88 wrote:I haven't the time or experience to critically evaluate whether the alternative theory for "global warming" mentioned in the article makes more sense than the greenhouse gas theory.
Thanks to having written The Manic Sun, a book about Svensmark’s initial discovery published in 1997, I have been privileged to be on the inside track for reporting his struggles and successes since then.
And therein lies the whole freaking problem, eh?
The "science" involved is entirely driven by which tactic anyone discussing it has chosen to make their slice of the pie from.
But the UN solution of "well, if the United States gives every other country a bunch of money, it will surely solve this crisis" is about the stupidest one I've heard yet. See if I've got this right... by PAYING OTHER COUNTRIES to develop energy usage and petroleum burning, it will slow the greenhouse gas thing?
Is there anyone who actually expected the USA to fall for that?