This is interesting
This is interesting
To take the A.D.D. sufferers among us by the hand, I highlighted a few points of interest.
I've even included a fun picture, in case trix would like to follow along.
Actually the whole thing is interesting to me.
But then again, I'm smarter than everyone else here.
-----------------------------------------
Go ahead, sign my free-agent linebacker. The running back, too. Pay them outrageous contracts and then make sure they put up big numbers next season.
And, no, we're not interested in playing the free-agent game and bringing in another team's discards. We'll stand pat.
If these statements came from an NFL front office, the team in question might face boycotts, riots and even the wraths of NFL experts ranging from Rush Limbaugh to Willie Brown.
Hidden in the statements, however, might be true genius.
See, teams that lose free agents and don't replace them with other teams' free agents are awarded compensatory draft picks by the NFL. And though those picks are an afterthought in most analyses of how teams are built, comp picks might have a lot more to say about tomorrow's Super Bowls than free agents.
Over the past 10 years, the teams that had the most compensatory picks were the Packers, Cowboys, Ravens, Rams, Eagles, Patriots, Bucs, Jaguars, Bears, Steelers and Titans. Only two of those 11 teams -- the Cowboys and Jaguars -- failed to reach the Super Bowl during that stretch.
In the same time frame, the teams with the fewest compensatory picks were the Browns, Texans, Jets, Bengals, Panthers, Falcons, Redskins, Chargers, Colts and Saints. Only two of those teams -- the Panthers and Colts -- played in a Super Bowl in that period.
Coincidence? I think not.
Compensatory picks are awarded to teams that lose more unrestricted free agents than they sign (players who are cut do not factor into the equation). The highest selection a team can get as compensation is a pick at the end of the third round.
The formula by which comp picks are awarded is a more closely guarded secret than the recipe for the Colonel's greasy chicken. Even NFL teams don't know it. But the picks are determined by the difference of the contracts signed by the players lost and the players acquired, as well as by the performances of the players. At least part of the formula is subjective.
No team has played the compensatory pick game better than the Ravens. They have allowed some fine players to leave as free agents -- including linebacker Ed Hartwell, running back Chester Taylor, cornerback Gary Baxter, defensive tackle Maake Kemoeatu, end Anthony Weaver, safety Will Demps, center Jeff Mitchell and corner Duane Starks. But with compensatory picks, they have drafted Taylor, fullback Ovie Mughelli, offensive tackle Tony Pashos and guard Edwin Mulitalo, among others.
The Patriots also have hit the compensatory jackpot by using bonus picks to take quarterback Tom Brady, guard Nick Kaczur and fullback Patrick Pass.
The compensatory pick system rewards teams that draft well and avoid looking for a quick fix. They select a player who becomes a starter. They lose him as a free agent and he gets a lucrative contract, so they are rewarded with a prime compensatory pick. Then they have a chance to draft a player of commensurate abilities who takes up less salary cap space.
"The key is not to panic and have faith in the process," says Eric DeCosta, the Ravens' director of college scouting. "Where you get in trouble is when you lose free agents and try to compensate by signing other free agents. The comp picks often have more value than the free agents you could sign."
The Patriots probably will come out ahead by allowing tight end Daniel Graham to leave as a free agent and getting a third-round compensatory pick in 2008 in return (assuming they don't sign a high-priced free agent from another team).
Having 11 picks instead of seven gives the draft room a different hue. It's a lot easier to talk yourself out of reaching for a player in the third round when you know you have two fourth-round picks to play with. With comp picks, teams might be more willing to gamble on a workout wonder, as the Ravens did with cornerback Derrick Martin last year; or select a specialty player, as the Chiefs did with punter Dustin Colquitt two years ago; or even a luxury quarterback, as the Packers did with Aaron Brooks in 1999.
Compensatory picks open up a world of possibilities. Even though they can't be traded, they clear avenues for other trades, both within the draft and outside of it. One reason the Ravens felt comfortable trading a sixth-round pick to move up in the first round to select defensive tackle Haloti Ngata last year is they had four comp picks in their arsenal.
Three months later, the Ravens were unconcerned about parting with a fourth-round pick to acquire quarterback Steve McNair from the Titans because they anticipated receiving a fourth-round compensatory pick for the loss of Kemoeatu to the Panthers.
The Ravens and other teams are expected to find out in the last week of March what comp picks have been awarded for the 2007 draft. The announcement won't get much attention.
But it probably should, given that the road to the Super Bowl is often lined with compensatory picks.
---------------------------------------------
Sports fans have grown progressively more impatient for success.
'5 yr programs' definitely won't cut it.
It's "just win now, baby," or somebody is gettin' shitcanned.
Silly rabbit.
I've even included a fun picture, in case trix would like to follow along.
Actually the whole thing is interesting to me.
But then again, I'm smarter than everyone else here.
-----------------------------------------
Go ahead, sign my free-agent linebacker. The running back, too. Pay them outrageous contracts and then make sure they put up big numbers next season.
And, no, we're not interested in playing the free-agent game and bringing in another team's discards. We'll stand pat.
If these statements came from an NFL front office, the team in question might face boycotts, riots and even the wraths of NFL experts ranging from Rush Limbaugh to Willie Brown.
Hidden in the statements, however, might be true genius.
See, teams that lose free agents and don't replace them with other teams' free agents are awarded compensatory draft picks by the NFL. And though those picks are an afterthought in most analyses of how teams are built, comp picks might have a lot more to say about tomorrow's Super Bowls than free agents.
Over the past 10 years, the teams that had the most compensatory picks were the Packers, Cowboys, Ravens, Rams, Eagles, Patriots, Bucs, Jaguars, Bears, Steelers and Titans. Only two of those 11 teams -- the Cowboys and Jaguars -- failed to reach the Super Bowl during that stretch.
In the same time frame, the teams with the fewest compensatory picks were the Browns, Texans, Jets, Bengals, Panthers, Falcons, Redskins, Chargers, Colts and Saints. Only two of those teams -- the Panthers and Colts -- played in a Super Bowl in that period.
Coincidence? I think not.
Compensatory picks are awarded to teams that lose more unrestricted free agents than they sign (players who are cut do not factor into the equation). The highest selection a team can get as compensation is a pick at the end of the third round.
The formula by which comp picks are awarded is a more closely guarded secret than the recipe for the Colonel's greasy chicken. Even NFL teams don't know it. But the picks are determined by the difference of the contracts signed by the players lost and the players acquired, as well as by the performances of the players. At least part of the formula is subjective.
No team has played the compensatory pick game better than the Ravens. They have allowed some fine players to leave as free agents -- including linebacker Ed Hartwell, running back Chester Taylor, cornerback Gary Baxter, defensive tackle Maake Kemoeatu, end Anthony Weaver, safety Will Demps, center Jeff Mitchell and corner Duane Starks. But with compensatory picks, they have drafted Taylor, fullback Ovie Mughelli, offensive tackle Tony Pashos and guard Edwin Mulitalo, among others.
The Patriots also have hit the compensatory jackpot by using bonus picks to take quarterback Tom Brady, guard Nick Kaczur and fullback Patrick Pass.
The compensatory pick system rewards teams that draft well and avoid looking for a quick fix. They select a player who becomes a starter. They lose him as a free agent and he gets a lucrative contract, so they are rewarded with a prime compensatory pick. Then they have a chance to draft a player of commensurate abilities who takes up less salary cap space.
"The key is not to panic and have faith in the process," says Eric DeCosta, the Ravens' director of college scouting. "Where you get in trouble is when you lose free agents and try to compensate by signing other free agents. The comp picks often have more value than the free agents you could sign."
The Patriots probably will come out ahead by allowing tight end Daniel Graham to leave as a free agent and getting a third-round compensatory pick in 2008 in return (assuming they don't sign a high-priced free agent from another team).
Having 11 picks instead of seven gives the draft room a different hue. It's a lot easier to talk yourself out of reaching for a player in the third round when you know you have two fourth-round picks to play with. With comp picks, teams might be more willing to gamble on a workout wonder, as the Ravens did with cornerback Derrick Martin last year; or select a specialty player, as the Chiefs did with punter Dustin Colquitt two years ago; or even a luxury quarterback, as the Packers did with Aaron Brooks in 1999.
Compensatory picks open up a world of possibilities. Even though they can't be traded, they clear avenues for other trades, both within the draft and outside of it. One reason the Ravens felt comfortable trading a sixth-round pick to move up in the first round to select defensive tackle Haloti Ngata last year is they had four comp picks in their arsenal.
Three months later, the Ravens were unconcerned about parting with a fourth-round pick to acquire quarterback Steve McNair from the Titans because they anticipated receiving a fourth-round compensatory pick for the loss of Kemoeatu to the Panthers.
The Ravens and other teams are expected to find out in the last week of March what comp picks have been awarded for the 2007 draft. The announcement won't get much attention.
But it probably should, given that the road to the Super Bowl is often lined with compensatory picks.
---------------------------------------------
Sports fans have grown progressively more impatient for success.
'5 yr programs' definitely won't cut it.
It's "just win now, baby," or somebody is gettin' shitcanned.
Silly rabbit.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 2810
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:34 pm
Re: This is interesting
I hate you Poptart.poptart wrote:.
Only two of those 11 teams -- the Cowboys and who cares-- failed to reach the Super Bowl during that stretch.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Mikey wrote:Interesting, but not that interesting.
In the same time frame, the teams with the fewest compensatory picks were the Browns, Texans, Jets, Bengals, Panthers, Falcons, Redskins, Chargers, Colts and Saints. Only two of those teams -- the Panthers and Colts -- played in a Super Bowl in that period.
Hmmm.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Seems to me that the reason teams who get compensatory picks do better is because they are better able to draft and coach players who are worthy of said compensatory picks. It stands to reason that free agents from bottom feeder teams would not attract nearly as much interest overall as FAs from perennial contenders. Ergo, the rich get richer.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Hidden in the statements, however, might be true genius.
This is old news in Foxboro. Is this supposed to be "groundbreaking stuff"? Good to see the rest of the league finally catching up.
This isn't just about "compensatory picks." It's about a certain philosophy on how to effectively stay under the cap every year. Don't sign a bunch of overpriced free agents in a league where you have a set spending limit. Wow. Hard hitting stuff here. The Patriots have been letting their guys go for years because they refuse to overpay for someone who may or may not be past their prime. They pay for what you're expected to do in the future... not what you have done in the past. It starts a domino effect... once you overpay for one guy, the rest of the team will have their hands out. They are being rewarded this offseason by refusing to break the bank in years past to keep the likes of Givens, Branch, McGinest, Vinatieri, etc, etc, etc... While everyone else wants to sign available talent in 07, they are out there... doing it. They'll be the odds on favorite to win it all next year once the free agent dust settles. Keep the core veterans and add some keys guys through the draft and free agency... IF YOU HAVE THE FUNDS.
Genius?
**Yawn**
This is old news in Foxboro. Is this supposed to be "groundbreaking stuff"? Good to see the rest of the league finally catching up.
This isn't just about "compensatory picks." It's about a certain philosophy on how to effectively stay under the cap every year. Don't sign a bunch of overpriced free agents in a league where you have a set spending limit. Wow. Hard hitting stuff here. The Patriots have been letting their guys go for years because they refuse to overpay for someone who may or may not be past their prime. They pay for what you're expected to do in the future... not what you have done in the past. It starts a domino effect... once you overpay for one guy, the rest of the team will have their hands out. They are being rewarded this offseason by refusing to break the bank in years past to keep the likes of Givens, Branch, McGinest, Vinatieri, etc, etc, etc... While everyone else wants to sign available talent in 07, they are out there... doing it. They'll be the odds on favorite to win it all next year once the free agent dust settles. Keep the core veterans and add some keys guys through the draft and free agency... IF YOU HAVE THE FUNDS.
Genius?
**Yawn**
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Eagles have been doing it for as long as the Patriots have without the same success in the SB column.. (but if you talk to Jeff Lurie and Joe Banner, they categorize the Eagles as the 'gold standard' for the rest of the NFL. )ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Good to see the rest of the league finally catching up.