how a cheerleader's eating disorder begins

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:49 am

The freckles didn't quite make it over to the right side. Interesting.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:50 am

Toddowen wrote:Flattering enough for me to tell her that I'd steal her panties from her clothes basket at the laundermat if I had the chance.

As if.

She's way too old for you, and she has a pussy.

Gunslinger · Post by **Gunslinger** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:02 am

Where is your next hot chick?

He's told you.

patsy stone · Post by **patsy stone** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:41 pm

e wrote:just have cnnsi.com post a pic of you in a thick-thighed, pasty belly roll pose

unflattering

No, women have eating disorders because men like you think this is unflattering and makes her look fat.

The majority of women can only WISH they had a mid-section as flat as hers. Her body looks just perfect to me.

pron · Post by **pron** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 3:25 pm

She's not fat, but she's not tight either.

But of course, I'd hit that.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:46 pm

88 wrote:I'd hit that until it couldn't walk. Just sayin.

that's what I thought too.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 4:51 pm

If she doesn't do it for any of the guys in here, I'd like to see the type of women you're hanging around because they must be 11s and 12s.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:23 pm

nuts? Plural?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:39 pm

Toddowen wrote:I'll bet she looks great in a bathtub.

You would, too, as long as you were in there with a toaster.

And RACK e for:

i got a neuticle at half price since i wasn't buying a complete set. i usually only wear it for pictures.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:36 pm

patsy stone wrote:No, women have eating disorders because men like you think this is unflattering and makes her look fat.

No, women have eating disorders because there's something wrong with their brain. Just because it's PC to blame American White Men for everything, it doesn't actually make it true.

But...as far as "men like you"...

Well, men like me get laid because we don't nitpick, looking for faults -- we appreciate a woman like that for what she is -- a hottie...and we make it a point to remind her whenever possible.

If you find beauty in many different women, you generally tend to find your dick in many different women.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:43 pm

Dinsdale wrote:If you find beauty in many different women, you generally tend to find your dick in many different women.

Bwaa.

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:55 pm

Not one Rack Fu fat/skinny chick reset?

Slippin'.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:00 pm

Rack Fu wrote:Not one Rack Fu fat/skinny chick reset?

Slippin'.

Our bad.

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:05 pm

Dinsdale wrote:
Rack Fu wrote:Not one Rack Fu fat/skinny chick reset?

Slippin'.

Our bad.

Just don't let it happen again.

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:19 pm

Dinsdale wrote:If you find beauty in many different women, you generally tend to find your dick in many different women.

Unless you're hung like a light switch a la ...

... in which case you're happy just to find your dick.

patsy stone · Post by **patsy stone** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:25 pm

I think that girl looks like Nelly Furtado, no?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:30 pm

I think she looks like she has potential to be the dirtiest of whores.

Which apperently I'm not alone in that assertion, judging by how much in the way of gems some dude hung on her.

Jess....as you grow older and wiser, you'll realize that any really hot chick sporting that much jewelry is always willing to cheat on her husband. Probably not with you or anything, but she usually will have a wandering eye.

patsy stone · Post by **patsy stone** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:51 pm

That's costume jewelry, dude. Not a wedding ring.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:55 pm

patsy stone wrote:That's costume jewelry, dude. Not a wedding ring.

Well, there you go. It served its purpose -- it made her look like the dirty whore that she is.

So...she throws a bigazz fake rock on "that finger" to trick everyone into thinking she's married and out looking for strange dick while she's drunk?

I think I'm in love. Jess, get me that bitch's number. Tell her I'm more than thiiiiiiissssssss big.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:24 pm

Anyone notice the ID badge photo from HS of Jess looks just like he looks now? The 20 year reunion will be similar only the chicks will be quite plumped up by then along with an additional tat or two. The whore in question is wearing costume jewelry. If it was real then she would have good implants by now.

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:22 pm

Jess' jacket still irks me to no end. Where did you get that crap?

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:45 pm

Suffice it to say that if Rack Fu thinks it sucks, (despite the fact Jess is sporting it), there's a good chance it's cool.

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:50 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Suffice it to say that if Rack Fu thinks it sucks, (despite the fact Jess is sporting it), there's a good chance it's cool.

That's a great post in one of those shitty, makes no sense kind of ways.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:35 am

I'll try to dumb it down for you.

You're a dork.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:09 am

Rack Fu wrote:Jess' jacket still irks me to no end. Where did you get that crap?

Do they have a big and tall store on Rodeo Drive?

Rack Fu · Post by **Rack Fu** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:06 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I'll try to dumb it down for you.

You're a dork.

I'm not the one that contradicted myself in a post while trying to run epic smack, fuckass.

A Rush fan calling me a dork. That's rich. Isn't there some badass Rush guitar tab DVD that you need to beat off to?

bbqjones · Post by **bbqjones** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:21 am

i was going to post in this thread about my wifes fat rolls, but the smack up in here is neurotica

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:53 am

~scccrrrrreeeeecccchhhhhhh as the needle tears into the spinning record~

Woah! Back that shit up! Wait one gotdamned minute here!!

Did I read that right?? All these years here, how did I ever miss this little nugget!!??

Rack Fu, referring to Mgo, wrote:A Rush fan

Are you serious?? Mgo, is this true??? YOU'RE a Rush fan???

How in grenn blazes could that happen??? It goes against the very fiber of every music related post I've ever seen of yours!!

More importantly, is Dins aware of this??

:-)

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:00 am

If I remember right(questionable on a good day), the first rock album I ever owned was either Black Sabbath - Paranoid, or Rush - Moving Pictures(an excellent album).

Sure, they jumped the shark after that, and Signals was a major letdown.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:12 am

Which is funny too, because to me, the best Rush stuff, is during and post "shark" era.

i.e., Signals, Grace Under Pressure, and Power Windows. That's their best shit, right there.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:13 am

And Fu, trust me, you've got nothing on me. I could listen to Rubben Stoddard and still be infinitely cooler than you. The very fact I exist means I'm cooler than you.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:16 am

OK, Van was semi-right...I WILL make fun of you.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: i.e., Signals, Grace Under Pressure, and Power Windows. That's their best shit, right there.

You are too high to function. Please inject yourself with a dose of Narcan and try again.

Those were pop albums. I was referring to "rock" albums.

Dumbest pro-Rush take I've ever read.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:25 am

I don't care if you categorize them as pop or rock. I merely mentioned my favorites.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:31 am

Those are your favorites because you clearly suck dick.

That you could possibly rate Grace Under Pressure ahead of Moving Pictures or 2112, or anything pre-Signals is a testament to this.

Then again...you like the Flaming Lips...it's not like the jury didn't return from deliberation on the dick-sucking charges a looooong time ago.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:35 am

Asshole, I started out on 2112 and Moving Pictures, just as any Rush fan would. I progressed from there.

2112? Play that futuristic shit to any horned up hottie, and TELL me you're going to get laid that night.

Not gonna happen.

Signals? Subdivisions? MUCH better chance, my friend.

Of course, no Rush would be your best chance, but that isn't a challenge.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:39 am

You know...when I think about throwing on some mood music by which to get laid by, the name Rush rarely comes to the forefront.

And as far as a "challenge"?

I don't need any more "challenges" when I'm trying to get a little on me. Hell, my personality and appearance make it challenging enough.

I find the much better challenge to be getting them to shut up and leave.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:42 am

Dinsdale wrote:Hell, my personality and appearance make it challenging enough.

Which is what separates me from the rest of you message board geeks. The second I get out of bed, I'm still more handsome and charming than the lot of you...to any woman. Hell, put me in the same room as Patsy Stone, and a six pack, and I'd have my tongue up her snatch in less than it would take for Van to turn down a lapdance past 9 o'clock.

The odds of this are like a home dog on a Thursday night.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:45 am

HA!

Just kidding. I'm the best-looking, swingingest stud on this or any other planet.

Werd.

Actually, that's not true, either. Women just check me out, and instinctively get an inkling as to my sexual prowess.

^^^THAT part is true-btw.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:46 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I'd have my tongue up her snatch in less than it would take for Van to turn down a lapdance past 9 o'clock.

RACK-btw.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:47 am

Wow...

My world's been rocked. Mgo, a Rush fan. Never would've imagined it.

Must be that nutclenching falsetto in the early years that grabbed you, right?

I actually don't mind Rush. Not my favorite band by any means and they put on the single worst show I've ever seen in my life on the one New Year's Eve night in Long Beach where I caught their act so many years ago...

...long story short, Missing Persons opened up for them and they were great, especially Terry Bozzio, but I'd always heard about these massively long and precise Rush shows so I wasn't prepared to see them come out and play a completely uninspired 57 minute (!!) "Moving Pictures" commercial before they skedaddled off to their Sahara treks on their Beemers...

...but I actually liked their firsr "raw" album with "Working Man" and I liked 'em all the way through that killer live album with the Norman Rockwell looking chick hiding behind the curtains.

"Exit, Not An Entrance", or something like that. "La Villa Strangiatta" and "2112" sure don't suck, live. How Mgo and his visceral loathing for long, extended guitar instrumentals could ever stomach sitting through "The Trees" or "La Villa", I have no idea...

Rush just acquired way too processed of a sound though, the more the years went by...

Anything beyond "Signals" and even Tom Scholz was shaking his head and saying, "Damn, dudes, lighten up a bit there in post production..."

T1B

how a cheerleader's eating disorder begins

Re: how a cheerleader's eating disorder begins

Re: how a cheerleader's eating disorder begins

Re: how a cheerleader's eating disorder begins

Re: how a cheerleader's eating disorder begins