Don't blame me. I'm one of the 5% or so of this board who didn't vote for him.Dinsdale wrote:you guys are really reaping a good, fair reward for voting for a traitor.
You're THE man
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
No see, that sounds to me like somebody needs to impeach him on those grounds. They're wasting their time with obsessing on Iraq.Dinsdale wrote: Yet you tards won't demand better, and make excuses for acts of treachery...ponderous.
If we can prove that Bush's policies or lack thereof in regards to the border, put our national security at risk ....
Then he's not doing his job.
I like that angle Dins.
A nonpartisan group's stats are fine by me. Point taken.mvscal wrote:No problem at all.
In the past two years, FAIR has issued fiscal cost studies for California, Arizona, Texas and Florida looking at the same cost factors studied by the Urban Institute 10 years earlier, i.e., education, emergency medical care and incarceration. Our findings of the annual net fiscal costs were:
California
$8.8 billion ($1,183 per native household)
Arizona
$1.03 billion ($717 per native household)
Texas
$3.73 billion ($725 per native household)
Florida
$.91 billion ($315 per native household)
These studies were done in 2004 and 2005, and the rapid continuing increase in the illegal immigrant population in each of these states would result in higher estimates of the fiscal cost today.
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?p ... localcosts
Btw, how is it that California has about 36 million people and Texas has 23 million, yet Califorina has 2 1/2 times the cost? hmmmmm?
And don't even get me started about Kalifornia's "legal" system.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
- Mister Bushice
- Drinking all the beer Luther left behind
- Posts: 9490
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:39 pm
Simple answer. Who the fuck wants to end up in Texas?
If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." —GWB Washington, D.C., Dec. 19, 2000
Martyred wrote: Hang in there, Whitey. Smart people are on their way with dictionaries.
War Wagon wrote:being as how I've got "stupid" draped all over, I'm not really sure.
You're kidding, right?Mister Bushice wrote:Simple answer. Who the fuck wants to end up in Texas?
Along the lines of pop's original post ...
1. Change the Capitol from Washington to Austin. Hell, it was early Texans who decided not to make the capitol there taller than the U.S. Capitol, out of "respect."
Sheeeeeet.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.