doesn't count towards the payroll and the team can acquire a replacement player as long as it fits under the cap. Let's say an $7 million player rips up his knee and misses the rest of the year...it's my understanding that team can use that money once again but that player can't be activated until their salary is able to fit back under the cap.
JD
Elwood
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by JD »

JaysFan wrote:
The cap is working. NJ still has to keep their 23 players under $44M. Malakhov and Mogilny were stupid decisions Lou was able to rectify.
So circumventing the cap's okay in your books?

Gotcha...
Nice response. Why don't you save your facetious comments and actually respond to what I said instead of making things up.

Lou isn't circumventing anything. He
a) traded a cap burden (Malakhov). Good on him for finding a buyer. That in itself is amazing.
b) put another guy on the injured list, which he is allowed to do.

Tough luck for Feaster that Andreychuk retired instead of getting hurt, or for Ferguson that Domi was signed to a long-term ridiculous contract and simply couldn't make the Leafs (of all teams).

I know a lot of fans and media were rubbing their hands together gleefully thinking, "that Lamoriello finally got his!!". Instead, he again showed some shredness, and now the naysayers are disappointed.
Still a FlameFan
fix
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:20 pm

Post by fix »

Sure Lou is.
''The neutral physician ... determined that the player is disabled and unable to perform his duties as an NHL hockey player, which includes playing in NHL games,'' deputy commissioner Bill Daly told The Canadian Press in an e-mail.

That means the Devils will be able to spend above the salary cap to the amount of Mogilny's contract, which is $3.5 million, for as long as Mogilny remains on Long-Term Injury. And since his condition is chronic and degenerative, Mogilny will not play a game in the NHL this season and the Devils will get the cap relief they've so desperately needed.


As for Mogilny, retirement could be in his future.


"I think he's going to wait and see and analyse what he can do with his hip,'' Mogilny's agent J.P. Barry said Tuesday. ''Right now he's in too much pain to play at the level that he needs to be at to play in the NHL.''
With a wink wink here and a nudge nudge there... as soon as that contract's up and doesn't count against the Devils cap... he'll retire.
Neutral physican my ass....:roll:


As for the trade with San Jose...

So now we have a new system in place, one in which first round draft picks will in essence be traded for cash.


Beautiful...

Nobody saw that one coming...
San Jose Purchases First-Rounder With CapCash

Sun, Oct 1, 7:00 PM Pacific

Two years ago, I wrote a rant in which I explained that Gary Bettman's (then) proposed salary cap was paramount to minting a new sort of currency which I labelled "CapCash".



Precisely one month ago, I wrote another piece called Potential Energy in which I gave an example of a CapCash barter. It went like this:

"Maybe Pittsburgh would send New Jersey $5M of caproom for one year in exchange for the Devils' upcoming first-round draft pick."

How close did I come?

Swap "San Jose" for "Pittsburgh". And change "$5M" into roughly "$3.6M". The "one year" remains the same and the "first round pick" remains the same.

Tonight I can report the first significant exchange of CapCash for the 2006-2007 season. The San Jose Sharks converted approximately $3.6M of CapCash into a first-round draft pick by accepting the salary cap burden of Vlad Malhakov from the New Jersey Devils.

And... as I also predicted in "Potential Energy"... it was necessary for San Jose to transfer some inconsequential meat to East Rutherford in order for NHL HQ to consummate the deal.

Understand that the Sharks will never cut a single paycheck to the Russian defender who insists he has retired, according to this interview. The sole purpose of this exchange was for Lou Lamoriello to rid himself of Malhakov's salary cap hit which did not vaporize just because the player retired.

CapCash is "virtual money". And that's exactly what exchanged hands this evening. The Sharks "bought" a first round pick for practically nothing out-of-pocket. That is the definition of "CapCash".

The bottom line is that San Jose did New Jersey a favor by minting, then mailing $3.6M of CapCash to the East Coast.
Last edited by fix on Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hobbes
Elwood
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:51 pm
Location: Reading more, posting less

Post by Hobbes »

I don't really see what the big deal is either, although I don't think a retired player's salary should count against the cap. Lamoriello found a loophole in a dumb rule. So what? Somebody would have done it sooner or later.

Incidentally, the rumor is that Colorado will do this with Konowalchuk as well. I'm not sure how that will work given that he's already officially announced retirement, but it wouldn't be the first time the Denver Post has gotten it wrong.
fix
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2551
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:20 pm

Post by fix »

Here's the problem with it Hobbes..

If a player who's retired or put on long term injury's salary doesn't count against the cap... teams that can't afford contracts that place them in the upper end of the cap level will start bitching once again that they can't compete with the large payroll teams that can afford to pay someone to sit at home...
JD
Elwood
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by JD »

JaysFan wrote:teams that can't afford contracts that place them in the upper end of the cap level will start bitching once again that they can't compete with the large payroll teams that can afford to pay someone to sit at home...
But do you think they actually WANT to pay someone to sit at home? Sure, Toronto would have less problem doing that than, say, the Flames, but I'm pretty sure the Leafs would prefer to keep that money in their own pockets.

As for the cap cash thing, you still have to pay the salary. It's not free. San Jose figures that first rounder is worth the $3M or whatever they'll have to dole out to Malakhov. For Jersey, it was worth the first rounder to avoid cap penalties.

Sure it's different than the past, but it is it really something to get outraged over? I just don't see it!
Still a FlameFan
JD
Elwood
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by JD »

Upon 2nd review, the writer of your article claims that San Jose won't have to pay Malakhov. That makes sense.

Still doesn't upset me, though!
Still a FlameFan
User avatar
Joey Moss
2005 SNC Champion
Posts: 338
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 12:59 am

Post by Joey Moss »

Wow, I agree with JD!!!

Which means this entire issue has to be so simple that even a flames fan can get it right.
GET-ZKY!!!!
JD
Elwood
Posts: 599
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by JD »

Joey Moss wrote:Wow, I agree with JD!!!
Yeah, well, don't get too agreeable. We've got a big weekend ahead of us where much hatred must be practised.
Still a FlameFan
Post Reply