NHL owners move closer to changing schedule format

Get the Puck out of here...

Moderator: Shoalzie

Post Reply
Screw_Michigan

NHL owners move closer to changing schedule format

Post by Screw_Michigan »

NHL owners move closer to changing schedule format

CHICAGO (AP) — NHL teams could be back to playing every other club in the league by next season.
The board of governors from the 30 teams met Tuesday and moved closer to ditching the unbalanced schedule put it place after the lockout wiped out the 2004-05 season.
Although a vote won’t take place before the group meets again in November, there was a clear indication Tuesday that the often criticized schedule would soon be scrapped.
“We had a preliminary discussion about the schedule, and I think it’s clear that there will be a change,” NHL commissioner Gary Bettman said after the four-hour meeting. “That’s something that we will work toward effectuating at the (next) meeting.”
The current schedule, in effect for the upcoming season that begins next weekend, consists of eight games against each divisional opponent and only 10 total against non-conference opponents. Teams play one out-of-conference division at home and another on the road — leaving five teams completely off the schedule.
Bettman declined to give specific details of how the schedule would be changed, but the discussion in the meeting focused on reducing the number of divisional games to allow each team to play the other 29 clubs at least once.
A two-thirds majority is needed to change the schedule, a move that would be effective in the 2008-09 season. The board of governors will meet again at the end of November in Pebble Beach, Calif. An informal poll during the meeting left the group confident that change was coming.
“I think there is sentiment for that: to go from eight to seven or eight to six,” Anaheim general manger Brian Burke said. “But keep the conference games the way they are, and you can get every other team in your building every other year.”
Before the lockout, every team played all the others.
“We think everybody should play everybody at least once,” Ottawa general manager Roy Malakar said. “Whether that’s home and away, I’d like to see more evidence that that’s the direction the majority wants to go in. But we’re willing to change.”
Toronto president and CEO Richard Peddie said, “it looks like change.”
Calgary Flames co-owner Harley Hotchkiss and Montreal Canadiens president Pierre Boivin said a change in the schedule was likely.
“I don’t know what the change will be, but I think it’s safe to say that we will be looking at a vote on the change at the (next) meeting,” Boivin said. “It’s a difficult topic. It’s difficult to reach a consensus, that’s for sure.”
Atlanta Thrashers GM Don Waddell voted against a change to the schedule at the last meeting, during the All-Star break last January. On Tuesday, Waddell said he would vote for change now that the three-year cycle of the collective bargaining agreement is ending.
Also discussed Tuesday was possible league expansion and the proposed sales of the Tampa Bay Lightning and Nashville Predators. Bettman said expansion talks were premature.
The team sales are not ready to be voted on, Bettman added, but could be by the time the board meets again.
you mean it wasn't a great idea to have montreal come to detroit only once every three/four years? no fucking way. :meds:
:meds: :meds: :meds: :meds: :meds: :meds: :meds: :meds: :meds: :meds:

this great news for the sport. i'm surprised the penny pinching owners are actually going along with this. you know, travel expenses and all that shit.
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Post by Shoalzie »

This had to be done. I know the fans up here would rather have a game every year with the Habs, Rangers, Leafs and Bruins than an extra tilt with our "longtime bitter rivals" Columbus and Nashville. The fewer divisional games, the better. I can't stand seeing the same team 8 times in a season...this isn't baseball.

My proposed format:

6 games against divisional opponents: 6 x 4 = 24
4 games against other conference opponents: 4 x 8 = 32

That gives you 56 conference games.

For remaining 26 games go towards the other conference. You can play every team at least once...11 home-and-home series and 4 teams where you play them just once. Make sure the Original 6 teams play each other twice every year and then draw the opponents that will play each other in the home-and-home series each year. Every two years, you have an out-of-conference opponent face twice with the exception being the Original 6 facing each other twice every year. Those 6 teams will have different schedules from the rest of the league.

The big twist in all of this is if the Red Wings end up in the East after realignment and an Eastern team relocates to Kansas City or Las Vegas. This would shake up my idea of the Original 6 having to face each other twice every year. Chicago would be the only Original 6 team in the West and they'd have the other 5 teams on their schedule twice every year and the 5 Eastern Original 6 teams would always have Chicago twice every season.

It would be a stretch but I'd love to see the league somehow align the divisions and get all 6 teams together again but they don't have the right number of clubs to do that. If that had 24 teams...it would be natural to have four 6-team divisions and the Original 6 teams can be together.
User avatar
Cicatrix
Elwood
Posts: 708
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 4:26 am
Location: The land of beer and hockey

Post by Cicatrix »

I actually wouldn't mind the Oil playing more games against Phoenix and Columbus this year. In fact, just those two teams...all year long would be fine by me.
Post Reply