Truman wrote:Mister Bushice wrote:The whole idea being that you get your infantile insult cravings in the cul de smack, and bring something a little less 1999 SCII here.
Wrong. The whole idea being is that you have your ignorant and naïve head planted squarely up your ass if you refuse to acknowledge that politics and “smack” have been synonymous with one another pre-dating the very founding of our Republic.
Calling someone names a 6th grader uses on a daily basis is not smack, unless you're in the 6th grade that is, but we're not anymore.
If you can't read and comprehend the very basic rules of this forum and follow along, just don't whine and cry when your crap gets removed.
I read
and comprehend just fine. Who the fuck do you think you are? King George III?
And we freely voted on the “very basic rules of this forum” when? Just don’t whine and cry when your crappy rules are challenged in open forum and your fallacies are removed by “smack”.
When? It was before you arrived, last year. We had a long discussion thread about it, and took a vote. OC Mike was modding here at the time before he ran off with his Emu. The results of all of that are what you see posted above, but fail to follow.
King? No. Just a Mod.
George? No. Mister Bushice
III? No. First.
BTW, there's no whining here, and you can challenge all you like, it doesn't change a damn thing. The first time you remove anything with smack will be the first time for both the removal thing, and the smack.
and coming up with six different ways to call B smack stupid that a 9th grader could manage to do is not witty. It's boring and has been done on these boards 10 million times before.
What part of
Truman wrote:…I would be the LAST person on this Board to suggest that BSmack is stupid.. Stubborn? Hell yes. B sets the standard for Missouri mules. But believe it or not, Bushie, I have a helluva lot of respect for BSmack. Sumbitch could successfully argue Canadian geese to fly north to the Arctic Circle for the winter.
…do you not understand?
Oh gee maybe it was..
1. I’m sure that there are some mosques and mental institutions in San Francisco that would love to take in like-minded folks just like you….
and:
2. Once you’ve mastered reading, B,
Ya think?
BTW, I don’t see BSmack – or anyone else for that matter – openly complaining of boredom or challenging my “wit”…
Easy answer. You are not witty.
‘cept you. But I can see where struggling through two Freshman terms would make anyone bitter…
See, now you think this is witty? It's not. Just more
"you are stupid" innuendoes. Not humorous, not original, not clever, and not needed here. There are reindeer over in the CDS that would love this shit, though.
Tell you what, Sparky: You document six instances where I called BSmack “stupid” and I vow never to “darken” your Forum again.
Short of that (and you WILL lose):
First off I said "six different
ways to call B smack stupid" not six "instances" where you used the word stupid. Don't misquote me.
But for the record, there are the two above, and these four, on a quick search:
3. Intelligent discourse would clearly mark you as an over-achiever, B. But despite your struggles, rest easy:
4. As for “what the fuck” we should expect…
Why, intelligent discourse, B!
But once again, you leave us sorely disappointed….
5. Are you being deliberately ignorant?
6. Ever tire of waking up wrong, Brian?
But don't feel like you have to leave, just stop the childish stuff.
You resign in favor of a more benevolent and “tolerant” moderator.
Feel free to PM PSU, and make any request you like. I'm sure he will do whatever you say.
Quick observation of your heavy-handed, ham-fisted bungling of past threads would tend one to believe it to be good policy to keep copies of one’s posts in this forum.
Oh come now. You kept that post of yours and reread it lovingly every night, marveling in your turn of phrase, and clever invective, didn't you?
BTW, It’s even MORE pathetic to OUTRIGHT delete posts without comment that challenge
your rules
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
, criticize your authority, or are openly suspicious of your agenda in this forum.
The rule as posted are very clear and very simple. I don't need to explain anything, actually the only two people who have questioned them are you and whitey, which speaks volumes.
You posted that thread as a direct attack on me ( see rule #2), there was nothing political about it, it was just a whiny personal attack I removed without reading.
Let's try pounding this into your skull one more time. They are not just my rules, but they are the rules of this forum. If you don't like them, stop bitching and leave. If you wanna criticize me, take it to cul de smack. See how well it goes over.
Odd how you're the only one bitching about this now though, isn't it? How many times do I need to explain it until you are able to comprehend?
And you infer that Bsmack stupid. How stupid do you have to be to NOT get the basic rules of posting here?
Stone tablets too heavy for you, Bushlight? Pussy. Moses carried ten….
Pretty much done here. Again. You don't like the rules, just leave. If you break the rules, shit will be removed and don't bitch, I won't be listening. If you continue this incessantly dull diatribe, it won't stay up. I've wasted enough time on it.
And try not to shit on any other topic threads with this stuff.
PS
If you weren't jerking off to Phoebe Cates in that movie, you're a eunuch, or gay.