Notre Dame is pathetic

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:17 pm

Being beat up by Tillers cream puffers.

Purdue couldnt out hit a peewee team, they are the epitomy of finesse, and they are sticking it up the irish ass

pathetic

Notre Dame might be the worst team in Division 1.

Spare me the young kids crap, seems other teams are excelling with the kids running things.

10 years 40mil buwahahahahahahahahaha!

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:31 pm

A young QB behind a bad offensive line...nothing good comes from that. Claussen ends up on his ass on pretty much every passing play because it's pretty much a jailbreak to the passer. Teams can play a base defense and blitz a couple extra guys and force Claussen into a throwaway or a turnover. The ground game doesn't take any pressure off him either and that's another product of a bad offensive line. Defensively, they have okay talent but they don't do anything exotic and don't present a threat to opposing offensive coordinators.

Are they the worst team in Division IA? I think that's a little strong...they should be able to beat the worst teams in the non-BCS conferences and the other independents.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:05 pm

Navy
Air Force
Duke
at Stanford

Stanford might save NDs season. A win over the cards will propel them to 1-11 and possibly a Orange Bowl bid.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 6:16 pm

Mr T wrote:A win over the cards will propel them to 1-11 and possibly a Orange Bowl bid.

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:03 pm

Purdue has folded up tent for the day and that may allow ND to get within one offensive TD.

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:10 pm

purdue are the epitomy of soft

what a pansy team.

if they cant gimmick the bal laround the field, they cant score in red zone. if not for bad early turnovers, garbage dame would be winning this thing.

the big10 is bad as a conference overall.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:52 pm

Clausen=Sabelhaus

Sharpley was DEFINTELY the better QB on the field.

No wonder dude transferred.....Clausen was "handed" the job.

Weis looks like he may get off the Clausen bus and go with the back-up, who CLEARLY looked better.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:58 pm

You could really see the frustration beginning to build up with Claussen today. I think he's getting tired of getting planted into the turf on every pass attempt. Purdue toyed with them today...they should've beaten them handedly but gave the Irish an outside chance at stealing this one from them.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:28 pm

T REX wrote: No wonder dude transferred.....Clausen was "handed" the job.

That is why he transfered. He said that when he transfered. I am surpised the guy didnt see it coming. ND has been hyping him up to be the next Ron Prowlus since 2006

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:17 pm

Shoalzie wrote:Are they the worst team in Division IA? I think that's a little strong...they should be able to beat the worst teams in the non-BCS conferences and the other independents.

duke will beat the living piss out of ND. they are that fucking bad.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:17 am

T REX wrote:Clausen=Sabelhaus

Sharpley was DEFINTELY the better QB on the field.

No wonder dude transferred.....Clausen was "handed" the job.

Weis looks like he may get off the Clausen bus and go with the back-up, who CLEARLY looked better.

Great call.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:50 am

ND has their best chance next week. UCLA's offense blows donkey spunk. Put points on the board and you leave the Rose Bowl with a W.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:53 pm

Killian wrote:
T REX wrote:Clausen=Sabelhaus

Sharpley was DEFINTELY the better QB on the field.

No wonder dude transferred.....Clausen was "handed" the job.

Weis looks like he may get off the Clausen bus and go with the back-up, who CLEARLY looked better.
Great call.

Are you saying otherwise??????

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:30 pm

Did you watch the whole game? If not, don't bother responding.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:47 pm

Killian wrote:Did you watch the whole game? If not, don't bother responding.

Wow....actually it was another TV so I DID watch most of it.

Are you saying that Clausen played better?

Okay, Charlie....

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:06 pm

T REX wrote:
Killian wrote:Did you watch the whole game? If not, don't bother responding.
Wow....actually it was another TV so I DID watch most of it.

Are you saying that Clausen played better?

Okay, Charlie....

Tell you what, you tell me how Sharpley "was DEFINTELY the better QB on the field".

They both played well, both threw stupid interceptions.

Obviously it was clear cut that Sharpley should be the starter, so tell me why he should start. After all, he "CLEARLY looked better".

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:10 pm

I thought the guy came in and played well. His throws were BETTER than Clausen's. I thought he had more zip on the ball.

Are you really arguing this with me?

I feel sorry for you.....

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:25 pm

T REX wrote:I thought the guy came in and played well. His throws were BETTER than Clausen's. I thought he had more zip on the ball.

Are you really arguing this with me?

I feel sorry for you.....

Don't feel sorry for me, please.

Yes, Sharpley came in and played well. He has more zip on the ball, but he is not nearly as accurate as Clausen.

The reason why Sharpley was sitting the bench is because he has had zero pocket awareness this year. He showed some this game, but he still struggles with that aspect of the game.

You still can't say or prove that one QB was "CLEARLY" or "DEFINTELY" better than the other.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:26 pm

Killian wrote: You still can't say or prove that one QB was "CLEARLY" or "DEFINTELY" better than the other.

you're right, they both suck monkey testicles.....

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:37 pm

Felix wrote:
Killian wrote: You still can't say or prove that one QB was "CLEARLY" or "DEFINTELY" better than the other.
you're right, they both suck monkey testicles.....

Nice shot, drive by.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:55 pm

I like how all the media types are looking for positives in ND ass rapings.

"They scored 19 points."

So 19 garbage points when your opponent clearly doesnt care anymore is a positive.

Maybe Weis has ate him self retarded and he thinks that he is going to get the first pick in the draft this way.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:28 pm

I still say their best chance for a W to date is this week.