Draft history ranking by school

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:50 am

kinda interesting. FWIW. the NFL is something i watch when i want to hang with some of my Donkey buddies. but, sort of interesting.

i didn't think Oklahoma would rank that high given that 20 years of their best "skill" and OL players were wishbone/option oriented. but, i guess the "League" needs pulling guard who can knock a downfield LB on his ass after all.

http://www.drafthistory.com/n_college/college_n.html

Husker4ever · Post by **Husker4ever** » Sat May 05, 2007 7:24 am

King Crimson wrote:kinda interesting. FWIW. the NFL is something i watch when i want to hang with some of my Donkey buddies. but, sort of interesting.

i didn't think Oklahoma would rank that high given that 20 years of their best "skill" and OL players were wishbone/option oriented. but, i guess the "League" needs pulling guard who can knock a downfield LB on his ass after all.

http://www.drafthistory.com/n_college/college_n.html

I've always been amazed at how many OL came out of Nebraska's run-oriented offense and went on to perform well in the NFL.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sat May 05, 2007 1:23 pm

Kind of funny that State is so high up. They've had NFL-ready talent but their teams have been mediocre at best.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sat May 05, 2007 1:29 pm

Like a lot of Pac-10 teams...

the_ouskull

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Sun May 06, 2007 2:58 am

I didn't see it on that link, but after the '07 draft tOSU passed up USC for the school with the most first round picks.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun May 06, 2007 6:56 pm

L45B wrote:I didn't see it on that link, but after the '07 draft tOSU passed up USC for the school with the most first round picks.

I'm curious to know the stats displaying the schools with the highest paid players entering the NFL draft.

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Mon May 07, 2007 2:06 am

I dunno, but I'm almost certain Iowa doesn't even make that list.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Mon May 07, 2007 3:00 am

'm curious to know the stats displaying the schools with the highest paid players entering the NFL draft.

I often wonder why kids from $C leave early because they have to be making a hell of a lot more while still in college.

buckeye_in_sc · Post by **buckeye_in_sc** » Mon May 07, 2007 5:04 pm

Iowa not on the list.

I call BULLSHIT!

Sin,

Jonsense...

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Mon May 07, 2007 5:25 pm

Interesting link. PSU had a few years with 10 guys drafted. That's a bunch.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon May 07, 2007 6:16 pm

Florida State 213
Iowa 213
Baylor 208
California 199
North Carolina 197

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Tue May 08, 2007 4:31 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:Florida State 213

Draft started in 1936. FSU didnt have D1 football til 1950.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue May 08, 2007 6:10 pm

Mr T wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:Florida State 213
Draft started in 1936. FSU didnt have D1 football til 1950.

I was pointing out that Kal was behind Baylor. Did the UBB code fly over yer head? Who gave nolesy T's password?

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed May 09, 2007 4:06 am

IndyFrisco wrote:
Mr T wrote:
IndyFrisco wrote:Florida State 213
Draft started in 1936. FSU didnt have D1 football til 1950.
I was pointing out that Kal was behind Baylor. Did the UBB code fly over yer head? Who gave nolesy T's password?

Just got defensive. You know you never want to be tied with iowa in anything.

buckeye_in_sc · Post by **buckeye_in_sc** » Wed May 09, 2007 12:15 pm

Rack the Iowa blast...

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Thu May 10, 2007 3:15 pm

kinda surprised Bama is so low.

and on the FSU issue. do the numbers, while FSU is a factory....they would need to have averaged about 7 per year they weren't playing D-1 ball to make the top 5. just goes to show (nothing against FSU) what the consistent quality of the top programs over teh last 50 years.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu May 10, 2007 4:15 pm

King Crimson wrote:kinda surprised Bama is so low.

and on the FSU issue. do the numbers, while FSU is a factory....they would need to have averaged about 7 per year they weren't playing D-1 ball to make the top 5. just goes to show (nothing against FSU) what the consistent quality of the top programs over teh last 50 years.

In fairness on this point, the NFL draft has been shortened dramatically over the years. At one point within the time that I was conscious of these sorts of things, the NFL draft was 18 rounds long. Expansion and supplemental draft picks have mitigated the effects of shortening of the draft somewhat, but there were still a lot more players drafted in the 1970's than there are today.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Thu May 10, 2007 4:21 pm

that's a good point TinC. taken.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Thu May 10, 2007 8:06 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
King Crimson wrote:kinda surprised Bama is so low.

and on the FSU issue. do the numbers, while FSU is a factory....they would need to have averaged about 7 per year they weren't playing D-1 ball to make the top 5. just goes to show (nothing against FSU) what the consistent quality of the top programs over teh last 50 years.
In fairness on this point, the NFL draft has been shortened dramatically over the years. At one point within the time that I was conscious of these sorts of things, the NFL draft was 18 rounds long. Expansion and supplemental draft picks have mitigated the effects of shortening of the draft somewhat, but there were still a lot more players drafted in the 1970's than there are today.

If FSU averaged 3 a season for 14 years or just 2. that would be 42 or 28 more guys. hell just give FSU 1 guy for that 14 year span so we are not tied with iowa

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Fri May 11, 2007 12:00 am

no one is saying you are Iowa's bitch. I mean except tha you don't have 22 first round draft picks and Ferentz does more with less. and Jason White sucks.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sat May 19, 2007 9:48 pm

I'm kinda surprised my 'skers were so high considering for a long-time they depended on overachievers that redshirted and got built-up in what used to be the premiere S&C program in the country. Plus for many of the years we were an option-oriented team which means our qb's, wr's, and even a fair amount of O-linemen(we tended to have shorter guys with quick feet that could pull) that weren't pro-types.

But hey, being ranked that high is something to mention to a recruit so it is all-good.

T1B

Draft history ranking by school

Draft history ranking by school

Re: Draft history ranking by school