Karen Shaw Petrou

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:25 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
cinderella_undercover wrote:Here's a totally hetero party....if anyone's interested?

http://www.stucknut.com/locker/files/angiee/gayparty.jpg
interested... tell me more.

Well, felice is out of the closet.

Mississippi Neck · Post by **Mississippi Neck** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:30 pm

Thats what I am talking about...

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:31 pm

RACK Jay and thanks.

Except I think you meant to say ....

"As for MSN...haven't watched it enough to be sure. CNN and FOX are both guilty of pontification and sabre rattling. FOX pundits tend behave more self-righteousness and blind loyalty to all things conservative. CNN isn't quite as pompous or buffoonish. They're more like the dirty hippies of news. Damn hippies."

I can't disagree. But the market for such an outlet as Fox was created due to the overwhelming bias of the other major news outlets .....

Necessity is the mother of invention. The problem is MONEY. It takes money to run these things and as soon as MONEY is involved ... objectivity gets thrown out the window. IMHO. Each outlet has people they need to "please" else the money won't flow.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:34 pm

My thread got hijacked into a who sucks more thread.

CNN or FoxNews?

How come everyone uses Fox instead of Fox News?

Do we use NBC instead of CNBC now?

If I say I was watching Family guy on Fox, does that make me a republican war-monger?

If I say I watched BSU pull off a badass upset over the okies on Fox, does that make me a republican war-monger?

IMO, all of them suck and if you think one of them is good then you are probably a retarded ass sheep.

Justa Heel · Post by **Justa Heel** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:41 pm

Cicero wrote: I actually think their coverage is more objective. They are willing to agree and disagree w/ the Administration's policies

All right. This is a troll.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:43 pm

Justa Heel wrote:
Cicero wrote: I actually think their coverage is more objective. They are willing to agree and disagree w/ the Administration's policies
All right. This is a troll.

I thought I was the troll?

Mississippi Neck · Post by **Mississippi Neck** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:44 pm

I thought we were all trolls.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:47 pm

Justa Heel wrote:
Cicero wrote: I actually think their coverage is more objective. They are willing to agree and disagree w/ the Administration's policies
All right. This is a troll.

IRONY

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:48 pm

Mississippi Neck wrote:I thought we were all trolls.

<----- never been a "troll".

Happy 1k, BTW.

Sorry Mr.T, I thought we were onto something beautiful there at the very beginning.

Justa Heel · Post by **Justa Heel** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:54 pm

Cicero wrote:
Justa Heel wrote:
Cicero wrote: I actually think their coverage is more objective. They are willing to agree and disagree w/ the Administration's policies
All right. This is a troll.

IRONY

Hey fuckwit, you do realize one of the foundational "tenets" of the press, if you will, is to serve as a check against the government, don't you? The Fourth Estate?

"FOXNews" is a propaganda outlet for the RNC, nothing more. If you're going to watch it at least admit it to yourself.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:56 pm

cinderella_undercover wrote: Sorry Mr.T, I thought we were onto something beautiful there at the very beginning.

Beautiful? No I knew it was going to be ugly as soon as i typed Karen Shaw Petrou in the title. The image wont leave me.

BTW, It aint your fault biz has something against fox news.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:56 pm

Mississippi Neck wrote:I thought it best to explain, dont want to get the natives excited...like Bizarro

A quick right click properties informed me of the fact. She didn't respond, but I was trying to get cinderella to go a little further. Although the chick has a great figure and good side rackage, I was looking for other fish.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:57 pm

Mr T wrote:BTW, It aint your fault biz has something against fox news.

Ever watch the Money Matters show? If you have, and don't find it to be laughable, you have blinders on. That and the fact that memos have been leaked where Fox is specifically courting a point of view instead of "the news".

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:09 pm

No, I havent.

If I dont like something, I usually dont watch it.

You do know shows depend on ratings and you are supporting said show you hate.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:15 pm

Tom In VA wrote:RACK Jay and thanks.

Except I think you meant to say ....

"As for MSN...haven't watched it enough to be sure. CNN and FOX are both guilty of pontification and sabre rattling. FOX pundits tend behave more self-righteousness and blind loyalty to all things conservative. CNN isn't quite as pompous or buffoonish. They're more like the dirty hippies of news. Damn hippies."

Touche!

Yeps. FOX is what I meant. Damn dysFOXia!

I can't disagree. But the market for such an outlet as Fox was created due to the overwhelming bias of the other major news outlets .....

Necessity is the mother of invention. The problem is MONEY. It takes money to run these things and as soon as MONEY is involved ... objectivity gets thrown out the window. IMHO. Each outlet has people they need to "please" else the money won't flow.

Concur on your take of FOX's launch point. And money is indeed a major motivating factor which puppeteers the network strings. It goes hand in hand with politics. But keep in mind, ABC, CBS and NBC all began as straightforward news entities, minus corporate noodling. To a degree, they still are. The Big 3's broadcasts have less of the superficial glitnz (old t.v. term for glitter) of their cable infotainment bretheren, though that isn't saying much. Their product is a lamentable dilution from what it used to be.

Even with that said, I'll take NBC or ABC over cable news. A less bitter apple than a couple of sour oranges.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:16 pm

Mr T wrote:retarded

Am not.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:20 pm

Tom In VA wrote:
Mr T wrote:retarded
Am not.

Yeah-huh

Do you really think CNBC, CNN, or Fox News is worth a shit?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:21 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
Tom In VA wrote:RACK Jay and thanks.

Except I think you meant to say ....

"As for MSN...haven't watched it enough to be sure. CNN and FOX are both guilty of pontification and sabre rattling. FOX pundits tend behave more self-righteousness and blind loyalty to all things conservative. CNN isn't quite as pompous or buffoonish. They're more like the dirty hippies of news. Damn hippies."

Touche!

Yeps. FOX is what I meant. Damn dysFOXia!

I can't disagree. But the market for such an outlet as Fox was created due to the overwhelming bias of the other major news outlets .....

Necessity is the mother of invention. The problem is MONEY. It takes money to run these things and as soon as MONEY is involved ... objectivity gets thrown out the window. IMHO. Each outlet has people they need to "please" else the money won't flow.
Concur on your take of FOX's launch point. And money is indeed a major motivating factor which puppeteers the network strings. It goes hand in hand with politics. But keep in mind, ABC, CBS and NBC all began as straightforward news entities, minus corporate noodling. To a degree, they still are. The Big 3's broadcasts have less of the superficial glitnz (old t.v. term for glitter) of their cable infotainment bretheren, though that isn't saying much. Their product is a lamentable dilution from what it used to be.

Even with that said, I'll take NBC or ABC over cable news. A less bitter apple than a couple of sour oranges.

And a RACK to you sir. "Cable Infotainment", very precise term.

I don't watch any of the news outlets. They all make me ill. The only t.v. news I watch I get from the internet too, and I can't understand a word she's saying ....

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:27 pm

Justa Heel wrote: Hey fuckwit, you do realize one of the foundational "tenets" of the press, if you will, is to serve as a check against the government, don't you? The Fourth Estate?

Really, I thought it was to sell a product that contained information of interest to the public. Besides, if that were true, explain the press's 7 years of fellatio of the Clinton Administration up to his implosion following the Lewinsky affair? Spare me the "dittohead" label...I voted for Clinton. I'm just disgusted by the left-wing agenda of the mainstream media who seem to feel that it's their job to "educate" us in the way that we should think if we dare have views that differ from theirs. I don't think that was one of the founding tenets of the press, was it?

"FOXNews" is a propaganda outlet for the RNC, nothing more. If you're going to watch it at least admit it to yourself.

FoxNews has a definite slant to the right, but less so than CBS's lean to the left. It's kind of a pick your poison thing. Personally, I either get my news from FoxNews or via the internet (Reuters releases, that sort of thing). I'm hardly a big Bush fan, but at this point I'm so sick of the daily Bush-bashing that I'd rather watch an episode of "The Ropers" than tune into CBS news or CNN.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:28 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
Mississippi Neck wrote:I thought it best to explain, dont want to get the natives excited...like Bizarro
A quick right click properties informed me of the fact. She didn't respond, but I was trying to get cinderella to go a little further. Although the chick has a great figure and good side rackage, I was looking for other fish.

I was told to limit myself.

Awwwww, what the hell.......

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:39 pm

cinderella_undercover wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:
Mississippi Neck wrote:I thought it best to explain, dont want to get the natives excited...like Bizarro
A quick right click properties informed me of the fact. She didn't respond, but I was trying to get cinderella to go a little further. Although the chick has a great figure and good side rackage, I was looking for other fish.
I was told to limit myself.

Awwwww, what the hell.......

what if I have a foot fetish? I don't. I like shoulders and racks and posteriors, but the fin doesn't help those who like feet. are you a flipperist?

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:42 pm

I like chicks in thigh high boots.

She's kind of wearing one.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:57 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:what if I have a foot fetish? I don't. I like shoulders and racks and posteriors, but the fin doesn't help those who like feet. are you a flipperist?

Hahaha, not really. Well, maybe? I can't remember the last time I actually saw a man with "nice feet"?

I'm able to appreciate the female form, without being a dyke. Hahaha.

I like the classic femme the best.

Ana Ng · Post by **Ana Ng** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:03 pm

Mr. T, I did a little research, and I think this is a picture of KSP in highschool?

I see a debinite resemblance.

(sorry I had to do that to ya)

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:55 pm

Tom In VA wrote:Most real badasses I know, don't spend a whole lot of time on the internet trying to prove ... how badass they are.

Losers.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:00 pm

Tom In VA wrote:Most real badasses I know, don't spend a whole lot of time on the internet trying to prove ... how badass they are.

By the way, how do you know they don't?

When I stroll into work tomorrow, I'm probably not going to mention to everybody how I just ran some epic smack on the internet to some guy who calls himself Douchebag.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:07 pm

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: By the way, how do you know they don't?

Technically I don't know that they don't. I'd be real shocked.

I missed this LOL'r

When I stroll into work tomorrow, I'm probably not going to mention to everybody how I just ran some epic smack on the internet to some guy who calls himself Douchebag.

Comedy Gold

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:21 am

My friends in DC who work for the state

Huh? What state?

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:01 am

1)US Department of State - Washington, DC
----Office of Foreign Affairs

2)District of Columbia: Department of Health

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:03 am

DC ain't a state, mushbrain.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:06 am

PSUFAN wrote:DC ain't a state, mushbrain.

He's living up to his "Unintentional Humorist" tag.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:27 am

PSUFAN wrote:DC ain't a state, mushbrain.

No fucking shit. They work for the US State Dept. I didnt see where I said DC was a state.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:17 pm

I know I could use a refresher in some of the fundamentals of writing as well.

That, and I wanted to check the pics in the thread out again. Especially that French broad.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:22 pm

I think I sawr a pron once where the mermaid chick took it in the backside. She squealed a lot in the scene.

I was DOWN BIG TIME.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:35 pm

R-Jack wrote:
Cicero wrote: I didnt see where I said DC was a state.

Uhhhhhhh

Cicero wrote: My friends in DC who work for the state

I work for a consulting firm. Our home office is in Boston, MA. I work "on-site" at one of our clients. It is in Jamaica Plain, MA. It is a hospital. It's a state run facility. I consider some of the hospital staff to be my friends. They are defined as "state workers."

So... if said, "my friends in JP who work for the state" you would extrapolate that Jamaica Plain is one of the States? Yikes...

I know you are shocked to read this, but, I gotta defend the tard on this one.

Tom In VA · Post by **Tom In VA** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:55 pm

There was some ambiguity and I think his statement could have been made with more precision and accuracy.

I actually interpreted his statement as ... "My friends in DadeCounty work for the State of Florida."

But then I was eating some

So I wasn't inclined to get all retentive about it because the overall point he was making was .... it's not all that uncommon for young, rising professionals to combine resources for fun and profit (offsetting the costs of living expenses to save for something further down the road).

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:37 pm

cinderella_undercover wrote:Mr. T, I did a little research, and I think this is a picture of KSP in highschool?

I see a debinite resemblance.

(sorry I had to do that to ya)

Sorry for what.

That bitch was oooo--glee.

I wish i could find a picture that would do its ugly justice, so i could post it and maybe make someone throw up.

T1B

Karen Shaw Petrou

(NSFW!)

Re: (NSFW!)

Re: (NSFW!)