Another Follow-up on the Locked Thread

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:22 pm

With respect to Bush's approval ratings . . .

mvscal wrote:Actually it's 42%, idiot. Try to keep up. No wonder you morons get stomped flat.

Uhhh, no. 34% and 39% on the two most recent ones. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:40 pm

mvscal wrote:Fuck off, moron.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm

41%. Thanks for proving my point. And that's Bush's high-weather mark this week, btw.

Do you want to provide another poll that has Bush lower than you said?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:43 pm

Terry,

Are you blind or stupid? That website shows 42% both Nov 1 and Nov 2. mvscal posted the 42% yesterday.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:45 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Terry,

Are you blind or stupid? That website shows 42% both Nov 1 and Nov 2. mvscal posted the 42% yesterday.

I read the article, didn't look at the panel on the left.

Regardless, two polls this week put him at 34% and 39%. mvscal's definitive statement that he's at 42% is shaky at best.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:46 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Terry,

Are you blind or stupid? That website shows 42% both Nov 1 and Nov 2. mvscal posted the 42% yesterday.
I read the article

So you're not blind. What are we left with?

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:55 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Terry,

Are you blind or stupid? That website shows 42% both Nov 1 and Nov 2. mvscal posted the 42% yesterday.
I read the article
So you're not blind.

The article (as opposed to the panel on the left) clearly said 41%.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:56 pm

mvscal wrote:Blind and stupid appears to be the answer.

Can't refute my polls, so you make personal attacks. How Republican of you.

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 9:56 pm

Interjection of the obvious here. 42% < 50% = still not good.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:11 pm

why are you all diddling over 1% point?

Pretty pathetic that the bushites are scrabbling for that one extra percent, as if it makes any difference.

When 6 out of 10 people think you suck, you pretty much do suck.

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:13 pm

Mister Bushice wrote: When 6 out of 10 people think you suck, you pretty much do suck.

Actually, its 5.8 people out of six, or 5.9 depending on whether you read the article or look at the table.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:43 pm

mvscal wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:Can't refute my polls, so you make personal attacks. How Republican of you.

mvscal wrote:Fuck off, moron.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm
Needless to say, you are a fucking idiot.

You didn't refute the polls I linked. You merely posted a link to another poll with a different result.

Fair to assume that the more accurate result is somewhere in the middle, which would still be less than 40%.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:58 pm

Dog wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote: When 6 out of 10 people think you suck, you pretty much do suck.
Actually, its 5.8 people out of six, or 5.9 depending on whether you read the article or look at the table.

Thank you, Doctor Anal.

Uncle Fester · Post by **Uncle Fester** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:18 pm

I kind of lost track after seeing that avatard:

FRICKIN HIGH-LARRY-OUS! :)

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:20 pm

Chernobyl ?

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:34 pm

Uncle Fester wrote:I kind of lost track after seeing that avatard:

FRICKIN HIGH-LARRY-OUS! :)

Check out the blonde in the front row, stand up and clap

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:12 am

Goober McTuber wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Terry,

Are you blind or stupid? That website shows 42% both Nov 1 and Nov 2. mvscal posted the 42% yesterday.
I read the article
So you're not blind. What are we left with?

Maybe he'd have noticed if it was printed in Vanity Fair... or Harpers

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 3:29 am

Goober McTuber wrote:Terry,

Are you blind or stupid? That website shows 42% both Nov 1 and Nov 2. mvscal posted the 42% yesterday.

Terry gets a pass because he was discriminated against as a young dumbass black tardlette growing up. ---> Years go by... Well, he got over as a lawyer bringing in 'BODE $$$ in the low 20G's now-a-days. Of course, Bush's plan is responsible for your "living high on the hog."

42%, 41%... etc. Who fucking cares douche?

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 5:12 am

Atomic Punk wrote:Terry gets a pass because he was discriminated against as a young dumbass black tardlette growing up. ---> Years go by... Well, he got over as a lawyer bringing in 'BODE $$$ in the low 20G's now-a-days.

Might want to update your spreadsheet, ZZ.

Btw, if I was changing geriatric diapers for a living, and on my 25th career change in the last 5 years, I wouldn't be running job smack on anyone else. Just sayin'.

Of course, Bush's plan is responsible for your "living high on the hog."

Pot meet kettle much?

Atomic Punk wrote:Clinton forced me to get out of the Navy.

Atomic Punk wrote:Gray Davis fucked over my teaching career.

42%, 41%... etc. Who fucking cares douche?

I'm sure you'd be running it all day if a Democratic President had those numbers.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:15 am

I see Terry went to the "I know you are but what am I?" card early on in several manners. Then you talk about spreadsheets and your Shrubb-a-Dub subscription ran out in year 2000.

You see Terry... bitches like yourself try to broadbrush others in a certain way. I don't give a shit about Clinton or Bush. None of them give a shit about you or me, so why waste the time?

The answer is because YOU are a fucking twat that needs the gubmint cheese to help you through life. You are dependent upon government to make policies and rules for you.

If you don't have the dignity to empower your worthless black carcass, then why should the gubmint? You seem to care about Dem vs Rep politics. Why?

Like you, they are equally worthless. Watch your 6 you stupid fucking sex accident.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:28 am

Atomic Punk wrote:I see Terry went to the "I know you are but what am I?" card early on in several manners.

Hardly. I was just correcting your errors.

You see, you should never post "I want my mommy" threads and then falsely accuse others of doing the same. Hypocrisy never looks good on anyone. And if you're going to do it regardless, you'd better make damn certain that the poster in question won't remember what you did. 0-for-2 on your part, I guess.

Btw, you made the same error twice, not that I expect you to see it.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:45 am

Terry, I have no respect for a $21K/yr lawyer and won't start now. The things you said I am doing or did are wrong. Yet you place your affirmative action degree as credibility while saying shit that is wrong... which explains why you make $21K/yr. See how that works? Of course not.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:48 am

Atomic Punk wrote:Terry, I have no respect for a $21K/yr lawyer and won't start now. The things you said I am doing or did are wrong. Yet you place your affirmative action degree as credibility while saying shit that is wrong... which explains why you make $21K/yr. See how that works? Of course not.

Two things:

I don't make $21K/yr -- or even remotely close to that.

I don't have an affirmative action degree.

You, OTOH, are a loser who has an excuse for everything -- why you quit the Navy (Clinton made you do it), why you quit teaching (Gray Davis made you do it, btw, notice a pattern here?) Now you're 2 years away from $100K/yr . . .

And you're a racist POS to boot. Thanks for proving it here.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 6:53 am

So far Terrytoken, you are still wrong, but I'm starting to dig this racist tag your kind puts on others when you squirm and lose in debates.

I'm sorry for the $21/k/yr claim you make... I think you said you made $22k/yr as of last year in a lawyer reach-around thread you were in.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:01 am

Atomic Punk wrote:So far Terrytoken, you are still wrong, but I'm starting to dig this racist tag your kind puts on others when you squirm and lose in debates.

Since you're flailing wildly, and have now made the same mistake at least four times, I'll dumb it down for you.

I'm not black. I've been posting on these boards for how long now? And this topic has been broached before.

The fact that you were unable to comprehend that tells me that you're either drunk or retarded. Given the time of day and your habits, I'm inclined to opt for the former. For now, anyway.

I'm sorry for the $21/k/yr claim you make... I think you said you made $22k/yr as of last year in a lawyer reach-around thread you were in.

Guess again.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:03 am

No, you said you made in the low $20k figures as a lawyer in Crapchester. I spotted you 1k and after you were offended, I upped it another K. What do you want for your reparations?

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:05 am

Atomic Punk wrote:No, you said you made in the low $20k figures as a lawyer in Crapchester. I spotted you 1k and after you were offended, I upped it another K.

Link? I never said that. I said that's what starting salaries are -- not what I make.

I think I might have said that when you boil it down to hourly, I actually make about $15 per hour. But I work far more than 40 hours/week. Ask my wife.

What do you want for your reparations?

Can you fucking read? Seriously?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:13 am

$15/hr @ 40 hrs/wk = ?

That is $28.8K/yr then minus taxes y'all if y'all work year 'round. Of course you prolly call out sick half that time so your wife brings the bacon home doesn't she?

Terry, watching JAG or other TV shows doesn't make you mo money.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:17 am

Atomic Punk wrote:$15/hr @ 40 hrs/wk = ?

Again, I question whether you can read.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:But I work far more than 40 hours/week. Ask my wife.

It's not uncommon for me to come home from work at 10 pm -- or later.

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:24 am

Jesus AP, Terry is not a mvscal. He is simply married to one. Update your spreadsheets fool.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:24 am

Terry in Crapchester wrote: It's not uncommon for me to come home from work at 10 pm -- or later.

From what I remember, you are married to a fat African-american blimp. I wouldn't come home after sorting the file cabinets all day either. Since you are married to a big fat hog of a woman, I really don't blame you for shirking your duties as an alleged man.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:30 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote: It's not uncommon for me to come home from work at 10 pm -- or later.
From what I remember, you are married to a fat African-american blimp. I wouldn't come home after sorting the file cabinets all day either. Since you are married to a big fat hog of a woman, I really don't blame you for shirking your duties as an alleged man.

Real clever, coming from the guy who claims he's better looking than everyone else on this board.

And like I said, I wouldn't be running job smack if'n I were you. Just sayin'.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:35 am

Terry, be honest... Are you in debt? Are you runnin' spinners on your phat SUV? Tards like yourself blame everyone but themselves for getting in a bind.

Runnin' job smack offends you? I have claimed to be the best lookin' mutha fucka on the boards? I'm Rick James bitch. However, I'm pretty sure I look better than you and definitely have a better body than your flabby nog marrying ass.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:46 am

Atomic Punk wrote:Terry, be honest... Are you in debt?

I wasn't born rich. I went to school. I own a house.

'Course, I suppose I could live like you or m2, then I wouldn't be in debt.

Are you runnin' spinners on your phat SUV?

Tards like yourself blame everyone but themselves for getting in a bind.

Glass houses.

Runnin' job smack offends you?

No, it doesn't offend me. But I wouldn't run it if I was in my 40's and still hadn't decided what I want to be when I grow up. Just sayin'.

I have claimed to be the best lookin' mutha fucka on the boards?

Yes, you have. And that worked out really well for you, didn't it?

I'm Rick James bitch. However, I'm pretty sure I look better than you and definitely have a better body than your flabby nog marrying ass.

Anyone who would go to the "I'm better looking than you" card needs to turn in his heterosexual card. Seriously.

Btw, nog? Wow, just wow.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:00 am

How many times are you going to end your crying with "Seriously" in a way that doesn't get laughed at?

You have no clue what I do or anything else. So that is what cracks me up about turds like yourself that go from anti-republican to personal attacks as you initially started. I'm just fucking with a mentally deficient cretin/tard like yourself for my amusement.

A maxed out $28.8k/yr lawyer ($15/hr) dude trying everything he can to bag on me for 10,000 different jobs in 5 years... AND making less and not as good looking keeps replying to me. Gotta love this free entertainment.

jtr · Post by **jtr** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:02 am

holy shit an ap sighting, what up dude?

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:05 am

Atomic Punk wrote:How many times are you going to end your crying with "Seriously" in a way that doesn't get laughed at?

I'm not crying. I'm just sad that you consider "I'm better looking than you" to be such epic smack.

You have no clue what I do or anything else. So that is what cracks me up about turds like yourself that go from anti-republican to personal attacks as you initially started.

You might want to check this thread (then again, reading obviously isn't your strong suit). You started with the personal attacks first. I'm just returning fire.

A maxed out $28.8k/yr lawyer ($15/hr) dude trying everything he can to bag on me for 10,000 different jobs in 5 years... AND making less

You have no idea how much I make. You've proved as much so many times in this thread, I've lost count.

and not as good looking . . .

You really are hung up on that, aren't you? Gay much?

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:12 am

Terry in Crapchester wrote:You really are hung up on that, aren't you? Gay much?

I thought your kind loved gays.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:17 am

stuckinia wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:You really are hung up on that, aren't you? Gay much?
I thought your kind loved gays.

I really don't care whether he is or isn't.

It's a smack board. I'm not ordinarily a fan of homo smack, as it's too often forced around here, or brought up completely out of the blue. But when somebody walks right into it . . .

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:23 am

So now I'm gay because you make low wages? That's okay Terry. I didn't say I'm beter looking than you as smack... that is just something you and your hog nog of a wife have to ponder.

You have no credibility with anything you say Terry. I've watched you C&P for years of useless drivel to further boring threads you shit upon.

First, let me ask you this... if it's okay. Since you are a successful lawyer, why did you marry a hog nog for a wife unit? That makes no sense to me. You seem to have low self-esteem. As you fuck up the facts about me, I remember the shit about you Terry.

You are a miserable fuck up and have said as much in the last year. Why do you deny this?

stuckinia · Post by **stuckinia** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 8:23 am

AP seems more attuned to illiterate smack, incoherent smack, inebriated smack, and complete fuckwit smack. But not homo smack.