Kerry torpedos Dems chances....

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:50 pm

IMHO...and don't come back with his lame ass spin on how it was a botched joke. We all know Kerry never miss-speaks, just ask him. Condescending, arrogant bastard he is, he won't be able to yank himself out of the dumper on this one, nor will his elitist cohorts. What a douch bag...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLuMWiQ6r2o

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:01 pm

Old news Mike. The rest of us are back to discussing the failure in Iraq, out of control defecit spending and the continued outsourcing of American jobs.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:10 pm

mvscal wrote:The deficit is shrinking, idiot and outsourcing isn't a political issue.

760 billion dollars is what you call "shrinking"?

NAFTA and WTO aren't political issues?

Dude, don't bogart. Pass that bong every once in a while.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:17 pm

BSmack wrote:Old news Mike. The rest of us are back to discussing the failure in Iraq, out of control defecit spending and the continued outsourcing of American jobs.

"Old news"...I guess thats your way of trying to bury a fiasco, color me

It's 2 freeking days old,.... I must have missed your spin errr thoughts on it.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:22 pm

ChargerMike wrote:
BSmack wrote:Old news Mike. The rest of us are back to discussing the failure in Iraq, out of control defecit spending and the continued outsourcing of American jobs.
"Old news"...I guess thats your way of trying to bury a fiasco, color me It's 2 freeking days old,.... I must have missed your spin errr thoughts on it.

101 dead American soldiers have more pressing concerns than a gaffe by Kerry. Back to the real issues dittotards.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:28 pm

BSmack wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:
BSmack wrote:Old news Mike. The rest of us are back to discussing the failure in Iraq, out of control defecit spending and the continued outsourcing of American jobs.
"Old news"...I guess thats your way of trying to bury a fiasco, color me It's 2 freeking days old,.... I must have missed your spin errr thoughts on it.
101 dead American soldiers have more pressing concerns than a gaffe by Kerry. Back to the real issues dittotards.

...oh, so the fact that ALL the candidates whom Kerry was stumping for have canceled his appearances doesn't rate any worries for the Dem's....hell, thats great news! :D

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:37 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:The deficit is shrinking, idiot and outsourcing isn't a political issue.
760 billion dollars is what you call "shrinking"?
Gee, you're nearly 500 billion dollars off. Lie much, shitstain?

The lie would be the numbers produced by OMB.

But even if we accept the OMB's numbers, the national debt is still at a larger percentage of GDP than at any time since WWII

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

(NAFTA and WTO) Have nothing to with private employers offshoring jobs nor is there anything the government can do about it.

Lower tairiffs make it easier for companies to outsource production.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:52 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:The lie would be the numbers produced by OMB.

Oh...OK. Well, if you say so.

Dumbfuck.

Like I said, even if you accept OMB's numbers, we are still running a debt larger than any we have had in relation to GDP since the administration of Harry Truman.

What say you about that "fiscal conservative"?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:29 pm

BSmack, you might want to let this election go.

With the looming "cut 'n run" from Iraq that Bush will be compelled to perform before '08, the GOP wont
have any Democrat House to hang the blame on.

That should go down like a sack of kittens in a pond for the Republicans for many years to come.

See what I'm doing? I'm strategizing!

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:39 pm

Martyred wrote:BSmack, you might want to let this election go.

With the looming "cut 'n run" from Iraq that Bush will be compelled to perform before '08, the GOP wont
have any Democrat House to hang the blame on.

That should go down like a sack of kittens in a pond for the Republicans for many years to come.

See what I'm doing? I'm strategizing!

I've been ambivalent about the prospect of a Democratic takeover for those exact same reasons. There are times when I think the ideal scenario would be to just miss taking over the House and Senate, giving us another 2 years of Bush rolling about in his own personal La Brea tar pit called Iraq.

But then I think of the opportunities to stifle the appointment of new fascists to the federal judiciary, hamstring Bush's fiscal insanity and generally make his life as miserable as it is possible to make the "Leader of the Free World" miserable, and I start thinking it might just be a time for a cool change.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:44 pm

BSmack wrote: But then I think of the opportunities to stifle the appointment of new fascists to the federal judiciary, hamstring Bush's fiscal insanity and generally make his life as miserable as it is possible to make the "Leader of the Free World" miserable, and I start thinking it might just be a time for a cool change.

Two words:

Nancy Pelosi

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:53 pm

What about the fact that Kerry was completely accurate?

If you fuck around and don't study--or prepare yourself for some kind of livlihood--your options will be limited to, among other odious tasks, serving in Iraq.

The American troops in Iraq are being physically and mentally ground into paste. Hundreds of thousands of cases of psychological damage are being incurred as we speak. And Tens of thousands of GIs are blown to shit, losing legs, eyes, movement, etc.

Of course no one with any sense or alternative would enlist in the U.S. army. Why would they? the Army is being deployed in a nightmarish--and illegal--manner, with no end in sight.

RACK KERRY and fuck the vile desperate smear machine of Rove/Rusp/O'Reilly

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 7:55 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:hamstring Bush's fiscal insanity
What drugs are you on?

Oh that's right, I forgot the Bush White House is not compelled to adhere to the Constitution.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:14 pm

mvscal wrote:Yes, of course. Congressional Democrats will restrain Bush's fiscal insanity.

Well, we have two choices. Since the current incumbents can't seem to manage, I guess we'll just have to try the alternative.

titlover · Post by **titlover** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:08 pm

Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote: But then I think of the opportunities to stifle the appointment of new fascists to the federal judiciary, hamstring Bush's fiscal insanity and generally make his life as miserable as it is possible to make the "Leader of the Free World" miserable, and I start thinking it might just be a time for a cool change.
Two words:

Nancy Pelosi

two words if that happens: oh shit.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:24 pm

titlover wrote:
Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote: But then I think of the opportunities to stifle the appointment of new fascists to the federal judiciary, hamstring Bush's fiscal insanity and generally make his life as miserable as it is possible to make the "Leader of the Free World" miserable, and I start thinking it might just be a time for a cool change.
Two words:

Nancy Pelosi
two words if that happens: oh shit.

Only if you're a greedy corporate bastard.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:33 pm

BSmack wrote:
titlover wrote:
two words if that happens: oh shit.
Only if you're a greedy corporate bastard.

Not if you're anti-American, AIPAC traitorous scum.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:43 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:Well, we have two choices.
Or so the Republicrats would have you believe...

Nice.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:44 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:
mvscal wrote:The deficit is shrinking, idiot and outsourcing isn't a political issue.
760 billion dollars is what you call "shrinking"?
Gee, you're nearly 500 billion dollars off. Lie much, shitstain?

US budget deficit shrinks in 2005

The US budget deficit shrank to $319bn (£180bn) last year as better economic conditions boosted tax revenues.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4343814.stm

Oh hey, it's only 300 billion per year?? Well that is so much better.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:47 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:
US budget deficit shrinks in 2005

The US budget deficit shrank to $319bn (£180bn) last year as better economic conditions boosted tax revenues.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4343814.stm
Oh hey, it's only 300 billion per year?? Well that is so much better.

Note also that the defecit only shrank that much due to increased revenue, not because Republicans suddenly developed any sense of fiscal responsibility.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:57 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:Note also that the defecit only shrank that much due to increased revenue,
Proving Bumblya's tax cuts worked.

Yea, and in another 200 years the defecit might even be manageable again.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:46 am

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:Note also that the defecit only shrank that much due to increased revenue,
Proving Bumblya's tax cuts worked. Good job kicking your own ass, again. How does it feel getting clowned by gibbering moron for eight years? It really doesn't say much for your future prospects.

Oh buillshit. The revenue increase had little to do with the tax cuts. It was the housing boom that has fueled this economy and supplied much of the additional tax revenue. People who owned a house they bought before 2000 suddently found it doubled in price in 2004, so they yanked out 100 k and either bought a second home or a boat or some shit. This administration had little to do with that circumstance, since the whole upward housing trend started back in the 1990's.