nice uniform, FSU

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:05 pm

[img]http://165.1.59.193/Previews/Mini/{1E3D ... j.MINI.jpg[/img]

not only did you play like shit, but you also looked like shit. the NC$$ should legislate a rule: no vertical lettering on the sides of pants. jesus. let me guess, they let the players give input on this? they could take a couple lessons from oregon players. good god.

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:10 pm

How about teams just having Home and Away uniforms instead of twenty different variations of suck?

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:13 pm

They looked awesome. It was a tribute uniform to be worn one time. It's way better than that shit Miami, UF and Va tech tried to pull off. Our coaches lost us that game. We shoulf have just downed the ball going into the half and yet we deiced to throw a 10 yard out and it gets picked off. I feel so bad for our players. Our defensive coaches coach there asses off yet our offensive coaching staff is so inept. Pleade G-d let Bobby retire so we can get Petrino in here to right the ship. Our players deserve better.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:19 pm

i'm voting that they didn't look awesome.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:19 pm

Cicero wrote:They looked awesome. It was a tribute uniform to be worn one time. It's way better than that shit Miami, UF and Va tech tried to pull off. Our coaches lost us that game. We shoulf have just downed the ball going into the half and yet we deiced to throw a 10 yard out and it gets picked off. I feel so bad for our players. Our defensive coaches coach there asses off yet our offensive coaching staff is so inept. Pleade G-d let Bobby retire so we can get Petrino in here to right the ship. Our players deserve better.

This is a thread about FSU's shit uniforms, not FSU's shit coaching/players. Start another thread, sissy. Don't expect much out of it though. We care more about FSU's shit uni's than we do about the team itself.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:20 pm

BTW, 'unconquered'?
Yeah, that's appropriate.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:40 pm

Ken wrote:BTW, 'unconquered'?
Yeah, that's appropriate.

I think they mean sexually.
Supposedly they've all taken a vow of virginity until marriage.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:50 pm

'Unconquered' is a tribute to the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:16 am

Cicero wrote:'Unconquered' is a tribute to the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

Needless to say, the Seminole tribe should demand the removal of the word.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:43 am

Aren't the Seminoles the tribe who were forced to move from Florida to Oklahoma on the 'trail of tears'?

If so, that's a rather fair definition of being "conquered".

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:55 am

Cicero wrote:They looked awesome.

no, they didn't. those looked disgraceful, "one-time" tribute uniform or not. and what does this say about the excess in big time athletic departments where they would literally waste tons of money on making 85 or so jerseys and pants for a one-time occasion?

hopefully this was lesson learned for FSU.

oh and sissy, you're pathetic.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:30 am

Cicero wrote:It was a tribute uniform to be worn one time.

That's not what Bowden was quoted as saying. They might wear them once a season or so.

Oh, no way Petrino would leave Louisville for FSU.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:36 am

Exactly how can an indian tribe who's forced to live on a reservation consider themselves to be "unconquered"?

I don't see the Seminoles calling the shots. I don't see the U.S. government living on reservations set up by the Seminoles.

Yep, the Seminoles (indian tribe or football team) are conquered.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:38 am

I doubt very seriously that FSU spent a dime on those unis. Nike paid for them and is hoping to make it back in jersey sales and marketing buzz.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:42 am

Van wrote:Exactly how can an indian tribe who's forced to live on a reservation consider themselves to be "unconquered"?

They never signed a peace treaty with the U.S. Government. TO my knowledge there are no Indian reservations in the State of Florida for the Seminole tribe.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:47 am

Mucho, that's one strange way of declaring 'bode.

The U.S. government didn't even require a peace treaty from 'em, like they did with the more troublesome tribes. They just went on ahead and took the Seminole land and used it to build condos, colleges, golf courses, Wal-Marts and Hooters joints and the 'Noles call this "unconquered"...

Gotcha.

Btw, FSU didn't sign a peace treaty with Boston College at the conclusion of today's game either.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:49 am

Left Seater wrote:I doubt very seriously that FSU spent a dime on those unis. Nike paid for them and is hoping to make it back in jersey sales and marketing buzz.

gotcha. that makes perfect sense.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:56 am

Van wrote:Mucho, that's one strange way of declaring 'bode.

I agree. I'm not saying I liked the uni's at all.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:04 am

Van wrote: The U.S. government didn't even require a peace treaty from 'em, like they did with the more troublesome tribes. They just went on ahead and took the Seminole land and used it to build condos, colleges, golf courses, Wal-Marts and Hooters joints and the 'Noles call this "unconquered"...

Upon further review, rack the Seminoles:

Only one group of Indians -- the Seminoles -- successfully resisted removal and they did so fiercely. Their resistance to removal brought about the Second Seminole War. It began on December 28, 1835, when a column of 108 soldiers led by Major Dade was massacred by Seminole warriors at the Dade Battle in Sumpter County. Just four days later, on December 31, the famous Seminole leader Osceola (pronounced as Asi-Yaholo) with only 250 warriors attacked a column of 750 men under General Duncan Clinch in the Battle of Withlacoochee in Citrus County. He soundly defeated the soldiers. Osceola promised to fight the white invaders "till the last drop of Seminole blood has moistened the dust of my hunting ground."

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:14 am

Somehow, since those "white invaders" did in fact manage to take over all of the southeast, I gotta figger that little saga is missing a few key subsequent chapters...

More to the point though, think of all the other possible football pants inscriptions Nike could sponsor...

Okay, we've got FSU, and "Unconquered"...

Haifa U: Unleavened
Goldtoof U: Thug Life
BYU: Wonder Bread
Arkansas: 'Least We're Not 'Sippi!
ND: Luck O' The Irish
UCLA: John Wooden! Oh, Snap!
Oregon St: We Are What We Eat

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:33 am

Could the tribe not beat BC either? Nice tribute to them.

How long will Bobby let this go-on? FSU still has more talent than 90% of the teams out there, no excuse for not being a top25 program.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:42 am

Danimal wrote:Could the tribe not beat BC either? Nice tribute to them.

bwahaha.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:18 am

Van wrote:Somehow, since those "white invaders" did in fact manage to take over all of the southeast, I gotta figger that little saga is missing a few key subsequent chapters...

That was inevitable.

The point remains that the Seminoles didn't succumb to being forcefully removed from their land, when the Cherokees, Choctaws, and assorted other tribes did.

Rack FSU for honoring their namesake, "The Unconquered", on their unis.

With all the BS that's been going down about groups and individuals getting their collective panties in a bunch over naming teams after American Indians, it's rather enlightening to see why some teams actually do that.

It's a sign that they respect the heritage. Jeez, you PC dumbfucks filing lawsuits over innocous names like 'Redskins'... do you seriously think that any team would intentionally name themselves after a group of people that they didn't respect?

The Seminole tribe today approves of FSU using their namesake.

Rack 'em both.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:29 am

In all seriousness I have no problem with either the Seminole tribe's pride or FSU's decision to try to honor the Seminole tribe with the new unis. That being said, let's not get carried away here with feel good revisionist history. The Seminole tribe's land and their way of life was taken from them. They were punted off to the side. No two ways about it.

Forcibly? Does it matter?

Whether forcibly or voluntarily, yep, they were in fact...conquered. They lost the dominion to the "white invaders", same as all other tribes, and doing so certainly wasn't their preference...

socal · Post by **socal** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:43 am

Van wrote:Haifa U: Unleavened
Goldtoof U: Thug Life
BYU: Wonder Bread
Arkansas: 'Least We're Not 'Sippi!
ND: Luck O' The Irish
UCLA: John Wooden! Oh, Snap!
Oregon St: We Are What We Eat

USC: Loves Me Them Wooden Horsecocks

Nolesy · Post by **Nolesy** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:00 pm

Can't you guys just let me suffer in peace? Sheeesh.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:48 pm

Talk about conquering with faint praise...

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:32 am

This is glassdick...kinda....

viewtopic.php?p=351337&highlight=#351337