G.O. wrote:but the NT is actually very solid, as well as much of the OT.
I could have a field day with this statement, but it's best left for another forum and another thread......
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
As I've discussed/debated with 'tart before, my attitude is that the bible is the Word of God....as filtered through His human scribes. There'd be little point in God trying to explain to the ancient Israelites that bats are not birds, that spiders are not insects, that rabbits do not chew cud, that the earth is actually billions of years old, how evolution through natural selection works, the mechanisms of meiosis and mitosis, genetics, epidemiology, germ theory of disease (well, actually, that WOULD have been helpful...), astronomy, geology, etc.velocet wrote:Mike the Lab Rat wrote:The scientific errors in the legit Bible are at least understandable, what with the primitive level of science thousand of years ago.
Scientific errors in anything touted as the Word of God are hardly understandable.
velocet
velocet wrote:Mike the Lab Rat wrote:The scientific errors in the legit Bible are at least understandable, what with the primitive level of science thousand of years ago.
Scientific errors in anything touted as the Word of God are hardly understandable.
velocet
So the next time one of those mormon teams knocks on my door, what should I say to piss them off, confuse them, or to possibly leave scars of doubt in their minds?Mike the Lab Rat wrote:As I've discussed/debated with 'tart before, my attitude is that the bible is the Word of God....as filtered through His human scribes. There'd be little point in God trying to explain to the ancient Israelites that bats are not birds, that spiders are not insects, that rabbits do not chew cud, that the earth is actually billions of years old, how evolution through natural selection works, the mechanisms of meiosis and mitosis, genetics, epidemiology, germ theory of disease (well, actually, that WOULD have been helpful...), astronomy, geology, etc.velocet wrote:Mike the Lab Rat wrote:The scientific errors in the legit Bible are at least understandable, what with the primitive level of science thousand of years ago.
Scientific errors in anything touted as the Word of God are hardly understandable.
velocet
The Bible has scientific errors. That's a fact. That in no way casts doubt on its authority as a book of faith. It casts doubt on its authority as a science text...which only morons and the hoplelessly deluded by into...
The errors in the BoM, on the other hand, are endless and unexcusable. The novel entirely hinges on the existence two mythical tribes that no scientific evidence can find evidence of, and it makes egregious errors in what species were present at the alleged time of the events and makes utterly unfounded claims as to the origin of the Native Americans. It is 100% bullshit from page one onward.
They love it when you ask about their "magic underwear."Mister Bushice wrote:So the next time one of those mormon teams knocks on my door, what should I say to piss them off, confuse them, or to possibly leave scars of doubt in their minds?
All I've ever done up until now was "No" SLAM!
ask them how Joseph Smith was able to translate the Kinderhook Plates via his magic glasses, which were then later proven to be forgeries......Mister Bushice wrote:
So the next time one of those mormon teams knocks on my door, what should I say to piss them off, confuse them, or to possibly leave scars of doubt in their minds?
Felix wrote:[ask them how Joseph Smith was able to translate the Kinderhook Plates via his magic glasses, which were then later proven to be forgeries......
that always gets them reeling....
the Kinderhook Plate story is something they'd love to shove on some back shelf...unfortunately, they can't....like I say, the only saving grace was that he died before he could publish his "translation".....Dinsdale wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinderhook_Plates
I love that story.
When confronted with this hilarious twist, they merely pass off the guy who is their great historian, essentailly their "custodian of records"...as a liar.
He wrote that Smith began to translate the plates. 100 years later(or whenever), the church says "that never happened."
What a paradox...they lap up Smith's words as absolute truth, yet his personal assistants and whatnot they have no problem accusing of lying.
not to mention by their own admission....the three witnesses, that are prominently displayed on the inside cover page of every BoM all eventually admitted they had never actually "seen" the golden tablets, but rather saw them through divine enlightenment.....PSSSST! The whole darn lot of them were lying, which has been fairy well proven both through science and common sense.
both.....G.O. wrote: which part, out of curiosity? NT or OT or both?
It's simple. Hope.Felix wrote: again, how any rational thinking human can buy into that horseshit is beyond me.......
Felix wrote:of course that's exactly how I feel.....Tom In VA wrote:
Do you go into the football season thinking, "The Broncos suck ass and shouldn't even bother".
bad example....[giantsmiley][/giantsmiley]
Felix wrote: not to mention by their own admission....the three witnesses, that are prominently displayed on the inside cover page of every BoM all eventually admitted they had never actually "seen" the golden tablets, but rather saw them through divine enlightenment.....
that may or may not be true (I was always under the impression that pitch, which is a derivative of oil, wasn't discovered until after the "great flood")......mvscal wrote:Nonsense.Felix wrote:how did he make the boat waterproof, because pitch was yet unknown.....
best bring your "A" game....I'm officially qualified as a "scourge" of the earth and a heretic....pretty impressive credentials if I do say so myself......Adelpiero wrote:if i ever see felix and the bible, i will fight them.
Love is a spirit.Rootbeer wrote:In regards to the nature of God I see numerous passages that indicate a multi-faceted God. God is a spirit but he is not only a spirit. The Bible also says that God is love. That doesn't mean that God is only love any more than other passages mean he is only a spirit. God created man in His own likeness and image. In Exodus Moses spoke to God "Face to face as a man speaketh to a man". Moses didn't see God with his mortal eyes but with his spiritual eyes and in that same meeting God told Moses that He would "take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen". The Ten Commandments were written by the finger of God. That doesn't mean God is only a finger. God has a mouth and a voice and many characteristics beyond the single-faceted idea that he is a Spirit and only a Spirit.
Jacob claimed to have seen God face to face.
The Bible routinely gave out ages of 6, 7, 800+ to people before the flood.Felix wrote:how could Noah (who was somewhere between 500 and 600 years old :? )......
Your questions show that you have a fundamental misunderstanding about what Noah needed to do, and how it was done.so many questions so few answers......
Or maybe, just maybe the flood never happened and the people before the flood are 100% fictional.poptart wrote:The Bible routinely gave out ages of 6, 7, 800+ to people before the flood.Felix wrote:how could Noah (who was somewhere between 500 and 600 years old :? )......
It matter of factly did so.
Post-flood the ages immediately went down to the 'normal' ranges we see today.
Obviously there was a drastic climate change post-flood which led to less favorable living conditions for man.
there are alot of christians who see the noah story as a fable or parable. even if true, if one believes in a God who made the earth and everything in it, a big boat is likely within his repertoire.Felix wrote:that may or may not be true (I was always under the impression that pitch, which is a derivative of oil, wasn't discovered until after the "great flood")......mvscal wrote:Nonsense.Felix wrote:how did he make the boat waterproof, because pitch was yet unknown.....
I'm sure G.O. will be thankful he doesn't have to deal with that part of the question......
so it's my fault for not asking the right questions and having a fundamental misunderstanding of what the Inerrant Book is saying......gotcha......poptart wrote:
Your questions show that you have a fundamental misunderstanding about what Noah needed to do, and how it was done.
While your questions about Noah's ark seem to you to be reasonable, they are not.
To cut to the chase, you really don't know which questions you need to ask.
That's obvious.
before we move on, how about you answer the questions I've already posed.....or are you going to stick with that "parable" response.....G.O. wrote:
what else? how about NT?
The fact that men lived for 800 years before and only like 40 years after should be enough to convince you.mvscal wrote:Drastic climate changes leave evidence behind.poptart wrote:Obviously there was a drastic climate change post-flood which led to less favorable living conditions for man.
Where is it?
look, if your not going to buy into the whole "You gotta have faith" argument espoused by the believers, well there is simply no hope for you.....mvscal wrote:
Drastic climate changes leave evidence behind.
Where is it?
You mean like Vanessa Redgrave in Second Serve?velocet wrote:
God may actually be turning the tables on us with that whole "God the Father" routine: God could be a Chick trolling as a Dude.
i never claimed to have all the answers. i'm just curious to your objections to the bible, in many parts, being a historical document.Felix wrote:
before we move on, how about you answer the questions I've already posed.....or are you going to stick with that "parable" response.....G.O. wrote:
what else? how about NT?
G.O. wrote:i never claimed to have all the answers. i'm just curious to your objections to the bible, in many parts, being a historical document.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
this is from six posts above, but what the hell....G.O. wrote: you have any beef with the NT?
Do your own Google.mvscal wrote:Drastic climate changes leave evidence behind.
Where is it?