T1b barely has a pulse...

Systematic Jackass · Post by **Systematic Jackass** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:30 pm

Who fuckin cares?

I forgot genres completely end when the clock turns to 00:00 on Jan. 1st

I guess I deserve a ban.

YD · Post by YD » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:31 pm

Systematic Jackass wrote:Who fuckin cares?

I forgot genres completely end when the clock turns to 00:00 on Jan. 1st

I guess I deserve a ban.

don't you already have some of those?

Systematic Jackass · Post by **Systematic Jackass** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:33 pm

timmay wrote:
Systematic Jackass wrote:Who fuckin cares?

I forgot genres completely end when the clock turns to 00:00 on Jan. 1st

I guess I deserve a ban.
don't you already have some of those?

Thanks for blowing my cover, dickhead

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:39 pm

Dog wrote:Syetematic Jackass posted that there were two 80's movie resets.

Wrong.

Number one, I wasn't sure if he actually "got" Bace's A.N. quote. Probably not, but I still wanted to acknowledge it.
Number two, he said late 80s, not 80s.

Systematic Jackass wrote:Alright! We got movie quotes from the late 80s being represented.

I am assuming he only meant Goodfellas. 1970 something is nowhere near the late 80s.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:41 pm

Dog wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Dog wrote:Moron's are people who think somebody is talking to them when they are actually talking to somebody else.

excuse the poor quoting etiquette, but you should've been smart enough to figure it out.
You mean like where you addressed ucant’s reply to Systematic Jackass? I’m supposed to be able to figure out that you were actually addressing Systematic Jackass? Forget about the etiquette, you’re too stupid to be posting on a message board. Moron.
Wow, I gave you too much credit. I'll recap.

Syetematic Jackass posted that there were two 80's movie resets.
Ucant pointed out that one movie was 1979 and one was 1990.
Both of those movies are 1 year off from being considered an 80's movie.
Yet you couldn't figure it out that I quoted the whole conversation and not just one post.
I get it, you suck at math. Silly me for assuming you could add and subtract ONE year.

Trust me, I never gave you much credit at all. The way you chose to reply indicated that you thought ucant was off by one year on each movie. Now if you had said, “Damn, Systematic Jackoff, you off on both by one freakin year! You suck!”, you might have a point.

I get it, you suck at English.

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:52 pm

wow, this has turned into a little tantrum. so shall i continue to whine and bitch about a single post regarding the year of two over-rated movies with some anonymous jackoff on the message board who believes he's cool because he knows proper usage of the quotation function?

what to do? what to do?

I'll pass.

YD · Post by YD » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:55 pm

Dog wrote:two over-rated movies

I like those movies

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:55 pm

Dog wrote:so shall i continue to whine and bitch about a single post regarding the year of two over-rated movies with some anonymous jackoff on the message board who believes he's cool because he knows proper usage of the quotation function?

After all, it’s so damn difficult to understand, isn’t it Corky?

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:03 pm

Dog wrote:two over-rated movies

you didn't just say those were over-rated did you...... :(

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:11 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
Dog wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
You mean like where you addressed ucant’s reply to Systematic Jackass? I’m supposed to be able to figure out that you were actually addressing Systematic Jackass? Forget about the etiquette, you’re too stupid to be posting on a message board. Moron.
Wow, I gave you too much credit. I'll recap.

Syetematic Jackass posted that there were two 80's movie resets.
Ucant pointed out that one movie was 1979 and one was 1990.
Both of those movies are 1 year off from being considered an 80's movie.
Yet you couldn't figure it out that I quoted the whole conversation and not just one post.
I get it, you suck at math. Silly me for assuming you could add and subtract ONE year.

Trust me, I never gave you much credit at all. The way you chose to reply indicated that you thought ucant was off by one year on each movie. Now if you had said, “Damn, Systematic Jackoff, you off on both by one freakin year! You suck!”, you might have a point.

I get it, you suck at English.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:19 pm

RACK Marisa

Are those her sexy feet with the slinky black nail polish ?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:43 pm

Dog wrote:who believes he's cool because he knows proper usage of the quotation function?.

I think Goobs is pretty cool for mastering this amazingly difficult technique too. He's got like a 7th degree quotation function belt and would totally kick Chuck Norris's ass if they ever tangled in a game of UBB skills. I'd "watch it" if I were you, buster...

YD · Post by YD » Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:30 pm

cue cantina music

*dog bellies up to the bar*

Goobs(pointin at ucant speaking to dog): He doesn't like you

Dog: I'm sorry

Goobs: I don't like you either. You must watch yourself we've mastered the quote function on over 12 message boards!

Dog: I'll be careful..

Goobs: You'll be dead!!

Music stopps...

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:52 pm

Felix, actually I already forgot what two movies we were even talking about.

I just love the whole "he made a typ-o and therefore must not know English" deductive reasoning that goes on. If I were getting paid for typing shit on message boards, maybe I'd proofread it....but beyond that, I don't really care if I misspell a word or type an apostrophe when one isn't needed.

But when you give some people nothing else to use, they have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to come up with anything at all.

See, some people would say "hey, welcome to this board. spend some time looking around and I think you'll enjoy it" while other people find it necessary to pounce on a newb.

I know the people who pounce on newbs are board bitches who are just ecstatic that a newb has showed up to take some of the daily beating that has been imposed upon them continuously. They get plungered on a daily basis and the fact that they get to do the plungering actually gets them harder than their own wives are capable of doing.

Its not a secret, and this sordid clambake isn't anything special. Its the same as any other sordid clambake but with a different url. We have Cam and Boges, .net has Marty or m2, this sordid clambake has Goober and Derron.

We are all more alike than any of you care to admit.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:57 pm

Dogshit for brains wrote: I just love the whole "he made a typ-o and therefore must not know English" deductive reasoning that goes on.

Go back and look where this started. It wasn't a typo, you fucking retard. Here's a hint for you: you might want to check out the "Preview" feature. It might help you look just a little bit less like an complete idiot.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:00 pm

Dog, while getting piled-on as a newb may suck (happens to just about everyone), it's a hell of a lot better than being ignored.

Roll your eyes at it, respond to it...do whatever the hell you want with it. But do try to keep in mind that this is the smack forum on a smack board, not the "cuddle under a warm blanket by the fireplace together" forum.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:02 pm

Except he's not a newbie. He's sucked here before.

ElvisMonster · Post by **ElvisMonster** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:05 pm

timmay wrote:cue cantina music

*dog bellies up to the bar*

Goobs(pointin at ucant speaking to dog): He doesn't like you

Dog: I'm sorry

Goobs: I don't like you either. You must watch yourself we've mastered the quote function on over 12 message boards!

Dog: I'll be careful..

Goobs: You'll be dead!!

Music stopps...

Cripple Fight · Post by **Cripple Fight** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:05 pm

Lock this festering shit heap.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:10 pm

Cripple Fight wrote:Lock this festering shit heap.

Don't you have a cocktail waitress job at the Barbary Coast to apply for?

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:16 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
Dogshit for brains wrote: I just love the whole "he made a typ-o and therefore must not know English" deductive reasoning that goes on.

Go back and look where this started. It wasn't a typo, you fucking retard. Here's a hint for you: you might want to check out the "Preview" feature. It might help you look just a little bit less like an complete idiot.

Holy shit, you are one exceptional retard.

Practice what you preach, senor tard. I typed moron's, and was corrected with morons. I know, it was a blow to my "self of steem"

Obviously you lack any reading comprehension skills. I don't care to hit preview. I'm not writing memos for a job nor am I writing my thesis, so I don't really care if I misspell something. I tried to explain it to you, but I understand that its hard for you to focus with hairy man ass on your face.

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:18 pm

OCmike wrote:Dog, while getting piled-on as a newb may suck (happens to just about everyone), it's a hell of a lot better than being ignored.

Roll your eyes at it, respond to it...do whatever the hell you want with it. But do try to keep in mind that this is the smack forum on a smack board, not the "cuddle under a warm blanket by the fireplace together" forum.

Damn, I thought this was adultfriendfinder.com

I was looking for someone who shared my interests in wind chimes.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:18 pm

dog wrote:...but I understand that its hard for you to focus with hairy man ass on your face.

Don't you mean "it's"?

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:21 pm

OCmike wrote:
dog wrote:...but I understand that its hard for you to focus with hairy man ass on your face.
Don't you mean "it's"?

Again, that type of smack fails to impress me.

I know, I know, you're not trying to impress. And I'm not trying to be grammatically correct. So it does seem pointless.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:22 pm

R: This thread has alot of posts in it.

L: I don't understand why everyone seems to be losing their heads though.

Sincerely,

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:22 pm

Dog wrote:
OCmike wrote:
dog wrote:...but I understand that its hard for you to focus with hairy man ass on your face.
Don't you mean "it's"?
Again, that type of smack fails to impress me.

I know, I know, you're not trying to impress. And I'm not trying to be grammatically correct. So it does seem pointless.

Actually, I was making a joke. Lighten up, Beavis.

YD · Post by YD » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:22 pm

ElvisMonster wrote:

I was hoping I wansn't the only one

ing

YD · Post by YD » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:24 pm

OCmike wrote:
dog wrote:...but I understand that its hard for you to focus with hairy man ass on your face.
Don't you mean "it's"?

bwahaha

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:25 pm

Tom In VA wrote:R: This thread has alot of posts in it.

L: I don't understand why everyone seems to be losing their heads though.

Sincerely,

Board bitches are always intimidated by new posters. They feel it's unfair if somebody shows up and doesn't get the proper treatment.

I'd like to thank OCMike for previously correcting my prior usage of "its" and thus allowing me to type it correctly this time.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:33 pm

I personally wouldn't classify Goober as a "board bitch".

Seems to me you and he are enjoying a nice round of smack wif each other.

You know what you're doing you sly dog, dog.

Frankly I highly doubt anyone here or any of the SCIII related boards are exactly "new".

Are Orenthal and Marcus resets still okay ? Can I get a ruling ?

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:36 pm

I can't even bait up a hook without somebody blowing my cover. Sheesh.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:39 pm

Dog wrote:without somebody blowing my .....

I don't think we do that under a warm blanket by the fireplace together either, dog.

Dog · Post by **Dog** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:44 pm

I figured out the problem!

This pacle needs a fireplace!

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:52 pm

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:07 pm

Tom In VA wrote:I personally wouldn't classify Goober as a "board bitch".

Why not?

His only purpose and function here is trying to insult and belittle others whilst puffing out his own chest in an effort to impress the "cool" crowd. He's an emminence fronting punk. I've very seldom seen him bring anything substansive.

He's a barnacle clinging to the hull of T1B. Fuck him.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:17 pm

War Wagon wrote:His only purpose and function here is trying to insult and belittle others

Rack him for getting it.

UNrack you for being all serious and shit all the time.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:18 pm

Dog wrote:I figured out the problem!

This pacle needs a fireplace!

we got one in the secret hideout.....

we've been going through duralogs like nobody's business

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:20 pm

His only purpose and function here is trying to insult and belittle others

IN!

Occasionally, when I read a post on this board, I come away feeling insulted and belittled.

When I read one from you...

I usually just feel cheated.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:33 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: Rack him for getting it.

shakes head morosely

No he doesn't "get" it, and quite obviously, neither do you.

If the only purpose of this board is to insult and belittle others, you'd have been run a long time ago. There's a way to do that without being a constantly snarling chihuahua.

UNrack you for being all serious and shit all the time.

Fair enough. I prefer to call it "keeping it real", but I do see your point. I'll leave the finger pulling to those more qualified.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:35 pm

Dinsdale wrote: I usually just feel cheated.

But Dins, you have the way to avoid that, remember?