I beg to differ.Luther wrote:[q
The kid got shot, but he wasn't intentionally shot at. They meant no harm to the kid, they meant to save his life.
No one made a judgement or determination that it should be the kid.
By gross incompetance, they did indeed make that judgement.
It was a knife. The report you linked indicated there were several officers on scene. OBVIOUSLY a bum-rush would have been sound judgement in that situation, and it's an abomination that it wasn't what was done.
And no, I'm not a "it's always the cops fault" guy -- quite the contrary, as mentioned earlier. Most of those shootings aren't just justified, they're a public service.
Now, if dude was holding a GUN to the kid's head, and there was no rifle available on that short notice, then ONE cop would want to go for a headshot to save the kid's life. Another OBVIOUS judgement call. But it was a knife -- what bit of Einsteinesque reasoning leads one to believe that when "another ounce of pressure" is going to start cutting carotids and whatnot, then even if you did take him down with a shot/shots that that pressure wouldn't have netted the same outcome?
Common fucking sense.
Is it tough to make such judgements in the blink of an eye?
Fuck yeah it is. And that's what we pay them for, and offer up all that "convoluted training" at taxpayer expense.
And in the case of those officers, when it came down to brass tacks, that training was all for naught. They fucked up. Period. Buh-Freking-Bye. Never to be employed as a cop again, since their judgement can't be trusted.
Unfair?
Probably.
Right?
Definitely. It's the job they signed up for, and it's a service the taxpayers pay them for. If they prove an inability to not perform at a high level, then to hell with them.
To reiterate -- I believe the overwhelming majority of Portland Police(and I've grown pretty familiar with their act over the years, unfortunately, by my own hand) do a great job. I'm guessing you did too. But the protection afforded to the ones who don't absolutely destroy the credibility of the entire department, which you somewhat alluded to.
And that's one incedent. There was of course the dumb bitch who forgot that whole "Constitution" thing she was sworn to uphold, and decided she knew better. Hearsay from a neighbor without affidavit suddenly became "probable cause"(could have sworn this is covered in the Bill of Rights) to start breaking people's doors down without warrants.
You know what I'm talking about, Luth.
One less rogue cop to worry about... paid for her crime with her life. I'm sad for those she left behind, but she broke the law.
BTW -- sweet coverup the Popo pulled by killing that guy in the hospital. Couldn't feed himself, pee, or sit up in bed under his own power for days. First time he was left unsupervised for a few minutes, he magically hanged himself in a way that's logistically impossible. I think ther official report went something like "suicide, because we said so." And when his lawyer tried to open an investigation, they threatened him with jail. He decided to persue it anyway, and something happened to shut him up in a big hurry.
Accountability?
Nope. Blame the "perp" for excercising his Constitutional right to defend his property from armed intruders.
Why?
Because his neighbor accused him of a crime they didn't witness, and wouldn't sign their name to.
Did the other cop get fired?
Nope. Probably got promoted.
Blame everyone else.
It might be time to start holding cops personally responsible for financial liability.
But rhetoric aside -- if the cops can't police themselves, it's asinine to expect the public to trust them in any other aspect of policework. A zero-tolerance policy when bad judgement results in major injury or death to a civilian would be an outstanding start.